He doesn't KNOW that the Outfit gets some money from every poker machine in Chicago that is run by the State of Illinois and overseen by the Gaming Commission. If he does really know, he should apply for a job as the new head of the FBI.
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Moderator: Capos
He doesn't KNOW that the Outfit gets some money from every poker machine in Chicago that is run by the State of Illinois and overseen by the Gaming Commission. If he does really know, he should apply for a job as the new head of the FBI.
Coli's extortion of Cinespace via the union was a very "New York-like" thing. In fact, it was rather surprising because we have not see much of that type of labor racketeering in Chicago for years now.CabriniGreen wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2017 3:09 am Someone made a good point, it is a gross exaggeration to say they control ALL the video gambling. It's impossible to prove. But it's seriously humurous when you say " but the State controls it, it's legal!!".
I'm saying it's all about the paperwork. Who's names are on those corporate charters, those llcs, who's connected to what Alderman, or politician, where the kickbacks going. You need to look places like THESE, stop looking for mobsters in track suits in social clubs and street corners, I mean, was that ever really the Chicago mob anyway? And I'm really asking here..
@ strocos
Good find, but you guys still kinda don't get it. The idea that you can just waltz into the state and get into something like video gambling with no heavy city and state connections is just, forgive me, naive.
Look you could have a mob connected businessman like Richard Simon who buys his way OUT of using the unions. Then you can have a guy Like Coli who USES the unions as weapons for extortion.
Y'all looking for social clubs in the city with gangsters on the corners. These guys been in the burbs for forever, where they got crazy clout with law enforcement. No ones making any gambling cases, ITS NOT LIKE NEW YORK. That shit is not going to get you a promotion, or any headlines. Any wonder the only arrest I remember recently are the COUPLE of incidents where there was actual violence, the Pannozo robberies, and the other guy, Carparelli? Is that his name?
Umm I simply made an off the cuff remark about how we had a 12 page thread in 48hrs when there was no new information. I can't see how that was 'taking it personally', but hey, perception is a funny thing.CabriniGreen wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2017 4:11 am 3. @Sonny
Good god man, why do take this so PERSONALLY? I saw you,in a thread recently, Sal Larca came up. You,were talking about a drug ban like it's still 1981?!!!!! You didn't know Barney Bellomo was around heroin. You know I follow the drugs a lot, I didn't feel compelled to bust your balls. What is it about the Midwest you guys hate talking about it so much??
You took the words outta my mouth.CabriniGreen wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2017 4:11 am Okay rant over, lol this was fun. Y'all need to chill..
fair enough, perhaps i was out of line, because i do enjoy your articles, i mean we all read them & enjoy them. Perhaps Solly is the #1. I just foundsome of the info to be vague. Like smooth over how? Splitting up rackets & routes? Which crew were Sarnos guys beefing with?scott22 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:53 pm I'm trying to be as professional about this as possible. I enjoy "Smoker's" takes on current climate of The Outfit.
But please don't say I make shit up for clicks. Most of the more recent Chicago mob news we know comes from my reporting, as its obvious the local papers don't cover the mob like they used to. What have I reported that is "ridiculous," as was claimed in an earlier post?
That all said, I stand firmly by my reporting of Solly D as the boss after Sarno. I also stand by my story from a few years ago that right when Sarno went away some of his loyalists were butting heads with non-Cicero guys and Solly D stepped in and smoothed it over.
Scott M. Burnstein