Businness or blood/George from Canada

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Businness or blood/George from Canada

Re: RE: Re: Businness or blood/George from Canada

by Slumpy » Thu Mar 29, 2018 11:54 am

Lupara wrote: Sat Mar 24, 2018 8:28 am
Slumpy wrote:On paper its simple, the reality of it was more complex.
What reality is that? It is all speculation. Reality = fact. And the facts we have are those on paper.
Fair enough. You're right, it's all speculative.

Re: RE: Re: Businness or blood/George from Canada

by Lupara » Mon Mar 26, 2018 12:18 am

yatescj7781 wrote:I've always wondered about that. From 99 to the meeting in MTL. Did the crew send tribute to Massino each month? What kept Massino from waiting almost 2 years to send an envoy?
Perhaps let the Sciascia murder cool down for a while and/or a lack of interest. What had Montreal to offer to NY at that point? Perhaps a little bit of xtc and weed coming in from Europe, but I think the Bonannos learned from the pizza connection trial and were keeping a low profile when it came to drugs.

That so called anual tribute wasn't of much significance either.

Re: Businness or blood/George from Canada

by yatescj7781 » Sun Mar 25, 2018 9:41 pm

I've always wondered about that. From 99 to the meeting in MTL. Did the crew send tribute to Massino each month? What kept Massino from waiting almost 2 years to send an envoy?

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Businness or blood/George from Canada

by Lupara » Sun Mar 25, 2018 4:03 am

yatescj7781 wrote:
Lupara wrote: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:58 pm
yatescj7781 wrote:
Lupara wrote: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:21 am
yatescj7781 wrote:
Lupara wrote: Thu Mar 15, 2018 12:55 am
yatescj7781 wrote:
JeremyTheJew wrote: Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:26 am very interesting on george w the gotti crew....

would george have been looked as capo over vito??
To the American Mob yes, particularly the Gambino's and Bonanno's. In the Montreal Mafia he was the liaison to the NY Mob. The main conduit for drug transactions. He was under the Rizzuto's, but considered the Capo of the Canadian Crew of the Bonanno's. Which is why when they whacked him Massino sent an envoy to choose the new capo of the Bonanno Montreal Crew.
Sciascia wasn't under the Rizzutos. At best he represented them because of hometown loyalties, but formally he was their superior. No need to overcomplicate things.

Even though the Rizzutos were more or less running their own show they were obligated to follow protocol if orders came down from New York through Sciascia. A good example is the three capos hit or Joe LoPresti's murder. Surely they weren't giving Sciascia orders..
Maybe in NY and regard to the Bonanno family he wasn't, but in Montreal George was under the rizzuto family. No way you can say George was head of the Montreal mob at that time.
There's no such thing as a Rizzuto crime family. That shit was invented by the authors of the Sixth Family. There was a Rizzuto blood family (Rizzuto-Manno-Renda-Cammalleri) and an organization but there's no evidence that they were a recognised autonomous family similar to those in the US or Ontario, certainly not during Sciascia's time. Perhaps today, considering all the circumstances, they may be regarded as an independent group but even that is up for debate still.
You still believe them to be a branch of the Bonanno Family?
Hard to answer given the lack of information. Montreal seems quite fractured right now with several break-away groups and affiliations in control of their own territories. However, recent evidence indicates that there are still people who are on record with or even inducted as members of the Bonannos operating there. But that is not enough to indicate the presence of a full fledged Bonanno crew. Reports of guys traveling back and forth between Montreal and New York on a regular basis would always be a good indicator, but as of now there are no such reports.

It seems to me that when Rizzuto returned to Canada in 2012 it was agreed upon during a meeting in Toronto with reportedly representatives from New York present that he was given carte blanche to take out his opponents and restore order so business could continue. This could have given him the opportunity to be in charge of his own group. The fact that he could hit Joe Di Maulo, a longtime made member of the Montreal decina, without any resistance supports this hypothesis of an agreement that was made.
Fair enough. That being said, did Vito take orders from the Bonanno family from 99 onwards? Or did he operate the Montreal crew to his own wishes?
It seems more like a lack of orders that were given rather than him not taking orders. Massino evidently didn't show much of an interest in Montreal when it took him 2 years after the Sciascia hit to send an envoy to acquaint themselves. This seems to have attributed to Montreal being Vito's playground. Even though I don't believe they ever officially broke off from the Bonannos by the mid 2000s they were seemingly functioning as their own little family until Montagna set foot over there and tried, but failed, to put things in order again.

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Businness or blood/George from Canada

by yatescj7781 » Sun Mar 25, 2018 1:42 am

Lupara wrote: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:58 pm
yatescj7781 wrote:
Lupara wrote: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:21 am
yatescj7781 wrote:
Lupara wrote: Thu Mar 15, 2018 12:55 am
yatescj7781 wrote:
JeremyTheJew wrote: Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:26 am very interesting on george w the gotti crew....

would george have been looked as capo over vito??
To the American Mob yes, particularly the Gambino's and Bonanno's. In the Montreal Mafia he was the liaison to the NY Mob. The main conduit for drug transactions. He was under the Rizzuto's, but considered the Capo of the Canadian Crew of the Bonanno's. Which is why when they whacked him Massino sent an envoy to choose the new capo of the Bonanno Montreal Crew.
Sciascia wasn't under the Rizzutos. At best he represented them because of hometown loyalties, but formally he was their superior. No need to overcomplicate things.

Even though the Rizzutos were more or less running their own show they were obligated to follow protocol if orders came down from New York through Sciascia. A good example is the three capos hit or Joe LoPresti's murder. Surely they weren't giving Sciascia orders..
Maybe in NY and regard to the Bonanno family he wasn't, but in Montreal George was under the rizzuto family. No way you can say George was head of the Montreal mob at that time.
There's no such thing as a Rizzuto crime family. That shit was invented by the authors of the Sixth Family. There was a Rizzuto blood family (Rizzuto-Manno-Renda-Cammalleri) and an organization but there's no evidence that they were a recognised autonomous family similar to those in the US or Ontario, certainly not during Sciascia's time. Perhaps today, considering all the circumstances, they may be regarded as an independent group but even that is up for debate still.
You still believe them to be a branch of the Bonanno Family?
Hard to answer given the lack of information. Montreal seems quite fractured right now with several break-away groups and affiliations in control of their own territories. However, recent evidence indicates that there are still people who are on record with or even inducted as members of the Bonannos operating there. But that is not enough to indicate the presence of a full fledged Bonanno crew. Reports of guys traveling back and forth between Montreal and New York on a regular basis would always be a good indicator, but as of now there are no such reports.

It seems to me that when Rizzuto returned to Canada in 2012 it was agreed upon during a meeting in Toronto with reportedly representatives from New York present that he was given carte blanche to take out his opponents and restore order so business could continue. This could have given him the opportunity to be in charge of his own group. The fact that he could hit Joe Di Maulo, a longtime made member of the Montreal decina, without any resistance supports this hypothesis of an agreement that was made.
Fair enough. That being said, did Vito take orders from the Bonanno family from 99 onwards? Or did he operate the Montreal crew to his own wishes?

Re: RE: Re: Businness or blood/George from Canada

by Lupara » Sat Mar 24, 2018 8:28 am

Slumpy wrote:On paper its simple, the reality of it was more complex.
What reality is that? It is all speculation. Reality = fact. And the facts we have are those on paper.

Re: Businness or blood/George from Canada

by Slumpy » Sat Mar 24, 2018 8:16 am

On paper its simple, the reality of it was more complex.

Re: RE: Re: Businness or blood/George from Canada

by Lupara » Sat Mar 24, 2018 8:11 am

Slumpy wrote:The frustrating thing about this topic is that its endlessly fascinating but there are just too many pieces of the puzzle missing to complete the picture. I still don't really know what to believe about the Rizzuto/Sciascia power dynamic, although I'm convinced it's even less cut and dry than I thought it was coming into this thread.
The Rizzuto/Sciascia power dynamic is really simple in layman Cosa Nostra terms: the Rizzutos were Bonanno soldiers and Sciascia was their capo who represented them. Like I said earlier, there's no need to make this situation more complicated than as it's already been presented as an established fact.

Re: Businness or blood/George from Canada

by Slumpy » Sat Mar 24, 2018 7:59 am

The frustrating thing about this topic is that its endlessly fascinating but there are just too many pieces of the puzzle missing to complete the picture. I still don't really know what to believe about the Rizzuto/Sciascia power dynamic, although I'm convinced it's even less cut and dry than I thought it was coming into this thread.

Re: Businness or blood/George from Canada

by SILENT PARTNERZ » Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:51 am

Glad I posed a question! Thanks for all of your hard work
and information: Lupara; Laurentian; B.; Antimafia and everyone else.

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Businness or blood/George from Canada

by Lupara » Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:58 pm

yatescj7781 wrote:
Lupara wrote: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:21 am
yatescj7781 wrote:
Lupara wrote: Thu Mar 15, 2018 12:55 am
yatescj7781 wrote:
JeremyTheJew wrote: Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:26 am very interesting on george w the gotti crew....

would george have been looked as capo over vito??
To the American Mob yes, particularly the Gambino's and Bonanno's. In the Montreal Mafia he was the liaison to the NY Mob. The main conduit for drug transactions. He was under the Rizzuto's, but considered the Capo of the Canadian Crew of the Bonanno's. Which is why when they whacked him Massino sent an envoy to choose the new capo of the Bonanno Montreal Crew.
Sciascia wasn't under the Rizzutos. At best he represented them because of hometown loyalties, but formally he was their superior. No need to overcomplicate things.

Even though the Rizzutos were more or less running their own show they were obligated to follow protocol if orders came down from New York through Sciascia. A good example is the three capos hit or Joe LoPresti's murder. Surely they weren't giving Sciascia orders..
Maybe in NY and regard to the Bonanno family he wasn't, but in Montreal George was under the rizzuto family. No way you can say George was head of the Montreal mob at that time.
There's no such thing as a Rizzuto crime family. That shit was invented by the authors of the Sixth Family. There was a Rizzuto blood family (Rizzuto-Manno-Renda-Cammalleri) and an organization but there's no evidence that they were a recognised autonomous family similar to those in the US or Ontario, certainly not during Sciascia's time. Perhaps today, considering all the circumstances, they may be regarded as an independent group but even that is up for debate still.
You still believe them to be a branch of the Bonanno Family?
Hard to answer given the lack of information. Montreal seems quite fractured right now with several break-away groups and affiliations in control of their own territories. However, recent evidence indicates that there are still people who are on record with or even inducted as members of the Bonannos operating there. But that is not enough to indicate the presence of a full fledged Bonanno crew. Reports of guys traveling back and forth between Montreal and New York on a regular basis would always be a good indicator, but as of now there are no such reports.

It seems to me that when Rizzuto returned to Canada in 2012 it was agreed upon during a meeting in Toronto with reportedly representatives from New York present that he was given carte blanche to take out his opponents and restore order so business could continue. This could have given him the opportunity to be in charge of his own group. The fact that he could hit Joe Di Maulo, a longtime made member of the Montreal decina, without any resistance supports this hypothesis of an agreement that was made.





Re: Businness or blood/George from Canada

by Lupara » Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:29 pm

Awesome post by B., Laurentian and Antimafia.

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Businness or blood/George from Canada

by yatescj7781 » Tue Mar 20, 2018 9:47 pm

Lupara wrote: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:21 am
yatescj7781 wrote:
Lupara wrote: Thu Mar 15, 2018 12:55 am
yatescj7781 wrote:
JeremyTheJew wrote: Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:26 am very interesting on george w the gotti crew....

would george have been looked as capo over vito??
To the American Mob yes, particularly the Gambino's and Bonanno's. In the Montreal Mafia he was the liaison to the NY Mob. The main conduit for drug transactions. He was under the Rizzuto's, but considered the Capo of the Canadian Crew of the Bonanno's. Which is why when they whacked him Massino sent an envoy to choose the new capo of the Bonanno Montreal Crew.
Sciascia wasn't under the Rizzutos. At best he represented them because of hometown loyalties, but formally he was their superior. No need to overcomplicate things.

Even though the Rizzutos were more or less running their own show they were obligated to follow protocol if orders came down from New York through Sciascia. A good example is the three capos hit or Joe LoPresti's murder. Surely they weren't giving Sciascia orders..
Maybe in NY and regard to the Bonanno family he wasn't, but in Montreal George was under the rizzuto family. No way you can say George was head of the Montreal mob at that time.
There's no such thing as a Rizzuto crime family. That shit was invented by the authors of the Sixth Family. There was a Rizzuto blood family (Rizzuto-Manno-Renda-Cammalleri) and an organization but there's no evidence that they were a recognised autonomous family similar to those in the US or Ontario, certainly not during Sciascia's time. Perhaps today, considering all the circumstances, they may be regarded as an independent group but even that is up for debate still.
You still believe them to be a branch of the Bonanno Family?

Re: Businness or blood/George from Canada

by Laurentian » Tue Mar 20, 2018 6:43 pm

That is an interesting discussion. Thank you very much all!

Re: RE: Re: Businness or blood/George from Canada

by B. » Tue Mar 20, 2018 5:38 pm

antimafia wrote: Tue Mar 20, 2018 4:05 pm
B. wrote: Tue Mar 20, 2018 1:51 pm
Laurentian wrote: Tue Mar 20, 2018 11:12 am
SILENT PARTNERZ wrote: Tue Mar 20, 2018 9:32 am
B. wrote: Tue Mar 20, 2018 2:05 am Cicale also said that Basciano had Montagna ask them for even more cash than they were previously giving, which Rizzuto reluctantly agreed to. Hope some info comes out eventually on whether Montagna knew the Montreal guys pre-2000s. Would be interesting to know too how much money/how often the Cotronis were passing up to the Bonanno administration in their era. Galante and probably other Bonanno leaders profited from the Cotroni's role in heroin trafficking, but not sure I've seen anything about them paying tribute/kicking up.

The Montreal crew didn't suddenly go from a street corner operation under Cotroni/Greco into a blossoming international mafia family/cartel under the Rizzutos. During the Cotroni days the Montreal crew was as much of an independent force with extensive international connections and the Cotroni brothers were top guys in possibly the biggest mafia drug operation/network of the day. Reports from that time also talk about how the crew basically governed itself. It's not taking anything away from the Rizzutos to say that this crew could have been called the "sixth family" at any point in its history.

Before we start calling a group its own family (a term with a very specific meaning in the mafia), it would be great if someone could identify/confirm more of the made members who have been said to make up the 20 man Montreal crew since the 1960s or earlier. We have a lot of good guesses, especially in the last couple decades, but there isn't reliable info. We've seen labels like "consigliere" thrown onto guys like Paolo Renda, but let's start with finding a source who can tell us firsthand that Renda was a soldier. Most of our limited info on membership comes from Bonanno informants. These guys did go to dinners and meet a number of the Montreal members so maybe they could ID them from photos and that info is in a file. If what Magaddino said is true, it would include a number of Ontario-based soldiers Bonanno recruited behind Magaddino's back circa 1950s/60s.
Did the Montreal crew, either under Cotroni or Rizzuto leadership, have or need the NYC Bonnano authority to make new members?
If not authorized by NYC, did they make guys anyway?
I am not totally sure about under the Rizzuto reign, but under the Vincenzo Cotroni - Paolo Violi tenure, Montreal had to request permission from the Bonanno Family to make new members, this of course after the Bonanno's got themselves permission from the four other NYC Families. That was evidenced by wiretaps that were played at the Quebec Crime Commission Probe, which inquired into the activities of the Mafia in Montréal, in November and December 1975.
JD also posted that as of 2004, there was some communication related to deceased members, as Frank Cotroni showed up on a Bonanno proposed member list as one of the names being replaced, indicating that the Bonanno leadership still factored Montreal into their membership slots. Romeo Bucci also appeared on a similar list from the 90s.

There is a doc from the 1960s that indicates Montreal handled the actual inductions themselves (requiring permission from NY, of course), which seems to be the belief for the Rizzuto era as well, but not sure. Could easily be a little bit of both over the years.

I've also wondered about Violi's "six year wait" rule. He apparently said that members made in Sicily (Italy as well?) had to wait six years in some kind of probationary period to officially transfer to the Montreal decina. Now that we know other families like the DeCavalcantes and even possibly the Gambinos allowed Sicilian men of honor to transfer, I wonder if this six year rule was mafia-wide, a Bonanno rule, or specific to the Montreal crew. Violi was an acting captain who hadn't been running things for long, so it's unlikely he came up with the rule himself. The rule must have come from or been approved by Cotroni or the Bonanno leadership originally.
I'm not at home to consult my books and my notes; so I'm going by memory here.

The probationary period of five years was not Violi's invention. Between 1972 and 1974, he explained what appeared to be a Commission rule, as well as other finer shadings of rules, to the Sicilian men of honour Carmelo Salemi and Giuseppe Cuffaro who visited him at the Reggio Bar in Montreal and who spoke with him over the phone; Pietro Sciara, born in Siculiana and raised in Cattolica Eraclea, was also present on at least one of these occasions. After receiving felice's help to determine which publication contained the Italian-language transcripts of Violi's interaction with the aforementioned Sicilians, I finally ordered Mafia: l'atto d'accusa dei giudici di Palermo last December and received it in January some seven weeks later.

I have assumed that the Commission rule, which reinforces the argument that a made member of a Sicilian CN family could not simultaneously be a made member of an American LCN family--he would have to transfer from one to the other--also applied to made members of other secret societies; however, as much as others and I may argue for the impossibility of dual membership in the US and Canada, which I do, we don't know for certain whether 'ndrangheta members who found themselves in these two countries were ever able to transfer to an American LCN family and transfer back.

As much as Violi was a made Bonanno who was enforcing the rule that came from the Commission, I'm of the firm opinion he straddled two worlds. He had deep connections to the 'ndrangheta on the Italian mainland--maybe even to 'ndrangheta groups in Australia, as did his father-in-law, Giacomo Luppino--and he may or may not have realized the contradiction of telling Sicilian men of honour that they couldn't do this and that in Montreal, while he looked the other way when it came to his own affairs and that of other Calabrians in Canada who were inducted into the 'ndrangheta or were in its orbit. For example, Violi's telling the Sicilian men of honour that they couldn't talk in Canada about their goings-on in Sicily has been correctly interpreted over the decades as more evidence of the separateness of the American LCN and Sicilian CN, i.e., they are two separate organizations; yet in the early 1970s, 'ndrangheta member Saverio Mammoliti told two undercover FBI agents who were interested in purchasing cocaine and heroin from him that he needed the assent of three people: 'ndrangheta superbosses Mommo Piromalli and Antonio Macrì for the coke, and Paolo Violi for the heroin.

In books and articles, the presence of 'ndrangheta members in Quebec has hardly been written about at all, especially compared with how much has been written about 'ndrangheta members in Ontario. What has occurred to me is that although Violi was definitely a made Bonanno, the brothers who followed him to Canada could very well have been 'ndranghetisti. I am left wondering how it was possible that someone with Violi's talents and connections was never inducted into the 'ndrangheta back in Sinopoli or in Canada. Vic Cotroni (might have been Frank?) gave 'ndrangheta members in Quebec the opportunity to hold meetings in one of his establishments--when I get home later, I'll have to check whether I got this right, as the establishment might have belonged to someone else. There was at least one Siderno Group member, Domenico Torrente, who at the very least would be considered an associate of the Montreal Mafia--he was Giuseppe Cotroni's driver but also owned a night club. On the other hand, Torrente also seemed to defer to Mike Racco of Toronto, the longtime head of the Siderno Group there, as Torrente was heard talking to him on wiretaps about mediating a beef he had with 'ndrangheta member Vincenzo Melia (I can't recall whether Melia was living in Montreal at the time of the dispute).

I sometimes assert on forums like these that Luppino had to have been a 'ndrangheta member because he could not simultaneously have been a made member of the Buffalo Family. But what if he had been able to transfer to the Buffalo Family under Magaddino's watch? In the 1960s, Luppino had been heard on wiretaps telling Johnny Papalia in person that, in Ontario, Luppino seemed to have been appointed by Magaddino as the command centre and that "[w}e are all under the Commission." (I'll correct the quote later if necessary.) So what was Luppino doing when establishing a 'ndrangheta board of control in 1962 whose sitting members were considered part of the Siderno Group? Why did Luppino and Papalia talk to each other about two of the board members who were eventually murdered in unsolved cases? Why were the former considered suspects in the murders of the latter? If Luppino and his son Natale sponsored Paul Volpe into the Buffalo Family, were the two Luppinos present for Volpe's induction ceremony?

It is not a given that all five of Giacomo Luppino's sons and all five of his sons-in-law are or were 'ndrangheta members. This would also apply to the grandsons such as Paolo Violi's sons Domenico and Giuseppe, whose names have been mentioned a number of times since last November in association with the Gambino Family, Bonanno Family, and--depending on how you read the DOJ's news release--the Buffalo Family (now named the "Todaro organized crime family").

I am aware I got a little off topic.
Excellent post!

If Violi said it was Commission orders on the transfer rule, then that is exactly where I was going by bringing that up. It's unlikely Violi or even the Montreal decina as a whole would have had the authority to make a decision that would impact different families/groups without some kind of higher authority.

On one of the Magaddino wiretaps, I believe he refers to the elder Luppino as a Camorrista. There is reason to believe that 'ndranghetisi/Camorristi are less narroow-minded when it comes to affiliations, i.e. they are open to their members being formally affiliated with other groups, while the Sicilian and US mafia is not. There is the well-known example of some Camorra bosses being inducted into the Sicilian mafia, for example, though I am way outside of my territory talking about this. That may explain how the Luppinos and others under the Magaddino banner were able to operate in two different organizations, if that is indeed what they did.

Something else to remember, re: "someone of Violi's talents" not being a member of the 'ndrangheta, is that at the time he came up in Canada, having an affiliation with a US mafia group like the Bonanno or Magaddino family was worth its weight in gold. It's only been in recent decades that those affiliations have less weight. It seems that if Violi was not an 'ndrangheta member before joining the Bonannos, him joining them later would have just been a way to honor his heritage and relatives and had little value or bearing on his role in the Canadian underworld given the status he had as Bonanno acting captain.

Top