The same thing happened to Genovese captain Anthony Antico. He beat robbery/murder charges, but the judge believed that the evidence against him was credible enough to factor into his sentencing for racketeering/extortion.
GL 1/4
Moderator: Capos
-
Teddy Persico
- Straightened out
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Thu May 18, 2017 10:20 am
- Location: Las Vegas
Re: GL 1/4
The way you talk, you just confuse him.
-
kingfromqueens
- Associate
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 2:12 am
Re: GL 1/4
The jury found him not guilty where the proof is beyond a reasonable doubt, that doesn't mean the conduct can't be considered during sentencing in another crime where many factors can be considered. Given the Judge presided over the trial, she is best suited to determine if there was cause to apply it. Sentencing guidelines are advisory and the Judge is by no means bound by it.
-
willychichi
- Full Patched
- Posts: 4291
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:54 pm
Re: GL 1/4
Except when mandatory minimum sentences are involved in drug cases.kingfromqueens wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2018 7:25 pm The jury found him not guilty where the proof is beyond a reasonable doubt, that doesn't mean the conduct can't be considered during sentencing in another crime where many factors can be considered. Given the Judge presided over the trial, she is best suited to determine if there was cause to apply it. Sentencing guidelines are advisory and the Judge is by no means bound by it.
Obama's a pimp he coulda never outfought Trump, but I didn't know it till this day that it was Putin all along.
-
kingfromqueens
- Associate
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 2:12 am
Re: GL 1/4
That's statutory not guidelines.