by Ed » Tue Aug 21, 2018 6:16 am
Again, not saying Girolami was the definite source for the "Fire Giancana" meeting. I haven't seen the original FBI documents. My point was more that Fratto was unlikely to be the source since, according to my understanding, he began to cooperate much later.
But Girolami did provide info about Battaglia's potential promotion.
Girolami was CG 6498.
https://www.archives.gov/files/research ... 292724.pdf
In October, 1964, Girolami told the FBI that Battaglia had been promoted and may have replaced Giancana as boss.
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.htm ... 2&tab=page
This was a number of months after the alleged "Fire Giancana" meeting but I thought I'd put it out there. There are other documents where Girolami comments on Battaglia. But like I said in my original post, just a guess that he was the source.
I agree that other political operatives were feeding info to the FBI and never said Girolami was the only one.
Again, not saying Girolami was the definite source for the "Fire Giancana" meeting. I haven't seen the original FBI documents. My point was more that Fratto was unlikely to be the source since, according to my understanding, he began to cooperate much later.
But Girolami did provide info about Battaglia's potential promotion.
Girolami was CG 6498.
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32292724.pdf
In October, 1964, Girolami told the FBI that Battaglia had been promoted and may have replaced Giancana as boss.
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=168130&search=124-10197-10000#relPageId=2&tab=page
This was a number of months after the alleged "Fire Giancana" meeting but I thought I'd put it out there. There are other documents where Girolami comments on Battaglia. But like I said in my original post, just a guess that he was the source.
I agree that other political operatives were feeding info to the FBI and never said Girolami was the only one.