Yeah, that's what I did. I'm too nervous about this Internet Archive lawsuit with publishing companies. It's about the online books that they used to have more of.Ivan wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 3:45 pmGlad you guys like it.
I figured it would be on the Wayback Machine because it's a federal government site and therefore the opposite of obscure (generally the less obscure something is the more likely it gets stashed on the Wayback Machine, but it's usually a good idea to check it for any site that gets nuked but you want to see as I've found some super obscure sites from like 15~20 years ago on it too).
Edit to add that I'm surprised the PDF exhibits got archived as that sort of media usually doesn't (at least from what I've seen). Usually shows up as dead links within the Wayback Machine. Might want to download the really good stuff just to be safe.
General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
Moderator: Capos
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
- Ivan
- Full Patched
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 6:33 am
- Location: The center of the universe, a.k.a. Ohio
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
Oh shit I completely forgot about that lawsuit - the situation is a lot worse that I implied in my posts. Guys that link I posted might not be long for this world, better save the good stuff while you still can. It costs money to run a huge archive of dead sites like that and there's a good chance they're about lose hundreds of millions in copyright infringement penalties. Also might want to look up any old dead sites besides the one I posted while you still can.
Here's the story for anyone not familliar: https://www.wired.com/story/internet-ar ... se-appeal/
I just hope someone is making a Wayback Machine for the Wayback Machine.
EYYYY ALL YOU CHOOCHES OUT THERE IT'S THE KID
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
What's worse is Google doesn't have "cached" websites anymore, either. That's not as big a deal because those didn't last forever, but it's just one more archival route for websites.Ivan wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 4:38 pmOh shit I completely forgot about that lawsuit - the situation is a lot worse that I implied in my posts. Guys that link I posted might not be long for this world, better save the good stuff while you still can. It costs money to run a huge archive of dead sites like that and there's a good chance they're about lose hundreds of millions in copyright infringement penalties. Also might want to look up any old dead sites besides the one I posted while you still can.
Here's the story for anyone not familliar: https://www.wired.com/story/internet-ar ... se-appeal/
I just hope someone is making a Wayback Machine for the Wayback Machine.