THE BLACK HAND FORUM

TommyGambino wrote: ↑Tue Jun 03, 2025 3:34 am Watched a bit of Cicale last night, can tell he's a full blown alcaholic, not saying he's wrong about it not happening, but he is definitely lying about having made guys feeding him info

NickyEyes1 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 02, 2025 5:38 pm Im not taking sides one way or the other, but doesn't two active guys giving info to a turncoat sound fishy? Especially guys in the same family that he ratted on..

Tonyd621 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 02, 2025 7:29 pm

Camo wrote: ↑Mon Jun 02, 2025 5:56 pm

NickyEyes1 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 02, 2025 5:38 pm

SonnyBlackstein wrote: ↑Mon Jun 02, 2025 5:27 pm Dominick Cicale just posted a line by line breakdown of Scott's article.

It's brutal.

Domick, who's from the bronx, apparently has confirmed with two current made guys still with the B's, a Genovese and Gambino, 2 different law enforcement districts/precincts plus friends and family still in Pelham bay and everyone confirms this never happened.

Let's take stock of two important things Scott said here in his Monday article:
1) Scott had this 'confirmed by two sources. This happened.'
2) 'on Monday all 5 families were meeting and talking about this'

The first, at best Scott's been absolutely had. More than likely he knew as his claims have been unverified for years now, so he's knowingly taking the piss now.

2) he just absolutely fabricates shit. IF the robbery took place, how the F would he know families were meeting, ON THE DAY AFTER FFS.
But, here's the kicker, that the robbery itself never happened proves Scott fabricated this.

I'm only 25mins in and I'm done. This never happened, Cicale has basically made a fool out of Scott, not that that's hard, and I think it's now fair to say this isn't about Scott getting had by sources, this is Scott clearly not checking jack, promoting unverified BS, charging for it and fabricating not insignificant details.

We can do this for 30 years

Im not taking sides one way or the other, but doesn't two active guys giving info to a turncoat sound fishy? Especially guys in the same family that he ratted on..

I have to agree. Also Cicale has been dismissed as a source numerous times here. His story regarding the Nick Cirillo situation for example. People weren't willing to believe he spoke to Dom in prison while an active member who was the central figure in the situation (Basicano's son wasn't there) but he's supposedly still speaking to made guys after becoming an informant?

Definitely not saying Scott is right or that Cicale is wrong just that there should be more consistency regarding sources and what you brought up about Cicale is at least reason to question him.

Didn't Nadu break the robbery stories first? I know for sure he did with the Gambino one.

Camo wrote: ↑Mon Jun 02, 2025 5:56 pm

NickyEyes1 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 02, 2025 5:38 pm

SonnyBlackstein wrote: ↑Mon Jun 02, 2025 5:27 pm Dominick Cicale just posted a line by line breakdown of Scott's article.

It's brutal.

Domick, who's from the bronx, apparently has confirmed with two current made guys still with the B's, a Genovese and Gambino, 2 different law enforcement districts/precincts plus friends and family still in Pelham bay and everyone confirms this never happened.

Let's take stock of two important things Scott said here in his Monday article:
1) Scott had this 'confirmed by two sources. This happened.'
2) 'on Monday all 5 families were meeting and talking about this'

The first, at best Scott's been absolutely had. More than likely he knew as his claims have been unverified for years now, so he's knowingly taking the piss now.

2) he just absolutely fabricates shit. IF the robbery took place, how the F would he know families were meeting, ON THE DAY AFTER FFS.
But, here's the kicker, that the robbery itself never happened proves Scott fabricated this.

I'm only 25mins in and I'm done. This never happened, Cicale has basically made a fool out of Scott, not that that's hard, and I think it's now fair to say this isn't about Scott getting had by sources, this is Scott clearly not checking jack, promoting unverified BS, charging for it and fabricating not insignificant details.

We can do this for 30 years

Im not taking sides one way or the other, but doesn't two active guys giving info to a turncoat sound fishy? Especially guys in the same family that he ratted on..

I have to agree. Also Cicale has been dismissed as a source numerous times here. His story regarding the Nick Cirillo situation for example. People weren't willing to believe he spoke to Dom in prison while an active member who was the central figure in the situation (Basicano's son wasn't there) but he's supposedly still speaking to made guys after becoming an informant?

Definitely not saying Scott is right or that Cicale is wrong just that there should be more consistency regarding sources and what you brought up about Cicale is at least reason to question him.

NickyEyes1 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 02, 2025 5:38 pm

SonnyBlackstein wrote: ↑Mon Jun 02, 2025 5:27 pm Dominick Cicale just posted a line by line breakdown of Scott's article.

It's brutal.

Domick, who's from the bronx, apparently has confirmed with two current made guys still with the B's, a Genovese and Gambino, 2 different law enforcement districts/precincts plus friends and family still in Pelham bay and everyone confirms this never happened.

Let's take stock of two important things Scott said here in his Monday article:
1) Scott had this 'confirmed by two sources. This happened.'
2) 'on Monday all 5 families were meeting and talking about this'

The first, at best Scott's been absolutely had. More than likely he knew as his claims have been unverified for years now, so he's knowingly taking the piss now.

2) he just absolutely fabricates shit. IF the robbery took place, how the F would he know families were meeting, ON THE DAY AFTER FFS.
But, here's the kicker, that the robbery itself never happened proves Scott fabricated this.

I'm only 25mins in and I'm done. This never happened, Cicale has basically made a fool out of Scott, not that that's hard, and I think it's now fair to say this isn't about Scott getting had by sources, this is Scott clearly not checking jack, promoting unverified BS, charging for it and fabricating not insignificant details.

We can do this for 30 years

Im not taking sides one way or the other, but doesn't two active guys giving info to a turncoat sound fishy? Especially guys in the same family that he ratted on..

SonnyBlackstein wrote: ↑Mon Jun 02, 2025 5:27 pm Dominick Cicale just posted a line by line breakdown of Scott's article.

It's brutal.

Domick, who's from the bronx, apparently has confirmed with two current made guys still with the B's, a Genovese and Gambino, 2 different law enforcement districts/precincts plus friends and family still in Pelham bay and everyone confirms this never happened.

Let's take stock of two important things Scott said here in his Monday article:
1) Scott had this 'confirmed by two sources. This happened.'
2) 'on Monday all 5 families were meeting and talking about this'

The first, at best Scott's been absolutely had. More than likely he knew as his claims have been unverified for years now, so he's knowingly taking the piss now.

2) he just absolutely fabricates shit. IF the robbery took place, how the F would he know families were meeting, ON THE DAY AFTER FFS.
But, here's the kicker, that the robbery itself never happened proves Scott fabricated this.

I'm only 25mins in and I'm done. This never happened, Cicale has basically made a fool out of Scott, not that that's hard, and I think it's now fair to say this isn't about Scott getting had by sources, this is Scott clearly not checking jack, promoting unverified BS, charging for it and fabricating not insignificant details.

We can do this for 30 years