by newera_212 » Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:06 pm
Wiseguy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 25, 2023 3:11 pm
newera_212 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 25, 2023 2:41 pm
I remember reading an article recently (past few years), an investigative piece centered around drivers/hauler's low wages, tough working conditions, and mandatory membership of paper locals that don't do shit - that mentioned Genovese member James "Jamie" Bernardone . So he's apparently involved with modern day garbage. Since Genovese member Hippy Zanfardino is apparently close with him, and has been alleged to extort a hauling company in the past, I would assume he probably has some involvement today as well.
Definitely need Garbageman to come on and give a breakdown, especially of the more modern day stuff.
You're referring to the Pro Publica articles on the NYC garbage industry. They mentioned Bernardone in relation to IUJAT Local 124, one of those independent or rogue locals the mob created or moved in on after being removed from the IBT, etc. That local represented Sanitation Salvage before the company shut down. What limited mob involvement there has been in NYC over the last 20-25 years has been mostly the Genovese family.
I was under the impression that in an effort to make everything more 'fair' and environmentally conscious, the City was getting ride of the byzantine route system and dividing up the map into literal territories , and making companies re-apply for the new routes. Also limiting the number of routes a company can have (or essentially landlocking them into a specific territory). To prevent a company from having a route that transverses all of Brooklyn, then going into the City, then back into Brooklyn etc... while another company is doing something similar picking up garbage for businesses on the other side of the street on the same route. I was told this over the height of COVID by someone who works in the industry. Not sure of the details, accuracy, or plans for implementation
That's it. Plan to cut waste hauling traffic in half by creating 20 zones that split up the 5 boroughs. Each zone can have up to 3 haulers screened and selected by the city. Contracts last for 10 years, if I remember right, with an option to extend. The first screening process has whittled the candidates down to the 50 companies above. And it will be whittled down even more when they pick the ones who actually get the contracts.
Awesome & informative reply, for sure. Thank you for that.
You're exactly right - that's the article I was referring to; the breakdown of the modern biz and the blips about Bernardone and Local 124. Great article. There was another article (jesus...with my memory and how I get things mixed up, it could very well be the same one) that had similar info and an interactive map of a low paid waste hauler. Like a night-in-the-life of one of the guys driving the trucks. Happen to remember that one as well? lol
Glad to know I remembered the new City rules as well. I met someone at an in-laws over COVID by happenstance who happened to be 2nd generation in the business, from Brooklyn, much older than me. Didn't ask him anything about LCN type stuff but asked him what the industry was like today, and that's when he gave a breakdown (and a tirade) on the newly proposed rules.
I have mixed feelings on what the City is trying to do. I guess what I don't understand is why they didn't do this years ago when they tried to basically de-cartel'ify the business. I know the environmental and logistical reasonings behind it play much better today (and an argument about why it's needed could be made better, today) - I guess the system had to change at some point. But, it almost feels like ripping the bandaid off and the rich just getting richer.
Awesome work on breaking down that list of companies who will remain. I'm assuming that some of those companies just bought up a bunch of smaller ones semi-recently? Otherwise it's crazy to think that a company with trucks, operations, and long-set routes would just be told they can essentially no longer operate. They sold to other companies who had a better chance at bidding within the new system perhaps?
All these weird long standing byzantine systems in NYC...how some things operate that would just operate like normal anywhere else...are part of why everything is so expensive. But I don't trust the end result of getting rid of these systems will benefit the consumer. The savings never trickles down. And part of me likes how wacky and insane some of those systems are, begrudgingly. Arguments long ago about the crazy garbage system, the taxi medallion system, rental brokerages, soo many things - were that if they didn't exist, things would be cheaper and better. Highly doubtful that it's fact and the consumer, customer, small biz, are going to see any difference. At best they'll pay the same for less service.
[quote=Wiseguy post_id=257218 time=1679782280 user_id=51]
[quote=newera_212 post_id=257215 time=1679780511 user_id=5522]
I remember reading an article recently (past few years), an investigative piece centered around drivers/hauler's low wages, tough working conditions, and mandatory membership of paper locals that don't do shit - that mentioned Genovese member James "Jamie" Bernardone . So he's apparently involved with modern day garbage. Since Genovese member Hippy Zanfardino is apparently close with him, and has been alleged to extort a hauling company in the past, I would assume he probably has some involvement today as well.
Definitely need Garbageman to come on and give a breakdown, especially of the more modern day stuff.[/quote]
You're referring to the Pro Publica articles on the NYC garbage industry. They mentioned Bernardone in relation to IUJAT Local 124, one of those independent or rogue locals the mob created or moved in on after being removed from the IBT, etc. That local represented Sanitation Salvage before the company shut down. What limited mob involvement there has been in NYC over the last 20-25 years has been mostly the Genovese family.
[quote]I was under the impression that in an effort to make everything more 'fair' and environmentally conscious, the City was getting ride of the byzantine route system and dividing up the map into literal territories , and making companies re-apply for the new routes. Also limiting the number of routes a company can have (or essentially landlocking them into a specific territory). To prevent a company from having a route that transverses all of Brooklyn, then going into the City, then back into Brooklyn etc... while another company is doing something similar picking up garbage for businesses on the other side of the street on the same route. I was told this over the height of COVID by someone who works in the industry. Not sure of the details, accuracy, or plans for implementation[/quote]
That's it. Plan to cut waste hauling traffic in half by creating 20 zones that split up the 5 boroughs. Each zone can have up to 3 haulers screened and selected by the city. Contracts last for 10 years, if I remember right, with an option to extend. The first screening process has whittled the candidates down to the 50 companies above. And it will be whittled down even more when they pick the ones who actually get the contracts.
[/quote]
Awesome & informative reply, for sure. Thank you for that.
You're exactly right - that's the article I was referring to; the breakdown of the modern biz and the blips about Bernardone and Local 124. Great article. There was another article (jesus...with my memory and how I get things mixed up, it could very well be the same one) that had similar info and an interactive map of a low paid waste hauler. Like a night-in-the-life of one of the guys driving the trucks. Happen to remember that one as well? lol
Glad to know I remembered the new City rules as well. I met someone at an in-laws over COVID by happenstance who happened to be 2nd generation in the business, from Brooklyn, much older than me. Didn't ask him anything about LCN type stuff but asked him what the industry was like today, and that's when he gave a breakdown (and a tirade) on the newly proposed rules.
I have mixed feelings on what the City is trying to do. I guess what I don't understand is why they didn't do this years ago when they tried to basically de-cartel'ify the business. I know the environmental and logistical reasonings behind it play much better today (and an argument about why it's needed could be made better, today) - I guess the system had to change at some point. But, it almost feels like ripping the bandaid off and the rich just getting richer.
Awesome work on breaking down that list of companies who will remain. I'm assuming that some of those companies just bought up a bunch of smaller ones semi-recently? Otherwise it's crazy to think that a company with trucks, operations, and long-set routes would just be told they can essentially no longer operate. They sold to other companies who had a better chance at bidding within the new system perhaps?
All these weird long standing byzantine systems in NYC...how some things operate that would just operate like normal anywhere else...are part of why everything is so expensive. But I don't trust the end result of getting rid of these systems will benefit the consumer. The savings never trickles down. And part of me likes how wacky and insane some of those systems are, begrudgingly. Arguments long ago about the crazy garbage system, the taxi medallion system, rental brokerages, soo many things - were that if they didn't exist, things would be cheaper and better. Highly doubtful that it's fact and the consumer, customer, small biz, are going to see any difference. At best they'll pay the same for less service.