Only if you ask for your money back.SonnyBlackstein wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:20 pmClaws down toto.toto wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:26 amYou should ask for your money back.SonnyBlackstein wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2017 1:23 am Can we fuck 'Ask Andy' off now please Jerry? Does anyone seriously like his 'historical contributions'?
GangLand 8/3/17
Moderator: Capos
Re: GangLand 8/3/17
- SonnyBlackstein
- Filthy Few
- Posts: 7689
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 2:21 am
Re: GangLand 8/3/17
Have a cranberry juice Andy.toto wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2017 3:41 pmOnly if you ask for your money back.SonnyBlackstein wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:20 pmClaws down toto.toto wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:26 amYou should ask for your money back.SonnyBlackstein wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2017 1:23 am Can we fuck 'Ask Andy' off now please Jerry? Does anyone seriously like his 'historical contributions'?
Don't give me your f***ing Manson lamps.
- Fughedaboutit
- Full Patched
- Posts: 1566
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:58 pm
Re: GangLand 8/3/17
in 2017 there is only going to be so much to write about mob wise every week.
It isnt like people are getting killed and huge busts every week
but lol@the back and forth
It isnt like people are getting killed and huge busts every week
but lol@the back and forth
"I wanna hear some noise." "Tell Salvie to clean the boat, the whole boat top to bottom" -Nicodemo "Nicky" Scarfo Sr"
Re: GangLand 8/3/17
Let's get something straight about HIPPA. Neither the lawyers, the judge, or any individual in that court room could violate HIPPA if they broke into a hospital and handed out every patient's medical records on the street. HIPPPA enacts privacy rules for certain "covered entities", including insurers, benefit plans, benefit funds, employers and their agents. None of the persons involved in this case are covered entities under HIPPA. While there may be a general invasion of privacy tort involved, HIPPA is 100% irrelevant to this case. Irizarry should know this 101 stuff. By the way, whether there is a right to privacy to something you discarded has been decided a million times also. There isn't, although a particular use of it may violate something else.
Re: GangLand 8/3/17
She was deemed "unqualified" by the American Bar Association when she was nominated by Bush in 2003. In a less PC era she would never be on the federal bench, and would be some small time judge in the Bronx for bull shit cases.
-
- Full Patched
- Posts: 2608
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 8:46 am
Re: GangLand 8/3/17
Yep, I'm a boxing fan. Because I don't pay for unworthy PPV events, like the farce that is Mayweather-McGregor, I can't have an opinion on it? What a fucking idiotic point of view.toto wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2017 1:44 pmBut still you complain.TommyGambino wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2017 1:27 pmI'd never pay for it. Problem solved.toto wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2017 1:12 pmNo. I'm giving you advice on how to solve your problem and its the same as SonnyBlackstein.TommyGambino wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:50 pmAre you a parrot?
Instead of asking such questions you should ask the money back from Capeci that you paid for his column. Every few weeks and sometimes every week the same people complaining. If you found it boring ask for your money back. I'm sure he will consider and value your opinion based on what you paid for the column.
Re: GangLand 8/3/17
Incredible. two of the most stupid and worthless posters here manage to contribute even less than usual.
- SonnyBlackstein
- Filthy Few
- Posts: 7689
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 2:21 am
Re: GangLand 8/3/17
I gotta say bud this is hysterical.
Because we don't like a segment of a column you go and throw this huge tantrum?
Hey, I love 'Ask Andy'. It's fascinating. Intriguing and topical. It's my favourite part of GL news.
Feel better Andy?
Don't give me your f***ing Manson lamps.
Re: GangLand 8/3/17
Nice try. But there's a few of you who put this shit every week. You have nothing useful to add. EVER. But still every week we get to see your worthless opinion if YOU enjoyed ganglandnews or not. You add nothing to any thread and instead even ruin useful threads.
Maybe if you add something useful your opinion will be worth something but until then nobody with more than three brain cells gives a shit about what you think is good or not.
Maybe if you add something useful your opinion will be worth something but until then nobody with more than three brain cells gives a shit about what you think is good or not.
Re: GangLand 8/3/17
Let's keep the discussion in this thread to the actual content of the article. If anyone has issues with Capeci's column perhaps another thread could be made concerning that sibject in General Chat. Any beefs with posters of course belongs in the Graveyard.
- SonnyBlackstein
- Filthy Few
- Posts: 7689
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 2:21 am
Re: GangLand 8/3/17
Youch.toto wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2017 12:55 pm Nice try. But there's a few of you who put this shit every week. You have nothing useful to add. EVER. But still every week we get to see your worthless opinion if YOU enjoyed ganglandnews or not. You add nothing to any thread and instead even ruin useful threads.
Maybe if you add something useful your opinion will be worth something but until then nobody with more than three brain cells gives a shit about what you think is good or not.
Easy there tiger.
The 'Andy' jibe was just that. Now you've got me wondering.
Don't give me your f***ing Manson lamps.
-
- Full Patched
- Posts: 2608
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 8:46 am
Re: GangLand 8/3/17
Throwing your toys out the pram because I don't like a Capeci article, get a fucking life. You say I complain every week, just had a quick look through my posting history, I've complained 3 times about Gangland articles this year and praised a few, nice try.
Re: GangLand 8/3/17
Guys, stop the squabbling. Either get back on topic or take it to the Graveyard.
Re: GangLand 8/3/17
It's a boring feud anyway compared to the entertaining ones in the old days.
-
- Sergeant Of Arms
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 12:22 pm
Re: GangLand 8/3/17
Defense Bar Wonders About Stevie Wonder's New Lawyer
More than a decade after engaging in a series of public spats with fellow attorneys representing John A. (Junior) Gotti, Jeffrey Lichtman — a high profile and often equally high maintenance criminal defense lawyer — jumped back into the fray big time this week as the new lead attorney for top Luchese mobster Steven (Stevie Wonder) Crea.
El Chapo just hired him as well. He is doing very well these days.
More than a decade after engaging in a series of public spats with fellow attorneys representing John A. (Junior) Gotti, Jeffrey Lichtman — a high profile and often equally high maintenance criminal defense lawyer — jumped back into the fray big time this week as the new lead attorney for top Luchese mobster Steven (Stevie Wonder) Crea.
El Chapo just hired him as well. He is doing very well these days.