by Angelo Santino » Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:24 pm
Pete wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 8:10 pm
Chris Christie wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 5:56 pm
Italians are no longer an ethnic minority in this country. We don't have neighborhoods that speak Italian, have first generation American children and act as conduits to Italy via money, banking, specialized services. After three generations we fall in with the rest of the white population. There are neighboods in NY and still the midwest of pockets of Italian descendants but its demographics rather than a minority enclave. That would be the Chinese or Vietnamese communities. Anyone today targeted by the FBI is because of their involvement with the mafia is due to their involvement, not because any brass decided: "hey, we're gonna target the Italian people." If people want to make the argument that the FBI goes to extreme lengths in the pursuit of convictions, there are examples of that but likening it to any Italian-bias decreases any validity to the argument.
If someone wants to say bias there’s equal bias to Russian gangsters and cartel gangsters. Feds go where the cases are
As they should. The argument then goes to what resources and parameters should be allocated for anti-crime measures and how much, if at all, should civilians have their rights trampled with in the pursuit of order. It's complex and I'm not equipped to answer it. Early history doesn't help me with law. I can offer my opinions on the matter but I'm just another asshole.
1) Anastasia made an excellent point that the Phila. FBI made a deal with the boss to testify against the underboss and wondered if NY would have done the same with Gotti - Gravano. It's bad optics but could be argued that its all done with the aim of disrupting crime. It doesn't make me think badly of the FBI.
2) The FBI using, let's say, Massino's family as leverage by seizing ten million, taking the house, essentially putting his family on the street is still hard for me to feel sympathy for. It was all bought and paid for by organized crime, why should Massino sit in prison with the comfort of knowing that despite it all, his life in crime paid off?
3) I guess these points are kinda one sided, I'm not as skeptical of the FBI as others on here are. I enjoyed Gotti with Assante and Find Me Guilty with Vin Diesel. Both films are laced with anti-FBI bias. The agents are depicted as ugly, unfunny, stuffy, angry and bitter while the wiseguys are honorable, timely, admirable etc. They did the same shit with American Gangster. The NJ Branch of the Sopranos FBI had to have been the most incompetent ever, for god sakes stick McNulty and Bunk on 'em and Tony'd been off the streets by next season.
[quote=Pete post_id=140182 time=1582773050 user_id=284]
[quote="Chris Christie" post_id=140133 time=1582764983 user_id=69]
Italians are no longer an ethnic minority in this country. We don't have neighborhoods that speak Italian, have first generation American children and act as conduits to Italy via money, banking, specialized services. After three generations we fall in with the rest of the white population. There are neighboods in NY and still the midwest of pockets of Italian descendants but its demographics rather than a minority enclave. That would be the Chinese or Vietnamese communities. Anyone today targeted by the FBI is because of their involvement with the mafia is due to their involvement, not because any brass decided: "hey, we're gonna target the Italian people." If people want to make the argument that the FBI goes to extreme lengths in the pursuit of convictions, there are examples of that but likening it to any Italian-bias decreases any validity to the argument.
[/quote]
If someone wants to say bias there’s equal bias to Russian gangsters and cartel gangsters. Feds go where the cases are
[/quote]
As they should. The argument then goes to what resources and parameters should be allocated for anti-crime measures and how much, if at all, should civilians have their rights trampled with in the pursuit of order. It's complex and I'm not equipped to answer it. Early history doesn't help me with law. I can offer my opinions on the matter but I'm just another asshole.
1) Anastasia made an excellent point that the Phila. FBI made a deal with the boss to testify against the underboss and wondered if NY would have done the same with Gotti - Gravano. It's bad optics but could be argued that its all done with the aim of disrupting crime. It doesn't make me think badly of the FBI.
2) The FBI using, let's say, Massino's family as leverage by seizing ten million, taking the house, essentially putting his family on the street is still hard for me to feel sympathy for. It was all bought and paid for by organized crime, why should Massino sit in prison with the comfort of knowing that despite it all, his life in crime paid off?
3) I guess these points are kinda one sided, I'm not as skeptical of the FBI as others on here are. I enjoyed Gotti with Assante and Find Me Guilty with Vin Diesel. Both films are laced with anti-FBI bias. The agents are depicted as ugly, unfunny, stuffy, angry and bitter while the wiseguys are honorable, timely, admirable etc. They did the same shit with American Gangster. The NJ Branch of the Sopranos FBI had to have been the most incompetent ever, for god sakes stick McNulty and Bunk on 'em and Tony'd been off the streets by next season.