B. wrote:Antiliar wrote:Some guys became bosses as soon as they came over (or very nearly), like Manfredi Mineo, so he could be one them. Judging by immigration records it looks like he came from Corleone. It also looks like he lived in Newark, not Elizabeth. Valachi said that Badami was the boss of the Newark Family and that Sam Monica (Monaco) was the UB. Badami's closest associates were Joseph and Sam Accardi as well as Monaco. It's on pages 235-236 of Organized Crime and Illicit Traffic in Narcotics (The McClellan Senate Hearings, AKA the Valachi Hearings).
Thanks for that info. Sam Monaco's bio on findagrave.com (which isn't necessarily reliable) also says that Monaco was Badami's underboss since the 1920's, but not sure where the author Bill Heneage got the info. It's also strange that Monaco and Luigi Russo (who was... consigliere? captain? soldier?) would be killed but not their boss Badami. Monaco/Russo were said to be Maranzano loyalists, but I wonder if the same is true for Badami. If he was from Corleone, he may have had other loyalties.
I found an article from 1955 that says 66-year-old Badami of South Orange had survived a drive-by shotgun blast a month before his murder. As for the actual murder, he was at a cafe owned by his friend Vito Oddo when two assailants came in and stabbed him 39 times. Frank Monaco (Sam's brother) was found 1/4 mile away from the crime scene with a switchblade but the police wouldn't tell the media anything more. There was speculation that the murder was related to the Italian lottery. Stabbing someone 39 times is definitely not your typical mob hit... sounds personal. If Monaco was getting revenge for his brother's murder, it's pretty incredible he waited over 30 years to do it
Also, the other question would be what Badami's affiliation was by 1955. The Newark family was disbanded but Badami appears to have still been involved with activities in the Newark area.
Bedami being underboss might have come from Valachi. When he was describing Newark he mentioned a name that sounded to him like Bonanno, when pressed if it was Joe Bonanno he answered no, Sam Monaco was the name he finally gave. I believe he cited Bedami as Under, but that could be faulty memory on my part as I'm recalling it from 10 years ago.
Also, weren't Monaco and Russo tied to Maranzano because years later someone thought to account for those 50-70 murders that occured in night and the closest they could find in that range were certain murdered gangland figures. I believe some author once even stated Bazzano was once tied to Maranzano'r murder as well.
As for Vincenzo D'Amico, Gentile said that he was murdered by Troia who was murdered in retribution. It's wrong. D'Amico survived and went back to Sicily and lived (I think) to the 60's, and Gentile's recollection of D'Amico and Troia's relationship might be wrong also. This is important because roughtly 70% of FBI's documented early history was influenced by Gentile. If you go through the 25 Years After Valachi book, you'll find a typed out Mafia timeline, alot of that came from Gentile, in fact I'll put it another way: without Gentile, we might have never heard of Lo Monte, Troia, Umberto Valente, certainly Dr Gregorio Conte's name would not have Mafia Boss next to it, same for Dr. Rosario DeSimone, Vito Di Giorgio, La Scaglia, Lanza, and etc etc etc.
You can find these names now in newspapers and documents, but without Gentile's confirmation of these men, they would have never been identified as members. So when he gets things wrong, and he does, he needs to be forgiven. But Gentile's words were often ambiguous and rambling, he could focus on one topic for 4 pages and then abruptly jump to another without any conclusion of his first narration. So people extracted what they could and it was open to interpretation. For instance, Al Capone being part of the Camorra who merged with the Mafia, portions of that story came from Gentile, but Gentile never specifically said Al was a camorra boss. Others have looked at the info and wrote out their take on it, and it just kept snowballing. That's why there's Al Capone and Lucky Luciano the Legends and then the actual story. Today when you look for sources you might find 4 that were influenced from one primary source through different means, and while it looks validating, it's skewed.