Made without Ceremony

Discuss all mafia families in the U.S., Canada, Italy, and everywhere else in the world.

Moderator: Capos

User avatar
PolackTony
Filthy Few
Posts: 5829
Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 10:54 am
Location: NYC/Chicago

Re: Made without Ceremony

Post by PolackTony »

In 1963, a Milwaukee member informant told the FBI that induction in the Milwaukee Family did not involve any formal procedures, not even an oath, but was conducted at an informal house party with the boss and other leading members. The same CI in 1963 also reported a Family meeting to the FBI, where members (including Frank Balistreiri, Vito Aiello, and Augie Maniaci, among others) discussed Valachi's recent testimony and commented that they had never heard "cosa nostra" used as a synonym for the organization that they referred to as "outfit" or "mafia" (it was opined that "casa nostra", or "our house", would make more sense). The CI here was not Augie Maniaci, who himself was also an FBI informant. For those unfamiliar with Milwaukee, the leadership of the Family was entirely Sicilian and so far as is known, they only inducted their first handful of Mainland Italians in the early 1960s, again supporting that attitudes to the formality of initiation could be relaxed even in Families that were very strongly Sicilian in membership.

Image

To underscore that practices could be variable even within the same Family, in 1964, Augie Maniaci told the FBI that members were inducted using the traditional punciuta ceremony; Maniaci was apparently made sometime in the 1930s or 40s, so it is unclear if this practice was current at the time that he spoke to the FBI. Note also that Maniaci claimed that the sponsor and initiate mixed their blood together. The same was claimed by an unknown Detroit CI about initiation into the Detroit "outfit", and was claimed to have been done in the NE Family as well (with the sponsor and initiate both having their fingers pricked and then pressing their fingers together):

Image

Image
"Hey, hey, hey — this is America, baby! Survival of the fittest.”
User avatar
PolackTony
Filthy Few
Posts: 5829
Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 10:54 am
Location: NYC/Chicago

Re: Made without Ceremony

Post by PolackTony »

Snakes wrote: Sun Jul 23, 2023 4:50 pm Chicago not doing the formal ceremony has somehow turned from conjecture into a fact. The truth is, we don't know the exact details of any ceremony aside from the 1983 ceremony with Calabrese. We don't know what exactly happened in the 1956 ceremony, except that a banquet was held and the prospective members had to "swear an oath." Other than that, we really don't know what else they did.
To underscore the ways that conjecture and fraught evidence have been turned into "fact", the below excerpt from 1963 was posted a while back on this forum and trumpeted as the gospel truth regarding Chicago's induction practices (it can be easily found by searching on Mary Ferrell, and was thus low hanging fruit). The FBI had very poor sources in Chicago at this point, and following Valachi's revelations were seeking to confirm his account of "La Cosa Nostra" in other cities. So, they asked some guy who was informing in Chicago about it, and he said that he was totally unaware of any ceremony or oath, or even that new members were sponsored by someone. In fact, the CI in question here (CG 6512) was not only apparently not a Chicago member, it's not even clear that he was an associate or had any formal affiliation with the mafia at all (in this period in Chicago, without strong member or even associate sources, the FBI leaned heavily on all sorts of randos who claimed to be in the know, from gamblers and restaurant owners to local cops and reporters, as confidential informants -- just because they assigned someone a CI code and referenced them in a report, doesn't mean that this person had any idea of what was actually going on). CG 6512 talked to the FBI for several years, giving sparse intel of a mainly anecdotal nature and nothing at all concerning the actual organization, and was never identified as a Chicago LCN member or associate in any report that I have read.

Image

In 1964, after he was pinched on heroin trafficking charges, Teddy DeRose began talking to the FBI (thanks to Ed Valin for uncovering that CG 6690 was Teddy DeRose). DeRose was a longtime associate of the mafia in Chicago and gave a detailed account of the organization and its history (going back to Mike Merlo and Tony Lombardo in the 1920s) from his perspective as an associate (excerpt below from Sam Battaglia's file). Unfortunately, we don't have an equally detailed account from a made member in Chicago during this period, as the member CIs that the FBI developed in Chicago typically gave much less intel. While not having gone through the ceremony himself (and DeRose was in fact of French Jewish ancestry but had successfully passed himself off as Italian in Chicago in order to advance his "career"), DeRose was aware that it at least entailed a formal ceremony where initiates had to swear an oath, and used the term "made" to denote membership status in "The Family" (unlike some other Chicago CIs, it is very clear that DeRose knew the difference between an associate and a made member). Unlike the guy who the FBI asked in 1963, DeRose was also aware that new members were proposed by a sponsor.

Image

If anyone is unfamiliar with this history, it should be stressed that a made member of the Chicago Family did not testify about the organization until 2007, when Nick Calabrese gave a detailed recounting of his traditional punciuta ceremony conducted in October of 1983. Other accounts on this matter for Chicago are vague and sparse. For example, in 1976, Chicago/Tampa informant Vic "Popeye" Arrigo told the FBI that he had been proposed for membership by Chicago member Joey DiVarco and was to be inducted at an upcoming ceremony officiated by Accardo (Arrigo testified in a case in Tampa and thus may not have wound up getting made).

Image
"Hey, hey, hey — this is America, baby! Survival of the fittest.”
BeatiPaoli
Straightened out
Posts: 217
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 10:51 pm

Re: Made without Ceremony

Post by BeatiPaoli »

To Everyone: First and only bump. Would love to hear from some more of the researchers on this Forum

Regards,
BeatiPaoli
BeatiPaoli
Straightened out
Posts: 217
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 10:51 pm

Re: Made without Ceremony

Post by BeatiPaoli »

To Everyone: First and only bump. Would love to hear from some more of the researchers on this Forum.

Regards,
BeatiPaoli
Post Reply