National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

Re: National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

by PolackTony » Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:52 pm

quadtree wrote: Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:51 am
PolackTony wrote: Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:42 am
quadtree wrote: Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:04 am Possible list of members of the Consiglio Supremo or their representatives during the Castellamarese War (december 1930):
1. Giuseppe Traina;
2. Vincenzo Troia;
3. Salvatore Lo Verde;
4. Salvatore Mangiaracina;
5. Nicolò Gentile;
6. Giuseppe Siragusa;
7. Gaspare Messina;
They had the authority to kill Masseria if he didn't make peace with Maranzano. It seems that someone wrote about this on reddit, the information is probably taken from Gentile's Vita Di Capomafia. Who read the original book Gentile, can confirm that it is mentioned there?
In Gentile’s account, this body was a “commissione” or panel established to bring a resolution to the war, not the Gran Consiglio. Gentile also said that Paul Ricca/Capone believed that Gentile was the only one faithfully carrying out his duties as mediator, while the other panel members were secretly doing the bidding of Maranzano (which may be why both Siragusa and LoVerde wound up getting killed, as Gentile states they were murdered for being Maranzano supporters).
Thanks! Salvatore Lo Verde was the official boss of the Chicago family? Was he previously a captain in the Palermitani in New York?
He would’ve come up in the Chicago Family. He arrived as a teenager to the US bound for Chicago in 1911. He was part of a cluster of immigrants from Brancaccio who settled in Chicago and already had relatives there. He was a Chicago, not NYC, guy, though he was presumably plugged into Palermitano political networks within the American mafia.

Here’s much more detail about LoVerde:

viewtopic.php?p=239073#p239073

Re: National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

by quadtree » Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:51 am

PolackTony wrote: Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:42 am
quadtree wrote: Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:04 am Possible list of members of the Consiglio Supremo or their representatives during the Castellamarese War (december 1930):
1. Giuseppe Traina;
2. Vincenzo Troia;
3. Salvatore Lo Verde;
4. Salvatore Mangiaracina;
5. Nicolò Gentile;
6. Giuseppe Siragusa;
7. Gaspare Messina;
They had the authority to kill Masseria if he didn't make peace with Maranzano. It seems that someone wrote about this on reddit, the information is probably taken from Gentile's Vita Di Capomafia. Who read the original book Gentile, can confirm that it is mentioned there?
In Gentile’s account, this body was a “commissione” or panel established to bring a resolution to the war, not the Gran Consiglio. Gentile also said that Paul Ricca/Capone believed that Gentile was the only one faithfully carrying out his duties as mediator, while the other panel members were secretly doing the bidding of Maranzano (which may be why both Siragusa and LoVerde wound up getting killed, as Gentile states they were murdered for being Maranzano supporters).
Thanks! Salvatore Lo Verde was the official boss of the Chicago family? Was he previously a captain in the Palermitani in New York?

Re: National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

by PolackTony » Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:42 am

quadtree wrote: Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:04 am Possible list of members of the Consiglio Supremo or their representatives during the Castellamarese War (december 1930):
1. Giuseppe Traina;
2. Vincenzo Troia;
3. Salvatore Lo Verde;
4. Salvatore Mangiaracina;
5. Nicolò Gentile;
6. Giuseppe Siragusa;
7. Gaspare Messina;
They had the authority to kill Masseria if he didn't make peace with Maranzano. It seems that someone wrote about this on reddit, the information is probably taken from Gentile's Vita Di Capomafia. Who read the original book Gentile, can confirm that it is mentioned there?
In Gentile’s account, this body was a “commissione” or panel established to bring a resolution to the war, not the Gran Consiglio. Gentile also said that Paul Ricca/Capone believed that Gentile was the only one faithfully carrying out his duties as mediator, while the other panel members were secretly doing the bidding of Maranzano (which may be why both Siragusa and LoVerde wound up getting killed, as Gentile states they were murdered for being Maranzano supporters).

Re: National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

by quadtree » Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:04 am

Possible list of members of the Consiglio Supremo or their representatives during the Castellamarese War (december 1930):
1. Giuseppe Traina;
2. Vincenzo Troia;
3. Salvatore Lo Verde;
4. Salvatore Mangiaracina;
5. Nicolò Gentile;
6. Giuseppe Siragusa;
7. Gaspare Messina;
They had the authority to kill Masseria if he didn't make peace with Maranzano. It seems that someone wrote about this on reddit, the information is probably taken from Gentile's Vita Di Capomafia. Who read the original book Gentile, can confirm that it is mentioned there?

Re: National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

by Don Mosseria » Sun Jan 01, 2023 11:19 am

Antiliar wrote: Sun Jan 01, 2023 12:11 am My Life in the Mafia by Vincent Teresa and Tom Renner came out in 1973, and Teresa had plenty to say about Lilo Galante. According to Teresa, Galante was practically running Lewisburg prison and everyone ran in fear of him. I'm sure the various NYC leaders had their own copies of that book and it reinforced Galante as a threat. Especially his hatred for Carlo Gambino and Frank Costello. Gambino was still the official boss of his borgata and Costello gained respect after he stepped down as boss. That plus his long history in narcotics and closeness to Bonanno wouldn't have made him very popular outside the Bonanno Family. For all we know, that book could have been a catalyst for what came later.
Interesting info and thoughts Antiliar. Vinny Teresa’s book sounds like a great source, even though he wasn’t a made member. I have actually just downloaded it because I read it had references to LCN’s dealings in casinos in London, England, through Angelo Bruno, Lansky, and others. It’s a bit off topic here, but I was trying to track down any legit info on Bruno and LCN’s alleged dealings with the Kray Firm, as well as in London/the UK generally. As a Londoner, the piques my interest. I’ve only done a very quick search of the book, but it seems he does go into London casino activity. I’ll have to read it properly. Cheers

Re: National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

by Pogo The Clown » Sun Jan 01, 2023 8:22 am

"I'll make Carlo Gambino shit in the middle of Times Square." - Carmine Galante


Pogo

Re: National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

by Antiliar » Sun Jan 01, 2023 12:11 am

My Life in the Mafia by Vincent Teresa and Tom Renner came out in 1973, and Teresa had plenty to say about Lilo Galante. According to Teresa, Galante was practically running Lewisburg prison and everyone ran in fear of him. I'm sure the various NYC leaders had their own copies of that book and it reinforced Galante as a threat. Especially his hatred for Carlo Gambino and Frank Costello. Gambino was still the official boss of his borgata and Costello gained respect after he stepped down as boss. That plus his long history in narcotics and closeness to Bonanno wouldn't have made him very popular outside the Bonanno Family. For all we know, that book could have been a catalyst for what came later.

Re: National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

by Don Mosseria » Sat Dec 31, 2022 7:29 pm

Lol - you are a walking Cosa Nostra encyclopaedia bro! Thanks, great info. So if he attended a Commission meeting in 76 he can’t have overtly dismissed its legitimacy out of hand. But yeah, he could well have had those feelings under the surface. Cheers

Re: National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

by B. » Sat Dec 31, 2022 7:19 pm

Galante was a captain when he went to prison but one source thought he was part of a panel at one point and he definitely assisted the admin, hence sources thinking he was underboss or consigliere. A Colombo informant said Galante represented the Bonannos at a Commission meeting in late 1976 to settle the Colombo conflict but he we know he had problems with the Commission members who opposed Bonanno, didn't respect Rastelli's position as official boss, and had contact with Bonanno until he died. Whatever he said out loud, it's obvious he didn't appreciate the Commission's authority even if he initially went through the motions.

Re: National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

by Don Mosseria » Sat Dec 31, 2022 6:36 pm

B. wrote: Sat Dec 31, 2022 5:36 pm Great post. It's funny that two Bonanno bosses in different eras both said the Commission was unrecognized after a certain point. Bonanno says 1961 and Massino said post-1985.
And on Bonanno bosses and not recognising the Commission, I have wondered whether this is why Carmine Galante thought it was okay to just ignore the will of the Commission on who should be Bonanno boss and seize control for himself. Other than being a megalomaniacal psychopath of course. Did he agree with Bonanno’s reasoning? He was very close to Bonanno (Consigliere?), but was in prison when Bonanno was deposed, then came out 12 years later and seized power against the will of the Commission. He probably thought “This fuckin illegitimate Commission can’t put some mainland fuck in charge of the Castellammarese Family. I’m taking it back for the home town!”

Re: National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

by Don Mosseria » Sat Dec 31, 2022 5:51 pm

All very interesting! What was Massino’s reason?

I would agree that presumably there aught to have been a Gran Consiglio under Maranzano. It seems like it was the Capo dei Capi role that was removed, and the Consiglio that remained, but taking a new name and sharing the Capo dei Capi powers, right?

I definitely need to look into more of these large meetings. If you guys could point me towards the sources that would be great. Thanks!

Re: National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

by B. » Sat Dec 31, 2022 5:36 pm

Great post. It's funny that two Bonanno bosses in different eras both said the Commission was unrecognized after a certain point. Bonanno says 1961 and Massino said post-1985.

We've talked about how the capo dei capi was the capo of the Gran Consiglio, Bonanno's "capo consigliere" playing into this but he doesn't mention the Gran Consiglio. It seems like Maranzano should have been capo of the Gran Consiglio until September 1931 at which point the Commission was formed. There should have been a Gran Consiglio between May and September so maybe some of the new bosses were given seats on the consiglio.

As far as the Assemblea goes, the 1932 Bazzano underworld trial seems more like a regional meeting of the Assemblea than a Commission meeting. The Commission was obviously involved but it included other East Coast bosses / representatives who weren't on the Commission so maybe some of the same pre-1931 patterns played out even if it wasn't officially an Assemblea meeting. I'd imagine guys who were active in the leadership pre-1931 wouldn't have seen much of a distinction but officially it was different. You also have the late 1931 meeting in Chicago where Los Angeles consulted with Capone for help with their local conflict which may have been similar to the Bazzano meeting the following year.

Re: National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

by Don Mosseria » Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:03 am

CabriniGreen wrote: Sat Dec 31, 2022 3:22 am
chin_gigante wrote: Fri Dec 30, 2022 5:22 pm This is a fantastic thread, that possible connection to British reorganisation of the Sicilian parliament was something I'd never thought of before
Agree. I've always saw it as like bastardized feudalism, but this stuff is next level...
Hey Cabrini - how you doing? I certainly also agree that the mafia borrows a lot of its form and aesthetic from feudalism. So it kind of combines both 19th century parliamentary forms and older feudal forms. Interestingly, I wrote about the feudal roots of Cosa Nostra a couple of weeks ago, in relation to Milwaukee member informant August Maniaci reporting that that family’s Assembly of all members was referred to as the “tourna”, as recorded phonetically by federal agents. I argue that this is a dialect pronunciation of the Italian word “torneo”, as “torne”, meaning “tournament”, and this is a reference to the feudal tournament. These feudal tournaments, with jousting etc., were ostentatious displays of power and chivalry, meaning military honour, where all the nobles and knights of a territory would come together. I post a short excerpt below, and you can follow the quote link to have a read if you are interested.

Cheers, and Happy New Year!
Don Mosseria wrote: Wed Dec 14, 2022 2:15 pm Further, I think this derivation of the term makes sense when one considers the socio-political function of the medieval tournament within the feudal political system. Before getting to that, I think it would be useful to consider briefly the borrowing from the feudal political order by the mafia, both in terms of aesthetic preference, and formal political structure. You rightly note in your podcasts and writings the borrowing from the early modern Italian representative systems of governance by the mafia - the Assembly and the Consiglio. But I think there is at least as clear an integration of the pyramidal feudal political structure.

63D25C83-CDBB-4F56-84B5-C6271E45B4AE.png

It is not a 1-2-1 mirroring between the mafia and feudal structures, but it is very close. I would probably lay it out slightly differently than the diagrams I have found. Something like King = Representante. High Lords = Capo Decine. Minor Lords = Soldati. Knights = On record associates/prospects. Peasants/Serfs = the general population whom the mafia tax. The King will select a handful of men from among his lords to serve as his administration, similar to the Soto Capo & Consigliere roles. It would also be possible to view the King as the Capo dei Capi, and the noble houses of the high lords as the different mafia families. Wherever exactly one decides to draw the parallels, the structural similarity is there. Given that in Southern Italy and Sicily the feudal system continued until 1860, the era in which the mafia was being created, it is not actually surprising that it would borrow from the political forms around it (though I don't know how similar early modern Bourbon feudalism was to the "true" feudalism of the Middle Ages).

Re: National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

by CabriniGreen » Sat Dec 31, 2022 3:22 am

chin_gigante wrote: Fri Dec 30, 2022 5:22 pm This is a fantastic thread, that possible connection to British reorganisation of the Sicilian parliament was something I'd never thought of before
Agree. I've always saw it as like bastardized feudalism, but this stuff is next level...

Re: National Convention & Commission v. Assemblea Generale, Gran Consiglio & Capo dei Capi

by chin_gigante » Fri Dec 30, 2022 5:22 pm

This is a fantastic thread, that possible connection to British reorganisation of the Sicilian parliament was something I'd never thought of before

Top