Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting
Moderator: Capos
Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting
The supreme court ruled this morning, allowing for expanded sports betting, to be controlled by each state. Huge loss for Vegas and a large win for New Jersey.
Re: Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting
Sports betting and pot legal at least in some states never thought I see it in my lifetime
"if he's such A sports wizard , whys he tending bar ?" Nicky Scarfo
-
- Full Patched
- Posts: 3240
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:48 am
Re: Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting
It’s estimated that in 5 years from now approximately 32 states will have legalized sports gambling.
- willychichi
- Full Patched
- Posts: 4291
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:54 pm
Re: Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting
U.S. high court paves way for states to legalize sports betting
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKCN1IF1WN
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKCN1IF1WN
Obama's a pimp he coulda never outfought Trump, but I didn't know it till this day that it was Putin all along.
Re: Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting
I find this mental, if any of you can clear this up for me, you(in the US) currently or before this law was changed don't have a bookies? you cant just walk in and put on an accumulator on the games or wire into the horses or roulette machines? or sit on your phone and gamble away?
I know the mob always used gambling and got prosecuted etc but for some reason always assumed that was heavy closed shop stuff
with this change in law will there be legal bookies for yous then?
I know the mob always used gambling and got prosecuted etc but for some reason always assumed that was heavy closed shop stuff
with this change in law will there be legal bookies for yous then?
- NickyEyes1
- Straightened out
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:26 am
Re: Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting
If you have to go to a casino to place a bet, I don't think it will hurt the bookies. But if they set up sites it will hurt pretty badly. But still not completely due to credit, taxes, and mostly likely worse lines.
Re: Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting
Only way it makes a difference is if they have it at bodegas and corner stores like lotto otherwise its a huge inconvenience to:
1) drive to casino every time you want to make a bet. these gamblers aren't like you and i. they arent just betting on super bowl. they are betting on EVERYTHING.
2) posting up instead of playing on credit and squaring every thursday/friday
3) pay taxes on winnings
1) drive to casino every time you want to make a bet. these gamblers aren't like you and i. they arent just betting on super bowl. they are betting on EVERYTHING.
2) posting up instead of playing on credit and squaring every thursday/friday
3) pay taxes on winnings
Sorry. Wrong Frank
Re: Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting
would be a novelty at first, then would die away.
Sorry. Wrong Frank
Re: Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting
1. That will suck , but people will do itCheech wrote: ↑Mon May 14, 2018 8:42 am Only way it makes a difference is if they have it at bodegas and corner stores like lotto otherwise its a huge inconvenience to:
1) drive to casino every time you want to make a bet. these gamblers aren't like you and i. they arent just betting on super bowl. they are betting on EVERYTHING.
2) posting up instead of playing on credit and squaring every thursday/friday
3) pay taxes on winnings
2. Once you post up and lose to the casino and our broke that’s when you call the bookie haha
3. Ways around it just like at the track
This is huge news for sports bettors in my opinion , especially if the casinos can share the handle across state lines .
Dollars to donuts they will have a online option just like in Nevada
But I agree with you unless it the short term won’t affect much , but in the long run it will kill the small time bookies
"if he's such A sports wizard , whys he tending bar ?" Nicky Scarfo
Re: Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting
biggest problem I see is access. if I have to drive an hour to Mohegan every time I want to bet I'll pass. if it is easy to access i would do it.Stroccos wrote: ↑Mon May 14, 2018 9:10 am1. That will suck , but people will do itCheech wrote: ↑Mon May 14, 2018 8:42 am Only way it makes a difference is if they have it at bodegas and corner stores like lotto otherwise its a huge inconvenience to:
1) drive to casino every time you want to make a bet. these gamblers aren't like you and i. they arent just betting on super bowl. they are betting on EVERYTHING.
2) posting up instead of playing on credit and squaring every thursday/friday
3) pay taxes on winnings
2. Once you post up and lose to the casino and our broke that’s when you call the bookie haha
3. Ways around it just like at the track
This is huge news for sports bettors in my opinion , especially if the casinos can share the handle across state lines .
Dollars to donuts they will have a online option just like in Nevada
But I agree with you unless it the short term won’t affect much , but in the long run it will kill the small time bookies
you;re right. a small guy goes away eventually.
Sorry. Wrong Frank
Re: Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting
Over the long term, the best way to tell (as usual) will be if we continue to see regular and ongoing mob sports betting cases.
All roads lead to New York.
Re: Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting
Most bookies have zero mob connections so that only works in certain areas
"if he's such A sports wizard , whys he tending bar ?" Nicky Scarfo
Re: Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting
Yeah I hope it’s all online and Nation wide so they will let you fire away , from what I saw of Nevada’s legal online wagering was pretty low limitsCheech wrote: ↑Mon May 14, 2018 9:34 ambiggest problem I see is access. if I have to drive an hour to Mohegan every time I want to bet I'll pass. if it is easy to access i would do it.Stroccos wrote: ↑Mon May 14, 2018 9:10 am1. That will suck , but people will do itCheech wrote: ↑Mon May 14, 2018 8:42 am Only way it makes a difference is if they have it at bodegas and corner stores like lotto otherwise its a huge inconvenience to:
1) drive to casino every time you want to make a bet. these gamblers aren't like you and i. they arent just betting on super bowl. they are betting on EVERYTHING.
2) posting up instead of playing on credit and squaring every thursday/friday
3) pay taxes on winnings
2. Once you post up and lose to the casino and our broke that’s when you call the bookie haha
3. Ways around it just like at the track
This is huge news for sports bettors in my opinion , especially if the casinos can share the handle across state lines .
Dollars to donuts they will have a online option just like in Nevada
But I agree with you unless it the short term won’t affect much , but in the long run it will kill the small time bookies
you;re right. a small guy goes away eventually.
"if he's such A sports wizard , whys he tending bar ?" Nicky Scarfo
Re: Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting
It's those areas I'm talking about since the discussion is legalized sports betting in relation to the mob, ie the extended NY metro area most of all, as well New England, Philadelphia/South Jersey, Chicago, and South Florida.
All roads lead to New York.
- willychichi
- Full Patched
- Posts: 4291
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:54 pm
Re: Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting
Major league executives are taking meetings with bookies
Everyone, it seems, wants to grab a piece of the expected sports gambling windfall. A major league sports team executive met with the owner of a bookmaker last week to pitch sponsorship opportunities, The Post has learned. While leagues have looked to grab a piece of the what could become a $10 billion-a-year sports gambling business in New Jersey — mostly through a hoped-for 1 or 2 percent integrity fee attached to each wager — the revelation that individual teams may now be interested in partnerships means in-stadium advertising for bookmakers could be coming down the road.
Read more: https://nypost.com/2018/05/14/major-lea ... h-bookies/
Everyone, it seems, wants to grab a piece of the expected sports gambling windfall. A major league sports team executive met with the owner of a bookmaker last week to pitch sponsorship opportunities, The Post has learned. While leagues have looked to grab a piece of the what could become a $10 billion-a-year sports gambling business in New Jersey — mostly through a hoped-for 1 or 2 percent integrity fee attached to each wager — the revelation that individual teams may now be interested in partnerships means in-stadium advertising for bookmakers could be coming down the road.
Read more: https://nypost.com/2018/05/14/major-lea ... h-bookies/
Obama's a pimp he coulda never outfought Trump, but I didn't know it till this day that it was Putin all along.