I'm not comparing the whole of the Philly family to the Decavs. I'm comparing one, maybe two crews to the Decavs.Wiseguy wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2017 2:49 pm
Looking at the cases going back to 2000, if we're talking about all of New Jersey, including South Jersey (traditionally Philadelphia territory), the Philadelphia family seems to have been quite a bit more active (both in gambling and in general) than the DeCavalcantes.
Looking at the DeCavalcante cases, there were bookmaking charges included in the big indictment that hit the family in the late 1990s/early 2000s. But that was a joint operation with the Gambinos and Colombos. Then in 2003, a few DeCavalcante guys were indicted for bookmaking and other crimes. Then a decade later, in 2013, a DeCavalcante associate was charged with running a "pick 6" lottery operation. That's about it. Meanwhile, over the same time period, the Philadelphia family has had a lot more - and bigger - gambling cases.
The DeCavalcantes are still a viable family but they are at the bottom of the 9 families left.
And gambling is THE staple of the mob.
So barring some truly bizarre reason making the Decavs the only family in the history of Cosa Nostra who have decided to ignore the industry staple, I'll still err on the 'a family vs one (two) crews, the family wins' argument.
But you do make a compelling case with your post.