B. wrote: ↑Wed Feb 22, 2023 11:24 pm
Rick made it clear his info on newer Chicago members was hearsay and researchers on here found interesting connections involving the names, nothing more. But Wiseguy held it deep in the pit of his stomach, just waiting to vomit it back up in an unrelated disagreement about Scott.
It became related once people started talking about their sources.
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Feb 23, 2023 5:49 am
I’m sorry. Why can’t we criticize Scott? Some of you telling others what they can and can’t do is ridiculous. If you don’t like what people are saying don’t read the thread or add something intellectual that argues against it. But to say tone it down or lay off Scott comes off a bit tacky and privileged. If you are going to curate outlandish tales of going to the mattresses and “potential” firebombings and houses shot at. With not one of the incidents confirmed. As a
journalist you should be prepared for backlash when you make claims of such nature. Not one other credible source is able to verify the story. Mikey Nose is under fbi watch for associating with known criminals. But he is also meeting with Barney and Lorenzo? Firebombing’s, shootouts and going to the mattresses sounds like Godfather 2. All these things happening in the biggest city but NO ONE else is reporting. Tom L couldnt find anyone that knew anything about it. Jerry hasn’t written anything on it.
All signs point to it not being a real story yet some of us want to give benefit of the doubt. Why? Cause he wrote a book you liked?
I think some of you won’t go against him because he is a fellow mob enthusiast and the other half just want something mob related to occur.
But save me the “stop bashing Scott” crap. It comes off very unbecoming.
My criticism is the reporting, not Scott personally, though I can see where the line between the two isn't always clear. And some would say there really is none.
Most of the time, in these situations with his more controversial reporting, I don't think Scott is completely inventing things out of whole cloth, but rather I think Scott will take some element of truth and blow it
waaaaaaaaay out of proportion. Maybe where "sensationalism" ends and editorializing/BS begins is a question for the historians.
But there are some times where I
do think he makes stuff up. The invented dialogue has been pointed out. Also, having observed his charts and reporting for 15 years or so, I've become convinced he often will just assume guys are made and plug them into whatever position makes sense to him at the time.
I also think he has an extremely
looooow bar, to a fault, when it comes to recognizing active mob families. An 87 year old, inactive member in Timbuktu could roll over and fart in bed and Scott would have a full writeup on the family, complete with current hierarchy and activities, etc. two days later. And I get it. Multiple families still alive and active, and working together around the country, is more interesting than the LCN basically being down to the NY metro area with some other activity in literally a few areas elsewhere.
But I do want to thank Scott for the shoutout on the OG podcast about "Keyboard gangsters live in Utah and Wyoming." It's good to see he doesn't forget about the little people.
All roads lead to New York.