A 1983 Congressional Hearing produced the following info:
- This states Stanfa was a member of the Sicilian mafia before coming to the US and emphasizes his ties to the Gambino family. Keep in mind this was two decades before his relative Nino Giuffre cooperated and said he was sponsored into the Sicilian mafia by John Stanfa, so they must have learned from another source before 1983. I have seen a similar description of Stanfa and the Gambino brothers that may have originated from Italian investigators.
- First it points out that Stanfa was close to Bruno and his son-in-law Ralph Puppo. The Puppo reference is important, as Puppo's father Orlando was a made member and the Puppos came from Stanfa's hometown of Caccamo. This goes well with other accounts of Stanfa and Bruno having a close friendship.
- The last part is weird, though. Despite pointing out that Stanfa already had a close relationship to Bruno and his family for some time and had worked for them, it says he was "new" to Bruno around the time of the murder and had been vouched for by Tony Caponigro because of Stanfa's Sicilian mafia ties. They are correct about Stanfa's Sicilian mafia ties, but Caponigro was a Calabrian and didn't become consigliere until 1978. Stanfa was already well-established in Philadelphia before 1978 and it doesn't make sense that a Newark-based soldier of Calabrian heritage would have "vouched" for him because of the Sicilian mafia.
- A second reference to Stanfa's Gambino ties, this time it is material as it connects to his car and employment. They don't call him a made member of the Gambino family but the wording almost suggests they believed that at the time. They were well aware that he was a mafia member either way.
- So despite FBI reports around this time referring to Sindone as a key member of the Bruno faction opposed to the Testa faction, here he was telling a top Testa faction associate that he offered Bruno and Testa an equal split of his operations if Bruno would let him retire.
- Says Frank Sindone was a captain by 1970 and sponsored Ciancaglini for membership. Note that this hearing also stated Riccobene was a captain, so they may have been mistaken on Sindone as well. We know Sindone was about to be made in 1969 but the ceremony had not taken place as of early 1970. If Ciancaglini was sponsored by Sindone that same year, they must have had multiple ceremonies.
- These accounts show there were FBI informants close to Ciancaglini in the early 1980s receiving information that would later be corroborated by witnesses like Caramandi and Delgiorno.
- We shouldn't assume all three informants are separate people. The FBI was known to pretend one informant was actually multiple informants in order to further mask the identity of the CI. It seems unlikely there were multiple FBI informants close to Ciancaglini during this short period.
- Informant 1 stands out. It says he knew Nick Scarfo, Joe Ciancaglini, and Pat Spirito, but then mentions hearing info on the hierarchy specifically from Ciancaglini and Scarfo without referring to Spirito. It suggests the informant could be a made member given that the boss and a captain told him who held official titles in the family. Informant reports will often refer to the informant himself as someone the informant is close to. This informant was close to Spirito and Ciancaglini, knew the formal hierarchy from the boss himself, and appears to have had firsthand knowledge of the family's "shakedown" operations which were being supervised by Ciancaglini using Spirito and a small crew of associates. I'm sure many people on the street knew this information at the time, but Spirito already has some red flags.
- I've previously suspected Spirito was an informant for several reasons. For one, an LE agent (FBI?) gave an account in which he said a made member of the Philly family was informing in the early 1980s but the informant was murdered. Despite being a willing participant in the Calabrese murder in 1981, Nick Caramandi described how Pat Spirito became unwilling to help with later murder contracts during the Riccobene war and would spend most of his time drinking and disparaging the leadership. Spirito had also been convicted on RICO charges in 1982.
- Spirito fits the profile of someone who would be susceptible to cooperation. With the agent's info about a member informant being killed around the time of Spirito's murder and the above excerpts from an informant close to Ciancaglini and Spirito who knew about their activities, it lends itself to the possibility that Spirito was an informant. If the FBI did split one informant into multiple informants for this report, that would make sense as informant two had knowledge of murder contracts during the Riccobene war. We know from Caramandi that Spirito was aware of many murder plots during the war and was given some of these contracts by Ciancaglini himself.
Tommy Scafidi interviewed by Dave Schratwieser
Moderator: Capos
- chin_gigante
- Full Patched
- Posts: 2566
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:36 pm
Re: Tommy Scafidi interviewed by Dave Schratwieser
Speaking of the proposed 1969 ceremony, I know Frank Iannarella Sr was scheduled to be inducted there having been proposed by Testa, but are there any sources confirming his membership since then? I checked the quite comprehensive membership chart in the Pennsylvania Crime Commission 1990 report and he isn't listed there. I know four other guys proposed by Albert Esposito for that ceremony were knocked down for being too young, and Riccobene and Ernest Perricone were trying to blackball Sindone. Maybe they got Iannarella instead. At one point Riccobene suspected Iannarella of someone who had used narcotics and therefore was not a member.
'You don't go crucifying people outside a church; not on Good Friday.'
Re: Tommy Scafidi interviewed by Dave Schratwieser
The 1983 congressional hearing report was a pretty inaccurate document. It suffers from having little of the knowledge that came out from the flood of informants in the late 80's, early 90's and was chaired by a guy who didn't seem to know much about Organized Crime. That is one source you should take with a grain of salt, though it has some decent info. While Sindone is identified as a captain in that document, i am convinced he never was a captain. Does it matter? He was closer to Bruno than most of the captains were. But historically the role of captain was like a street boss of his guys, Sindone was a street boss for Bruno but didn't have a crew. Stanfa was close to Bruno through the 70's so theres that.
Leonetti identifies Snuffy Iannarella as being made. I think Caramandi refers to Faffy being the son of a made guy as well. I don't think there is a question there. He wasn't an associate of Esposito either and was proposed for awhile. I also think two of the four that Esposito proposed actually got made, one being Esposito's older son, who is identified as being made in the same shaky congressional hearings I think. If you read the reports and ignore the sequence of the dates of the reports, Maggio told Ernie Perricone more than Joe Scafidi knew entirely. It's hard to take to the bank that four got knocked down when Perricone said yes but two got approved and than Joe just repeats the same information he told Rocco previously and only adding the ceremony was only days away. I'd rely on Maggio "whole mess of guys comment" because he has more details and it comes from a better source. Peter Maggio is in a better position to know because he was with Bruno daily or semi-daily.
Leonetti identifies Snuffy Iannarella as being made. I think Caramandi refers to Faffy being the son of a made guy as well. I don't think there is a question there. He wasn't an associate of Esposito either and was proposed for awhile. I also think two of the four that Esposito proposed actually got made, one being Esposito's older son, who is identified as being made in the same shaky congressional hearings I think. If you read the reports and ignore the sequence of the dates of the reports, Maggio told Ernie Perricone more than Joe Scafidi knew entirely. It's hard to take to the bank that four got knocked down when Perricone said yes but two got approved and than Joe just repeats the same information he told Rocco previously and only adding the ceremony was only days away. I'd rely on Maggio "whole mess of guys comment" because he has more details and it comes from a better source. Peter Maggio is in a better position to know because he was with Bruno daily or semi-daily.
Re: Tommy Scafidi interviewed by Dave Schratwieser
There are reports of Stanfa and Sindone meeting with Caponigro BEFORE the Bruno murder. Came out around Stanfa's trial. Then right after Bruno gets it, who meets with Stanfa but Sindone again more than once, one time with John Simone. I don't think Stanfa was with John Simone, though I wouldn't exclude the possibility. If Stanfa had a boss other than Sindone or even Simone, they would have been involved in the after hit meetings as well. Stanfa enjoyed a higher level position to the admin due to his relationship with Bruno, Gambino conneciton and Sicilian transfer. That is another piece that leads me to believe he reported to Sindone, due to his role in the hit. I also put large credence in what the prevailing feeling was in the underworld, that Stanfa was definitely involved in the move on Bruno.
Re: Tommy Scafidi interviewed by Dave Schratwieser
I agree that 1983 hearing was imperfect, though most of what's in the above excerpts can be contextualized or reinforced by other info. You make a good point about others' views of Stanfa, though one of the issues with him is he seems to have been viewed as a perpetual outsider by most of the family. Piccolo went along with Stanfa as boss, but Sparacio wanted another arrangement. Piccolo had also just been taped inducting members, had been dealing with Mike Ciancaglini's crew, and his cousin's regime had completely melted down; you have to figure Piccolo might have welcomed any shift in responsibility.
The biggest issue I have with the Bruno murder narrative is that most of what we have is gossip and circumstance. I always use the Bonannos as an example, where we have the boss, underboss, and multiple captains flipping yet there is still discrepancy on well-known murders: not only why someone was killed, but even who all the participants were. None of the later Philly witnesses had first-hand knowledge of the Bruno murder and their opinion does matter of course, but we're at a massive disadvantage without firsthand participants and even then there are missing pieces.
Looking at the Castellano murder, we have the main conspirators and the hit team, but Gravano also talks about other senior members who quietly went along with the plan but can't be called full-on conspirators. It's possible the Bruno murder had some high-level members who didn't plot the murder but quietly went along with it. Both Fresolone and Caramandi said Caponigro "hinted" that the Bruno murder was coming down the pipeline before it happened. If that's true and he was giving these associates a hint, we can only imagine what he may have said to made members.
An important part of this too is the rumor that Caponigro believed the murder was sanctioned by the Commission. If that's the case, he could have convinced any number of members to participate and they would have openly argued that their consigliere lied to them. The narrative zig-zags, where we have this idea the Bruno conspirators believed the murder was sanctioned, yet their behavior afterward doesn't suggest they truly believed that. Many question marks.
The biggest issue I have with the Bruno murder narrative is that most of what we have is gossip and circumstance. I always use the Bonannos as an example, where we have the boss, underboss, and multiple captains flipping yet there is still discrepancy on well-known murders: not only why someone was killed, but even who all the participants were. None of the later Philly witnesses had first-hand knowledge of the Bruno murder and their opinion does matter of course, but we're at a massive disadvantage without firsthand participants and even then there are missing pieces.
Looking at the Castellano murder, we have the main conspirators and the hit team, but Gravano also talks about other senior members who quietly went along with the plan but can't be called full-on conspirators. It's possible the Bruno murder had some high-level members who didn't plot the murder but quietly went along with it. Both Fresolone and Caramandi said Caponigro "hinted" that the Bruno murder was coming down the pipeline before it happened. If that's true and he was giving these associates a hint, we can only imagine what he may have said to made members.
An important part of this too is the rumor that Caponigro believed the murder was sanctioned by the Commission. If that's the case, he could have convinced any number of members to participate and they would have openly argued that their consigliere lied to them. The narrative zig-zags, where we have this idea the Bruno conspirators believed the murder was sanctioned, yet their behavior afterward doesn't suggest they truly believed that. Many question marks.