Umberto Valenti

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Umberto Valenti

Re: Umberto Valenti

by Bontade » Sat Feb 04, 2017 6:58 am

My sources are not reliable Wiki, there is no other.

Re: Umberto Valenti

by Antiliar » Wed Feb 01, 2017 10:38 am

Rocco Valenti died of natural causes in 1971. What are "some sources"? What are these sources that claim they were the same person?

Re: Umberto Valenti

by Bontade » Wed Feb 01, 2017 1:55 am

Antiliar wrote:
Bontade wrote:Umberto "The Ghost" Valenti and Rocco Valenti тhis same litsi or two different people?
According to Wikipedia they're the same person. That's a good reason why we don't rely on Wikipedia. They're two different people. Umberto Valenti was a Sicilian who was part of Toto D'Aquila's Family and was killed in 1922, and Rocco Valenti was associated with the Camorra.
Umberto was killed in 1922, then what happened to Rocco Valenti if two different people?
It is known that Toto D'Aquila took into its ranks members of the Camorra against war with Morello, in some sources write that this was a war with Morello Camorra others write that D'Aquila fought with Morello.

Re: Umberto Valenti

by Antiliar » Tue Jan 31, 2017 2:28 pm

Bontade wrote:Umberto "The Ghost" Valenti and Rocco Valenti тhis same litsi or two different people?
According to Wikipedia they're the same person. That's a good reason why we don't rely on Wikipedia. They're two different people. Umberto Valenti was a Sicilian who was part of Toto D'Aquila's Family and was killed in 1922, and Rocco Valenti was associated with the Camorra.

Re: Umberto Valenti

by Bontade » Tue Jan 31, 2017 9:12 am

Umberto "The Ghost" Valenti and Rocco Valenti тhis same litsi or two different people?

Re: Umberto Valenti

by B. » Wed Sep 28, 2016 3:12 pm

The Philly informants I know of don't talk about it either. Harry Riccobene only says he was made without his father's knowledge, but not the process he went through before getting made. Rocco Scafidi was brought in through his uncle/father, so not clear on the formalities either.

Re: Umberto Valenti

by Antiliar » Wed Sep 28, 2016 2:12 pm

No, there's nothing like being "on record" in any of the early accounts I read. Nick Gentile, for ex, only says he was made in Philadelphia and tells us nothing else. Valachi's account makes no mention of anything similar, and as you note, Bonanno didn't either. Salvatore Clemente wasn't asked so didn't tell, just like the other very early CI's. Imagine what we could have learned if only the Secret Service asked the right questions. Dr. Giuseppe Romano of Cleveland and Chester LaMare, who both became bosses, and Clemente himself, who was still a made member of the Luciano crime family until he died and was probably made before Morello was even a boss. So it's an educated guess that being "on record" existed that early, but there's no proof. We do know that names were passed around by the Family bosses before someone was considered for being made. That's in a Secret Service report from around 1913 and may also have been in some Sicilian trial transcript from the 1870s to 1890s time period.

Re: Umberto Valenti

by B. » Wed Sep 28, 2016 1:00 pm

I know about guys being "on record" and transferring around, but I'm wondering more if the process for being "on record" was at all different in the early days. Did Valachi ever mention being put on record as an associate with anyone in the Lucchese family before the war? When Joe Bonanno was the victim of an attempted extortion as an associate, he specifically avoided telling them he was on record with Schiro so that he could give them a scare, but I also don't know that Bonanno would have needed to be formally put on record in the same was as a guy like Valachi, as Bonanno was born to be with that group. What I do wonder about Bonanno is if he was officially placed on record with Maranzano or an individual at any point, or if it was just sort of "You're with us."

Very interesting about the Lercara Friddi and Corleone connections. Despite being maybe the most infamous and visible mafia leaders to ever live, Luciano is one of the greatest enigmas to me.

Re: Umberto Valenti

by Antiliar » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:30 pm

B. wrote: As an expert in the old days, do you think the way guys were "on record" or "with" someone was at all different back then? Guys who would get connected to a family through direct relations or same hometown cemented the family they would be with, but it seems possible that guys who got connected simply by living in a mob neighborhood might have had a little more freedom than they would later on. That's why Luciano and guys like him stand out, as you'd think if he was originally with D'Aquila's family he couldn't just be like "Hey, Masseria offered me a higher salary and promotion, seeya!" because that's the system as we know it post-1930s.

Once a guy is on record we know it can be a painstaking if not impossible process to get him released, but I don't know if it was always that way for guys who got connected to the mob on a circumstantial basis, especially if there were chaotic external circumstances. We know Valachi, who as a neighborhood criminal wasn't much different from Luciano in terms of how he got connected, was allowed to choose between three different families after the Castellammarese war. It's unlikely if not impossible that a guy like Carlo Gambino or Joe Bonanno would have been given that choice considering their blood and hometown connections to their respective families. But because Valachi was just some knockaround guy without those deep ties, circumstances allowed him to go elsewhere.

With all of the chaos of early prohibition and the disputes going on in the NYC mafia in the early 1920s, maybe Luciano was in a situation similar to what Valachi would later be in a decade later.
Guys could be "on the record" with one Family and end up with another. Sammy Gravano was associated with the Colombos then got picked up by the Gambinos, and Joe Pistone was "on record" with the Colombos too, but he ended up with the Bonannos. So I think it's fluid. I can't say how long it was like that, but I would guess that shortly after there were multiple Families in New York would be a good starting point, so possibly as early as the 1890s.

In Luciano's case, he was made during the period that Masseria/Morello were looking to increase their membership as protection against D'Aquila, who didn't recognize them. Since they weren't recognized they could be flexible with the rules and offer incentives to go with them. For example, we know that they made certain people with large gangs captains instead of having to start from the bottom. They could have done the same with Luciano. I believe he did this with Frankie Yale too, and probably Vito Genovese. Frank Costello was already a millionaire, so he could have been another example. It explains how the Masseria/Morello Family got to be the second largest borgata in such a short period of time. Especially considering that Reina split off (or they split off, depending on how you look at it) in this period, which could have been devastating.

Something else to consider is that Luciano's hometown of Lercara was connected to Corleone. Lercara was an important mining town and I believe that some of those mines were owned or controlled by people from Corleone. It's possible this could have accounted for something.

Re: Umberto Valenti

by B. » Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:00 pm

Antiliar wrote:Masseria made him an offer he couldn't refuse...because it was such a good deal. LOL

The only thing that makes sense is economics. Being with Masseria offered him more opportunities than being with D'Aquila. We don't know if D'Aquila offered to make him, but obviously Masseria did. A prostitute recalled seeing Luciano early in his career and he looked poor. Several years later, around 1923, she saw him again at a party and noticed that he was dressed much better. Masseria may have been at the same party. I don't recall, but the story is in Hickman Powell's book on Luciano.
As an expert in the old days, do you think the way guys were "on record" or "with" someone was at all different back then? Guys who would get connected to a family through direct relations or same hometown cemented the family they would be with, but it seems possible that guys who got connected simply by living in a mob neighborhood might have had a little more freedom than they would later on. That's why Luciano and guys like him stand out, as you'd think if he was originally with D'Aquila's family he couldn't just be like "Hey, Masseria offered me a higher salary and promotion, seeya!" because that's the system as we know it post-1930s.

Once a guy is on record we know it can be a painstaking if not impossible process to get him released, but I don't know if it was always that way for guys who got connected to the mob on a circumstantial basis, especially if there were chaotic external circumstances. We know Valachi, who as a neighborhood criminal wasn't much different from Luciano in terms of how he got connected, was allowed to choose between three different families after the Castellammarese war. It's unlikely if not impossible that a guy like Carlo Gambino or Joe Bonanno would have been given that choice considering their blood and hometown connections to their respective families. But because Valachi was just some knockaround guy without those deep ties, circumstances allowed him to go elsewhere.

With all of the chaos of early prohibition and the disputes going on in the NYC mafia in the early 1920s, maybe Luciano was in a situation similar to what Valachi would later be in a decade later.

Re: Umberto Valenti

by Antiliar » Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:35 pm

Masseria made him an offer he couldn't refuse...because it was such a good deal. LOL

The only thing that makes sense is economics. Being with Masseria offered him more opportunities than being with D'Aquila. We don't know if D'Aquila offered to make him, but obviously Masseria did. A prostitute recalled seeing Luciano early in his career and he looked poor. Several years later, around 1923, she saw him again at a party and noticed that he was dressed much better. Masseria may have been at the same party. I don't recall, but the story is in Hickman Powell's book on Luciano.

Re: Umberto Valenti

by B. » Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:18 pm

Luciano's early ties with the Gambinos are very interesting to me. I wonder what it was that put him in with the Masseria group. His involvement in the street would have predated the Masseria family by at least a few years.

Re: Umberto Valenti

by willychichi » Sun Sep 25, 2016 4:13 am

Thanks guys, much appreciated.

Re: Umberto Valenti

by HairyKnuckles » Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:05 am

Lol! I love that show!

Interesting is that Joe Biondo and possibly others from that group/crew originally came from that place.

Re: Umberto Valenti

by SonnyBlackstein » Sat Sep 24, 2016 6:48 pm


Top