by SonnyBlackstein » Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:25 pm
bert wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:15 pm
SonnyBlackstein wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:59 pm
bert wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:32 pm
SonnyBlackstein wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:29 pm
bert wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:04 pm
Pogo, you are going by what the feds want people to think,
Do you have ANY source for ANY claim you make?
Made guys didn’t know about it? Source?
The Feds are misleading? Source?
Can you back up ANYTHING you say?
Can you do anything but start shit? Every time someone disagrees with me you jump in trying to stir things up. I gave my comment, and it was not directed at anyone personally.
You could always win the discussion and kick my ass in one foul swoop.... by citing ONE reference to your bullshit.
But I’m guessing, that’ll be a no.
You may be trying to bait me, and you already said what my answer will be. I read the story pogo put up, and a lot of others, and I listened to local news covering the case. plus some local talk shows that had guests on discussing it, I also read the indictment. I gave my take, if you don't like it too bad. Same for anyone else. I don't mind anyone disagreeing, but you and a couple of others throw insults, question reading comprehension, and other crap. Now disagree, or insult, it's up to you.
That’s the issue.
You don’t give your ‘take’. You make definitives. Statements.
You don’t say ‘I haven’t seen any evidence that made guy’s knew they were trafficking under age girls.’
You say ‘No made guys knew there was trafficking in under age girls.’
See the diff? One you’re voicing an opinion (kudos and more power too you), the other, you KNOW. When you don’t. And you couldn’t.
Hence the pushback.
Opinions are cool. Making statements that you know, and then refusing to back them up with ANY sources, that’s where Pogo and I push back. As we should.
Have an opinion? Cool.
Have new facts? Cool. Back then up.
Don’t? Then here we are.
[quote=bert post_id=136692 time=1580184901 user_id=5933]
[quote=SonnyBlackstein post_id=136689 time=1580183971 user_id=171]
[quote=bert post_id=136685 time=1580182355 user_id=5933]
[quote=SonnyBlackstein post_id=136684 time=1580182145 user_id=171]
[quote=bert post_id=136677 time=1580180673 user_id=5933]
Pogo, you are going by what the feds want people to think,
[/quote]
Do you have ANY source for ANY claim you make?
Made guys didn’t know about it? Source?
The Feds are misleading? Source?
Can you back up ANYTHING you say?
[/quote]
Can you do anything but start shit? Every time someone disagrees with me you jump in trying to stir things up. I gave my comment, and it was not directed at anyone personally.
[/quote]
You could always win the discussion and kick my ass in one foul swoop.... by citing ONE reference to your bullshit.
But I’m guessing, that’ll be a no.
[/quote]
You may be trying to bait me, and you already said what my answer will be. I read the story pogo put up, and a lot of others, and I listened to local news covering the case. plus some local talk shows that had guests on discussing it, I also read the indictment. I gave my take, if you don't like it too bad. Same for anyone else. I don't mind anyone disagreeing, but you and a couple of others throw insults, question reading comprehension, and other crap. Now disagree, or insult, it's up to you.
[/quote]
That’s the issue.
You don’t give your ‘take’. You make definitives. Statements.
You don’t say ‘I haven’t seen any evidence that made guy’s knew they were trafficking under age girls.’
You say ‘No made guys knew there was trafficking in under age girls.’
See the diff? One you’re voicing an opinion (kudos and more power too you), the other, you KNOW. When you don’t. And you couldn’t.
Hence the pushback.
Opinions are cool. Making statements that you know, and then refusing to back them up with ANY sources, that’s where Pogo and I push back. As we should.
Have an opinion? Cool.
Have new facts? Cool. Back then up.
Don’t? Then here we are.