Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

Re: Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

by Angelo Santino » Fri Sep 22, 2017 10:18 am

Yes, that's Lawrence 'Dago' Mangano, of Chicago. Not to be confused with Vincenzo Mangano of NYC:

Image
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... ugshot.jpg

Re: Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

by BillyBrizzi » Fri Sep 22, 2017 10:13 am

Chris Christie wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:12 am
Villain wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:03 am
BillyBrizzi wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2017 3:48 am Great read Villain..

I just looked at a couple of pics of Lawrence Mangano and Vincent Mangano of New York and became convinced that Joe Bonanno put a photo of Lawrence Mangano in his book that supposed to be Vincent. I'm talking about the NY Commission succession chart in the middle of the book, where Bonanno pictured all the bosses of the Five Families from 1931 to 1968.

Strange mistake, since Vincent Mangano was supposedly such a good friend..
Yeah I remember seeing the same photo on the Crime Inc doc i think. Who knows, maybe its just another of Bonannos lies, after all he was one of devils who walked the earth. I saw his 60 min interview more than a dozen of times and he always reminds me of my late grandfather who used to tell me fantasy stories when I was a kid. Everything was the same during the story telling, same smile, same face, same eyes, same moves...
That may have been a mistake on the publisher's part. I base that on the other photos used which were mugshots and don't believe every photo came from the family collection.
It was this photo, but they only showed his head in it. Was supposed to be Vincent Mangano, but it's Lawrence right?

Image

Re: Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

by Villain » Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:36 am

Chris Christie wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:12 am
Villain wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:03 am
BillyBrizzi wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2017 3:48 am Great read Villain..

I just looked at a couple of pics of Lawrence Mangano and Vincent Mangano of New York and became convinced that Joe Bonanno put a photo of Lawrence Mangano in his book that supposed to be Vincent. I'm talking about the NY Commission succession chart in the middle of the book, where Bonanno pictured all the bosses of the Five Families from 1931 to 1968.

Strange mistake, since Vincent Mangano was supposedly such a good friend..
Yeah I remember seeing the same photo on the Crime Inc doc i think. Who knows, maybe its just another of Bonannos lies, after all he was one of devils who walked the earth. I saw his 60 min interview more than a dozen of times and he always reminds me of my late grandfather who used to tell me fantasy stories when I was a kid. Everything was the same during the story telling, same smile, same face, same eyes, same moves...
That may have been a mistake on the publisher's part. I base that on the other photos used which were mugshots and don't believe every photo came from the family collection.
Yeah but they should have. When my dad used to write books regarding neuropsychiatry, he as the author checked his books more than a dozen of times before publishing and in fact he always found more than few mistakes regarding photos which are way more complicated rather then muggshots or press photos

Re: Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

by Angelo Santino » Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:12 am

Villain wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:03 am
BillyBrizzi wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2017 3:48 am Great read Villain..

I just looked at a couple of pics of Lawrence Mangano and Vincent Mangano of New York and became convinced that Joe Bonanno put a photo of Lawrence Mangano in his book that supposed to be Vincent. I'm talking about the NY Commission succession chart in the middle of the book, where Bonanno pictured all the bosses of the Five Families from 1931 to 1968.

Strange mistake, since Vincent Mangano was supposedly such a good friend..
Yeah I remember seeing the same photo on the Crime Inc doc i think. Who knows, maybe its just another of Bonannos lies, after all he was one of devils who walked the earth. I saw his 60 min interview more than a dozen of times and he always reminds me of my late grandfather who used to tell me fantasy stories when I was a kid. Everything was the same during the story telling, same smile, same face, same eyes, same moves...
That may have been a mistake on the publisher's part. I base that on the other photos used which were mugshots and don't believe every photo came from the family collection.

Re: Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

by Villain » Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:03 am

BillyBrizzi wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2017 3:48 am Great read Villain..

I just looked at a couple of pics of Lawrence Mangano and Vincent Mangano of New York and became convinced that Joe Bonanno put a photo of Lawrence Mangano in his book that supposed to be Vincent. I'm talking about the NY Commission succession chart in the middle of the book, where Bonanno pictured all the bosses of the Five Families from 1931 to 1968.

Strange mistake, since Vincent Mangano was supposedly such a good friend..
Yeah I remember seeing the same photo on the Crime Inc doc i think. Who knows, maybe its just another of Bonannos lies, after all he was one of devils who walked the earth. I saw his 60 min interview more than a dozen of times and he always reminds me of my late grandfather who used to tell me fantasy stories when I was a kid. Everything was the same during the story telling, same smile, same face, same eyes, same moves...

Re: Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

by BillyBrizzi » Fri Sep 22, 2017 3:48 am

Great read Villain..

I just looked at a couple of pics of Lawrence Mangano and Vincent Mangano of New York and became convinced that Joe Bonanno put a photo of Lawrence Mangano in his book that supposed to be Vincent. I'm talking about the NY Commission succession chart in the middle of the book, where Bonanno pictured all the bosses of the Five Families from 1931 to 1968.

Strange mistake, since Vincent Mangano was supposedly such a good friend..

Re: Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

by Villain » Fri Sep 22, 2017 1:50 am

Frank wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2017 12:35 pm Dated material or not it all sounds very possible. Very, very good article. It's very possible with all your evidence that Ricca was the boss after Al. And that Nitto was a Capo only, being misidentified as boss. The Chicago Outfit, Genovese's post Vito's inprisonmant and the Gambino's of the post John Gotti are hard to figure out. The Outfit since Al. I think I have the Outfit leadership since Giancana figured out, but not 100 percent certain lol.
Thank you and I agree that the Outfit was and still is one of the most complicated and mysterious factions in US Cosa Nostra, as you said, since the days of Al. For me personally the main reason for this was the huge attention which was brought by Al. I mean there were some countries during that period without radio or even newspapers only regarding their local activities but still, somehow they managed to hear regarding the big time boss. My grandmother used to talk about Capone, my mother did the same thing...nobody ever mentioned Luciano or Lansy when I was a kid but when somebody mention Chicago, instantly in everybodys mind there was the picture of the big fella.

So Ricca and boys had a tough job in maintaining the organization under the radar but still I believe that they succeeded doing it for a very long time. Obviously many of them went to jail a couple of times but by the end of the day, most of the time they were free on the streets and died in that style. On top of that, at one point they controlled the most powerful criminal organization in the country and possibly the world.

As for Nittos high stature during the Capone days, it is quite possible since many history books or newspaper articles claim the same thing and if you look at some of his records, he was always arrested with the big boys and one time I think that he was arrested with Capones books but im not sure. But when Capone went away, his closest underlings were no more at the top. Accrding to his record, during the next decade he was arrested with members of lower rank such as Louis Fratto. Together they were arrested in a car and Nitto was driving. You see, eventhough Al was Riccas best man at his wedding (1926 or 27), still Ricca came from the West Side and previously worked for Esposito who in turn was connected to the Mafia if not a member besides his non-Sicilian roots. Also Campagna was imported from NY in 1928 i think on the citys West Side, so this means that "recent" members and allies took over his organization, instead of his closest people.

If you ask me, Nitto even did not have the time for the top position, since first he was jailed for more than a year and after he was shot and almost killed which gave him an additional year to get back on track. So thats more than two years regarding Nittos absence from the stage and Im talking about the period when Prohibition ended

Re: Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

by Frank » Thu Sep 21, 2017 12:47 pm

Also didn't an informant name Nitto as boss in leadership history? But maybe he was talking about him being boss when Capone and Franky Rio we're locked up in I want to say Philadelphia.

Re: Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

by Frank » Thu Sep 21, 2017 12:35 pm

Dated material or not it all sounds very possible. Very, very good article. It's very possible with all your evidence that Ricca was the boss after Al. And that Nitto was a Capo only, being misidentified as boss. The Chicago Outfit, Genovese's post Vito's inprisonmant and the Gambino's of the post John Gotti are hard to figure out. The Outfit since Al. I think I have the Outfit leadership since Giancana figured out, but not 100 percent certain lol.

Re: Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

by Villain » Thu Sep 21, 2017 11:44 am

Re: Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

by Villain » Thu Sep 21, 2017 11:32 am

Frank wrote: Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:54 am Also that Blackhand article about Ricca is a great read. I wasn't sure if they meant Nitti was the top boss or not, but most of the evidence points to Ricca being top boss and definitely from the death of Nitti till the day retired or died.
Im the author of that article but I have to be honest that most of my work is old and there are a lot of new conclusions and informations, which means that I have to do a lot editing.

Regarding the Nitto/Ricca debate you should check out Gentiles testimony in which he explains Riccas contacts with other national mob bosses during the Capone era. The old guys even had a special name for him. Theres no mention of Nitto or any other Capone member. Also if you look at the pictures from that period you can find Al Ralph and Ricca together or Ricca Rio and D'Andrea and after Capone theres even one famous photo of Ricca Fischetti and Agoglia together with Luciano and Lansky and again no Nitto.

Nitto was the boss of the most lucrative crew at the time and on top of that his headquarters was the Near North Side which is the heart of the old Mafia. So when he and Capone hit the national headlines in 1932, Nitto took a lower sentence, 18 months i think, and when he got out, tge newspaper men "regarded" him as Als successor. On top of that, Mayor Cermak additionaly polluted the newspapers with stories regardibg the Outfit and Nitto. In fact one day Cermak sent two of his henchmen to kill Nitto but they failed. So all of these situations were just additional fuel to the fire.

Bioff once said that during the meetings with the top bosses, Nitto allegedly had the last word but that dont mean anything since years later Humpgreys had the last word on anything which was connected to the union racket and the Bioff-Nitto conbection was regarding the same thing

As for Campagna, I have to be honest that sonetimes hes one of tge most mysterious individuals regarding the Outfits hirearchy but we know that he was the guy who sponsored Giancana

Re: Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

by Frank » Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:54 am

Also that Blackhand article about Ricca is a great read. I wasn't sure if they meant Nitti was the top boss or not, but most of the evidence points to Ricca being top boss and definitely from the death of Nitti till the day retired or died.

Re: Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

by Frank » Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:43 am

I read the Black Hand article Father of the Chicago Outfit and in it states that Campagna replaced Accardo as Boss, Chief operating Officer to groom Giancana for the job. Accardo was demoted because the Feds caught on to the horsemeat and cigarette scams. What happened immediately after Campagna died is unclear, but Accardo eventually took Campagna's spot under Ricca. Joe Fosco had mentioned Campagna as being the Godfather of the Outfit after Capone. And I read one other mention of Campagna being boss after Nitti, but can't remember what I read it from.

Re: Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

by Villain » Thu Sep 21, 2017 12:07 am

Frank wrote: Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:28 pm Ok thanks Villain. Besides this period of leadership I'm interested in your opinion on the Ricca Nitti debate as to who was boss and was Campagna ever the top guy. Nitti I would assume was definitely boss when Al was locked up in Philadelphia. Another theory I had was maybe Capone made Nitti his acting boss,then when they knew of Capone's illness and that he would not return as boss, Ricca was voted official boss
Heres one doc which states that Ricca was the boss during the extortion case...

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.htm ... arch=nitti

Im not quite sure since i have to do a lot more digging but Campagna mightve replaced Accardo after the huge meat scandal but since Campagna unexpectedly died in 1955, it is possible that Accardo was brought back on the chief executive position until 1957 when Giancana took over. After that Accardo took Campagnas position by constantly being next to Ricca. So in other words it seems to me that it was always like Ricca/Campagna or Ricca/Accardo and the whole hirearchy beneath them such as boss, underboss etc.

Re: Mangano's Downfall-Chicago

by Antiliar » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:55 pm

Confederate wrote: Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:07 pm
Frank wrote: Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:28 pm Ok thanks Villain. Besides this period of leadership I'm interested in your opinion on the Ricca Nitti debate as to who was boss and was Campagna ever the top guy. Nitti I would assume was definitely boss when Al was locked up in Philadelphia. Another theory I had was maybe Capone made Nitti his acting boss,then when they knew of Capone's illness and that he would not return as boss, Ricca was voted official boss
Villian or Antiliar,
I have read in more than one place that Frank Nitti was Capone's first cousin. Is this true?
Are there any OFFICIAL documents bearing this fact?
What kind of OFFICIAL documents? FBI records? Court records? Not sure what you're looking for here. The FBI did not investigate organized crime with a significant level of detail until 1957. By then, Nitto was long dead and there was no reason to investigate his connection to the Capones. So no, there aren't any official documents (at least none in English) that have anything to say about Nitto and Capone being cousins. They were not first cousins, but according to different sources they were cousins of some kind. No one has gone through all of the genealogical details to see exactly how they were related since the Angri records have not been microfilmed.

Top