In addition to Milazzo and Parrino (who I'd consider part of the "Castellammarese" network because of his closeness to Milazzo, his brother's membership in the Bonanno family, connections between the towns, and the way Parrino has been described in books), there was also the presence of mafiosi Buccellatos a little bit earlier which is why I figured there was an existing Detroit Castellammarese population of some kind beyond Milazzo.Chris Christie wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 2:18 am I don't know if there was a large percentage of Castellammarese in Detroit or Michigan for that matter. Even outside of the topic which had one member that we know about, Michigan Italian demographics doesn't seem to show that there was any sizable colony there. So at the very least it was similar to Philly: a few blood relatives and within that mini-demo were a few made guys. CDC and Alcamo and Terrasini aren't that far away and, from personal experience, the populations are interrelated. I for instance, am from CDG but I have relatives in Alcamo, Partinico as far as Bagheria. While I don't come from a Mafioso-infused family I reckon those that are likely have those same connections beyond their own town.
There were many figures from Alcamo in the Detroit family aside from Parrino, as well as members from Balestrate, Paceco, Marsala, and the city of Trapani. I don't know if they were all aligned with each other or with Milazzo/Parrino, but I consider Castellammare and most of Trapani part of the same larger network so if some of these guys were aligned with Milazzo, that's not different from Castellammarese being under someone like Benny Gallo from Santa Ninfa. For whatever reason, the Castellammarese became the dominant figures over most US Trapanese after a certain point, which might have to do with some mafia form of classicism.
In the Maranzano and Joe Bonanno eras, the Bonanno family had many members from around Trapani province but the Castellammarese would rule the family, with two non-Castellammarese ex-consiglieri murdered (a rare fate for consiglieri) and ultimately replaced with a Castellammarese in Tartamella, making the entire administration from the same town.
But you can see where they still didn't go too far from their roots. In the 1960s, Joe Bonanno named his brother-in-law LaBruzzo as his successor and his son Bill was elected consigliere, which meant that the pro-Bonanno faction had a boss of Camporeale heritage and a consigliere who was half-Camporealese / half-Castellammarese. So even though Joe Bonanno was responsible for pushing the Castellammarese into total dominance, he also preserved the Camporeale roots of the family in his own relations and bloodline. For comparison's sake, at that time the anti-Bonanno faction was led by DiGregorio from Castellammare and Sciacca from Salemi (whose wife was from Santa Ninfa), with counsel by Alfano from Racalmuto.
Nick Licata was from Camporeale, originally with Detroit, and became the top man to Frank DeSimone from Trapani province. While it might be a coincidence, he's another example of Camporeale fitting in with guys from Partinico and Trapani. The Alcamo element in Detroit also crossed over into Los Angeles, with the Adamos and Mirables being involved with Detroit then taking over in the San Diego area. They coincidentally(?) had Biagio Bonventre under them in San DIego, who was from San Vito Lo Capo but his family looks to be originally from Castellammare and he played some part in Joe Bonanno's first attempted plot to take over LA from DeSimone. San Diego was also frequented heavily by the Partinico element of the Detroit family.
--
A St. Louis informant claimed that only men from Partinico, Cinisi, and Terrasini could become leaders of the St. Louis family because mafiosi from those villages considered themselves of a higher class, similar to Joe Bonanno's feelings about the Castellammarese. At the time this was reported, Giardino and Vitale were the leaders of St. Louis, both being from the villages in question, but the previous two bosses and possibly an even earlier boss were all from Agrigento, which goes against what the informant said and again shows that Agrigento was a wild card in US mafia politics.
By the time of the above report, the St. Louis family was said to be deeply influenced by Detroit, whose leaders also came from Terrasini, Cinisi, and Partinico and it looks like the SL informant's comments about mafiosi from those villages applied to Detroit when you look at how dominant those groups were. Along with some crossover between Partinico, Trapani, and maybe Camporeale, the Castellammarese of the Bonanno family seem to have operated as a higher leadership class of the family much like Terrasini/Cinisi/Partinico in Detroit and allegedly later on in St. Louis. Side note, but it's interesting that the Bonanno family had ties to Detroit but not St. Louis -- this could be for any number of reasons, but what's a core difference between the Detroit and St. Louis membership? Detroit had strong representation from Trapani province.
--
With the talk about certain groups considering themselves a higher class and wanting leadership positions, contrast this with the DeCavalcantes . For as much has been said about their Ribera roots and connections, Nick Delmore was from Enna, Sam DeCavalcante was from Monreale, Frank Majuri from Corleone, and Joe LaSelva from the mainland. Their official administration for close to 20 years had no direct representation from Agrigento aside from the short period under Delmore where Louis LaRasso was underboss, plus Majuri marrying a Riberese woman. Despite such importance being placed on Ribera in their family, that faction seemingly had no problem maintaining their own insular faction without direct representation on the administration. Sounds a lot like the Gambino "Sciacchitani" faction -- their own insular crews, mediator(s) to handle affairs within their multi-crew faction, but no representation on the admin.
There are def families like Pueblo and Tampa where you had Agrigentesi filling out both the membership and leadership of a single family, but in families where there was a faction from Agrigento it doesn't seem they were as competitive for top leadership spots as men from other cities and networks. Certain individuals may have been power-hungry, and you could argue Gentile fits this, but in an ultra-competitive environment like NYC / NJ the Agrigentesi are noticeably absent from the early admins considering how represented they were among the membership.
Were they not considered a higher leadership class by other factions, like we see from parts of Palermo province and Trapani, or did they simply prefer to deal with their own affairs? Or is that just how it worked out randomly? I would guess it wasn't one single reason and probably a combination of these reasons, as well as reasons we can't guess as they related to specific mafia politics of the time that weren't clearly documented.
However, while I haven't done nearly enough reading on the Sicilian mafia, what I've seen suggests that Agrigento province plays a similar role in Sicilian mafia politics. We have men from all over Palermo province and now Trapani taking a larger political role in governing the Sicilian mafia, but we don't see the figures from Agrigento competing for that level of influence, while we do see them competing within their own province. Maybe someone can correct me on that, but it doesn't seem politically that different from their behavior in the US mafia.
Ciancaglini was close with Frank Sindone, whose family came from Messina. So he technically may have come up around a Sicilian, but as we've talked about, Messina in Philadelphia might be better seen as a halfway point between the Calabrian and Sicilian factions given its location. You have to figure, too, that the first two bosses after Sabella were from Messina, which I don't think is a coincidence given that the Calabrian v. Sicilian political factionalism would have been a bigger factor in the 1930s and having bosses from Messina may have smoothed that out.I recall in Leonetti's book Scarfo is talking shit about the Sicilians and seems to lump the Ciancaglinis in and along with them. Technically they aren't Sicilian in the least so perhaps that was an error on Leonetti's part or Scarfo lumped the Changs in with the Sicilians because that's who they were around and came up with?
--
Re: Gambino post
- I've never seen anything about Vincenzo DiLeonardo being part of the DiMino crew or Agrigento faction. He was close with Andrea Torregrossa from Licata and Onofrio Modica from Sciacca, so he was friendly with the Brooklyn Agrigentesi, but DiLeonardo's crew was mainly Palermitani, later including D'Aquila's brother-in-law, plus later D'Aquila's son and nephew.
- Your article says both LoMontes' murders involved men from Agrigento -- Fortunato killed by a hit team including Accursio DiMino, Valenti, and Biondo, and Gaetano by Impelluso from Castrofilippo. Given that the LoMontes were at war with D'Aquila, it makes sense the hit teams would include Agrigentesi as that faction already appears to have existed under him.
- I believe the Manhattan Trupia crew likely became the Stincone crew in Astoria. They were both from Canicatti, part of the same Astoria Canicatti club, and it appears immigrants from Canicatti migrated from Manhattan to Astoria, so would make sense Stincone inherited at least some portion from Trupia.
- Not sure when Domenico Arcuri became a captain, but he was a transplant from Tampa and both he and his son were deeply tapped into the Agrigento network.
- Giuseppe Parlapiano was one of the main Sciacchitani faction captains by the time Gentile joined that family.
--
At the end of the day, we're talking about networks within networks. Individuals have their own networks based on individual relationships; groups of paesani from a specific hometown are a network unto themselves; there are regional (not necessarily provincial) networks that include a set of connected towns, with some of those towns being more dominant or important within the network and perhaps being over-represented in the network; an individual's own personal network can influence and expand the shape a regional network takes, too; then there is the Sicilian mafia network as a whole, which all of these networks fit into.
I mean, at some point when you're talking about an Agrigento network, a Trapani network, and a Palermo network, etc., you're going to find that those networks intersect because these guys were all part of the same mafia and had relationships around the entire island and that's what makes the mafia such an incredible international phenomenon -- it's like there are coordinates that can be translated to another part of the map in a different shape but stay connected. Obviously these connections changed and died out, but there was a substantial period of time where they still mattered.