General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

by B. » Sat Jun 07, 2025 11:33 am

PolackTony wrote: Sat Jun 07, 2025 8:47 am Thanks for the detail around the LA transfers. And yes, it could well have been the case that LaPorte had been told about the Fratianno thing at the time and later denied knowing, given the bad blood between them around the failed trucking endeavor. I’d think that the fact that Roselli could, if queried, have attested to LaPorte having known would mitigate against that likelihood. If LaPorte was found to have lied to the Consiglio about not being aware of the transfer and was found out, that could have obviously been a big problem for him. Though, we are talking about Chicago, so maybe he did lie, was found out, and we just have no idea that this happened lol.

Also, “The Rat Boss of California” would be a great movie title.
What's interesting is the first time Fratianno told Bomp he was a Chicago member, he said his captain was Frank LaPorte which contradicts what he told Alderisio about being direct with Giancana although I guess Fratianno could have meant he was initially with Giancana then assigned to LaPorte in Giancana's absence. You'd think he would have mentioned LaPorte when Alderisio spoke to him in 1969 if that were the case, though. Bomp said Fratianno's would-be transfer happened in part because Chicago stood to make significant money from the trucking operation he was building with LaPorte. So Fratianno's involvement with LaPorte seems to have been central to the would-be transfer but Fratianno claimed at different times to be assigned to both Giancana and LaPorte and LaPorte denied any knowledge of it either way.

Bomp's understanding was that Fratianno's transfer was arranged by Roselli and that Giancana more or less "told" Desimone that Fratianno was going to transfer but Desimone felt forced into it and didn't tell anyone else in the LA Family. It came to a head when Nick Licata was being elected boss as SD captain Joe Adamo told Bomp they needed Fratianno's vote for the election but Bomp insisted that Fratianno was now a Chicago member so they wouldn't get his vote. That's when Licata reached out to LaPorte through Bomp, who in turn met with Ricca, Accardo, and Alderisio who similarly denied knowledge. Bomp felt that Licata could have sent word to Giancana directly to settle it but didn't want to, as he enjoyed putting Fratianno in limbo and Fratianno was to be shelved or otherwise treated as persona non grata.

The basic story of the informal transfer is consistent but there is a possible inconsistency in who Fratianno claimed to be assigned to and the only people we're aware of who fully believed Fratianno was a Chicago member were Fratianno himself, Bomp, Roselli, and possibly Desimone and Giancana but Desimone was basically coerced into agreeing to it and we have no idea what Giancana would have said if he'd been approached about it.

Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

by Patrickgold » Sat Jun 07, 2025 11:08 am

NickyEyes1 wrote: Sat Jun 07, 2025 10:59 am
Patrickgold wrote: Sat Jun 07, 2025 10:49 am
funkster wrote: Sat Jun 07, 2025 9:51 am He has jumped the shark for sure.


Just attended kids party on Harlem literally two doors down from Sorrentos, hasn’t it been figured that this is where the last supper meeting was?
It’s a take out food only place now. They cut the building into three different businesses with one being Sorrentos. So it is very likely the picture was taken in one of the other businesses because there is no dining room area now. Just a counter to pay and pick up food and a kitchen in back.
It's too bad Agostinos closed down. I went past there the other day and it's still empty
Yes that is too bad. Especially since they redid the entire place after the fire. They are trying to revitalize Harlem Ave and designate it Little Italy so maybe that will draw some interest.

Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

by NickyEyes1 » Sat Jun 07, 2025 10:59 am

Patrickgold wrote: Sat Jun 07, 2025 10:49 am
funkster wrote: Sat Jun 07, 2025 9:51 am He has jumped the shark for sure.


Just attended kids party on Harlem literally two doors down from Sorrentos, hasn’t it been figured that this is where the last supper meeting was?
It’s a take out food only place now. They cut the building into three different businesses with one being Sorrentos. So it is very likely the picture was taken in one of the other businesses because there is no dining room area now. Just a counter to pay and pick up food and a kitchen in back.
It's too bad Agostinos closed down. I went past there the other day and it's still empty

Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

by Patrickgold » Sat Jun 07, 2025 10:49 am

funkster wrote: Sat Jun 07, 2025 9:51 am He has jumped the shark for sure.


Just attended kids party on Harlem literally two doors down from Sorrentos, hasn’t it been figured that this is where the last supper meeting was?
It’s a take out food only place now. They cut the building into three different businesses with one being Sorrentos. So it is very likely the picture was taken in one of the other businesses because there is no dining room area now. Just a counter to pay and pick up food and a kitchen in back.

Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

by PolackTony » Sat Jun 07, 2025 10:31 am

funkster wrote: Sat Jun 07, 2025 9:51 am He has jumped the shark for sure.


Just attended kids party on Harlem literally two doors down from Sorrentos, hasn’t it been figured that this is where the last supper meeting was?
Yup, though obviously it was a totally different restaurant then. In the 70s, it was the Sicily Restaurant, owned by members of the Incandela family from Altavilla Milicia.

Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

by funkster » Sat Jun 07, 2025 9:51 am

He has jumped the shark for sure.


Just attended kids party on Harlem literally two doors down from Sorrentos, hasn’t it been figured that this is where the last supper meeting was?

Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

by PolackTony » Sat Jun 07, 2025 8:47 am

Thanks for the detail around the LA transfers. And yes, it could well have been the case that LaPorte had been told about the Fratianno thing at the time and later denied knowing, given the bad blood between them around the failed trucking endeavor. I’d think that the fact that Roselli could, if queried, have attested to LaPorte having known would mitigate against that likelihood. If LaPorte was found to have lied to the Consiglio about not being aware of the transfer and was found out, that could have obviously been a big problem for him. Though, we are talking about Chicago, so maybe he did lie, was found out, and we just have no idea that this happened lol.

Also, “The Rat Boss of California” would be a great movie title.

Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

by B. » Sat Jun 07, 2025 12:19 am

Roselli, Fratianno, and Bompensiero all requested transfers to Chicago at various points after Desimone became boss because they had been Dragna's inner circle and detested the idea of reporting to Desimone. Fratianno and Bompensiero were particularly upset because they had been captains under Dragna and lost their titles in prison but Desimone wouldn't promote them back. Roselli's transfer went smoothly but Bompensiero's transfer was vetoed by Tommy Lucchese, the one-time avugad of the LA Family, as Bomp still had a murder contract he had to fulfill (this might have been an excuse just to keep him with LA).

Both Fratianno and Bompensiero told fairly consistent stories about Fratianno's failed transfer, that Roselli brokered an informal transfer between Giancana and Desimone that was apparently kept quiet. Even Bompensiero believed Fratianno was a Chicago member until Licata pursued it, found out protocol wasn't followed, and nixed it. Not even Jimmy Fratianno would have the balls to claim he was a Chicago member if he didn't truly believe it, much less a member direct with Giancana. He told Alderisio this while Giancana was alive too, knowing they could at some point reach out to Giancana to verify.

I wouldn't be surprised if Frank LaPorte did know about the Fratianno transfer and later denied it. LaPorte was initially high on Fratianno because the trucking deal they had going looked promising and LaPorte invested heavily in it. When it failed and brought a ton of heat, LaPorte greatly soured on Fratianno and basically life in general. From that point on Bompensiero said LaPorte was constantly drinking and depressed. By the late 1960s when he was asked about the transfer I'm sure he wanted nothing to do with Fratianno even if he did have knowledge of it.

--

Here is an old post I did about Gravano's Fratianno story:
Not sure it's been mentioned elsewhere, but Gravano says he attended one of the events at the Westchester Theater and DePalma asked him if he wanted to be formally introduced to Jimmy Fratianno, described by DePalma as the boss of California.

Gravano turned it down. He says he didn't even think there was a California family, thinking it was open territory, and was focused on being there with his wife.

He says Fratianno walked directly up to him and introduced himself as the boss of California, which as Gravano says was a violation of the rules. Gravano was upset and the two exchanged words. Gravano was also upset with DePalma, as he felt DePalma egged Fratianno on to go talk to Gravano. Gravano met with Paul Castellano later where he aired his grievances about DePalma and Fratianno. DePalma was apparently chastised for his conduct and he and Gravano were never close after that.

Later Paul Castellano told Gravano that Fratianno lied about being boss and that Fratianno was also a confidential informant. Interesting if true, as it means the mob knew Fratianno had been a CI before becoming a witness (unless Gravano mixed the two up, though we are fairly sure Fratianno was also a CI).
Fratianno attended multiple events at the theater between 1976 and 1977 and met a bunch of NYC members so it's in the realm of possibility that he met Gravano but personally I don't believe Fratianno became obsessively fixated on introducing himself to a random young Gambino soldier to the point of ignoring the third party rule and accosting him with "I'm the boss of California! You hear me? Boss of California!" Just ridiculous.

Seems like the sort of thing he would have included in his book if it actually happened. If I remember right, he told this story around the same time as the even more absurd Bonanno story:
- Says when he moved to Arizona after he flipped in the 1990s a made member was an FBI CI and recorded Joe Bonanno telling Bill Bonanno he wanted to to arrange a meeting w/ Gravano. Bill said he didn't want to meet because Sammy was a rat, but Joe insisted as Sammy was "dangerous" and might put them in a trunk.

- Sammy said Bonanno sent the member CI to talk to Gravano to arrange a meeting and Sammy was willing to meet with Bonanno but assured him everything would be fine as long as Bonanno didn't mess with his family, otherwise he'd go "on the warpath". Gravano says he sent word back to tell Joe Bonanno that he (Gravano) had no interest in "taking over" Arizona. He says Bonanno sent word back that he "appreciates the message" and if anyone bothers Gravano that they'd have his back as "he's in our circle".

- Says the FBI got in touch with him about it and told him if he meets with Joe Bonanno he'd violate his parole.

My take on Sammy is he exaggerates and spins things, but this is Ralph Natale level bullshit. Might as well have said Bonanno made him underboss of the Tucson Family.
Sammy was always teetering on the edge but there was a period there where he completely jumped the shark. It used to be "Yeah yeah, Sammy's the best, Sammy is the real stand up guy" but the basic stories were believable, then it became "I punked the fake rat boss of California" and "Joe Bonanno had my back." This is a guy with an Aryan Brotherhood tattoo who put Mexican guys through a mafia induction ceremony in prison.

Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

by PolackTony » Fri Jun 06, 2025 4:09 pm

“Introduced” as, like, just a person is not the same as *introduced* as amici nostri, of course. Possible that DePalma introduced Fratianno to Gravano in ‘77 in the first, general, sense (similar to how Fratianno had been acquainted with Alderisio for years before they were formally introduced as Cosa Nostra members), and that Gravano subsequently exaggerated this, but also possible that the entire story was fabricated. Hard to tell what’s what with some of Gravano’s stories.

Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

by Camo » Fri Jun 06, 2025 2:33 pm

JoePuzzles234 wrote: Fri Jun 06, 2025 11:53 am
funkster wrote: Fri Jun 06, 2025 11:48 am That would make sense, I always got a slimy used car salesman vibe from Fratianno in his interviews. I think Sammy also claimed he got an introduction to him in NY in the 70s and he was acting like he was a boss? Though one never knows what’s true with Gravano either.
Gravano is probably lying about this

Fratianno had been demoted from acting underboss by February 1977 and in his story, Sammy is introduced to Fratianno by Gregory DePalma who only became a Gambino member in June 1977 - though in my view, he probably never even met him and was just throwing out a name to build up to a fabricated story about Roy DeMeo for clicks/views
Frattiano is in the Sinatra picture in 1976 so DePalma definitely knew him by 1977. He wasn't made at that time and was around Carlo Gambino and Paul Castellano.

Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

by funkster » Fri Jun 06, 2025 12:21 pm

I would imagine so too.

Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

by JoePuzzles234 » Fri Jun 06, 2025 11:53 am

funkster wrote: Fri Jun 06, 2025 11:48 am That would make sense, I always got a slimy used car salesman vibe from Fratianno in his interviews. I think Sammy also claimed he got an introduction to him in NY in the 70s and he was acting like he was a boss? Though one never knows what’s true with Gravano either.
Gravano is probably lying about this

Fratianno had been demoted from acting underboss by February 1977 and in his story, Sammy is introduced to Fratianno by Gregory DePalma who only became a Gambino member in June 1977 - though in my view, he probably never even met him and was just throwing out a name to build up to a fabricated story about Roy DeMeo for clicks/views

Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

by funkster » Fri Jun 06, 2025 11:48 am

That would make sense, I always got a slimy used car salesman vibe from Fratianno in his interviews. I think Sammy also claimed he got an introduction to him in NY in the 70s and he was acting like he was a boss? Though one never knows what’s true with Gravano either.

Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

by PolackTony » Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:21 am

funkster wrote: Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:11 am Such an odd situation. Is there any indication why Giancana would go to any such length to have Fratianno transferred? Just buddies?
I’m not at home so I can’t check right now, and don’t recall offhand what Fratianno said about it in his book exactly. But my understanding is that Fratianno wanted the transfer due to problems he was having with the LA admin in the early 60s and had Roselli arrange the meeting with Giancana. Fratianno was a slick guy and I’d assume would’ve persuaded Giancana that the transfer would have brought some lucrative business interests under Giancana’s control. That this wasn’t handled properly is further demonstrated by the fact that several years later, Frank LaPorte claimed to have had been totally unaware of this when it was happening. LaPorte was Roselli’s capodecina and himself spent much of his time in California (hence his close relationship to Bompensiero). Obviously, Roselli should not have been going around engaging in such matters directly with the boss behind LaPorte’s back. I’d suspect that this was one of several marks against Roselli that eventually tallied up to him getting hit, as I can’t imagine that LaPorte, Accardo, or Ricca were happy to have found out that Roselli was involved in secret dealings that the rest of Chicago’s admin were kept in the dark about.

Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground

by funkster » Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:11 am

Such an odd situation. Is there any indication why Giancana would go to any such length to have Fratianno transferred? Just buddies?

Top