That he saw it in 2002 is highly improbable. If someone said they saw it after he died it would be more believable. If the feds let a civilian see a document with a CI’s real name on it who was still alive he would be fired and possibly brought up on charges. That is highly confidential information which would put someone’s life at riskfunkster wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 5:44 pmMike Byrne's post of the Gangster Report article on Rainone. Says he saw it in 2002.Confederate wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 2:30 pm"Those are Fightin' Words". lol
Where did Red Wemette post that comment?
John DiFronzo was a CI?
Moderator: Capos
Re: John DiFronzo was a CI?
I agree with phat,I love those old fucks and he's right.we all got some cosa nostra in us.I personnely love the life.I think we on the forum would be the ultimate crew! - camerono
- SonnyBlackstein
- Filthy Few
- Posts: 7561
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 2:21 am
- SonnyBlackstein
- Filthy Few
- Posts: 7561
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 2:21 am
Re: John DiFronzo was a CI?
This makes sense.Pete wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 6:19 pm That he saw it in 2002 is highly improbable. If someone said they saw it after he died it would be more believable. If the feds let a civilian see a document with a CI’s real name on it who was still alive he would be fired and possibly brought up on charges. That is highly confidential information which would put someone’s life at risk
Don't give me your f***ing Manson lamps.
Re: John DiFronzo was a CI?
Yep, that's my thought too. Given the level of the information, why allow someone like Wemette to have the information? I can think of no reason to give it to him? Obviously i dont know, but I see no reason for him to have a need to know and they wouldn't unless he did.Pete wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 6:19 pmThat he saw it in 2002 is highly improbable. If someone said they saw it after he died it would be more believable. If the feds let a civilian see a document with a CI’s real name on it who was still alive he would be fired and possibly brought up on charges. That is highly confidential information which would put someone’s life at riskfunkster wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 5:44 pmMike Byrne's post of the Gangster Report article on Rainone. Says he saw it in 2002.Confederate wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 2:30 pm"Those are Fightin' Words". lol
Where did Red Wemette post that comment?
- Fughedaboutit
- Full Patched
- Posts: 1566
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:58 pm
Re: John DiFronzo was a CI?
post the document or dont post this thread
"I wanna hear some noise." "Tell Salvie to clean the boat, the whole boat top to bottom" -Nicodemo "Nicky" Scarfo Sr"
- Confederate
- Full Patched
- Posts: 3404
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2017 12:39 am
- Location: Pensacola Beach & Jacksonville, FL
Re: John DiFronzo was a CI?
Thanks for the further clarification. So, Red Wemette is talking about something he saw 18 years ago. But why would he see it in the first place?funkster wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 5:44 pmMike Byrne's post of the Gangster Report article on Rainone. Says he saw it in 2002.Confederate wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 2:30 pm"Those are Fightin' Words". lol
Where did Red Wemette post that comment?
Why would the Feds show him something of that nature? So, he's known about this for the last 18 years but now all of a sudden he is mentioning it?
Maybe I'm missing something but the whole story seems strange. No?
" Everything Woke turns to shit".
- SonnyBlackstein
- Filthy Few
- Posts: 7561
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 2:21 am
Re: John DiFronzo was a CI?
Don't give me your f***ing Manson lamps.
Re: John DiFronzo was a CI?
Yes, very much. I can see them doing it in furtherance of an investigation with a high level cooperator, Wemette..nah.
Re: John DiFronzo was a CI?
Always count on you to bring something of substance to the discussion. Keep it up we would all be lost here without your guidance
I agree with phat,I love those old fucks and he's right.we all got some cosa nostra in us.I personnely love the life.I think we on the forum would be the ultimate crew! - camerono
Re: John DiFronzo was a CI?
The thing is generally they specifically don’t tell other cooperators because they don’t wanna influence what they say. For instance frank jr and Nick Calabrese were cooperating at the same time but neither of them knew that
I agree with phat,I love those old fucks and he's right.we all got some cosa nostra in us.I personnely love the life.I think we on the forum would be the ultimate crew! - camerono
- Pogo The Clown
- Men Of Mayhem
- Posts: 14146
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 7:02 am
Re: John DiFronzo was a CI?
Chris Christie wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 4:59 pmFor what it's worth, Joe Fosco called him a rat but it may have been libel as he said many things, including the allegation that DiFronzo liked to masturbate on his victims' corpses. He later deleted much of it and years later the two took a photo together when he was senile.Pogo The Clown wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 4:55 pm Yeah there was also that article from like 10 years ago were it was leaked that the Feds had two member informants in the Outfit with one of them being high ranking. The "high ranking" part pretty much narrows it down to a handful of candidates.
Pogo
D'Andrea back in the day provided information in either Buffalo or Rochester before becoming Boss of Chicago. Accardo's had that rumor floating without basis, I suspected it somewhat because Roemer had an unhealthy obsession with him that shows in the books.
That sounds like something Mad Sam Destefano would during one of his torture sessions.
Pogo
It's a new morning in America... fresh, vital. The old cynicism is gone. We have faith in our leaders. We're optimistic as to what becomes of it all. It really boils down to our ability to accept. We don't need pessimism. There are no limits.
-
- Straightened out
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 8:16 am
Re: John DiFronzo was a CI?
Didn't Nick Calabrese testify that DiFronzo was on the scene of the Spilotro murders? What I learned from a thread on this forum just recently was that when Frank Sr was getting recorded by his son he implicated DiFronzo in the planning of the murders and supposedly the making ceremony ruse was his idea. Now if Nick testified that he was there and they also had this tape, I know the Calabrese tape isn't direct corroboration but look we've seen guys get indicted in RICO cases for less. Jesus just look at the case Madonna and Crea got life for. That's a red flag for me that they didn't go hard on him because we know how aggressive they are. That being said I'm not sure I buy this Wemette guy. I have to think it would have been a major screwup for a guy like him to have seen a document that names a source like that let alone have it in his possession, wtf? But then again major screwups happen especially when the government is involved so who knows.
Re: John DiFronzo was a CI?
I also have my own suspicion regarding Wemettes claims and i think Pete is right, although they never indicted DiFronzo in the family secrets case, besides having few leads on him, and he even closed down his own crew and gave the Outfit to the Cicero/South mob...just something to think about
Do not be deceived, neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God - Corinthians 6:9-10
Re: John DiFronzo was a CI?
A former porn shop operator on Rush Street, friend of Joey Lombardo and his crew, then testified against Frank Schweihs and in the Family Secrets trial. He put out a book and now puts out videos and manages a Facebook group with Mike Byrne.
Re: John DiFronzo was a CI?
Improbable and unlikely don't tell us whether or not it actually happened. I know a couple guys who worked with the feds and were allowed to get copies of some otherwise confidential docs. I can't explain why this happened, only that it happened. My guess is that every now and then some rules are bent or they make exceptions. If I can, I'll see if I can follow up with him and see if he can recall the circumstances.Pete wrote: ↑Sat May 23, 2020 6:19 pm
That he saw it in 2002 is highly improbable. If someone said they saw it after he died it would be more believable. If the feds let a civilian see a document with a CI’s real name on it who was still alive he would be fired and possibly brought up on charges. That is highly confidential information which would put someone’s life at risk