bert wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2019 1:37 pm
SonnyBlackstein wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2019 10:56 am
bert wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2019 11:03 pm
SonnyBlackstein wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2019 9:55 pm
bert wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2019 8:43 pm
PIsciotti is the type who would have been chased years ago, but standards must have gotten lower than ever for him to get made.
Based on....... ?
Based on what I just read in that story.
Chased years ago?
The preponderant reason for PJ's flipping appears to be his betrayal by Rabbito et al.
Now its easy to say in hindsight someone should never have gotten their button, but in PJ's case he was a rising star within the family and had served legitimate prison time and had stood tall, so any suggestion he shouldve 'been chased' etc is an easy Monday morning quaterback call which up until his flipping, had no basis.
First, calm down. You misunderstood my reason for saying he should have and would have been chased years ago. I was referring to his behavior and who he associated with, plus a minor thing like the mustache. He could not have been considered for membership till later going by that photo of him. If a guy was considered a prospect to one day get made they were told to shave. Second, the drugs, he sounds to me like the type who may have been using drugs too, although I can't be certain on that one. I got an impression of him just reading the parts before his ratting. If it was 30 years ago, or even a few years before he came along, and he was with a crew, he would have been chased, or cut off. My take, if you don't see it that way, then fine. I'm new here, and not looking for a fight.
My apologies if you perceived my post as aggressive. That was not my intent.
I merely meant to state that up until PJ flipping, there was not only no reason to anticipate that (he had spent several years inside) but was, by the family, considered a rising star. And there is not, that I am aware, evidence to suggest he used drugs, broke any LCN rules or was in any way worthy of being chased.
It's obviously fine to have opinions, speculate etc, but when its based on little to no evidence or even as it appears in this case, contrary evidence, then expect disagreement.
But again, no offence intended, just a discussion.
And welcome to the board!
Don't give me your f***ing Manson lamps.