by aray22 » Sat Oct 12, 2024 9:48 am
Couple things....how can he be guilty of "witness harassment" and "witness tampering" if he didn't know Martino was a cooperating witness at the time? It's one thing if it was a known witness on a case but that's not what this is.
Also, it talked all about how Ragano forced Martino to take his clothes off but of course didn't mention that was in response to Martino first accusing Ragano of ratting on him. Martino obviously knew it would get Ragano riled up and he got the response that he and of course the government wanted. The government is so good at controlling the narrative.
Couple things....how can he be guilty of "witness harassment" and "witness tampering" if he didn't know Martino was a cooperating witness at the time? It's one thing if it was a known witness on a case but that's not what this is.
Also, it talked all about how Ragano forced Martino to take his clothes off but of course didn't mention that was in response to Martino first accusing Ragano of ratting on him. Martino obviously knew it would get Ragano riled up and he got the response that he and of course the government wanted. The government is so good at controlling the narrative.