Frank Locascio Evidentiary Hearing.

[bert]

I was wondering when our resident crackhead was going to jump in to try to stir the pot.


Pogo

You were supposed to keep this in the graveyard section and not ruin this topic. You obviously don't care.

[Pogo The Clown]

I guess you missed that I was initially responding to your accusation.


Pogo

[bert]

I guess you missed that I was initially responding to your accusation.


Pogo

Which accusation, you make 3 or 4 a day? You want this thread off, and you only way to do it is this shit. I was thinking MS should not waste time putting her stories up here, to just post hem on other groups only. I realized right away that is exactly what you and wiseguy want. The two of you are frantic about it, and it has the two of you pulling your shit over and over. This could have been 5 high quality pages of discussion, with intelligent disagreements. Congrats again, you turned it to shit. It's the only thing you are any good at.

[bert]

And pogo, no one knows what was said on the other site, you make shit up, and post it as such. Greco has also been said to have taken over for Albert Anastasia---want the link? He was well known, but not to you. Did Dan tell you this too ?

Maxie did, he tried to educate you, and failed. When you need an education from maxie, you really are a fuck up. How's your John Gacy Fanboy Club doing? Oh wait, I hope Giacamo Vicari, Maxie, Dan. or anyone else never said that, you'll say it proves something. It would prove you're a fuck up.

[Pete]

I really don’t get this. I posted the official court documents that the lawyer admitted he didn’t cross Sammy in certain things because gotti said he would kill him and I guess no read it and wants to just stick to their talking points when I have court documents that show otherwise. Whatever have fun guys don’t let the truth get in the way of a good argument. And cardinale was looking at disbarment for that. Why not just read the documents and go with the truth? Like I said you guys have fun I won’t argue If people won’t even. Read the docs that show an alternate view

[bert]

I really don’t get this. I posted the official court documents that the lawyer admitted he didn’t cross Sammy in certain things because gotti said he would kill him and I guess no read it and wants to just stick to their talking points when I have court documents that show otherwise. Whatever have fun guys don’t let the truth get in the way of a good argument. And cardinale was looking at disbarment for that. Why not just read the documents and go with the truth? Like I said you guys have fun I won’t argue If people won’t even. Read the docs that show an alternate view

Cardinale was the attorney for Locascio, and the judge did threaten him when he tried to bring things like you mention up. Kreiger was the lawyer for Gotti and did little, the one thing I have to respectfully disagree with is Gotti threatening to kill him. Krieger had been around a long time, and would not have put up with that from Gotti. Cardinale tried hard, if notfor Glasser being the judge, and being so obviously biased, who knows how things may have went

[Pete]

I really don’t get this. I posted the official court documents that the lawyer admitted he didn’t cross Sammy in certain things because gotti said he would kill him and I guess no read it and wants to just stick to their talking points when I have court documents that show otherwise. Whatever have fun guys don’t let the truth get in the way of a good argument. And cardinale was looking at disbarment for that. Why not just read the documents and go with the truth? Like I said you guys have fun I won’t argue If people won’t even. Read the docs that show an alternate view

Cardinale was the attorney for Locascio, and the judge did threaten him when he tried to bring things like you mention up. Kreiger was the lawyer for Gotti and did little, the one thing I have to respectfully disagree with is Gotti threatening to kill him. Krieger had been around a long time, and would not have put up with that from Gotti. Cardinale tried hard, if notfor Glasser being the judge, and being so obviously biased, who knows how things may have went

Did you read the document? Gotti threatened cardinale not to tailor his defense for Sammy. Cardinale admitted he did not ask certain questions on cross out of fear for gotti. It’s all there I don’t know why people won’t at least read and consider a different view

[bert]

I really don’t get this. I posted the official court documents that the lawyer admitted he didn’t cross Sammy in certain things because gotti said he would kill him and I guess no read it and wants to just stick to their talking points when I have court documents that show otherwise. Whatever have fun guys don’t let the truth get in the way of a good argument. And cardinale was looking at disbarment for that. Why not just read the documents and go with the truth? Like I said you guys have fun I won’t argue If people won’t even. Read the docs that show an alternate view

Cardinale was the attorney for Locascio, and the judge did threaten him when he tried to bring things like you mention up. Kreiger was the lawyer for Gotti and did little, the one thing I have to respectfully disagree with is Gotti threatening to kill him. Krieger had been around a long time, and would not have put up with that from Gotti. Cardinale tried hard, if notfor


Glasser being the judge, and being so obviously biased, who knows how things may have went

Did you read the document? Gotti threatened cardinale not to tailor his defense for Sammy. Cardinale admitted he did not ask certain questions on cross out of fear for gotti. It’s all there I don’t know why people won’t at least read and consider a different view

I was for the most part agreeing with you.

[Pete]

I really don’t get this. I posted the official court documents that the lawyer admitted he didn’t cross Sammy in certain things because gotti said he would kill him and I guess no read it and wants to just stick to their talking points when I have court documents that show otherwise. Whatever have fun guys don’t let the truth get in the way of a good argument. And cardinale was looking at disbarment for that. Why not just read the documents and go with the truth? Like I said you guys have fun I won’t argue If people won’t even. Read the docs that show an alternate view

Cardinale was the attorney for Locascio, and the judge did threaten him when he tried to bring things like you mention up. Kreiger was the lawyer for Gotti and did little, the one thing I have to respectfully disagree with is Gotti threatening to kill him. Krieger had been around a long time, and would not have put up with that from Gotti. Cardinale tried hard, if notfor


Glasser being the judge, and being so obviously biased, who knows how things may have went

Did you read the document? Gotti threatened cardinale not to tailor his defense for Sammy. Cardinale admitted he did not ask certain questions on cross out of fear for gotti. It’s all there I don’t know why people won’t at least read and consider a different view

I was for the most part agreeing with you.

I understand I just didn’t see where the part about Krieger came in cuz I saw nothing about that. Gotti did also threaten to throw shargel out a window in another trial

[mafiastudent]

Gertner is a badass and I'm trying to find out more about her...Still not sure if she left her judgeship to work on this case or not. Either way this 375-page document from the government is outrageous. It's like a mini-book.

[Confederate]

Gertner is a badass and I'm trying to find out more about her...Still not sure if she left her judgeship to work on this case or not. Either way this 375-page document from the government is outrageous. It's like a mini-book.

So Like I said, the Judge never ordered anything in a pretrial conference about "not asking Gravano certain questions about Locascio" in their cross examination. I TOLD you that was the dumbest most idiotic thing you said in the whole thread. The big researching expert that you are with all your credentials & experience & all the hours you put into this crusade & you didn't know that never happened? You had the audacity & nerve to even suggest such a stupid thing? Jesus....

[mafiastudent]

Gertner is a badass and I'm trying to find out more about her...Still not sure if she left her judgeship to work on this case or not. Either way this 375-page document from the government is outrageous. It's like a mini-book.

So Like I said, the Judge never ordered anything in a pretrial conference about "not asking Gravano certain questions about Locascio" in their cross examination. I TOLD you that was the dumbest most idiotic thing you said in the whole thread. The big researching expert that you are with all your credentials & experience & all the hours you put into this crusade & you didn't know that never happened? You had the audacity & nerve to even suggest such a stupid thing? Jesus....

Where's your proof?

[Confederate]

Gertner is a badass and I'm trying to find out more about her...Still not sure if she left her judgeship to work on this case or not. Either way this 375-page document from the government is outrageous. It's like a mini-book.

So Like I said, the Judge never ordered anything in a pretrial conference about "not asking Gravano certain questions about Locascio" in their cross examination. I TOLD you that was the dumbest most idiotic thing you said in the whole thread. The big researching expert that you are with all your credentials & experience & all the hours you put into this crusade & you didn't know that never happened? You had the audacity & nerve to even suggest such a stupid thing? Jesus....

Where's your proof?

Don't you read the postings in your own Thread? Read Pete's Posting he made yesterday on May 29. He confirmed what I told you.

[mafiastudent]

Gertner is a badass and I'm trying to find out more about her...Still not sure if she left her judgeship to work on this case or not. Either way this 375-page document from the government is outrageous. It's like a mini-book.

So Like I said, the Judge never ordered anything in a pretrial conference about "not asking Gravano certain questions about Locascio" in their cross examination. I TOLD you that was the dumbest most idiotic thing you said in the whole thread. The big researching expert that you are with all your credentials & experience & all the hours you put into this crusade & you didn't know that never happened? You had the audacity & nerve to even suggest such a stupid thing? Jesus....

Where's your proof?

Don't you read the postings in your own Thread? Read Pete's Posting he made yesterday on May 29. He confirmed what I told you.

Pretrial hearings are a thing. So you can't discredit that. Also, get used to my injustice crusade. You know, you can just bypass those thread if they're such a bug up your ass.

[Confederate]

Gertner is a badass and I'm trying to find out more about her...Still not sure if she left her judgeship to work on this case or not. Either way this 375-page document from the government is outrageous. It's like a mini-book.

So Like I said, the Judge never ordered anything in a pretrial conference about "not asking Gravano certain questions about Locascio" in their cross examination. I TOLD you that was the dumbest most idiotic thing you said in the whole thread. The big researching expert that you are with all your credentials & experience & all the hours you put into this crusade & you didn't know that never happened? You had the audacity & nerve to even suggest such a stupid thing? Jesus....

Where's your proof?

Don't you read the postings in your own Thread? Read Pete's Posting he made yesterday on May 29. He confirmed what I told you.

Pretrial hearings are a thing. So you can't discredit that. Also, get used to my injustice crusade. You know, you can just bypass those thread if they're such a bug up your ass.

I know but what you said NEVER HAPPENED in this Trial. Apology accepted.