Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Discuss all mafia families in the U.S., Canada, Italy, and everywhere else in the world.

Moderator: Capos

User avatar
willychichi
Full Patched
Posts: 4291
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:54 pm

Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Post by willychichi »

Why was Joe Magliocco allowed to retire after ordering the hits on Tommy Lucchese and Carlo Gambino and why did Joe Columbo warn Lucchese and Gambino?
Obama's a pimp he coulda never outfought Trump, but I didn't know it till this day that it was Putin all along.
OlBlueEyesClub
Sergeant Of Arms
Posts: 664
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 9:24 am

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Post by OlBlueEyesClub »

Perhaps Colombo saw it as an opportunity to advance to higher positions within his family. I don't know if a reason was ever given for that to be honest, if it was I don't recall it.
User avatar
willychichi
Full Patched
Posts: 4291
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:54 pm

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Post by willychichi »

OlBlueEyesClub wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 6:49 am Perhaps Colombo saw it as an opportunity to advance to higher positions within his family. I don't know if a reason was ever given for that to be honest, if it was I don't recall it.
Thanks OBE.

From what I have read Magliocco ordered the hits because Gambino and Lucchese sided with the Gallo brothers so why didn't Joey Gallo take over? I'm surprised that Magliocco was allowed to retire after giving the contract to Colombo to take out the heads of two other families, seems odd? Not to mention that Bonanno was backing Magliocco in order to raise his chances of taking over the commission with Gambino and Lucchese out of the way.
Obama's a pimp he coulda never outfought Trump, but I didn't know it till this day that it was Putin all along.
User avatar
Pogo The Clown
Men Of Mayhem
Posts: 14219
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 7:02 am

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Post by Pogo The Clown »

Lucchese and Gambino didn't just side with the Gallos but were backing and funding their coup attempt. That's why Magliocco wanted them dead. Even though the Gallos once kidnapped and abused him Colombo went and betrayed Magliocco to Lucchese and Gambino. Shows you want a treacherous snake Joe Colombo was.


Pogo
It's a new morning in America... fresh, vital. The old cynicism is gone. We have faith in our leaders. We're optimistic as to what becomes of it all. It really boils down to our ability to accept. We don't need pessimism. There are no limits.
OlBlueEyesClub
Sergeant Of Arms
Posts: 664
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 9:24 am

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Post by OlBlueEyesClub »

Forgot that Colombo was one of the guys the Gallos had kidnapped, in an effort to make Profaci step down as boss. I know guys don't like to use his book as reference (The President Street Boys), but the author spoke a lot about the Profaci/Gallo war, but a lot of the things he spoke on was accurate, things that may not be all that common knowledge, like Gambino backing the Gallo's in that whole thing. Magliocco absolutely hated the Gallos for that, because as the story goes, he pissed his pants out of fear he would be killed.
furiofromnaples
Full Patched
Posts: 1823
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:41 am

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Post by furiofromnaples »

bonanno los angeles.png
Bonanno wanted Gambino and Lucchese dead because they don't wanted that Bonanno put his flag on arizona and los angeles (also desimone should die and bonanno send his son bill and 40 made men to take over L.A.) and used Magliocco ,that the commission considered weak due the gallo rebellion, for do the dirty work. After Colombo said all to the commission,magliocco that had a bad health can retire (and died a year later.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
JeremyTheJew
Full Patched
Posts: 3228
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 10:08 pm
Location: DETROIT
Contact:

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Post by JeremyTheJew »

speaking of snakes... what was persico doing at this time? in prison?
HANG IT UP NICKY. ITS TIME TO GO HOME.
Dwalin2014
Sergeant Of Arms
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 10:08 am

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Post by Dwalin2014 »

I think if would have been cool if Colombo didn't rat out Magliocco, and the hits on Gambino, Lucchese and Magaddino were successfully carried out. Not only 3 "untouchables" who never had serious problems with neither law enforcement nor mafia rivals, would have been "taught a lesson" (poetic justice), but it would have been interesting to see what would have Bonanno (the instigator of the plot) done. Magliocco was dying already, would Bonanno have tried to formally restore the "boss of bosses" position for himself? Or would he just put "puppet" bosses in the other families, while becoming "non official" boss of bosses anyway? In this case, would the the whole mafia really temporarily be controlled by 1 single person? Or would the murdered bosses' loyalists try to take revenge and start a large scale mafia war? Anyway, Colombo was a scumbag when he saved Gambino's, Lucchese's and Magaddino's lives by informing on Magliocco. If somebody who passes information to law enforcement is a "rat", then somebody who informs on his boss to underworld rivals, is a rat too imo. What's the difference? It's still being disloyal. Fuck Colombo.
User avatar
Pogo The Clown
Men Of Mayhem
Posts: 14219
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 7:02 am

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Post by Pogo The Clown »

JeremyTheJew wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 9:50 am speaking of snakes... what was persico doing at this time? in prison?

He was a high ranking Soldier reporting direct to the UnderBoss. Soon after this mess he was promoted to Capo.

Dwalin2014 wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 10:16 am I think if would have been cool if Colombo didn't rat out Magliocco, and the hits on Gambino, Lucchese and Magaddino were successfully carried out.

I don't think Magadinno was a target. I think he just claimed he was later on to gain leverage against Bonanno in their beef. It is also questionable wether Joe Bonanno was bhind it either.


Pogo
It's a new morning in America... fresh, vital. The old cynicism is gone. We have faith in our leaders. We're optimistic as to what becomes of it all. It really boils down to our ability to accept. We don't need pessimism. There are no limits.
furiofromnaples
Full Patched
Posts: 1823
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:41 am

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Post by furiofromnaples »

Dwalin2014 wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 10:16 am I think if would have been cool if Colombo didn't rat out Magliocco, and the hits on Gambino, Lucchese and Magaddino were successfully carried out. Not only 3 "untouchables" who never had serious problems with neither law enforcement nor mafia rivals, would have been "taught a lesson" (poetic justice), but it would have been interesting to see what would have Bonanno (the instigator of the plot) done. Magliocco was dying already, would Bonanno have tried to formally restore the "boss of bosses" position for himself? Or would he just put "puppet" bosses in the other families, while becoming "non official" boss of bosses anyway? In this case, would the the whole mafia really temporarily be controlled by 1 single person? Or would the murdered bosses' loyalists try to take revenge and start a large scale mafia war? Anyway, Colombo was a scumbag when he saved Gambino's, Lucchese's and Magaddino's lives by informing on Magliocco. If somebody who passes information to law enforcement is a "rat", then somebody who informs on his boss to underworld rivals, is a rat too imo. What's the difference? It's still being disloyal. Fuck Colombo.
For sure Bonanno would control L.A. and Arizona thanks to his son bill; I don't think that would restore the capo dei capi position,the time was changed and lucchese and Gambino capos would easly rebel against bonanno and would be the same a banana war.
User avatar
BillyBrizzi
Straightened out
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:41 am

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Post by BillyBrizzi »

Dwalin2014 wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 10:16 am If somebody who passes information to law enforcement is a "rat", then somebody who informs on his boss to underworld rivals, is a rat too imo. What's the difference? It's still being disloyal. Fuck Colombo.
Well said Dwalin, I co-sign that statement 100%
FORTIS FORTUNA IUVAT
UTC
Sergeant Of Arms
Posts: 972
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2016 10:59 pm

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Post by UTC »

BillyBrizzi wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 2:06 pm
Dwalin2014 wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 10:16 am If somebody who passes information to law enforcement is a "rat", then somebody who informs on his boss to underworld rivals, is a rat too imo. What's the difference? It's still being disloyal. Fuck Colombo.
Well said Dwalin, I co-sign that statement 100%
The difference is huge and cuts to the core of LCN. The first is a breach of omerta. The second isn't.
Dwalin2014
Sergeant Of Arms
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 10:08 am

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Post by Dwalin2014 »

UTC wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 8:28 pm
BillyBrizzi wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 2:06 pm Well said Dwalin, I co-sign that statement 100%
The difference is huge and cuts to the core of LCN. The first is a breach of omerta. The second isn't.
If the 2nd isn't a breach of omerta', they are more hypocrites than I thought. What logic did they have, when writing this so-called "code of honor"? A cop is an enemy, so leaking information to them and/or testifying is treason, ok. But if an underworld rival happens to be an enemy too, why are mafiosi who switched sides or spied on their bosses for the rival clan. considered less "traitors" that the ones who spy for the cops? An enemy is an enemy. The cop wants to jail you for life, the rival wants to kill you. What "loyalty" do they talk about it double crossing your own boss isn't considered a breach of the "code of honor?"
furiofromnaples
Full Patched
Posts: 1823
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:41 am

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Post by furiofromnaples »

Dwalin2014 wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 9:23 pm
UTC wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 8:28 pm
BillyBrizzi wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 2:06 pm Well said Dwalin, I co-sign that statement 100%
The difference is huge and cuts to the core of LCN. The first is a breach of omerta. The second isn't.
If the 2nd isn't a breach of omerta', they are more hypocrites than I thought. What logic did they have, when writing this so-called "code of honor"? A cop is an enemy, so leaking information to them and/or testifying is treason, ok. But if an underworld rival happens to be an enemy too, why are mafiosi who switched sides or spied on their bosses for the rival clan. considered less "traitors" that the ones who spy for the cops? An enemy is an enemy. The cop wants to jail you for life, the rival wants to kill you. What "loyalty" do they talk about it double crossing your own boss isn't considered a breach of the "code of honor?"

Dwalin the concept of omertà means to don't speak with who are out of the secret society. Colombo don't break the omertà when said to commission the Magliocco plan. The commission was above the single bosses.
User avatar
willychichi
Full Patched
Posts: 4291
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:54 pm

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Post by willychichi »

Speaking of Colombo his birthday was on June 16th and someone wished him a happy birthday in the NYDN obits, a Big Lou From Avenue U.

http://obituaries.nydailynews.com/obitu ... =185816797
Obama's a pimp he coulda never outfought Trump, but I didn't know it till this day that it was Putin all along.
Post Reply