by gohnjotti » Sun Oct 13, 2019 1:20 pm
Frank wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 11:36 am
cavita wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:09 pm
"Per sources" and "according to sources." I wish these sources could be narrowed down or even named to give a little more credibility. Interesting to see Mitria's name in there. I remember hearing about him a lot in the late 90s.
That's my stance too, that I would first of all like to see the sources narrowed down or even named.
I think the anonymity of sources is important, so I disagree with you there, but I wish he would at least address the validity of these sources. I know I’m not in the same league as Gangster Report, but I get a few people who I deem “sources,” although I won’t publish anything they write unless they’ve been proven right before, or I can credit their validity.
Then again, I’m not dealing with any “top-secret” or high-risk sources like actual wiseguys or feds.
[quote=Frank post_id=125963 time=1570905412 user_id=5387]
[quote=cavita post_id=125658 time=1570493360 user_id=72]
"Per sources" and "according to sources." I wish these sources could be narrowed down or even named to give a little more credibility. Interesting to see Mitria's name in there. I remember hearing about him a lot in the late 90s.
[/quote]
That's my stance too, that I would first of all like to see the sources narrowed down or even named.
[/quote]
I think the anonymity of sources is important, so I disagree with you there, but I wish he would at least address the validity of these sources. I know I’m not in the same league as Gangster Report, but I get a few people who I deem “sources,” although I won’t publish anything they write unless they’ve been proven right before, or I can credit their validity.
Then again, I’m not dealing with any “top-secret” or high-risk sources like actual wiseguys or feds.