Current Chicago Players 2020

Discuss all mafia families in the U.S., Canada, Italy, and everywhere else in the world.

Moderator: Capos

Post Reply
User avatar
PolackTony
Filthy Few
Posts: 5593
Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 10:54 am
Location: NYC/Chicago

Re: Current Chicago Players 2020

Post by PolackTony »

Villain wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 10:28 am
Snakes wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 10:25 am "Front boss" would imply a patsy. Giancana, Fat Tony... those guys were no patsies. Ralph Natale, on the other hand
I completely agree...like you said, those guys were no joke.

Also, when Giancana wanted to open or close down some specific big time gambling or vending operation, he didnt call for his capos but instead he called for Eddie Vogel who in turn was the real boss of all vending ops at the time, including slots and other gambling machines, and so later Vogel was the one who spread the word to the rest of the organization...it was that simple
Agreed on the patsy question (including that the portrayal of Salerno by some as a simple "front boss" for Gigante is simplistic and misleading as well).

A question I've long had centers on the amount of input or democracy Chicago had vis a vis its made guys. We know in other families the made soldiers had input and votes on who was appointed boss, obviously on the Consigliere, and from what I understandade guys in a crew were consulted also regarding appointments of capos as well as potential recruits to be made or transferred into their crew. I'm sure these things varied a lot in terms of actual practice in different families under different bosses of course, but typically with the LCN you do see some degree of democratic input from the rank and file on certain matters. Do we have any evidence that similar practices were in place in Chicago? Do we have any indication that votes were elicited for positions such as boss or crew capos? Did crew members have any input on who might be inducted in their ranks? Or was Chicago, with the legacy of the Capone gang in play, always top down, with either the admin or a counsel of the admin and top factional bosses/crew capos in charge of the deliberation and decision making processes? One of the variables at play I think is that the meaning of being a "made guy" is already different for Chicago, in that many of the de facto "soldiers" in the Outfit were not made guys as in NYC but associates who were considered Outfit guys but not inducted LCN members of course. And once someone was inducted, they obviously joined the inner mafia circle at the heart of the Syndicate, and thus a "rank and file" made guy in the Outfit was not really comparable to a made "soldier" in New York.
"Hey, hey, hey — this is America, baby! Survival of the fittest.”
User avatar
Confederate
Full Patched
Posts: 3404
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2017 12:39 am
Location: Pensacola Beach & Jacksonville, FL

Re: Current Chicago Players 2020

Post by Confederate »

PolackTony wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 10:59 am
Villain wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 10:28 am
Snakes wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 10:25 am "Front boss" would imply a patsy. Giancana, Fat Tony... those guys were no patsies. Ralph Natale, on the other hand
I completely agree...like you said, those guys were no joke.

Also, when Giancana wanted to open or close down some specific big time gambling or vending operation, he didnt call for his capos but instead he called for Eddie Vogel who in turn was the real boss of all vending ops at the time, including slots and other gambling machines, and so later Vogel was the one who spread the word to the rest of the organization...it was that simple
Agreed on the patsy question (including that the portrayal of Salerno by some as a simple "front boss" for Gigante is simplistic and misleading as well).

A question I've long had centers on the amount of input or democracy Chicago had vis a vis its made guys. We know in other families the made soldiers had input and votes on who was appointed boss, obviously on the Consigliere, and from what I understandade guys in a crew were consulted also regarding appointments of capos as well as potential recruits to be made or transferred into their crew. I'm sure these things varied a lot in terms of actual practice in different families under different bosses of course, but typically with the LCN you do see some degree of democratic input from the rank and file on certain matters. Do we have any evidence that similar practices were in place in Chicago? Do we have any indication that votes were elicited for positions such as boss or crew capos? Did crew members have any input on who might be inducted in their ranks? Or was Chicago, with the legacy of the Capone gang in play, always top down, with either the admin or a counsel of the admin and top factional bosses/crew capos in charge of the deliberation and decision making processes? One of the variables at play I think is that the meaning of being a "made guy" is already different for Chicago, in that many of the de facto "soldiers" in the Outfit were not made guys as in NYC but associates who were considered Outfit guys but not inducted LCN members of course. And once someone was inducted, they obviously joined the inner mafia circle at the heart of the Syndicate, and thus a "rank and file" made guy in the Outfit was not really comparable to a made "soldier" in New York.
You know that's a good question & very possibly shows yet another minor difference between Chicago & New York. From what I've read, I've never seen any evidence of the Top administration in the Outfit asking the opinion of middle ranked guys what they thought about somebody moving up towards the top. It always seemed like the Administration made that choice. Never read about voting or opinions from the lower rank?
" Everything Woke turns to shit".
Villain
Filthy Few
Posts: 5890
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 12:17 am

Re: Current Chicago Players 2020

Post by Villain »

PolackTony wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 10:59 am
Villain wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 10:28 am
Snakes wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 10:25 am "Front boss" would imply a patsy. Giancana, Fat Tony... those guys were no patsies. Ralph Natale, on the other hand
I completely agree...like you said, those guys were no joke.

Also, when Giancana wanted to open or close down some specific big time gambling or vending operation, he didnt call for his capos but instead he called for Eddie Vogel who in turn was the real boss of all vending ops at the time, including slots and other gambling machines, and so later Vogel was the one who spread the word to the rest of the organization...it was that simple
Agreed on the patsy question (including that the portrayal of Salerno by some as a simple "front boss" for Gigante is simplistic and misleading as well).

A question I've long had centers on the amount of input or democracy Chicago had vis a vis its made guys. We know in other families the made soldiers had input and votes on who was appointed boss, obviously on the Consigliere, and from what I understandade guys in a crew were consulted also regarding appointments of capos as well as potential recruits to be made or transferred into their crew. I'm sure these things varied a lot in terms of actual practice in different families under different bosses of course, but typically with the LCN you do see some degree of democratic input from the rank and file on certain matters. Do we have any evidence that similar practices were in place in Chicago? Do we have any indication that votes were elicited for positions such as boss or crew capos? Did crew members have any input on who might be inducted in their ranks? Or was Chicago, with the legacy of the Capone gang in play, always top down, with either the admin or a counsel of the admin and top factional bosses/crew capos in charge of the deliberation and decision making processes? One of the variables at play I think is that the meaning of being a "made guy" is already different for Chicago, in that many of the de facto "soldiers" in the Outfit were not made guys as in NYC but associates who were considered Outfit guys but not inducted LCN members of course. And once someone was inducted, they obviously joined the inner mafia circle at the heart of the Syndicate, and thus a "rank and file" made guy in the Outfit was not really comparable to a made "soldier" in New York.
It depended on the situation....when Ferraro got sick and everyone knew he was going to die, a meeting occurred on which Ricca and Accardo, Humphreys, Ferraro, Cerone (capo), Les Kruse (crew boss for Alex and Ferraro), Ralph Pierce (crew boss for Alex and Ferraro), Hy Godgrey (soldier and messenger for Alex and Ferraro) were all present. So even though Ferraro was the underboss, still he was the real boss of the South Side faction and Alex was his acting boss over that same faction....and if you look at the attendees on that same meeting, you will notice that most of them belonged to the South Side mob including Humphreys, Kruse, Pierce and Godfrey....so my point is that if the boss or underboss or capo who was about to be replaced out of various reasons, belonged to the West or South factions, Ricca and Accardo usually called for members from those same factions

When Giancana was about to be replaced, Ricca called for the whole west side faction, including Battaglia, Alderisio, Daddono, the Frattos, and Frabotta, mainly because Giancana was a west side guy. BUT by the end of the day, it was up to Ricca and Accardo on who was going to go up or down. For example, even before Giancana went down, Accardo and Ricca already groomed Battaglia for the position

As for members being sponsored, we have examples in which the underboss and one capo are the sponsors, or one capo and one influential soldier. Even though guys like Alex or Humphreys werent made members of the Mafia, still they had the same power as the made guys ONLY in the Outfit and received the same treatment. Alex had to check in or check out like any other made guy and received a cut straight from made members....it wasnt something operational or whatever, but instead guys like Humphreys, Guzik or Alex were looked upon as legit bosses of the Outfit with the power to make war or peace
Do not be deceived, neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God - Corinthians 6:9-10
Coloboy
Straightened out
Posts: 330
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:45 pm

Re: Current Chicago Players 2020

Post by Coloboy »

PolackTony wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 9:43 am
Villain wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 8:55 am
Coloboy wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 8:26 am I've always wondered if the top admin intentionally put out the word, either through the lower level street members, or even a press leak, that certain people were the "boss" to protect the real bosses. Did Ricca/Accardo intentionally do this with Giancana? Was it purposefully leaked that Ferriola was the boss to distract? Maybe even up to Marcello/Difronzo? Interesting stuff.
My opinion is that every1 knew who were Ricca and Accardo, and if not they were able to see it after awhile, meaning they only saw the chief executives like Battaglia, Cerone or Giancana being replaced, while the same two old timers kept their positions for quite a long time...the point of being a top boss or senior advisor is very simple and the investigators werent able to reach them until the bosses made a mistake, like when Ricca sat down with a low level member and discussed illegal stuff and i dont blane them since its in their blood
It still remains a bit unclear to me the exact division of labor and scope of responsibilities/authority between the boss emeritus/"Old Man" position and the boss ("number 1"). My current assumption is that while the "Boss emeritus" was the ultimate source of authority and of course received his cut from the kick up, the day to day responsibility was invested in the Boss, who set the policy and direction of Outfit rackets, approved who was inducted, and appointed the capos and crew structure. So even if ultimate authority rested in Ricca during Giancana's tenure, thus authority was delegated to Giancana who was largely responsible for shaping the direction of the Outfit during his rule (for example he put his boys in as capos etc). I think it's easy sometimes to look at the panel structure of the Outfit admin and confuse it with a "front boss" type of system, and maybe there was some element of that as well, but from what I understand the "number 1" really was the day to day executive.

I agree the dynamic between the "old man" and the day to day boss is an interesting one. It seems clear that the day to day role was much more than a "front boss". They weren't simply relaying orders from Ricca or Accardo. I believe that role did set most of the policy and had most of the influence surrounding key rackets and positions. However, ultimately the Old Man had veto power would be my guess. They could sit back and watch, and if something felt off they could nix it or make a change at their discretion. It was setup this way on purpose. Both to protect them at the very top but also so they didnt have to worry about all the details of running a very large operation. Both Ricca and Accardo had done that day to day stuff for a long time, they were over it.

I think the very best analogy is a business GM, and a business owner. The GM is pretty much running the show, but if the owner says jump you have to jump.
Villain
Filthy Few
Posts: 5890
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 12:17 am

Re: Current Chicago Players 2020

Post by Villain »

Nicely said
Do not be deceived, neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God - Corinthians 6:9-10
User avatar
Antiliar
Full Patched
Posts: 4303
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Current Chicago Players 2020

Post by Antiliar »

According to one informant from the early 1960s, the top two positions were "The Man" and "The Boss." The Man set policy and controlled the finances. The Boss in charge of the day-to-day activities. The Man was the ultimate authority, the CEO. The Boss was like a corporate president. During his day Ricca would have been The Man and Giancana was The Boss, although since he wasn't made he got some things confused and believed Giancana was both The Man and The Boss.
Villain
Filthy Few
Posts: 5890
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 12:17 am

Re: Current Chicago Players 2020

Post by Villain »

Antiliar wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 12:23 pm According to one informant from the early 1960s, the top two positions were "The Man" and "The Boss." The Man set policy and controlled the finances. The Boss in charge of the day-to-day activities. The Man was the ultimate authority, the CEO. The Boss was like a corporate president. During his day Ricca would have been The Man and Giancana was The Boss, although since he wasn't made he got some things confused and believed Giancana was both The Man and The Boss.
Thats true, although from 1959 until 1961 i think Ricca was in jail while Accardo together with one half of the membership were concentrated on his tax evasion case which almost landed him in prison also. So my point is that Giancanas huge ego and power was possibly "born" during those few years and thats why some low level informants at the time thought that he was alone at the top....
Do not be deceived, neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God - Corinthians 6:9-10
User avatar
PolackTony
Filthy Few
Posts: 5593
Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 10:54 am
Location: NYC/Chicago

Re: Current Chicago Players 2020

Post by PolackTony »

Antiliar wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 12:23 pm According to one informant from the early 1960s, the top two positions were "The Man" and "The Boss." The Man set policy and controlled the finances. The Boss in charge of the day-to-day activities. The Man was the ultimate authority, the CEO. The Boss was like a corporate president. During his day Ricca would have been The Man and Giancana was The Boss, although since he wasn't made he got some things confused and believed Giancana was both The Man and The Boss.
Yes, I’ve seen it stated where "The Man" was also called "the Old Man" or "The Man Out West", both of which could've been used to refer to either Ricca or Accardo at different times.

And IIRC correctly another 60s era CI referred to the "Boss" as the "number 1" and the "Underboss" as the "number 2". Do we have other sources using the same terms?

Another question I have is whether the Chicago admin ever had an official "street boss" position (regardless of whether the term was actually used by insiders or they calledd ot something else). This guy "BokaBreeze" on the Mafia subreddit has been stating unequivocally that they did, and claimed that Lombardo was the "street boss" before he was locked up. He describes the street boss of course as the intermediary between the admin and the crew bosses/capos. I know that Villain has cited sources that discussed Ferraro (I believe) as "relay man" playing a similar role. But was this a well defined and specific position in the admin, and does it makes sense to refer to it as "street boss", or was it just a duty that might be assigned to the underboss/number 2 or a top level trusted crew boss/capo?
"Hey, hey, hey — this is America, baby! Survival of the fittest.”
Villain
Filthy Few
Posts: 5890
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 12:17 am

Re: Current Chicago Players 2020

Post by Villain »

PolackTony wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 2:09 pm
Antiliar wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 12:23 pm According to one informant from the early 1960s, the top two positions were "The Man" and "The Boss." The Man set policy and controlled the finances. The Boss in charge of the day-to-day activities. The Man was the ultimate authority, the CEO. The Boss was like a corporate president. During his day Ricca would have been The Man and Giancana was The Boss, although since he wasn't made he got some things confused and believed Giancana was both The Man and The Boss.
Yes, I’ve seen it stated where "The Man" was also called "the Old Man" or "The Man Out West", both of which could've been used to refer to either Ricca or Accardo at different times.

And IIRC correctly another 60s era CI referred to the "Boss" as the "number 1" and the "Underboss" as the "number 2". Do we have other sources using the same terms?

Another question I have is whether the Chicago admin ever had an official "street boss" position (regardless of whether the term was actually used by insiders or they calledd ot something else). This guy "BokaBreeze" on the Mafia subreddit has been stating unequivocally that they did, and claimed that Lombardo was the "street boss" before he was locked up. He describes the street boss of course as the intermediary between the admin and the crew bosses/capos. I know that Villain has cited sources that discussed Ferraro (I believe) as "relay man" playing a similar role. But was this a well defined and specific position in the admin, and does it makes sense to refer to it as "street boss", or was it just a duty that might be assigned to the underboss/number 2 or a top level trusted crew boss/capo?
"The Man" was a reference for the top boss...."the old man" was also used by guys like Alderisio and Nicoletti to pick up somebody for their boss Battaglia who in turn was a capo or underboss at the time, i dont really remember....Cerone referred to Ferraro as "next in line" after Giancana or something like that...."out West" was used to describe the profits that went to the top admin at the time which was represented by the west side faction.....the "relay man" term was used by Fratto or Pranno, again i dont remember, to describe Buccieris position at the time who was beneath Ricca, Accardo and Cerone but above Alderisio, Alex, Prio and LaPorte....
Do not be deceived, neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God - Corinthians 6:9-10
SolarSolano
Full Patched
Posts: 2175
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 8:23 am

Re: Current Chicago Players 2020

Post by SolarSolano »

Was Buccieri really above Alderisio? I've read transcripts about Alderisio essentially taking over the south side from Buccieri following LaPorte's departure to California - that was the same transcript where Alderisio threatens Joe Ferriola who was representing Buccieri with "I'll tear you limb from limb..."
Villain
Filthy Few
Posts: 5890
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 12:17 am

Re: Current Chicago Players 2020

Post by Villain »

SolarSolano wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 2:38 pm Was Buccieri really above Alderisio? I've read transcripts about Alderisio essentially taking over the south side from Buccieri following LaPorte's departure to California - that was the same transcript where Alderisio threatens Joe Ferriola who was representing Buccieri with "I'll tear you limb from limb..."
Thats right but Alderisio never achieved that since he was swindled by Alex and Ralph Pierce, the real reps for the south side at the time. Once Giancana was out of the country and later Battaglia stepped foot in jail, Alderisio lost his protection but remained as top rep for the west side block. As a matter of fact, some sources say that during some specific situations, Alderisio sometimes acted as being subordinate to Alex....while on the other hand, the Buccieri crew managed to infiltrate the south side since the mid 60s when Alex invited them in. There was a meeting between Alex and Buccieri in New Mexico i think, where Alex asked Buccieri to help him out with the collections from around the Loop, Chinatown and the South Side and so Buccieri remained ....thats why LaPorte and the Chi Heights faction also had problems with the Buccieri group at the time....hence the absorption of their territory by the Cicero crew two decades later or during the mid 90s....
Do not be deceived, neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God - Corinthians 6:9-10
User avatar
Antiliar
Full Patched
Posts: 4303
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Current Chicago Players 2020

Post by Antiliar »

SolarSolano wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 2:38 pm Was Buccieri really above Alderisio? I've read transcripts about Alderisio essentially taking over the south side from Buccieri following LaPorte's departure to California - that was the same transcript where Alderisio threatens Joe Ferriola who was representing Buccieri with "I'll tear you limb from limb..."
Do you mean this? https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.htm ... 20ferriola
User avatar
PolackTony
Filthy Few
Posts: 5593
Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 10:54 am
Location: NYC/Chicago

Re: Current Chicago Players 2020

Post by PolackTony »

Villain wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 2:19 pm
PolackTony wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 2:09 pm
Antiliar wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 12:23 pm According to one informant from the early 1960s, the top two positions were "The Man" and "The Boss." The Man set policy and controlled the finances. The Boss in charge of the day-to-day activities. The Man was the ultimate authority, the CEO. The Boss was like a corporate president. During his day Ricca would have been The Man and Giancana was The Boss, although since he wasn't made he got some things confused and believed Giancana was both The Man and The Boss.
Yes, I’ve seen it stated where "The Man" was also called "the Old Man" or "The Man Out West", both of which could've been used to refer to either Ricca or Accardo at different times.

And IIRC correctly another 60s era CI referred to the "Boss" as the "number 1" and the "Underboss" as the "number 2". Do we have other sources using the same terms?

Another question I have is whether the Chicago admin ever had an official "street boss" position (regardless of whether the term was actually used by insiders or they calledd ot something else). This guy "BokaBreeze" on the Mafia subreddit has been stating unequivocally that they did, and claimed that Lombardo was the "street boss" before he was locked up. He describes the street boss of course as the intermediary between the admin and the crew bosses/capos. I know that Villain has cited sources that discussed Ferraro (I believe) as "relay man" playing a similar role. But was this a well defined and specific position in the admin, and does it makes sense to refer to it as "street boss", or was it just a duty that might be assigned to the underboss/number 2 or a top level trusted crew boss/capo?
"The Man" was a reference for the top boss...."the old man" was also used by guys like Alderisio and Nicoletti to pick up somebody for their boss Battaglia who in turn was a capo or underboss at the time, i dont really remember....Cerone referred to Ferraro as "next in line" after Giancana or something like that...."out West" was used to describe the profits that went to the top admin at the time which was represented by the west side faction.....the "relay man" term was used by Fratto or Pranno, again i dont remember, to describe Buccieris position at the time who was beneath Ricca, Accardo and Cerone but above Alderisio, Alex, Prio and LaPorte....
Thanks for the clarification. Admin the in the 60s while Giancana was boss then was Ricca as the "Man" or top boss, Giancana as the boss or "number 1", Accardo as senior advisor, and Ferraro as underboss or "number 2", correct? Did any one else besides either Fratto or Pranno describe Buccieri as the "relay man"? I wonder if this was an actual title or position, or if it was just the CIs way of describing a responsibility delegated to Buccieri as a trusted top capo. Does it make sense to describe Buccieri as a de jure or de facto "street boss"? Did Chicago ever really have a street boss position as BokaBreeze claims?
"Hey, hey, hey — this is America, baby! Survival of the fittest.”
User avatar
PolackTony
Filthy Few
Posts: 5593
Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 10:54 am
Location: NYC/Chicago

Re: Current Chicago Players 2020

Post by PolackTony »

Villain wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 2:46 pm
SolarSolano wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 2:38 pm Was Buccieri really above Alderisio? I've read transcripts about Alderisio essentially taking over the south side from Buccieri following LaPorte's departure to California - that was the same transcript where Alderisio threatens Joe Ferriola who was representing Buccieri with "I'll tear you limb from limb..."
Thats right but Alderisio never achieved that since he was swindled by Alex and Ralph Pierce, the real reps for the south side at the time. Once Giancana was out of the country and later Battaglia stepped foot in jail, Alderisio lost his protection but remained as top rep for the west side block. As a matter of fact, some sources say that during some specific situations, Alderisio sometimes acted as being subordinate to Alex....while on the other hand, the Buccieri crew managed to infiltrate the south side since the mid 60s when Alex invited them in. There was a meeting between Alex and Buccieri in New Mexico i think, where Alex asked Buccieri to help him out with the collections from around the Loop, Chinatown and the South Side and so Buccieri remained ....thats why LaPorte and the Chi Heights faction also had problems with the Buccieri group at the time....hence the absorption of their territory by the Cicero crew two decades later or during the mid 90s....
This makes a lot of sense. Alderisio attempts to muscle in on the Southside but is blocked by Alex and Pierce who apparently favored Buccieri? Then with Giancana out of town and Battaglia out, Alderisio and the Westside lose their ability to contest for the Southside. After Buccieri dies (and I suppose with Alex increasingly out in FL and tasked with admin responsibilities as senior advisor) LaPietra then becomes boss of the Southside.
"Hey, hey, hey — this is America, baby! Survival of the fittest.”
User avatar
Snakes
Full Patched
Posts: 4284
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 7:00 am
Location: Elvis Country

Re: Current Chicago Players 2020

Post by Snakes »

I've also seen the term "elder statesmen." During a funeral, Buccieri, Prio, and LaPorte -- among others that I can't remember -- were described as "elder statesmen." It didn't sound like an official term but it also seemed like it was something that was more common in the 60s and earlier when the organization was larger and these men ruled over a significant geographic area or commanded a higher level of respect. Once the Outfit shrank, this seemed to die off, although it may have eventually turned into the "old dudes on parole"/adviser group.
Post Reply