Confederate wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 5:19 ammaxiestern11 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 1:10 am During the 1950-60’s era, LE said commission size would vary, but that 9-12 members was possible and sometimes utilized depending upon the situation at hand. For instance, the early 60’s era you speak of was the Gallo-Profaci War era. Ray Patriarca was indeed a Steady commission member. He was integral to negotiations at that time relative to a “peace” settlement between warring factions.(remember Nicky Bianco).
-
Also, REMEMBER that “automatically” ALL bosses across the country ARE commission members but for functionality and practicality only typically 6-9 actually sat!
-
But as needed any boss could be called upon to execute commission business...... (and for that matter any “amico nostro”!
-
Buffalo
The NYC Five
Chicago
Detroit
Cleveland
NE
?
I thought at any given time there were no more than 9 Commission members.
There was always the New York 5 & Chicago (Who were allied with Genovese)
The other 3 would sometimes rotate? No?
Wasn't Philly in that rotation?
Commission Question
Moderator: Capos
- FriendofFamily
- Full Patched
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:25 am
- Location: Chicago & Cleveland
Re: Commission Question
Know which Game to Play
- motorfab
- Full Patched
- Posts: 2831
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2017 2:07 am
- Location: Grenoble, France
- Contact:
Re: Commission Question
According to Piscopo, L.A. was reprensented by the LucchesesJeremyTheJew wrote: ↑Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:24 pmGenovese.
As well as there has been said to be a "West Coast Commision" by Lonardo but i have never heard anything else pther then Chi runs wverything West.
- HairyKnuckles
- Full Patched
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:42 am
Re: Commission Question
Sam Gianzana represented Chicago while he was boss. Probably Ricca and Accardo before him. But by the mid/late 1960s, Chicago didn´t bother going to Commission meetings although they still had a seat. The arrangement was such that Chicago would go with the majority rule if issues were put to a vote.
There you have it, never printed before.
Re: Commission Question
Wao I ain't ever heard a that. Genovesees being the proxy for the capone mob. Is this even when the lucania was boss of bosses?JeremyTheJew wrote: ↑Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:24 pmGenovese.
As well as there has been said to be a "West Coast Commision" by Lonardo but i have never heard anything else pther then Chi runs wverything West.
JIGGS
Re: Commission Question
I wonder if the situation with the hoffa necesitated everyone meeting? Or if it was just a meeting of the MINES between the west side and the capone mob with a handful of detroit guys in on the caper?HairyKnuckles wrote: ↑Fri Sep 20, 2019 10:04 amSam Gianzana represented Chicago while he was boss. Probably Ricca and Accardo before him. But by the mid/late 1960s, Chicago didn´t bother going to Commission meetings although they still had a seat. The arrangement was such that Chicago would go with the majority rule if issues were put to a vote.
JIGGS
Re: Commission Question
Yeah, the families west of Chicago deferred to the Outfit, and there was obviously some mutual interests in Las Vegas and what not; but I don't think there was ever a Western Commission in the sense of one similar to in New York.JeremyTheJew wrote: ↑Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:24 pmGenovese.
As well as there has been said to be a "West Coast Commision" by Lonardo but i have never heard anything else pther then Chi runs wverything West.
All roads lead to New York.