In light of Pennisi video regarding Joe Vollaro and the Gambino bust in 2008, came across the govt detention motion. Sharing below:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
Joseph AGATE, et al., Defendants.
No. 08 CR 76 (NGG).
February 7, 2008.
Memorandum of Law in Support of the Government’s Motion for Permanent Orders of Detention
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
The government hereby moves for a permanent order of detention with respect to the following defendants: Thomas Cacciopoli, Frank Cali, Charles Carneglia, Mario Cassarino, Domenico Cefalu, Joseph Corozzo, Nicholas Corozzo, John D’Amico, Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Louis Filippelli, Vincent Gotti, Richard G. Gotti, Ernest Grillo, James Outerie, Richard Ranieri, Angelo Ruggiero, Jr. and William Scotto.
Each of these defendants is a member or associate of the Gambino organized crime family of La Cosa Nostra (the “Gambino family”) -- a violent criminal enterprise responsible for numerous murders and each is charged with crimes of violence. All of these defendants, except Ranieri, are “made” members of the Gambino family, and eight hold or have held senior leadership positions as captains or acting captains. In addition, John D’Amico currently serves as the acting boss of the Gambino family, Domenico Cefalu currently serves as the acting underboss, and Joseph Corozzo currently serves as the consigliere.
As further described below, each of these defendants poses a danger to the community and a risk of flight and thus should be detained pending trial.
I. Indictment & Investigation
Brief overviews of the charges set forth in the indictment and the underlying investigation are detailed below.
A. Indictment
On February 6, 2008, a grand jury in the Eastern District of New York returned a sealed 80 count indictment charging various crimes against 62 defendants. Over half of those defendants are either members or associates of the Gambino family. The 18 defendants as to whom the government seeks permanent orders of detention are charged with murder, attempted murder, murder conspiracy, felony murder, robbery, robbery conspiracy, extortion, attempted extortion, extortion conspiracy, extortionate extension of credit, extortionate extension of credit conspiracy, extortionate collection of credit, extortionate collection of credit conspiracy, cocaine distribution conspiracy, marijuana distribution conspiracy, illegal gambling, money laundering, money laundering conspiracy, securities fraud conspiracy, mail fraud, bribery of labor officials, embezzlement of union funds and theft of union benefits.
Those charges are summarized by defendant, count and racketeering act in the attached charts.
B. Investigation
The indictment returned in this matter is the most recent result of a longstanding investigation by this Office, the New York State Attorney General’s Office, Organized Crime Task Force, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Labor and other law enforcement agencies into the ongoing criminal activities of the Gambino family. During the course of this investigation, witnesses and recordings show that the Gambino family is still entrenched in the construction and trucking industries and remains a violent criminal enterprise willing to engage in violence in order to make illegal profits. Hundreds of hours of recorded conversations spanning three years detail both the grand scope of the Gambino family’s efforts to wring illegal profits from scores of businesses representing nearly every facet of New York’s construction industry as well as the day to day operation of these extortions.
These facts -- including the positions of D’Amico, Cefalu and Joseph Corozzo -- will be established at trial through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, recorded conversations and surveillance evidence.
II. Legal Standard
A. Bail Reform Act
Under the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3141 et seq., federal courts are empowered to order a defendant’s detention pending trial upon a determination that the defendant is either a danger to the community or a risk of flight. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) (“no condition or combination of conditions would reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of any other person and the community”). A finding of dangerousness must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540, 542 (2d Cir. 1995); United States v. Chimurenga, 760 F.2d 400, 405 (2d Cir. 1985). A finding of risk of flight must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence. See United States v. Jackson, 823 F.2d 4, 5 (2d Cir. 1987); Chimurenga, 760 F.2d at 405.
The Bail Reform Act lists four factors to be considered in the detention analysis: (1) the nature and circumstances of the crimes charged, (2) the history and characteristics of the defendant, (3) the seriousness of the danger posed by the defendant’s release, and (4) the evidence of the defendant’s guilt. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g).
B. Organized Crime Defendants
Courts in this circuit routinely have faced the issue of pretrial detention of organized crime defendants charged with racketeering-related offenses. See, e.g., United States v. Cirillo, Cr. No. 05-212 (SLT), slip op. (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (Genovese family acting bosses Dominick Cirillo and Lawrence Dentico, as well as Genovese family captain Anthony Antico, detained as dangers to the community), aff’d, 149 Fed. Appx. 40 (2d Cir. 2005); United States v. Gotti, 219 F. Supp. 2d 296, 299-300 (E.D.N.Y. 2002) (Gambino family acting boss Peter Gotti detained as danger to the community), aff’d, United States v. Ciccone, 312 F.3d 535, 543 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Defede, 7 F. Supp. 2d 390, 395 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) (Luchese family acting boss Joseph DeFede detained as danger to the community); United States v. Agnello, 101 F. Supp. 2d 108, 116 (E.D.N.Y. 2000) (Gambino family captain Carmine Agnello detained as danger to the community); United States v. Salerno, 631 F. Supp. 1364, 1375 (S.D.N.Y. 1986) (Genovese acting boss and captain detained as danger to the community), order vacated, 794 F.2d 64 (2d Cir.), order reinstated, 829 F.2d 345 (2d Cir. 1987).
Together, these cases stand, at the very least, for the following propositions: (1) leaders of a violent organized criminal enterprise are dangerous due to their position of authority in that enterprise; (2) organized crime defendants often constitute dangers to the community due to the high likelihood that they will continue to commit crimes if released on bail; and (3) elaborate bail packages involving home detention and electronic monitoring are insufficient safeguards to protect the community against dangerous organized crime defendants.
1. Organized Crime Leaders Are Dangers to the Community
Pretrial detention is warranted where defendants, charged with violent crimes, are leaders or high-ranking members of a criminal organization whose activities routinely include violence and threats of violence. See Ciccone, 312 F.3d at 543; United States v. Colombo, 777 F.2d 96, 99-100 (2d Cir. 1985); United States v. Bellomo, 944 F. Supp. 1160, 1166 (S.D.N.Y. 1996). Courts in this circuit have recognized that when organized crime depends on a pattern of violent conduct of the sort charged in this case, the risk to the community is substantial and justifies detention.
For example, in Salerno, in ordering the detention of two leaders of the Genovese family, the district court observed that:
The activities of a criminal organization such as the Genovese Family do not cease with the arrest of its principals and their release on even the most stringent of bail conditions. The illegal businesses, in place for many years, require constant attention and protection, or they will fail. Under these circumstances, this court recognizes a strong incentive on the part of its leadership to continue business as usual. When business as usual involves threats, beatings, and murder, the present danger such people pose in the community is self evident.
631 F. Supp. at 1375.
III. Motion for Detention
The government moves for a permanent order of detention with respect to defendants Thomas Cacciopoli, Frank Cali, Charles Carneglia, Mario Cassarino, Domenico Cefalu, Joseph Corozzo, Nicholas Corozzo, John D’Amico, Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Louis Filippelli, Vincent Gotti, Richard G. Gotti, Ernest Grillo, James Outerie, Richard Ranieri, Angelo Ruggiero, Jr. and William Scotto, each of whom poses a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
A. THOMAS CACCIOPOLI
Thomas Cacciopoli, a captain in the Gambino family pled guilty to extortion unrelated to this case in the Southern District of New York and received a 24 month term of incarceration. He is currently serving that term. The government seeks pre-trial detention of Cacciopoli based on factors outlined in the Bail Reform Act: that is, the nature and circumstances of the offense charged, the weight of the evidence against Cacciopoli, the history and characteristics of the defendant and the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community that would be posed by the person’s release. Specifically, Cacciopoli is a captain in a violent criminal enterprise who is charged with extortions, which constitute crimes of violence. Brief summaries of the evidence against him in connection with extortions with which he is charged follow.
1. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - Trucking
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.1
In the mid-1990’s, Joseph Vollaro and a partner formed a trucking company. Following the company’s founding, while Joseph Vollaro was incarcerated, Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli recovered a debt owed to the company and, in return, demanded monthly extortion payments from that point forward.
In 1999, Joseph Vollaro was released from prison and began making extortion payments to Cacciopoli. Since that time, he has paid more than $160,000 to Cacciopoli in extortion payments related to the trucking business. Joseph Vollaro made these payments directly to Cacciopoli and to Gambino family soldier Joseph Scopo, who collected the payments on Cacciopoli’s behalf on numerous occasions. In addition, on multiple occasions Gambino family soldier Robert Epifania relayed instructions from Cacciopoli to Joseph Vollaro concerning the operation of Joseph Vollaro’s trucking business.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including dozens of recordings detailing the extortion of his extortion by the above-named defendants, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members of the Gambino family that Thomas Cacciopoli exerted control of Joseph Vollaro’s trucking business and collected extortion payments from Joseph Vollaro, and (iv) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
2. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - Staten Island Cement Company Profits
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately December 2003, Joseph Vollaro approached Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli and requested permission to open a cement company on Staten Island. Due to the Gambino family’s control of the New York cement industry, Cacciopoli, together with Gambino family captain Louis Filippelli, engaged in a series of meetings to obtain permission from the Gambino family’s administration to open such a company. Cacciopoli and Filippelli succeeded and informed Joseph Vollaro that he could start the company provided that following a one-year grace period, the Gambino family would receive 15% or $1 per yard for all cement sold, with the payments to be collected by Filippelli and passed through to the family’s administration.
Joseph Vollaro opened the company in April 2004. Since May 2005, he has paid over $60,000 of extortion payments to the Gambino family. The initial payments were collected by Gambino family soldier Vincent Pacelli on behalf of then incarcerated Louis Filippelli. After Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo assumed control of Joseph Vollaro from Filippelli in late June 2005, payments were collected on his behalf for the administration by DiMaria, who controlled Joseph Vollaro for Corozzo while Corozzo was on supervised release, as well as by Gambino family soldiers Mario Cassarino and Ernest Grillo.
Multiple members of the Gambino family informed Joseph Vollaro that the profits from his Staten Island cement company were passed along to the Gambino family administration, and that the administration consists of acting boss John D’Amico, acting underboss Domenico Cefalu and consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation.
3. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - Staten Island Cement Company Sale - John Doe #13
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
During the spring of 2007, a company offered to buy Joseph Vollaro’s Staten Island cement company. In keeping with instructions from Gambino family captains Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria to consult them before making any decisions concerning his business, Joseph Vollaro informed DiMaria of the offer. DiMaria later informed Joseph Vollaro that the family had agreed to allow him to make the sale, provided he pay $100,000 to the Gambino family.
In early January 2008, Gambino family soldier Joseph Scopo approached Joseph Vollaro on behalf of Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli and instructed him that when the sale of his cement company took place, Joseph Vollaro should not provide his partner with the more than $300,000 in sale proceeds due to him, and that Cacciopoli would collect the money himself when he was released from prison. In a second conversation, Scopo stated that he would either collect the money himself for Cacciopoli, or that Joseph Vollaro should keep the money and deliver it to Cacciopoli when he was released from prison. Joseph Vollaro’s partner also informed him that Gambino family soldier Robert Epifania had approached him and told him that Cacciopoli would take all the proceeds due to him from the sale of the cement company.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing the extortion of his partner by Scopo and Cacciopoli, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, and (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family.
The government seeks pretrial detention of Cacciopoli based on dangerousness. Cacciopoli is a captain in a violent criminal enterprise. He is currently incarcerated on extortion conspiracy charges and, according to the Bureau of Prisons, is scheduled to be released on November 30, 2008. Should he be eligible for release during the pendency of this case, he should be detained. He has been charged with crimes of violence and was participating in such conduct while on pre-trial release. The case against him is strong, as he was captured on or referenced on more than 15 recordings detailing his participation in the crimes charged. Accordingly, he has shown that he does not follow instructions of the court. Because he is a leader in a violent criminal organization who has been engaged in crimes of violence, and because he did so while on supervised release, the government moves from pre-trial detention based on dangerousness as well as risk of flight.
B. FRANK CALI
Frank Cali is an acting captain in the Gambino family. He has substantial familial ties to the Gambino family. He is the first cousin through marriage of Gambino family associate Tommy Gambino, the second cousin through marriage of Gambino family associate Frank Inzerillo and the brother-in-law of Gambino family soldier Pietro “Tall Pete” Inzerillo. According cooperating witnesses as discussed below, Cali became a made member of the Gambino family in the late 1990s and was in the crew of co-defendant John D’Amico, who was a Gambino family captain at the time. In approximately 2005, Cali became an acting captain when D’Amico was elevated to acting boss of the Gambino family.
Cali is charged in the indictment with extortion and extortion conspiracy -- both crimes of violence -- and faces a term of 40 years’ imprisonment if convicted. The government seeks to have a permanent order of detention entered against Cali on the ground that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Cali.
a. Cali Is a Gambino Family Acting Captain
Cali is a longstanding Gambino family member. The government will establish his position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses and surveillance evidence. At least four cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Cali is a member of the Gambino family.
This testimony regarding Cali’s membership in with the Gambino family will be corroborated by the testimony of an organized crime expert and the testimony of other law enforcement officials who have observed Cali at various organized crime events and locations, and a consensually recorded conversations.
As early as 1990 -- nearly 18 years ago -- Cali has been observed at locations and events relating to the Gambino family, including most recently at the following events: the wake of Gambino family boss John J. Gotti in 2002; the wake of the mother of incarcerated Gambino family soldier Ronald Trucchio and grandmother of Gambino family soldier Alphonse Trucchio in June 2006; the wake of the wife of Gambino family soldier Blaise Corozzo in January 2007; the wake of Gambino family soldier George Remini in March 2007; the wake of Pietro Inzerillo, the father-in-law of Gambino family soldier Giuseppe “Joseph” Gambino and grandfather of Gambino family soldier Pietro “Tall Pete” Inzerillo in April 2007; the wake of Gambino family captain Giuseppe “Joseph” Arcuri in November 2007; and Cali’s own Christmas party in December 2007, attended by co-defendants Gambino family acting boss John D’Amico and acting underboss Domenico Cefalu, among others.
Additionally, in late 2005, Cali was observed by law enforcement officials meeting with Gambino family captain Michael Paradiso and then meeting with Gambino family acting boss John D’Amico and acting underboss Domenico Cefalu. In late 2005, Cali was further observed meeting with Paradiso, who is now incarcerated for extortion and loansharking, and codefendant Angelo Ruggiero, Jr., a Gambino family soldier. In 2007, law enforcement officers observed Cali meeting with Cefalu on at least two occasions at Cafe Italiano in Brooklyn and Cafe Euro in Queens.
In addition, in November 2002, Cali was recorded during a consensually monitored meeting with a former high-ranking member of the Gambino family discussing promotions in the Gambino family.
b. Cali Is Charged with Crimes of Violence
Cali is charged with extortion of Joseph Vollaro relating to his work at the NASCAR construction site. The evidence of Cali’s involvement is strong. As set forth below, it consists of testimony of a cooperating witness which is corroborated by consensually recorded conversations.
In January 2006, NASCAR had begun construction on a racetrack in Staten Island. Recine Trucking, a company under the control of Gambino family acting underboss Domenico Cefalu, was among the first companies hired to bring fill to the site. Thereafter, Gambino family soldier Ernest Grillo acquired exclusive dumping rights at the site for Joseph Vollaro.
From late January 2006 to May 2006, Grillo, Cefalu and Gambino family members Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Nicholas Corozzo and Frank Cali negotiated the amount of extortion Joseph Vollaro would be required to pay for the exclusive dumping rights. Eventually, Joseph Vollaro received those rights on the condition that he make extortion payments of $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Corozzo and DiMaria, and $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Cefalu and Cali.
Before Joseph Vollaro could begin dumping at the site pursuant to these terms, the exclusive dumping deal fell through. Later, after a new deal was worked out, Corozzo and DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to take the job on the condition that he pay them $1 for every yard of fill dumped at the site.
Joseph Vollaro also was required to make a one-time $9,000 payment to NASCAR employee Todd Polakoff on behalf have NASCAR executive William Kilgannon.
Joseph Vollaro worked at the site for a short time and made approximately $13,000 in extortion payments to Gambino family soldier Mario Cassarino, who collected the extortion payments for Corozzo and DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony is corroborated by recordings made of Joseph Vollaro’s conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing the extortion of Joseph Vollaro in connection with the NASCAR construction site. In at least seven separate conversations, including several in which Cali has been explicitly referenced by name, co-conspirators have discussed his role in the extortion of Joseph Vollaro.
The cooperating witness’s testimony is further corroborated by surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the recorded conversations. In addition, multiple cooperating witnesses, who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets, are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
2. Cali Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
Cali poses a danger to the community. He is an acting captain of a violent organized crime family and has himself engaged in a crime of violence in furtherance of the family’s illegal activities. Courts in this Circuit repeatedly have held that high-ranking members of organized crime constitute a danger to the community. As discussed below, each of the relevant considerations under the Bail Reform Act favors detention of Cali.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Cali is charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy -- both of which are crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). Moreover, Cali currently heads a crew of soldiers sworn to follow his orders and commit violence upon his request.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
Cali is a longstanding member of the Gambino family who now serves as a captain. He has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. Cali has no arrests or convictions however, several cooperating witnesses are expected to testify as to his history of criminal activity, including illegal gambling, extortion, fraud and loansharking.
Two cooperating witness, who were former Gambino family members, are expected to testify that in the late 1990s, Cali was involved in operating illegal joker poker gambling machines out of several establishments in Brooklyn, including approximately four or five machines in Cafe Italia in Brooklyn. Cali split a percentage of the gambling profits with the owner of the restaurant with 10 percent off the top going to the administration of the Gambino family. Cali also had approximately two or three machines in a cafe on 20th Avenue in Brooklyn and a soccer on 70th Street in Brooklyn.
Those cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that in the 1990s, Cali was involved in overseeing the Gambino family interest in the annual Italian Feast on 18th Avenue in Brooklyn. The Gambino family received a percentage of the fees charged for the booths and rides, which generated tens of thousands of dollars each year. Cali split the money with other Gambino family associates with 10 percent off the top going to the administration of the Gambino family.
Those cooperating witnesses and another cooperating witness, who is also a former Gambino family member, are expected to testify that in the mid-1990s, Cali was involved in a telephone card fraud with co-defendant John D’Amico and Gambino family associate Joseph Watts, in which they bought calling cards containing air-time minutes from telephone companies, such as WorldCom, and then sold them without paying the telephone companies. Cali, D’Amico and Watts made tens of millions of dollars from this fraud.
One of the cooperating witness is expected to testify that in the early to mid-1990s, the cooperating witness was involved in loansharking with Cali. The cooperating witness loaned Cali money, which Cali in turn loaned to others at a usurious interest rate. The cooperating witness loaned Cali approximately $10,000, which Cali repaid in the mid-1990s with money he made from the telephone card fraud.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Cali poses a clear danger if released. As noted above, the government will establish Cali’s association with, and position of authority in, the Gambino family through a variety of sources, including the testimony of four cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence.
Courts in this circuit routinely detain high-ranking members of organized crime based on their leadership roles in criminal enterprises that engage in acts of violence. See, e.g. Defede, 7 F. Supp. 2d at 393 (detaining defendant on dangerousness based on the proffered testimony of cooperating witness and surveillance evidence that he was the acting boss of the Luchese family, an enterprise involved in extortionate conduct, among other crimes); Gotti, 312 F.3d at 542 (“Indeed, we made it quite clear in United States v. Colombo, 777 F.2d 96, 98 (2d Cir. 1985), that the [Bail Reform Act] ‘does not require that the defendant himself commit acts of physical violence as a condition precedent to a detention order.’ ”).
As an acting captain, Cali is one of the leaders of the Gambino family and has been involved in acts of violence, including the charged extortions with Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. The violent nature of the Gambino family’s method of collecting money is made clear in the following recording of DiMaria: “You have to go bother these people for your money ... they are going to tell you we got to sit down and talk and this and that. Rough them up a little. Tell them, ‘You’re a fucking stiff.’ Tell them what you have to tell them.... The next guy that owes you money from there with them guys, you catch them, and that’s what I’m saying, that you check in with the other guys ... Crack a face, fuck them up. Don’t you do it, send a fucking kid to rough them up, a fucking joke.” He thus falls within the “small but identifiable group of particularly dangerous defendants as to whom neither the imposition of stringent release conditions nor the prospect of revocation of release can reasonably assure the safety of the community.” Senate Report at 3188-89. Cali’s position in the Gambino family gives him the authority and resources to continue his criminal activities and to order and accomplish acts of violence against potential witnesses or persons perceived as a threat - of which there will be many during the course of this prosecution.
Moreover, if released, Cali likely will continue his criminal conduct. He is a professional criminal who supervises a continuing criminal enterprise, the needs of which require constant monitoring. As noted, courts in this circuit have recognized that when organized crime defendants are charged with their participation in a criminal enterprise, the risk of continued criminal conduct is substantial and justifies detention. See Salerno, 631 F. Supp. at 1375.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Cali’s guilt on the charged extortion offenses is strong. To prevail, the government must prove that: (1) the defendant obtained or attempted to obtain property from another; (2) the defendant knowingly and intentionally used extortionate means to obtain the property, and (3) as a result of the defendant’s actions, interstate commerce was delayed, obstructed, or affected in some way.
Here, the government will prove the elements of the crimes through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance. One cooperating witness is expected to testify about Cali’s involvement in the extortion and conspiracy to extort Joseph Vollaro in connection with the NASCAR construction site. That cooperating witness will lay out the scheme by which Gambino family members provided the entree for Joseph Vollaro to obtain work at the site by securing the exclusive rights to dump fill and, once in place, how they exerted extortionate control over him - at the risk of losing the work. The cooperating witness is expected to testify that the extortionate control was exerted by Cali and other Gambino family members who siphoned a percentage of the profits from Joseph Vollaro.
The cooperating witness’ testimony is corroborated by dozens of recorded conversations pertaining to the NASCAR construction site extortion including several conversations implicating Cali and setting forth his participation. That evidence is further corroborated by at least three other cooperating witnesses, who are expected to testify about Cali’s longstanding membership and leadership as an acting captain in the Gambino family.
Based on the foregoing, the government’s evidence favors detention.
3. Cali Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set forth above, Cali also constitutes a risk of flight. Cali, who has substantial ties to Italy and thus the ability to seek refuge outside the United States, faces 20 years’ imprisonment on each count if convicted. This risk of flight is heightened as a result of the strong evidence against Cali. Accordingly, Cali should also be detained as a risk of flight.
C. CHARLES CARNEGLIA
Charles Carneglia is a longtime soldier in the Gambino family and is charged in the indictment with crimes of violence, including murder, robbery and extortion. Carneglia, who is currently on supervised release as a result of a 2001 conviction for extortion conspiracy, faces a term of life in prison if convicted.
As part of the RICO conspiracy, Carneglia is charged with the following nine predicate acts: murder/murder conspiracy of Albert Gelb (February 10, 1975); murder of Michael Cotillo (November 6, 1977); murder of Salvatore Puma (July 29, 1983); murder/murder conspiracy of Louis DiBono (October 4, 1990); robbery of armored car company employees/felony murder Jose Delgado Rivera (December 14, 1990); robbery of funeral home employee (November 5, 1995); marijuana distribution conspiracy (June 1988 - December 1990); extortion/extortion conspiracy of John Doe #1 (January 1991 - January 2003); and securities fraud conspiracy (January 1995 - December 1996).
The murders, robberies and extortion for which Carneglia has been charged constitute crimes of violence. Accordingly, the government seeks a permanent order of detention for Carneglia on the grounds that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Carneglia.
a. Carneglia Is a Gambino Family Soldier
Carneglia is a longstanding Gambino family soldier. The government will establish Carneglia’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses and surveillance evidence.
At least 10 cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Carneglia is a longstanding member of the Gambino family. Many of those cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Carneglia became a member of the Gambino family in the early 1990s and was closely associated with his brother, John Carneglia, a captain in the Gambino family. In 1989, John Carneglia was convicted of narcotics distribution conspiracy with Gambino family captain Eugene Gotti, and sentenced to 50 years’ imprisonment.
This testimony regarding Carneglia’s membership in with the Gambino family will be corroborated by the testimony of an organized crime expert and the testimony of other law enforcement officials who have observed Carneglia at various organized crime events and locations. From the mid-1980s - more than 20 years ago - Carneglia has been observed at locations and events relating to the Gambino family. Carneglia has been observed dozens of times in the late 1980s through the late 1990s at the Ravenite social club, Bergen Hunt and Fish Club and Our Friends Social Club, three Gambino family social clubs, which acted as the headquarters for John J. Gotti and thereafter for John A. Gotti when they ran the Gambino family.
In addition, Carneglia has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at more than 15 weddings and wakes. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that these events are attended by dozens of other members and associates of organized crime, many of whom are convicted felons who committed those crimes as part of an organized crime family, and that Gambino family business is routinely conducted at such events.
Prior to Carneglia’s recent incarceration from approximately 2001 to 2005, he has been observed at the following Gambino family events: the wedding of Carmine Agnello, a Gambino family member, and Victoria Gotti, the daughter of former Gambino family boss John J. Gotti, on December 8, 1984; the wake of Gambino family soldier Robert Borriello on April 16, 1991; the wedding of John A. Gotti, the former boss of the Gambino family, on April 30, 1991; the wedding of Joseph Corozzo, Jr., the son of co-defendant Joseph Corozzo, the consigliere of the Gambino family on October 19, 1991; the wake of former Gambino family underboss Joseph Armone on February 29, 1992; the wake of Colombo family soldier Ralph Scopo on March 11, 1993; the wedding of the daughter of co-defendant Leonard DiMaria, a captain the Gambino family, on September 11, 1993; the wedding of the daughter of Gambino family captain Joseph Corrao on January 14, 1995; the wake of the father of co-defendants Joseph Corozzo and Nicholas Corozzo, a captain in the Gambino family, on January 11, 1996; the wake of Gambino family associate James Burke on April 16, 1996; the wake of the mother of Gambino family captain Anthony Ciccone on July 2, 1996; the wake of the father of co-defendant Robert Epifania, a soldier in the Gambino family, on February 11, 1998; the wedding of Gambino family captain Alphonse Trucchio on February 14, 1999; the wakes of Gambino family soldier Anthony Ruggiano and the father of Gambino family captain Ronald Trucchio on March 21, 1999; the wake of Gambino family member James Failla on August 13, 1999; the wedding of the daughter of Gambino family soldier Salvatore Scala on September 3, 1999; and the wake of the father-in-law of Gambino family captain Ronald Trucchio on April 6, 2000.
b. Crimes of Violence
As noted above, Carneglia is charged in multiple crimes of violence including five murders, two robberies and an extortion.
i. Murder of Albert Gelb
Carneglia is charged in the fatal shooting of Albert Gelb, a Brooklyn criminal court officer, near his home in Queens on March 11, 1976. Gelb was expected to testify against Carneglia at trial arising from an altercation at a diner when Gelb stopped Carneglia for possessing a handgun. The evidence of Carneglia’s involvement is extremely strong. It consists of testimony of five cooperating witness and several lay witnesses, crime scene evidence and the medical examiner’s report.
Four cooperating witnesses are expected to testify about Carneglia’s involvement in the murder. At least two cooperating witness are expected to testify that Carneglia admitted his involvement in the murder. Two cooperating witness are expected to testify that they learned from high ranking Gambino family members and a third cooperating witness is expected to testify that he learned from a Gambino family associate that Carneglia killed the court officer due to his gun arrest.
Several lay witnesses are expected to testify about the altercation between Gelb and Carneglia at the diner, in which Gelb attempted to arrest Carneglia after observing that he had a gun. Gelb, in his testimony at Carneglia’s preliminary hearing, explained the incident and how he was assaulted by Carneglia and others after confronting him over the gun.
Gelb, who was expected to testify at Carneglia’s trial on March 15, 1976, was killed four days earlier on March 11, 1976. The crime scene evidence will show that Gelb’s body was discovered in the front seat of a car near his home. Consistent with the autopsy report, the medical examiner is expected to testify that Gelb died from multiple gunshot wounds to the chest and face.
2008 Gambino Indictment Detention Motion
Moderator: Capos
Re: 2008 Gambino Indictment Detention Motion
ii. Murder of Michael Cotillo
Carneglia is charged with the fatal stabbing of Michael Cotillo during an altercation outside of the Blue Fountain Diner in Queens. The evidence of Carneglia’s involvement is strong. It consists of testimony of three cooperating witness and several lay witnesses, an intercepted conversation of Carneglia, crime scene evidence and the medical examiner’s report.
One cooperating witnesses is expected to testify that he was present for and witnessed the altercation between Carneglia and Cotillo, immediately after which Cotillo collapsed on the ground and later died. The cooperating witness is expected to testify that he discussed the stabbing with several Gambino family members, including a codefendant, who is a high-ranking member of the family. The cooperating witness is expected to testify that the codefendant attended a “sitdown” to resolve the stabbing incident and implicated Carneglia in the murder on multiple occasions. Another cooperating witness is expected to testify that he learned from several Gambino family associates that Carneglia was responsible for the stabbing outside the Blue Fountain Diner. Another cooperating witness is expected to testify that he learned from several Gambino family associates, including one who was present at the Blue Fountain Diner with Carneglia, that Carneglia stabbed Michael at the diner. In addition, several lay witnesses are expected to testify about the altercation at the diner.
The government also will introduce a court-authorized intercepted recording of Carneglia. On November 18, 1999, Carneglia was intercepted discussing the stabbing at the diner with Gambino family captain Eugene Gotti, who was incarcerated at FCI McKean at the time.2 During the course of this conversation, as set forth below with emphasis added, Carneglia admits that he committed the fatal stabbing.
Gotti: You’re talking about the thing at the diner, not that (UI). Joe wasn’t going nowhere. Joe was lucky he didn’t come.
Carneglia: Yeah, they were gonna come after us for another reason. And that’s a reason I forgot.
Gotti: Yeah, well, you stabbed somebody Charles. You stabbed one of their guys.
Carneglia: I know that. I know that. I know.
Gotti: And that’s why they wanted to get you. They come (UI) at all.
Carneglia: I know.
Gotti: Tony ain’t doing shit. And that ended that.
Carneglia: You’re right.
Gotti: Joe Lombardi. I don’t remember why.
Carneglia: That was for the same reason. For the diner. That was the reason that Diane - Lenny was the one that told Angelo that we were on the hit parade.
Gotti: Lenny was wrong (UI) that you stabbed somebody about that point.
Carneglia: You know (UI) you knew.
Gotti: (UI) I hear. I’m dying to hear.
Carneglia: And he’s the one that told Angelo that we were okayed.
Gotti: Yeah, but you don’t understand what you’re saying.
Carneglia: Okay.
Gotti: He told Angelo that he okayed what?
Carneglia: To kill me and my brother.
Gotti: That never happened.
Carneglia: That never happened? They didn’t, they didn’t mention the name, right. They said Carneglia. This thing you got to do.
Gotti: Yes. What would happen to the guy?
Carneglia: Yes.
Gotti: What happened? I forgot. That you went bye-bye.
* * * *
Gotti: The only guy I got that here that did that, I’m trying to tell you, don’t even remember. Remember when Willie Boy got really banged up bad?
Carneglia: Right.
Gotti: His face and everything? And he gave two shots in the (UI) listed? In that little joint? Whose that guy that did that? Well, we stopped it.
Carneglia: Oh.
Gotti: Cause we shirked them.
Carneglia: Right.
Gotti: And you over that day and killed the other guy.
Carneglia: I know. I know ...
Gotti: They went all out. That’s what I’ve got. You keep telling me I don’t know where you got. I get confused. And that’s a ways back.
Carneglia: 30 years ago.
Gotti: I remember ... What, it was more than 10 years ago.
Carneglia: I didn’t say 10. I said 30.
Gotti: Yeah, that’s how long ago it was.
Carneglia: (UI) I look at the calendar. I know.
Gotti: Hey, anyway. He’s got everything else.
An organized crime expert is expected to testify that in the context of the conversation between Carneglia and Gotti about events that occurred 30 years prior, “Lenny” is defendant Leonard DiMaria, a current Gambino family captain, “Angelo” is Angelo Ruggiero, a now-deceased but former Gambino family soldier, “Neil” is Aniello Dellacroce, the now deceased but former underboss of the Gambino family, “Joe Lombardi” is a former Gambino family soldier, and “Willie Boy” is Wilfred Johnson, a former Gambino family associate.
The crime scene evidence will show that on November 6, 1977, blood from the sidewalk outside the Blue Fountain Diner was recovered and consistent with the autopsy report, the medical examiner is expected to testify that Cotillo died from a stab wound to the chest.
iii. Murder of Salvatore Puma
Carneglia is charged in the fatal stabbing of Gambino family associate Salvatore Puma on a street corner in Queens on July 29, 1983. Following an argument over money, Carneglia stabbed Puma in the chest, resulting in his death the following day at the hospital. The evidence of Carneglia’s involvement is extremely strong. It consists of testimony of three cooperating witness and several lay witnesses and the medical examiner’s report.
Three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify about Carneglia’s involvement in the murder. All three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Carneglia admitted that he stabbed Puma. Several lay witnesses will also testify about Puma’s condition immediately after he was stabbed and rushing him to the hospital. Consistent with the autopsy report, the medical examiner is expected to testify that Puma died from a stab wound to the chest.
iv. Murder/Murder Conspiracy of Louis DiBono
Carneglia is charged in the murder and conspiracy to murder Gambino family soldier Louis DiBono. On October 4, 1990, on the orders of John J. Gotti, the boss of the Gambino family at the time, Carneglia shot and killed DiBono in the parking garage of the World Trade Center in Manhattan, after DiBono had repeatedly disobeyed Gotti’s orders to meet with him.3 The evidence against Carneglia is overwhelming. It consists of testimony of three cooperating witness, intercepted conversations of Gotti, crime scene evidence and the medical examiner’s report.
Three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify about Carneglia’s involvement in the murder. One of the cooperating witnesses participated in the murder with Carneglia. He is expected to testify that Carneglia shot and killed DiBono in a car in the parking garage of the World Trade Center and left DiBono’s body there. Another cooperating witness participated in the murder conspiracy with Carneglia. He is expected to testify that Carneglia was a member of the “hit team” ordered to find and kill DiBono and that a high-ranking member of the Gambino family informed the cooperating witness that the DiBono murder had been carried out. A third cooperating witness is expected to testify that Carneglia indicated he was looking for DiBono and later admitted his involvement in the murder.
The government also will introduce intercepted recordings of Gambino family boss John J. Gotti. In late 1989 and early 1990, Gotti was intercepted, pursuant to a court-authorized bug in the apartment above the Ravenite social club in Manhattan, talking to Gambino family consigliere Frank Locascio about killing DiBono.4
• On December 12, 1989, Gotti told Locascio: “I took Sammy’s (Gravano) word. Louie DiBono. And I sat with this guy. I saw the papers and everything. He didn’t rob nothin’. You know why he’s dying? He’s gonna die because he refused to come in when I called. He didn’t do nothing else wrong.”
• On January 24, 1990, Gotti told Locascio: “that’s not, that don’t belong to us. That’s their fucking ‘crew.’ And he’s gotta get ‘whacked.’ Because he’s getting the same, for the same reason that “Jelly Belly’s” (referring to DiBono) getting it. You wanna, you wanna challenge the ‘administration,’ we’ll, we’ll you will meet the challenge. And you’re ‘going,’ you motherfucker!”
The crime evidence will show that on October 4, 1990, DiBono’s body was discovered in the parking garage in the World Trade Center lying face down across the front seat in his car. Consistent with the autopsy report, the medical examiner is expected to testify that DiBono died from multiple gunshot wounds to the head, neck and chest.
v. Robbery/Robbery Conspiracy/ Felony Murder of Jose Delgado Rivera
Carneglia is charged in the robbery/robbery conspiracy of an armored truck as it was delivering money to the American Airlines building at John F. Kennedy International Airport (“JFK”) in Queens on December 14, 1990. In the course of the robbery, one of the armored truck guards, Jose Delgado Rivera, was shot and killed. The evidence against Carneglia is overwhelming. It consists of the testimony of two cooperating witnesses and lay witnesses, crime scene evidence and the medical examiner’s report.
Two cooperating witnesses are expected to testify about Carneglia’s involvement in the robbery and murder. One of the cooperating witnesses participated in the robbery with Carneglia. He is expected to testify that Carneglia participated in the robbery of the armored truck outside the American Airlines building at JFK and that during the course of the robbery money was stolen and one of the guards was shot. Another cooperating witness participated in the robbery conspiracy with Carneglia. He is expected to testify that Carneglia was involved in the plot to rob the armored truck and that he heard from a Gambino family associate involved in the robbery that Carneglia robbed the truck and one of the guard was shot. Lay witnesses are expected to testify that the armored truck that delivers money to the American Airlines building at JFK was robbed and that one of the guards was shot.
The crime scene evidence will show that on December 14, 1990, Rivera was shot outside the American Airlines building at JFK airport. Consistent with the autopsy report, the medical examiner is expected to testify that Rivera died from a shotgun wound to the back and a bullet wound to the abdomen.
vi. Robbery/Robbery Conspiracy of Papavero Funeral Home
Carneglia is charged in the robbery of an employee of Papavero Funeral Home in Queens on November 5, 1995. The evidence against Carneglia is overwhelming. It consists of the testimony of five cooperating witnesses and lay witnesses.
Three of the cooperating witnesses are expected to testify about Carneglia’s involvement in the robbery. All three of those cooperating witnesses participated in the robbery with Carneglia. They are expected to testify that Carneglia was involved in the planning of robbery which targeted the funeral home because in excess of $300,000 in cash was thought to be in a safe. All three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the safe was not found but money was taken from an employee of the funeral home, and shared with Carneglia.
vii. Marijuana Distribution Conspiracy
Carneglia is charged in a lucrative conspiracy to distribute marijuana from approximately June 1988 to December 1990. The evidence of Carneglia’s involvement is strong. It consists of the testimony of two cooperating witnesses, who are expected to testify about Carneglia’s involvement in the marijuana distribution conspiracy.
One of the cooperating witnesses participated in the conspiracy with Carneglia. He is expected to testify that marijuana was purchased from a drug connection in Texas, arranged by Carneglia’s brother John Carneglia. The cooperating witness is expected to testify that John and Charles Carneglia received proceeds from the sale of the marijuana amounting to tens of thousands of dollars, until one of the shipments was intercepted by law enforcement. Another cooperating witness, who was close to Carneglia, is expected to testify that John and Charles Carneglia received money from a Gambino family associate from marijuana being shipped from Texas.
viii. Extortion/Conspiracy of John Doe #1
Carneglia is charged in a long-running conspiracy to extort weekly protection payments from an individual identified as John Doe #1 in the indictment from approximately January 1991 to January 2003. The evidence against Carneglia is strong. It consists of the testimony of two cooperating witnesses, who are expected to testify about Carneglia’s use of extortionate means to secure the payments.
One of the cooperating witnesses is expected to testify that John Doe #1 was approached in the early 1990s about paying Carneglia for protection in connection with his business. The cooperating witness is expected to testify that John Doe #1 paid Carneglia approximately $400 per week over a ten year period - resulting in extortion payments totaling more than $200,000. The cooperating witness also is expected to testify that John Doe #1 made “tribute payments” to Carneglia at Christmas each year, totaling more than $50,000. Another cooperating witness, who was close to Carneglia, is expected to testify that John Doe #1 made weekly protection payments as well as holiday tribute payments to Carneglia throughout the 1990s.5
2. Carneglia Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should be Detained
As discussed above, Carneglia has been associated with the Gambino family for more than 30 years. During that time, he has committed numerous crimes of violence, including murder, robbery and extortion. Accordingly, he constitutes a danger to the community and should be detained.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Carneglia is charged with serious crimes - racketeering conspiracy with crimes of violence as predicate acts. Murder, robbery and extortion are crimes of violence. The nature and circumstances of those crimes, as set forth above, clearly favors detention.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
Carneglia is a Gambino family soldier. He is a life-long criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. Carneglia has multiple convictions and is currently on supervised release following his conviction in 2001 for extortion. Below is a brief summary of Carneglia’s arrests and convictions:
• On June 19, 1966, Carneglia was arrested in Brooklyn on charges of receiving stolen property. The charges were dismissed.
• On July 3, 1967, Carneglia was arrested in Brooklyn on charges of petit larceny. The charges were dismissed.
• On April 25, 1968, Carneglia was arrested in Brooklyn on charges of possession of stolen property and conspiracy. The charges were dismissed.
• On December 10, 1968, Carneglia was arrested in Queens on charges of conspiracy. The charges were dismissed.
• On January 10, 1969, Carneglia was arrested in the Eastern District of New York on charges of theft of interstate shipment. The charges were dismissed.
• On February 26, 1970, Carneglia was convicted in Brooklyn on a felony charge of grand larceny and sentenced to one year imprisonment.
• On February 6, 1973, Carneglia was arrested in the Eastern District of New York on charges of theft of interstate shipment. The charges were dismissed.
• On May 5, 1976, Carneglia was convicted in Brooklyn on a misdemeanor charge of petit larceny and sentenced to a $200 fine.
• On July 20, 1978, Carneglia was convicted in Queens on a misdemeanor charge of resisting arrest arising from the altercation with Officer Albert Gelb described above. Carneglia was originally convicted at trial of two counts of resisting arrest and sentenced to one year imprisonment. The conviction was overturned on appeal and thereafter Carneglia pleaded guilty and was sentenced to conditional discharge.
• On August 15, 1980, Carneglia was arrested in Brooklyn on charges of attempted murder, criminal possession of a weapon, assault with intent to cause physical injury with a weapon. The charges were dismissed.
• On November 13, 1981, Carneglia was arrested in Brooklyn on charges of assault with intent to cause physical injury and criminal mischief. Prosecution was declined.
• On September 5, 1985, Carneglia was convicted in Suffolk County on a charge of operating a motor vehicle impair by alcohol. He was sentenced to a $250 fine and his license was revoked.
• On December 1, 1988, Carneglia was arrested in the Eastern District of New York on RICO. The charges were dismissed.
Most recently, on November 2, 2001, Carneglia and Gambino family captain were convicted after trial in the Eastern District of New York on charges of extortion conspiracy and sentenced to 63 months’ imprisonment. Carneglia and Scala were tried on charges premised on the extortions of two adult entertainment businesses in Suffolk County, the Forbidden Fruit and Cherries Video. At trial, the government proved that Carneglia is a Gambino family soldier and Scala is a Gambino family captain, who supervised the extortion of Cherries Video, which involved explicit threats of violence to the owner of Cherries Video, an assault, the collection of weekly protection money, and a further effort to force him to sign over a portion of his business to organized crime.
Given Carneglia’s longstanding association with the Gambino family and his long history of arrests and convictions, which include grand larceny, resisting arrest and extortion conspiracy, this factor also favors detention. See Connolly, 1999 WL 1995186 (long history of arrests favors detention).
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Carneglia is a career criminal and a murderer who has routinely engaged in violence as part of a dangerous criminal enterprise. His release clearly poses a serious threat of danger to the community both due to the violent crimes in which he has engaged and because of the likelihood that, if released on bail, Carneglia will continue to commit crimes. Even after his release from prison in May 2006, the evidence will show that Carneglia has continued to meet and communicate with members and associates of organized crime. Accordingly, this factor favors detention.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Carneglia’s guilt on the charged crimes is extremely strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove that (a) the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate -- and conducted and participated -- directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
The government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Carneglia’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and physical surveillance. More than a dozen cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and at least 10 cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Carneglia is a long-standing member of the family.
The government will satisfy the interstate commerce requirement by presenting evidence that the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including robbery, extortion and marijuana distribution conspiracy, among other crimes that affect interstate commerce.
Finally, the government will prove that Carneglia agreed to participate in the conduct of the affairs of the Gambino family through a pattern of racketeering activity. As set forth above, the testimony of numerous cooperating witnesses, several of whom actually participated in the crime with Carneglia and will provide eye-witness testimony, and significant corroborating evidence will establish Carneglia’s agreement to participate in the Gambino family through the charged pattern of racketeering activity - namely, the murders in 1975, 1977, 1983 and 1990, the robberies in 1990 and 1995 and the extortion from 1991 to 1993.
The government’s evidence of Carneglia’s guilt is strong and clearly favors detention.
3. Carneglia Constitutes a Risk Of Flight
In addition to the facts set forth above, given the certainty of a life sentence if convicted of the charged RICO conspiracy, Carneglia constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight).
Further, Carneglia was deemed to be a fugitive for several years after he was indicted in United States v. Aniello Dellacroce. et al., No. 81 CR 695 (E.D.N.Y.). Because Carneglia has already shown a willingness to abscond when faced with criminal charges, and in light of the severity of the sentence in this case should he be convicted, it is reasonable to assume a high probability exists that Carneglia would attempt to flee should he be released on bail.
Thus, Carneglia should also be detained as a risk of flight.
D. MARIO CASSARINO
Mario Cassarino is a soldier in the Gambino family. He is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including four predicate acts of extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy, and additional predicate acts of union benefit theft, conspiracy to embezzle union benefits, mail fraud, mail fraud conspiracy and false statements in connection to a union benefit fund. Cassarino is also charged with extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy, union benefit theft, conspiracy to embezzle union benefits, mail fraud, mail fraud conspiracy and false statements in connection to a union benefit fund.
The extortion counts for which Cassarino has been charged constitute crimes of violence. Accordingly, the government seeks a permanent order of detention for Cassarino on the grounds that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Cassarino.
a. Cassarino Is a Gambino Family Soldier
Cassarino is a Gambino family soldier. The government will establish Cassarino’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
At least three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Cassarino is a soldier in the Gambino family. This testimony is corroborated by more than 90 consensual recordings of Cassarino engaging in Gambino family business, dozens of which show his position as a soldier of Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo’s crew.
The available surveillance evidence also establishes Cassarino’s association with and position in the Gambino family. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that weddings and wakes of members of organized crime or their relatives are often places where Gambino family business is discussed. Cassarino was been observed with other members of the Gambino family at the January 2001 wake of Antoinette Fappiano, the mother of Gambino soldier Frank Fappiano. In the past year, Cassarino was surveilled at the wake of Gambino soldier Pietro Inzerillo, the father-in-law of Gambino family soldier Guiseppe Gambino and the grandfather of Gambino family soldier Pietro Inzerillo, the father-in-law of Gambino family soldier Guiseppe Gambino and the grandfather of Gambino family soldier Pietro Inzerillo.
b. Crimes of Violence
As noted above, Cassarino is charged in multiple extortions, all crimes of violence. A brief proffer of the facts pertaining to each of the extortions follows.
i. Extortion /Extortion Conspiracy - Staten Island Cement Company Profits
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately December 2003, Joseph Vollaro approached Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli and requested permission to open a cement company on Staten Island. Due to the Gambino family’s control of the New York cement industry, Cacciopoli, together with Gambino family captain Louis Filippelli, engaged in a series of meetings to obtain permission from the Gambino family’s administration to open such a company. Cacciopoli and Filippelli succeeded and informed Joseph Vollaro that he could start the company provided that following a one-year grace period, the Gambino family would receive 15% or $1 per yard for all cement sold, with the payments to be collected by Filippelli and passed through to the family’s administration.
Joseph Vollaro opened the company in April 2004. Since May 2005, he has paid over $60,000 of extortion payments to the Gambino family. The initial payments were collected by Gambino family soldier Vincent Pacelli on behalf of the then incarcerated Louis Filippelli. After Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo assumed control of Joseph Vollaro from Filippelli in late June 2005, payments were collected on his behalf for the administration by DiMaria, who controlled Joseph Vollaro for Corozzo while Corozzo was on supervised release, as well as by Gambino family soldiers Mario Cassarino and Ernest Grillo.
Multiple members of the Gambino family informed Joseph Vollaro that the profits from his Staten Island cement company were passed along to the Gambino family administration, which consists of acting boss John D’Amico, acting underboss Domenico Cefalu and consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation.
ii. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - NASCAR Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In January 2006, NASCAR had begun construction on a racetrack in Staten Island. Recine Trucking, a company under the control of Gambino family acting underboss Domenico Cefalu, was among the first companies hired to bring fill to the site. Thereafter, Gambino family soldier Ernest Grillo acquired exclusive dumping rights at the site for Joseph Vollaro.
From late January 2006 to May 2006, Grillo, Cefalu and Gambino family members Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Nicholas Corozzo and Frank Cali negotiated the amount of extortion Joseph Vollaro would be required to pay for the exclusive dumping rights. Eventually, Joseph Vollaro received those rights on the condition that he make extortion payments of $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Corozzo and DiMaria, and $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Cefalu and Cali.
Before Joseph Vollaro could begin dumping at the site pursuant to these terms, the exclusive dumping deal fell through. Later, after a new deal was worked out, Corozzo and DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to take the job on the condition that he pay them $1 for every yard of fill dumped at the site.
Joseph Vollaro also was required to make a one-time $9,000 payment to NASCAR employee Todd Polakoff on behalf have NASCAR executive William Kilgannon.
Joseph Vollaro worked at the site for a short time and made approximately $13,000 in extortion payments to Gambino family soldier Mario Cassarino, who collected the extortion payments for Corozzo and DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
2. Cassarino Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
As discussed below, Cassarino is a Gambino family soldier with a violent past who has continued to engage in acts of violence.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Cassarino is charged in four predicate acts and eight counts of extortion, which are considered crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). Cassarino is a soldier in a violent criminal organization who acted as an enforcer for Nicholas Corozzo, a powerful and violent captain in the family, by collecting extortion payments for him on numerous occasions. Further, Cassarino did Corozzo’s bidding while Corozzo was on under court supervision. He thus knowingly aided his superior commit crimes and ignore court orders. Thus the nature and circumstances of the crimes charged favor detention.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
As a soldier in the Gambino family, Cassarino has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. Further, Cassarino has a history of criminal conduct. Below is a brief summary of Cassarino’s arrests and convictions:
• On August 19, 1983, Cassarino was arrested for Robbery in the Second Degree and pled guilty to petit larceny and disorderly conduct on November 9, 1983. He received a sentence of a conditional discharge.
• On January 24, 1985, Cassarino was arrested for Assault in the Second Degree and Assault in the Third Degree and Possession of a Dangerous Weapon. He pled guilty on January 24, 1985 to Attempted Assault in the Third Degree, Possession of a Weapon in the Fourth Degree and Resisting Arrest. He received a sentence of a $100 fine.
• On April 7, 1986, Cassarino was arrested for Possession of the Forged Instrument in the Second Degree and Aggravated Unlicensed Operation of the Motor Vehicle. On April 8, 1986, Cassarino pled guilty to Attempted Possession of a Forged Instrument and was sentenced to a $100 fine or 10 days incarceration.
• On February 4, 1988, Cassarino was arrested and convicted of Robbery in the First Degree, Theft with a Deadly Firearm, Robbery in the Second Degree, Grand Larceny and Unlawful Imprisonment. He received a sentence of 42 to 126 months imprisonment. He was released on April 28, 1999.
Cassarino’s criminal history, coupled with the fact that he helped his superior commit crimes while on supervised release and those crimes were all crimes of violence favor detention.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Cassarino has long engaged in violence on behalf of the Gambino family. His recent involvement in acts of violence include the multiple charged extortions with Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. The violent nature of the Gambino family’s method of collecting money is made clear in the following recording of DiMaria: “You have to go bother these people for your money... they are going to tell you we got to sit down and talk and this and that. Rough them up a little. Tell them, ‘You’re a fucking stiff.’ Tell them what you have to tell them.... The next guy that owes you money from there with them guys, you catch them, and that’s what I’m saying, that you check in with the other guys ... Crack a face, fuck them up. Don’t you do it, send a fucking kid to rough them up, a fucking joke.”
The crimes charged, coupled with his prior convictions for robbery and assault with a dangerous weapon, make clear that Cassarino is a danger to the community.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Cassarino’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted and participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Cassarino’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Numerous cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and at least three will confirm that Cassarino is a member of the family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce. Finally, to prove that Cassarino engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity, the government will offer the testimony of law enforcement witnesses, numerous cooperating witnesses and consensual recordings. For example, the government has more than a dozen recordings documenting Cassarino’s involvement in the extortions for which he is indicted in this case. Thus, the government’s evidence of Cassarino’s guilt is strong and clearly favors detention.
3. Cassarino Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the facts above, given that he faces a term of 20 years’ imprisonment for each extortion if he were convicted, Cassarino constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). The strength of the government’s case makes Cassarino’s incentive to flee even stronger.
Carneglia is charged with the fatal stabbing of Michael Cotillo during an altercation outside of the Blue Fountain Diner in Queens. The evidence of Carneglia’s involvement is strong. It consists of testimony of three cooperating witness and several lay witnesses, an intercepted conversation of Carneglia, crime scene evidence and the medical examiner’s report.
One cooperating witnesses is expected to testify that he was present for and witnessed the altercation between Carneglia and Cotillo, immediately after which Cotillo collapsed on the ground and later died. The cooperating witness is expected to testify that he discussed the stabbing with several Gambino family members, including a codefendant, who is a high-ranking member of the family. The cooperating witness is expected to testify that the codefendant attended a “sitdown” to resolve the stabbing incident and implicated Carneglia in the murder on multiple occasions. Another cooperating witness is expected to testify that he learned from several Gambino family associates that Carneglia was responsible for the stabbing outside the Blue Fountain Diner. Another cooperating witness is expected to testify that he learned from several Gambino family associates, including one who was present at the Blue Fountain Diner with Carneglia, that Carneglia stabbed Michael at the diner. In addition, several lay witnesses are expected to testify about the altercation at the diner.
The government also will introduce a court-authorized intercepted recording of Carneglia. On November 18, 1999, Carneglia was intercepted discussing the stabbing at the diner with Gambino family captain Eugene Gotti, who was incarcerated at FCI McKean at the time.2 During the course of this conversation, as set forth below with emphasis added, Carneglia admits that he committed the fatal stabbing.
Gotti: You’re talking about the thing at the diner, not that (UI). Joe wasn’t going nowhere. Joe was lucky he didn’t come.
Carneglia: Yeah, they were gonna come after us for another reason. And that’s a reason I forgot.
Gotti: Yeah, well, you stabbed somebody Charles. You stabbed one of their guys.
Carneglia: I know that. I know that. I know.
Gotti: And that’s why they wanted to get you. They come (UI) at all.
Carneglia: I know.
Gotti: Tony ain’t doing shit. And that ended that.
Carneglia: You’re right.
Gotti: Joe Lombardi. I don’t remember why.
Carneglia: That was for the same reason. For the diner. That was the reason that Diane - Lenny was the one that told Angelo that we were on the hit parade.
Gotti: Lenny was wrong (UI) that you stabbed somebody about that point.
Carneglia: You know (UI) you knew.
Gotti: (UI) I hear. I’m dying to hear.
Carneglia: And he’s the one that told Angelo that we were okayed.
Gotti: Yeah, but you don’t understand what you’re saying.
Carneglia: Okay.
Gotti: He told Angelo that he okayed what?
Carneglia: To kill me and my brother.
Gotti: That never happened.
Carneglia: That never happened? They didn’t, they didn’t mention the name, right. They said Carneglia. This thing you got to do.
Gotti: Yes. What would happen to the guy?
Carneglia: Yes.
Gotti: What happened? I forgot. That you went bye-bye.
* * * *
Gotti: The only guy I got that here that did that, I’m trying to tell you, don’t even remember. Remember when Willie Boy got really banged up bad?
Carneglia: Right.
Gotti: His face and everything? And he gave two shots in the (UI) listed? In that little joint? Whose that guy that did that? Well, we stopped it.
Carneglia: Oh.
Gotti: Cause we shirked them.
Carneglia: Right.
Gotti: And you over that day and killed the other guy.
Carneglia: I know. I know ...
Gotti: They went all out. That’s what I’ve got. You keep telling me I don’t know where you got. I get confused. And that’s a ways back.
Carneglia: 30 years ago.
Gotti: I remember ... What, it was more than 10 years ago.
Carneglia: I didn’t say 10. I said 30.
Gotti: Yeah, that’s how long ago it was.
Carneglia: (UI) I look at the calendar. I know.
Gotti: Hey, anyway. He’s got everything else.
An organized crime expert is expected to testify that in the context of the conversation between Carneglia and Gotti about events that occurred 30 years prior, “Lenny” is defendant Leonard DiMaria, a current Gambino family captain, “Angelo” is Angelo Ruggiero, a now-deceased but former Gambino family soldier, “Neil” is Aniello Dellacroce, the now deceased but former underboss of the Gambino family, “Joe Lombardi” is a former Gambino family soldier, and “Willie Boy” is Wilfred Johnson, a former Gambino family associate.
The crime scene evidence will show that on November 6, 1977, blood from the sidewalk outside the Blue Fountain Diner was recovered and consistent with the autopsy report, the medical examiner is expected to testify that Cotillo died from a stab wound to the chest.
iii. Murder of Salvatore Puma
Carneglia is charged in the fatal stabbing of Gambino family associate Salvatore Puma on a street corner in Queens on July 29, 1983. Following an argument over money, Carneglia stabbed Puma in the chest, resulting in his death the following day at the hospital. The evidence of Carneglia’s involvement is extremely strong. It consists of testimony of three cooperating witness and several lay witnesses and the medical examiner’s report.
Three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify about Carneglia’s involvement in the murder. All three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Carneglia admitted that he stabbed Puma. Several lay witnesses will also testify about Puma’s condition immediately after he was stabbed and rushing him to the hospital. Consistent with the autopsy report, the medical examiner is expected to testify that Puma died from a stab wound to the chest.
iv. Murder/Murder Conspiracy of Louis DiBono
Carneglia is charged in the murder and conspiracy to murder Gambino family soldier Louis DiBono. On October 4, 1990, on the orders of John J. Gotti, the boss of the Gambino family at the time, Carneglia shot and killed DiBono in the parking garage of the World Trade Center in Manhattan, after DiBono had repeatedly disobeyed Gotti’s orders to meet with him.3 The evidence against Carneglia is overwhelming. It consists of testimony of three cooperating witness, intercepted conversations of Gotti, crime scene evidence and the medical examiner’s report.
Three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify about Carneglia’s involvement in the murder. One of the cooperating witnesses participated in the murder with Carneglia. He is expected to testify that Carneglia shot and killed DiBono in a car in the parking garage of the World Trade Center and left DiBono’s body there. Another cooperating witness participated in the murder conspiracy with Carneglia. He is expected to testify that Carneglia was a member of the “hit team” ordered to find and kill DiBono and that a high-ranking member of the Gambino family informed the cooperating witness that the DiBono murder had been carried out. A third cooperating witness is expected to testify that Carneglia indicated he was looking for DiBono and later admitted his involvement in the murder.
The government also will introduce intercepted recordings of Gambino family boss John J. Gotti. In late 1989 and early 1990, Gotti was intercepted, pursuant to a court-authorized bug in the apartment above the Ravenite social club in Manhattan, talking to Gambino family consigliere Frank Locascio about killing DiBono.4
• On December 12, 1989, Gotti told Locascio: “I took Sammy’s (Gravano) word. Louie DiBono. And I sat with this guy. I saw the papers and everything. He didn’t rob nothin’. You know why he’s dying? He’s gonna die because he refused to come in when I called. He didn’t do nothing else wrong.”
• On January 24, 1990, Gotti told Locascio: “that’s not, that don’t belong to us. That’s their fucking ‘crew.’ And he’s gotta get ‘whacked.’ Because he’s getting the same, for the same reason that “Jelly Belly’s” (referring to DiBono) getting it. You wanna, you wanna challenge the ‘administration,’ we’ll, we’ll you will meet the challenge. And you’re ‘going,’ you motherfucker!”
The crime evidence will show that on October 4, 1990, DiBono’s body was discovered in the parking garage in the World Trade Center lying face down across the front seat in his car. Consistent with the autopsy report, the medical examiner is expected to testify that DiBono died from multiple gunshot wounds to the head, neck and chest.
v. Robbery/Robbery Conspiracy/ Felony Murder of Jose Delgado Rivera
Carneglia is charged in the robbery/robbery conspiracy of an armored truck as it was delivering money to the American Airlines building at John F. Kennedy International Airport (“JFK”) in Queens on December 14, 1990. In the course of the robbery, one of the armored truck guards, Jose Delgado Rivera, was shot and killed. The evidence against Carneglia is overwhelming. It consists of the testimony of two cooperating witnesses and lay witnesses, crime scene evidence and the medical examiner’s report.
Two cooperating witnesses are expected to testify about Carneglia’s involvement in the robbery and murder. One of the cooperating witnesses participated in the robbery with Carneglia. He is expected to testify that Carneglia participated in the robbery of the armored truck outside the American Airlines building at JFK and that during the course of the robbery money was stolen and one of the guards was shot. Another cooperating witness participated in the robbery conspiracy with Carneglia. He is expected to testify that Carneglia was involved in the plot to rob the armored truck and that he heard from a Gambino family associate involved in the robbery that Carneglia robbed the truck and one of the guard was shot. Lay witnesses are expected to testify that the armored truck that delivers money to the American Airlines building at JFK was robbed and that one of the guards was shot.
The crime scene evidence will show that on December 14, 1990, Rivera was shot outside the American Airlines building at JFK airport. Consistent with the autopsy report, the medical examiner is expected to testify that Rivera died from a shotgun wound to the back and a bullet wound to the abdomen.
vi. Robbery/Robbery Conspiracy of Papavero Funeral Home
Carneglia is charged in the robbery of an employee of Papavero Funeral Home in Queens on November 5, 1995. The evidence against Carneglia is overwhelming. It consists of the testimony of five cooperating witnesses and lay witnesses.
Three of the cooperating witnesses are expected to testify about Carneglia’s involvement in the robbery. All three of those cooperating witnesses participated in the robbery with Carneglia. They are expected to testify that Carneglia was involved in the planning of robbery which targeted the funeral home because in excess of $300,000 in cash was thought to be in a safe. All three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the safe was not found but money was taken from an employee of the funeral home, and shared with Carneglia.
vii. Marijuana Distribution Conspiracy
Carneglia is charged in a lucrative conspiracy to distribute marijuana from approximately June 1988 to December 1990. The evidence of Carneglia’s involvement is strong. It consists of the testimony of two cooperating witnesses, who are expected to testify about Carneglia’s involvement in the marijuana distribution conspiracy.
One of the cooperating witnesses participated in the conspiracy with Carneglia. He is expected to testify that marijuana was purchased from a drug connection in Texas, arranged by Carneglia’s brother John Carneglia. The cooperating witness is expected to testify that John and Charles Carneglia received proceeds from the sale of the marijuana amounting to tens of thousands of dollars, until one of the shipments was intercepted by law enforcement. Another cooperating witness, who was close to Carneglia, is expected to testify that John and Charles Carneglia received money from a Gambino family associate from marijuana being shipped from Texas.
viii. Extortion/Conspiracy of John Doe #1
Carneglia is charged in a long-running conspiracy to extort weekly protection payments from an individual identified as John Doe #1 in the indictment from approximately January 1991 to January 2003. The evidence against Carneglia is strong. It consists of the testimony of two cooperating witnesses, who are expected to testify about Carneglia’s use of extortionate means to secure the payments.
One of the cooperating witnesses is expected to testify that John Doe #1 was approached in the early 1990s about paying Carneglia for protection in connection with his business. The cooperating witness is expected to testify that John Doe #1 paid Carneglia approximately $400 per week over a ten year period - resulting in extortion payments totaling more than $200,000. The cooperating witness also is expected to testify that John Doe #1 made “tribute payments” to Carneglia at Christmas each year, totaling more than $50,000. Another cooperating witness, who was close to Carneglia, is expected to testify that John Doe #1 made weekly protection payments as well as holiday tribute payments to Carneglia throughout the 1990s.5
2. Carneglia Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should be Detained
As discussed above, Carneglia has been associated with the Gambino family for more than 30 years. During that time, he has committed numerous crimes of violence, including murder, robbery and extortion. Accordingly, he constitutes a danger to the community and should be detained.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Carneglia is charged with serious crimes - racketeering conspiracy with crimes of violence as predicate acts. Murder, robbery and extortion are crimes of violence. The nature and circumstances of those crimes, as set forth above, clearly favors detention.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
Carneglia is a Gambino family soldier. He is a life-long criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. Carneglia has multiple convictions and is currently on supervised release following his conviction in 2001 for extortion. Below is a brief summary of Carneglia’s arrests and convictions:
• On June 19, 1966, Carneglia was arrested in Brooklyn on charges of receiving stolen property. The charges were dismissed.
• On July 3, 1967, Carneglia was arrested in Brooklyn on charges of petit larceny. The charges were dismissed.
• On April 25, 1968, Carneglia was arrested in Brooklyn on charges of possession of stolen property and conspiracy. The charges were dismissed.
• On December 10, 1968, Carneglia was arrested in Queens on charges of conspiracy. The charges were dismissed.
• On January 10, 1969, Carneglia was arrested in the Eastern District of New York on charges of theft of interstate shipment. The charges were dismissed.
• On February 26, 1970, Carneglia was convicted in Brooklyn on a felony charge of grand larceny and sentenced to one year imprisonment.
• On February 6, 1973, Carneglia was arrested in the Eastern District of New York on charges of theft of interstate shipment. The charges were dismissed.
• On May 5, 1976, Carneglia was convicted in Brooklyn on a misdemeanor charge of petit larceny and sentenced to a $200 fine.
• On July 20, 1978, Carneglia was convicted in Queens on a misdemeanor charge of resisting arrest arising from the altercation with Officer Albert Gelb described above. Carneglia was originally convicted at trial of two counts of resisting arrest and sentenced to one year imprisonment. The conviction was overturned on appeal and thereafter Carneglia pleaded guilty and was sentenced to conditional discharge.
• On August 15, 1980, Carneglia was arrested in Brooklyn on charges of attempted murder, criminal possession of a weapon, assault with intent to cause physical injury with a weapon. The charges were dismissed.
• On November 13, 1981, Carneglia was arrested in Brooklyn on charges of assault with intent to cause physical injury and criminal mischief. Prosecution was declined.
• On September 5, 1985, Carneglia was convicted in Suffolk County on a charge of operating a motor vehicle impair by alcohol. He was sentenced to a $250 fine and his license was revoked.
• On December 1, 1988, Carneglia was arrested in the Eastern District of New York on RICO. The charges were dismissed.
Most recently, on November 2, 2001, Carneglia and Gambino family captain were convicted after trial in the Eastern District of New York on charges of extortion conspiracy and sentenced to 63 months’ imprisonment. Carneglia and Scala were tried on charges premised on the extortions of two adult entertainment businesses in Suffolk County, the Forbidden Fruit and Cherries Video. At trial, the government proved that Carneglia is a Gambino family soldier and Scala is a Gambino family captain, who supervised the extortion of Cherries Video, which involved explicit threats of violence to the owner of Cherries Video, an assault, the collection of weekly protection money, and a further effort to force him to sign over a portion of his business to organized crime.
Given Carneglia’s longstanding association with the Gambino family and his long history of arrests and convictions, which include grand larceny, resisting arrest and extortion conspiracy, this factor also favors detention. See Connolly, 1999 WL 1995186 (long history of arrests favors detention).
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Carneglia is a career criminal and a murderer who has routinely engaged in violence as part of a dangerous criminal enterprise. His release clearly poses a serious threat of danger to the community both due to the violent crimes in which he has engaged and because of the likelihood that, if released on bail, Carneglia will continue to commit crimes. Even after his release from prison in May 2006, the evidence will show that Carneglia has continued to meet and communicate with members and associates of organized crime. Accordingly, this factor favors detention.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Carneglia’s guilt on the charged crimes is extremely strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove that (a) the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate -- and conducted and participated -- directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
The government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Carneglia’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and physical surveillance. More than a dozen cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and at least 10 cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Carneglia is a long-standing member of the family.
The government will satisfy the interstate commerce requirement by presenting evidence that the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including robbery, extortion and marijuana distribution conspiracy, among other crimes that affect interstate commerce.
Finally, the government will prove that Carneglia agreed to participate in the conduct of the affairs of the Gambino family through a pattern of racketeering activity. As set forth above, the testimony of numerous cooperating witnesses, several of whom actually participated in the crime with Carneglia and will provide eye-witness testimony, and significant corroborating evidence will establish Carneglia’s agreement to participate in the Gambino family through the charged pattern of racketeering activity - namely, the murders in 1975, 1977, 1983 and 1990, the robberies in 1990 and 1995 and the extortion from 1991 to 1993.
The government’s evidence of Carneglia’s guilt is strong and clearly favors detention.
3. Carneglia Constitutes a Risk Of Flight
In addition to the facts set forth above, given the certainty of a life sentence if convicted of the charged RICO conspiracy, Carneglia constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight).
Further, Carneglia was deemed to be a fugitive for several years after he was indicted in United States v. Aniello Dellacroce. et al., No. 81 CR 695 (E.D.N.Y.). Because Carneglia has already shown a willingness to abscond when faced with criminal charges, and in light of the severity of the sentence in this case should he be convicted, it is reasonable to assume a high probability exists that Carneglia would attempt to flee should he be released on bail.
Thus, Carneglia should also be detained as a risk of flight.
D. MARIO CASSARINO
Mario Cassarino is a soldier in the Gambino family. He is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including four predicate acts of extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy, and additional predicate acts of union benefit theft, conspiracy to embezzle union benefits, mail fraud, mail fraud conspiracy and false statements in connection to a union benefit fund. Cassarino is also charged with extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy, union benefit theft, conspiracy to embezzle union benefits, mail fraud, mail fraud conspiracy and false statements in connection to a union benefit fund.
The extortion counts for which Cassarino has been charged constitute crimes of violence. Accordingly, the government seeks a permanent order of detention for Cassarino on the grounds that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Cassarino.
a. Cassarino Is a Gambino Family Soldier
Cassarino is a Gambino family soldier. The government will establish Cassarino’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
At least three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Cassarino is a soldier in the Gambino family. This testimony is corroborated by more than 90 consensual recordings of Cassarino engaging in Gambino family business, dozens of which show his position as a soldier of Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo’s crew.
The available surveillance evidence also establishes Cassarino’s association with and position in the Gambino family. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that weddings and wakes of members of organized crime or their relatives are often places where Gambino family business is discussed. Cassarino was been observed with other members of the Gambino family at the January 2001 wake of Antoinette Fappiano, the mother of Gambino soldier Frank Fappiano. In the past year, Cassarino was surveilled at the wake of Gambino soldier Pietro Inzerillo, the father-in-law of Gambino family soldier Guiseppe Gambino and the grandfather of Gambino family soldier Pietro Inzerillo, the father-in-law of Gambino family soldier Guiseppe Gambino and the grandfather of Gambino family soldier Pietro Inzerillo.
b. Crimes of Violence
As noted above, Cassarino is charged in multiple extortions, all crimes of violence. A brief proffer of the facts pertaining to each of the extortions follows.
i. Extortion /Extortion Conspiracy - Staten Island Cement Company Profits
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately December 2003, Joseph Vollaro approached Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli and requested permission to open a cement company on Staten Island. Due to the Gambino family’s control of the New York cement industry, Cacciopoli, together with Gambino family captain Louis Filippelli, engaged in a series of meetings to obtain permission from the Gambino family’s administration to open such a company. Cacciopoli and Filippelli succeeded and informed Joseph Vollaro that he could start the company provided that following a one-year grace period, the Gambino family would receive 15% or $1 per yard for all cement sold, with the payments to be collected by Filippelli and passed through to the family’s administration.
Joseph Vollaro opened the company in April 2004. Since May 2005, he has paid over $60,000 of extortion payments to the Gambino family. The initial payments were collected by Gambino family soldier Vincent Pacelli on behalf of the then incarcerated Louis Filippelli. After Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo assumed control of Joseph Vollaro from Filippelli in late June 2005, payments were collected on his behalf for the administration by DiMaria, who controlled Joseph Vollaro for Corozzo while Corozzo was on supervised release, as well as by Gambino family soldiers Mario Cassarino and Ernest Grillo.
Multiple members of the Gambino family informed Joseph Vollaro that the profits from his Staten Island cement company were passed along to the Gambino family administration, which consists of acting boss John D’Amico, acting underboss Domenico Cefalu and consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation.
ii. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - NASCAR Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In January 2006, NASCAR had begun construction on a racetrack in Staten Island. Recine Trucking, a company under the control of Gambino family acting underboss Domenico Cefalu, was among the first companies hired to bring fill to the site. Thereafter, Gambino family soldier Ernest Grillo acquired exclusive dumping rights at the site for Joseph Vollaro.
From late January 2006 to May 2006, Grillo, Cefalu and Gambino family members Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Nicholas Corozzo and Frank Cali negotiated the amount of extortion Joseph Vollaro would be required to pay for the exclusive dumping rights. Eventually, Joseph Vollaro received those rights on the condition that he make extortion payments of $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Corozzo and DiMaria, and $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Cefalu and Cali.
Before Joseph Vollaro could begin dumping at the site pursuant to these terms, the exclusive dumping deal fell through. Later, after a new deal was worked out, Corozzo and DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to take the job on the condition that he pay them $1 for every yard of fill dumped at the site.
Joseph Vollaro also was required to make a one-time $9,000 payment to NASCAR employee Todd Polakoff on behalf have NASCAR executive William Kilgannon.
Joseph Vollaro worked at the site for a short time and made approximately $13,000 in extortion payments to Gambino family soldier Mario Cassarino, who collected the extortion payments for Corozzo and DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
2. Cassarino Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
As discussed below, Cassarino is a Gambino family soldier with a violent past who has continued to engage in acts of violence.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Cassarino is charged in four predicate acts and eight counts of extortion, which are considered crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). Cassarino is a soldier in a violent criminal organization who acted as an enforcer for Nicholas Corozzo, a powerful and violent captain in the family, by collecting extortion payments for him on numerous occasions. Further, Cassarino did Corozzo’s bidding while Corozzo was on under court supervision. He thus knowingly aided his superior commit crimes and ignore court orders. Thus the nature and circumstances of the crimes charged favor detention.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
As a soldier in the Gambino family, Cassarino has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. Further, Cassarino has a history of criminal conduct. Below is a brief summary of Cassarino’s arrests and convictions:
• On August 19, 1983, Cassarino was arrested for Robbery in the Second Degree and pled guilty to petit larceny and disorderly conduct on November 9, 1983. He received a sentence of a conditional discharge.
• On January 24, 1985, Cassarino was arrested for Assault in the Second Degree and Assault in the Third Degree and Possession of a Dangerous Weapon. He pled guilty on January 24, 1985 to Attempted Assault in the Third Degree, Possession of a Weapon in the Fourth Degree and Resisting Arrest. He received a sentence of a $100 fine.
• On April 7, 1986, Cassarino was arrested for Possession of the Forged Instrument in the Second Degree and Aggravated Unlicensed Operation of the Motor Vehicle. On April 8, 1986, Cassarino pled guilty to Attempted Possession of a Forged Instrument and was sentenced to a $100 fine or 10 days incarceration.
• On February 4, 1988, Cassarino was arrested and convicted of Robbery in the First Degree, Theft with a Deadly Firearm, Robbery in the Second Degree, Grand Larceny and Unlawful Imprisonment. He received a sentence of 42 to 126 months imprisonment. He was released on April 28, 1999.
Cassarino’s criminal history, coupled with the fact that he helped his superior commit crimes while on supervised release and those crimes were all crimes of violence favor detention.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Cassarino has long engaged in violence on behalf of the Gambino family. His recent involvement in acts of violence include the multiple charged extortions with Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. The violent nature of the Gambino family’s method of collecting money is made clear in the following recording of DiMaria: “You have to go bother these people for your money... they are going to tell you we got to sit down and talk and this and that. Rough them up a little. Tell them, ‘You’re a fucking stiff.’ Tell them what you have to tell them.... The next guy that owes you money from there with them guys, you catch them, and that’s what I’m saying, that you check in with the other guys ... Crack a face, fuck them up. Don’t you do it, send a fucking kid to rough them up, a fucking joke.”
The crimes charged, coupled with his prior convictions for robbery and assault with a dangerous weapon, make clear that Cassarino is a danger to the community.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Cassarino’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted and participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Cassarino’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Numerous cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and at least three will confirm that Cassarino is a member of the family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce. Finally, to prove that Cassarino engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity, the government will offer the testimony of law enforcement witnesses, numerous cooperating witnesses and consensual recordings. For example, the government has more than a dozen recordings documenting Cassarino’s involvement in the extortions for which he is indicted in this case. Thus, the government’s evidence of Cassarino’s guilt is strong and clearly favors detention.
3. Cassarino Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the facts above, given that he faces a term of 20 years’ imprisonment for each extortion if he were convicted, Cassarino constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). The strength of the government’s case makes Cassarino’s incentive to flee even stronger.
Re: 2008 Gambino Indictment Detention Motion
E. DOMENICO CEFALU
Domenico Cefalu is the current acting underboss of the Gambino family and a convicted felon. Cefalu is charged is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including three predicate acts of extortion. Cefalu is also charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy. If convicted as charged, Cefalu faces a term of 20 years’ imprisonment for each of the racketeering conspiracy, extortion and extortion conspiracy counts. If he is sentenced consecutively for the two different extortion schemes in which he participated, the 61-year-old Cefalu faces an effective life sentence.
The government seeks to have a permanent order of detention entered against Cefalu on the ground that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the charges lodged against Cefalu.
a. Cefalu Is the Acting Underboss of The Gambino Family
Cefalu is a longstanding member and captain in the Gambino family; he currently serves as the acting underboss. The government will establish Cefalu’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
More than three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Cefalu is a longstanding member and captain in the Gambino family. At least two witnesses are expected to testify that Cefalu is presently the acting underboss of the Gambino family.
This testimony is corroborated by consensual recordings detailing his leadership role within the Gambino family and confirming his current status as a member of the family’s administration.
Surveillance evidence also establishes Cefalu’s long-lived association with and position in the Gambino family. Cefalu has been observed at numerous locations and events relating to the Gambino family. He has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at 13 weddings and wakes. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that these events are attended by dozens of other members and associates of organized crime, many of whom are convicted felons who committed those crimes as part of an organized crime family, and that Gambino family business is routinely conducted at such events. Cefalu was observed at the 2002 wake of Gambino family acting boss John Gotti. In the past two years alone, Cefalu was surveilled attending the June 2006 wake of Anna Trucchio, mother of incarcerated Gambino family soldier Ronald Trucchio and grandmother of Gambino family soldier Alphonse Trucchio; the September 2006 wake of the sister of Gambino family captain Bartolomeo “Baboots” Vernace; the January 2007 wake of Maryann Corozzo, the wife of Gambino family soldier Blaise Corozzo; the March 2007 wake of Gambino family soldier George Remini; the April 2007 wake of Pietro Inzerillo, the father-in-law of Gambino family soldier Giuseppe “Joseph” Gambino and grandfather of Gambino family of Pietro “Tall Pete” Inzerillo; the November 2007 wake of Gambino family captain Giuseppe “Joseph” Arcuri; Gambino family captain (and co-defendant) Frank Cali’s December 2007 Christmas party. In just 2007, Cefalu was observed meeting with Gambino family captains on more than five occasions and with Gambino family soldiers on more than five other occasions. Further, in late 2005, Cefalu was observed meeting with Gambino family captain Frank Cali and acting underboss Domenico Cefalu.
b. Cefalu Is Charged with Crimes of Violence
As noted above, Cefalu is charged in multiple extortions, all crimes of violence. A brief proffer of the facts pertaining to each of the extortions follows.
i. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Profits
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately December 2003, Joseph Vollaro approached Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli and requested permission to open a cement company on Staten Island. Due to the Gambino family’s control of the New York cement industry, Cacciopoli, together with Gambino family captain Louis Filippelli, engaged in a series of meetings to obtain permission from the Gambino family’s administration to open such a company. Cacciopoli and Filippelli succeeded and informed Joseph Vollaro that he could start the company provided that following a one-year grace period, the Gambino family would receive 15% or $1 per yard for all cement sold, with the payments to be collected by Filippelli and passed through to the family’s administration.
Joseph Vollaro opened the company in April 2004. Since May 2005, he has paid over $60,000 of extortion payments to the Gambino family. The initial payments were collected by Gambino family soldier Vincent Pacelli on behalf of then incarcerated Louis Filippelli. After Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo assumed control of Joseph Vollaro from Filippelli in late June 2005, payments were collected on his behalf for the administration by DiMaria, who controlled Joseph Vollaro for Corozzo while Corozzo was on supervised release, as well as by Gambino family soldiers Mario Cassarino and Ernest Grillo.
Multiple members of the Gambino family informed Joseph Vollaro that the profits from his Staten Island cement company were passed along to the Gambino family administration, and that the administration consists of acting boss John D’Amico, acting underboss Domenico Cefalu and consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation.
ii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Sale
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
During the spring of 2007, a company offered to buy Joseph Vollaro’s Staten Island cement company. In keeping with instructions from Gambino family captains Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria to consult them before making any decisions concerning his business, Joseph Vollaro informed DiMaria of the offer. DiMaria later told Joseph Vollaro that the family had agreed to allow him to make the sale, provided he pay $100,000 to the administration of the Gambino family, which includes Cefalu.
In January 2008, Joseph Vollaro sold the Staten Island cement company. Thereafter, Gambino family consigliere Joseph Corozzo, through Gambino family solider Gus Sclafani, directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the $100,000 to Joseph Corozzo. Later, Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the money to Leonard DiMaria for distribution to the administration. As directed, Joseph Vollaro made a payment of the proceeds of the sale of the cement company to DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
iii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - NASCAR Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In January 2006, NASCAR had begun construction on a racetrack in Staten Island. Recine Trucking, a company under the control of Gambino family acting underboss Domenico Cefalu, was among the first companies hired to bring fill to the site. Thereafter, Gambino family soldier Ernest Grillo acquired exclusive dumping rights at the site for Joseph Vollaro.
From late January 2006 to May 2006, Grillo, Cefalu and Gambino family members Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Nicholas Corozzo and Frank Cali negotiated the amount of extortion Joseph Vollaro would be required to pay for the exclusive dumping rights. Eventually, Joseph Vollaro received those rights on the condition that he make extortion payments of $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Corozzo and DiMaria, and $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Cefalu and Cali.
Before Joseph Vollaro could begin dumping at the site pursuant to these terms, the exclusive dumping deal fell through. Later, after a new deal was worked out, Corozzo and DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to take the job on the condition that he pay them $1 for every yard of fill dumped at the site.
Joseph Vollaro also was required to make a one-time $9,000 payment to NASCAR employee Todd Polakoff on behalf have NASCAR executive William Kilgannon.
Joseph Vollaro worked at the site for a short time and made approximately $13,000 in extortion payments to Gambino family soldier Mario Cassarino, who collected the extortion payments for Corozzo and DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
2. Cefalu Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
The defendant Domenico Cefalu poses a danger to the community. He is the current acting underboss of a violent organized crime family and has himself engaged in crimes of violence in furtherance of the family’s illegal businesses. Courts in this circuit repeatedly have held that high-ranking members of organized crime constitute a danger to the community. The Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. Ciccone, 312 F.3d 535 (2d Cir. 2002) is particularly instructive. There, Gambino family acting boss Peter Gotti was indicted on racketeering charges that included predicate acts of extortion against others. Peter Gotti, himself, was not charged with any predicate acts of extortion; only money laundering and money laundering conspiracy.
At the detention hearing, the government contended that Gotti, as the leader of the Gambino family, was able to direct the activities of his co-defendants and therefore was responsible for the extortions and the other crimes committed by them. Magistrate Judge Pollak ordered Gotti detained finding that Gotti had been “charged with a crime of violence” and therefore could be detained on grounds of dangerousness. Id. at 538. Judge Pollak held that the government had clearly shown that Gotti was the acting boss of the Gambino family, and as such, was responsible for controlling the activities of the enterprise. Id. Thus, while Gotti was not named in the specific racketeering acts charging extortion, he could nonetheless be held responsible for the acts of the members of his organization given his status as the acting boss of the family. Because extortions are crimes of violence, Judge Pollack ordered Gotti detained as a danger to the community. Id. at 538-39.
On appeal, the Second Circuit upheld the court’s findings that Gotti constituted a danger to the community. The court held that it was proper for a court to consider the RICO enterprise as a whole when considering the dangerousness of one of its leaders. Id. at 542. The court found once the government demonstrated Gotti’s leadership role in the enterprise, and the enterprise was charged with crimes of violence, there was clear and convincing evidence for the court to have found that Gotti was a danger to the community and therefore should be detained. Id. at 542-43.
As discussed below, Cefalu is currently the acting underboss of the Gambino family. Not only are other members of the Gambino family charged with multiple counts of extortion and murder, but here, Cefalu himself is charged with extortions. Accordingly, the evidence supporting the government’s argument for detention here is stronger than that in Ciccone. See also United States v. Cirillo, Cr. No. 05-212 (SLT), slip op. (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (Genovese family acting bosses Dominick Cirillo and Lawrence Dentico, as well as Genovese family captain Anthony Antico, who were charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy, detained as dangers to the community), aff’d, 149 Fed. Appx. 40 (2d Cir. 2005). As set forth below, each of the relevant considerations under the Bail Reform Act favors detention here.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
In addition to racketeering conspiracy, Cefalu is charged as the acting underboss of a violent criminal organization with extortion and extortion conspiracy - both of which are crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). Moreover, Cefalu currently leads a violent criminal enterprise and has at his disposal more than 200 made men - soldiers - sworn to follow his orders and commit violence upon his request. Cefalu faces 20 years’ imprisonment for each of the five counts with which he is charged. Thus, the nature and circumstances of the crimes charged favors detention.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
Cefalu is a long-standing member of the Gambino family who now serves as its underboss. He is a life-long criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. He also is a multiple convicted felon. Below is a brief summary of Cefalu’s arrests and convictions:
• On June 24, 1981, Cefalu was arrested in New York and charged with conspiracy to import heroin (21 U.S.C. § 963) and violating bank secrecy laws (31 U.S.C. § 1059); he was convicted on the heroin conspiracy charges and sentenced to eight years in prison;
• On June 13, 1995, Cefalu was charged with contempt of court and sentenced to 33 months in prison.
Cefalu’s position of leadership in the Gambino family combined with his history of criminal activity favors detention.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Cefalu poses a clear danger if released. As noted above, the government will establish Cefalu’s association with, and position of authority in, the Gambino family through a variety of sources, including the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence.
Courts in this circuit routinely detain high-ranking members of organized crime based on their leadership roles in criminal enterprises that engage in acts of violence. See, e.g, Defede, 7 F. Supp. 2d at 393 (detaining defendant on dangerousness based on the proffered testimony of cooperating witness and surveillance evidence that he was the acting boss of the Luchese family, an enterprise involved in extortionate conduct, among other crimes); Gotti, 312 F.3d at 542 (“Indeed, we made it quite clear in United States v. Colombo, 777 F.2d 96, 98 (2d Cir. 1985), that the [Bail Reform Act] ‘does not require that the defendant himself commit acts of physical violence as a condition precedent to a detention order.’ ”).
Cefalu is one of the current leaders of the Gambino family “on the street” and he has been involved in acts of violence, including extortions with Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. The violent nature of the Gambino family’s method of collecting money is made clear in the following recording of DiMaria: “You have to go bother these people for your money... they are going to tell you we got to sit down and talk and this and that. Rough them up a little. Tell them, ‘You’re a fucking stiff.’ Tell them what you have to tell them.... The next guy that owes you money from there with them guys, you catch them, and that’s what I’m saying, that you check in with the other guys ... Crack a face, fuck them up. Don’t you do it, send a fucking kid to rough them up, a fucking joke.”
He thus falls within the “small but identifiable group of particularly dangerous defendants as to whom neither the imposition of stringent release conditions nor the prospect of revocation of release can reasonably assure the safety of the community.” Senate Report at 3188-89. As demonstrated by the recorded conversations, Cefalu’s position in the Gambino family gives him the authority and resources to continue his criminal activities and to order and accomplish acts of violence against potential witnesses or any person he perceives as a threat - of which there will be many during the course of this prosecution.
Finally, Cefalu likely will continue his criminal conduct if released; he is a convicted felon and career criminal who heads a continuing criminal enterprise, the needs of which require constant monitoring. As noted, courts in this circuit have recognized that when organized crime defendants are charged with their participation in a criminal enterprise, the risk of continued criminal conduct is substantial and justifies detention. See Salerno, 631 F. Supp. at 1375.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Cefalu’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy and racketeering counts, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted or participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affected interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Cefalu’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance photographs. Numerous cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Cefalu is a longstanding member of the family and a captain. At least two witnesses are expected to testify that Cefalu currently serves as the underboss of the Gambino family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Cefalu engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity, the government will offer the testimony of the extortion victim, which is corroborated by law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses and consensual recordings, including more than a dozen recordings detailing Cefalu’s involvement in the extortions for which he is indicted.
Accordingly, the government’s evidence of Cefalu’s guilt clearly favors detention.
3. Cefalu Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the facts set forth above, given that he faces 20 years’ imprisonment on each of the five counts in which he is charged, Cefalu constitutes a risk of flight and should be detained.
See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). This risk of flight is heightened as a result of the strong evidence against Cefalu and the fact that he maintains ties to Italy. For these reasons, detention is warranted.
F. JOSEPH COROZZO
Joseph Corozzo currently is the consigliere of the Gambino family and a convicted felon. Corozzo is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including predicate acts of cocaine distribution conspiracy, extortion and extortion conspiracy. Corozzo is also charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy. If convicted as charged, Corozzo faces a term of life imprisonment.
The government seeks to have a permanent order of detention entered against Corozzo on two grounds: that he is a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the charges lodged against Corozzo.
a. Corozzo Is the Consigliere of the Gambino Family
Corozzo is a longstanding member and captain in the Gambino family; he currently serves as the consigliere - the third highest-ranking position. The government will establish Corozzo’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, an undercover law enforcement officer, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
At least five cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Corozzo is a longstanding member and captain in the Gambino family who presently serves as the consigliere of the family. This testimony will be corroborated by consensual recordings, as well as an undercover law enforcement officer who penetrated the Gambino family and are expected to testify that he heard Joseph Corozzo constantly referred to as the family’s consigliere.
The available surveillance evidence also establishes Corozzo’s long-lived association with and position in the Gambino family. As early as 1976 - more than 30 years ago - Corozzo has been observed at locations and events relating to the Gambino family. He has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at least 25 weddings and wakes. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that these events are attended by dozens of other members and associates of organized crime, many of whom are convicted felons who committed those crimes as part of an organized crime family, and that Gambino family business is routinely conducted at such events. Corozzo was observed at the following events: the 1976 wake of Carlo Gambino, the former boss of the Gambino family; the December 1984 wedding of Gambino family soldier Carmine Agnello and Victoria Gotti, the daughter of Gambino family boss John J. Gotti wedding; the 1991 wedding of John A. Gotti, the son of the then-Gambino family boss; the 1992 wake of Gambino family boss John J. Gotti.
In the past two years alone, Corozzo was surveilled attending the wake of the sister of Gambino family captain Bartolomeo “Baboots” Vernace; the wake of Gambino family soldier George Remini (and leaving with Gambino family underboss Domenico Cefalu and captain Frank Cali); and the wake of former Gambino family underboss Guiseppe Arcuri.
Further, consensual recordings corroborate Corozzo’s position of leadership in the family.
b. Corozzo Is Charged with Crimes of Violence and with Cocaine Distribution Conspiracy
As noted above, Corozzo is charged in multiple extortions, all crimes of violence. A brief proffer of the facts pertaining to each of the extortions follows.
i. Cocaine Distribution Conspiracy
At least four cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Corozzo was involved from the mid 1980s through the mid-1990s in a conspiracy to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine in Ozone Park, Queens. In approximately the mid-1980s, Corozzo, Gambino family soldier Vincent Gotti and others financed and helped consolidate the drug distribution activity in Ozone Park. During that time, the minimum amount of drugs sold per week was approximately two kilograms.
A witness is expected to testify that on one occasion, Corozzo threatened to kill him because Corozzo and the others believed the witness might be an undercover police officer. The witnesses are expected to testify that the cocaine trafficking conspiracy continued through the mid-1990s.
ii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Profits
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately December 2003, Joseph Vollaro approached Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli and requested permission to open a cement company on Staten Island. Due to the Gambino family’s control of the New York cement industry, Cacciopoli, together with Gambino family captain Louis Filippelli, engaged in a series of meetings to obtain permission from the Gambino family’s administration to open such a company. Cacciopoli and Filippelli succeeded and informed Joseph Vollaro that he could start the company provided that following a one-year grace period, the Gambino family would receive 15% or $1 per yard for all cement sold, with the payments to be collected by Filippelli and passed through to the family’s administration. Joseph Vollaro opened the company in April 2004. Since May 2005, he has paid over $60,000 of extortion payments to the Gambino family. The initial payments were collected by Gambino family soldier Vincent Pacelli on behalf of then incarcerated Louis Filippelli. After Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo assumed control of Joseph Vollaro from Filippelli in late June 2005, payments were collected on his behalf for the administration by DiMaria, who controlled Joseph Vollaro for Corozzo while Corozzo was on supervised release, as well as by Gambino family soldiers Mario Cassarino and Ernest Grillo.
Multiple members of the Gambino family informed Joseph Vollaro that the profits from his Staten Island cement company were passed along to the Gambino family administration, and that the administration consists of acting boss John D’Amico, acting underboss Domenico Cefalu and consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation.
iii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Sale
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
During the spring of 2007, a company offered to buy Joseph Vollaro’s Staten Island cement company. In keeping with instructions from Gambino family captains Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria to consult them before making any decisions concerning his business, Joseph Vollaro informed DiMaria of the offer. DiMaria later told Joseph Vollaro that the family had agreed to allow him to make the sale, provided he pay $100,000 to the Gambino family. In January 2008, Joseph Vollaro sold the Staten Island cement company. Thereafter, Gambino family consigliere Joseph Corozzo, through Gambino family solider Gus Sclafani, directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the $100,000 to Joseph Corozzo. Later, Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the money to Leonard DiMaria for distribution to the administration. As directed, Joseph Vollaro made a payment of the proceeds of the sale of the cement company to DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
2. Corozzo Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
The defendant Joseph Corozzo poses a danger to the community. He is the consigliere of a violent organized crime family and has himself engaged in crimes of violence in furtherance of the family’s illegal businesses. Courts in this circuit repeatedly have held that high-ranking members of organized crime constitute a danger to the community. The Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. Ciccone, 312 F.3d 535 (2d Cir. 2002) is particularly instructive. There, Gambino family acting boss Peter Gotti was indicted on racketeering charges that included predicate acts of extortion against others. Peter Gotti, himself, was not charged with any predicate acts of extortion; only money laundering and money laundering conspiracy. At the detention hearing, the government contended that Gotti, as the leader of the Gambino family, was able to direct the activities of his co-defendants and therefore was responsible for the extortions and the other crimes committed by them. Magistrate Judge Pollak ordered Gotti detained finding that Gotti had been “charged with a crime of violence” and therefore could be detained on grounds of dangerousness. Id. at 538. Judge Pollak held that the government had clearly shown that Gotti was the acting boss of the Gambino family, and as such, was responsible for controlling the activities of the enterprise. Id. Thus, while Gotti was not named in the specific racketeering acts charging extortion, he could nonetheless be held responsible for the acts of the members of his organization given his status as the acting boss of the family. Because extortions are crimes of violence, Judge Pollack ordered Gotti detained as a danger to the community. Id. at 538-39.
On appeal, the Second Circuit upheld the court’s findings that Gotti constituted a danger to the community. The court held that it was proper for a court to consider the RICO enterprise as a whole when considering the dangerousness of one of its leaders. Id. at 542. The court found once the government demonstrated Gotti’s leadership role in the enterprise, and the enterprise was charged with crimes of violence, there was clear and convincing evidence for the court to have found that Gotti was a danger to the community and therefore should be detained. Id. at 542-43.
As discussed below, Corozzo is the current consigliere, a position in the family administration designed to counsel the boss of the Gambino family. Not only are other members of the Gambino family charged with multiple counts of extortion and murder, but here, Corozzo, himself, along with the acting boss and acting underboss of the Gambino family, is charged with extortions. Accordingly, the evidence supporting the government’s argument for detention here is stronger than that in Ciccone. See also United States v. Cirillo, Cr. No. 05-212 (SLT), slip op. (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (Genovese family acting bosses Dominick Cirillo and Lawrence Dentico, as well as Genovese family captain Anthony Antico, who were charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy, detained as dangers to the community), aff’d, 149 Fed. Appx. 40 (2d Cir. 2005). As set forth below, each of the relevant considerations under the Bail Reform Act favors detention here.
Domenico Cefalu is the current acting underboss of the Gambino family and a convicted felon. Cefalu is charged is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including three predicate acts of extortion. Cefalu is also charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy. If convicted as charged, Cefalu faces a term of 20 years’ imprisonment for each of the racketeering conspiracy, extortion and extortion conspiracy counts. If he is sentenced consecutively for the two different extortion schemes in which he participated, the 61-year-old Cefalu faces an effective life sentence.
The government seeks to have a permanent order of detention entered against Cefalu on the ground that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the charges lodged against Cefalu.
a. Cefalu Is the Acting Underboss of The Gambino Family
Cefalu is a longstanding member and captain in the Gambino family; he currently serves as the acting underboss. The government will establish Cefalu’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
More than three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Cefalu is a longstanding member and captain in the Gambino family. At least two witnesses are expected to testify that Cefalu is presently the acting underboss of the Gambino family.
This testimony is corroborated by consensual recordings detailing his leadership role within the Gambino family and confirming his current status as a member of the family’s administration.
Surveillance evidence also establishes Cefalu’s long-lived association with and position in the Gambino family. Cefalu has been observed at numerous locations and events relating to the Gambino family. He has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at 13 weddings and wakes. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that these events are attended by dozens of other members and associates of organized crime, many of whom are convicted felons who committed those crimes as part of an organized crime family, and that Gambino family business is routinely conducted at such events. Cefalu was observed at the 2002 wake of Gambino family acting boss John Gotti. In the past two years alone, Cefalu was surveilled attending the June 2006 wake of Anna Trucchio, mother of incarcerated Gambino family soldier Ronald Trucchio and grandmother of Gambino family soldier Alphonse Trucchio; the September 2006 wake of the sister of Gambino family captain Bartolomeo “Baboots” Vernace; the January 2007 wake of Maryann Corozzo, the wife of Gambino family soldier Blaise Corozzo; the March 2007 wake of Gambino family soldier George Remini; the April 2007 wake of Pietro Inzerillo, the father-in-law of Gambino family soldier Giuseppe “Joseph” Gambino and grandfather of Gambino family of Pietro “Tall Pete” Inzerillo; the November 2007 wake of Gambino family captain Giuseppe “Joseph” Arcuri; Gambino family captain (and co-defendant) Frank Cali’s December 2007 Christmas party. In just 2007, Cefalu was observed meeting with Gambino family captains on more than five occasions and with Gambino family soldiers on more than five other occasions. Further, in late 2005, Cefalu was observed meeting with Gambino family captain Frank Cali and acting underboss Domenico Cefalu.
b. Cefalu Is Charged with Crimes of Violence
As noted above, Cefalu is charged in multiple extortions, all crimes of violence. A brief proffer of the facts pertaining to each of the extortions follows.
i. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Profits
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately December 2003, Joseph Vollaro approached Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli and requested permission to open a cement company on Staten Island. Due to the Gambino family’s control of the New York cement industry, Cacciopoli, together with Gambino family captain Louis Filippelli, engaged in a series of meetings to obtain permission from the Gambino family’s administration to open such a company. Cacciopoli and Filippelli succeeded and informed Joseph Vollaro that he could start the company provided that following a one-year grace period, the Gambino family would receive 15% or $1 per yard for all cement sold, with the payments to be collected by Filippelli and passed through to the family’s administration.
Joseph Vollaro opened the company in April 2004. Since May 2005, he has paid over $60,000 of extortion payments to the Gambino family. The initial payments were collected by Gambino family soldier Vincent Pacelli on behalf of then incarcerated Louis Filippelli. After Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo assumed control of Joseph Vollaro from Filippelli in late June 2005, payments were collected on his behalf for the administration by DiMaria, who controlled Joseph Vollaro for Corozzo while Corozzo was on supervised release, as well as by Gambino family soldiers Mario Cassarino and Ernest Grillo.
Multiple members of the Gambino family informed Joseph Vollaro that the profits from his Staten Island cement company were passed along to the Gambino family administration, and that the administration consists of acting boss John D’Amico, acting underboss Domenico Cefalu and consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation.
ii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Sale
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
During the spring of 2007, a company offered to buy Joseph Vollaro’s Staten Island cement company. In keeping with instructions from Gambino family captains Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria to consult them before making any decisions concerning his business, Joseph Vollaro informed DiMaria of the offer. DiMaria later told Joseph Vollaro that the family had agreed to allow him to make the sale, provided he pay $100,000 to the administration of the Gambino family, which includes Cefalu.
In January 2008, Joseph Vollaro sold the Staten Island cement company. Thereafter, Gambino family consigliere Joseph Corozzo, through Gambino family solider Gus Sclafani, directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the $100,000 to Joseph Corozzo. Later, Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the money to Leonard DiMaria for distribution to the administration. As directed, Joseph Vollaro made a payment of the proceeds of the sale of the cement company to DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
iii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - NASCAR Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In January 2006, NASCAR had begun construction on a racetrack in Staten Island. Recine Trucking, a company under the control of Gambino family acting underboss Domenico Cefalu, was among the first companies hired to bring fill to the site. Thereafter, Gambino family soldier Ernest Grillo acquired exclusive dumping rights at the site for Joseph Vollaro.
From late January 2006 to May 2006, Grillo, Cefalu and Gambino family members Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Nicholas Corozzo and Frank Cali negotiated the amount of extortion Joseph Vollaro would be required to pay for the exclusive dumping rights. Eventually, Joseph Vollaro received those rights on the condition that he make extortion payments of $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Corozzo and DiMaria, and $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Cefalu and Cali.
Before Joseph Vollaro could begin dumping at the site pursuant to these terms, the exclusive dumping deal fell through. Later, after a new deal was worked out, Corozzo and DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to take the job on the condition that he pay them $1 for every yard of fill dumped at the site.
Joseph Vollaro also was required to make a one-time $9,000 payment to NASCAR employee Todd Polakoff on behalf have NASCAR executive William Kilgannon.
Joseph Vollaro worked at the site for a short time and made approximately $13,000 in extortion payments to Gambino family soldier Mario Cassarino, who collected the extortion payments for Corozzo and DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
2. Cefalu Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
The defendant Domenico Cefalu poses a danger to the community. He is the current acting underboss of a violent organized crime family and has himself engaged in crimes of violence in furtherance of the family’s illegal businesses. Courts in this circuit repeatedly have held that high-ranking members of organized crime constitute a danger to the community. The Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. Ciccone, 312 F.3d 535 (2d Cir. 2002) is particularly instructive. There, Gambino family acting boss Peter Gotti was indicted on racketeering charges that included predicate acts of extortion against others. Peter Gotti, himself, was not charged with any predicate acts of extortion; only money laundering and money laundering conspiracy.
At the detention hearing, the government contended that Gotti, as the leader of the Gambino family, was able to direct the activities of his co-defendants and therefore was responsible for the extortions and the other crimes committed by them. Magistrate Judge Pollak ordered Gotti detained finding that Gotti had been “charged with a crime of violence” and therefore could be detained on grounds of dangerousness. Id. at 538. Judge Pollak held that the government had clearly shown that Gotti was the acting boss of the Gambino family, and as such, was responsible for controlling the activities of the enterprise. Id. Thus, while Gotti was not named in the specific racketeering acts charging extortion, he could nonetheless be held responsible for the acts of the members of his organization given his status as the acting boss of the family. Because extortions are crimes of violence, Judge Pollack ordered Gotti detained as a danger to the community. Id. at 538-39.
On appeal, the Second Circuit upheld the court’s findings that Gotti constituted a danger to the community. The court held that it was proper for a court to consider the RICO enterprise as a whole when considering the dangerousness of one of its leaders. Id. at 542. The court found once the government demonstrated Gotti’s leadership role in the enterprise, and the enterprise was charged with crimes of violence, there was clear and convincing evidence for the court to have found that Gotti was a danger to the community and therefore should be detained. Id. at 542-43.
As discussed below, Cefalu is currently the acting underboss of the Gambino family. Not only are other members of the Gambino family charged with multiple counts of extortion and murder, but here, Cefalu himself is charged with extortions. Accordingly, the evidence supporting the government’s argument for detention here is stronger than that in Ciccone. See also United States v. Cirillo, Cr. No. 05-212 (SLT), slip op. (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (Genovese family acting bosses Dominick Cirillo and Lawrence Dentico, as well as Genovese family captain Anthony Antico, who were charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy, detained as dangers to the community), aff’d, 149 Fed. Appx. 40 (2d Cir. 2005). As set forth below, each of the relevant considerations under the Bail Reform Act favors detention here.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
In addition to racketeering conspiracy, Cefalu is charged as the acting underboss of a violent criminal organization with extortion and extortion conspiracy - both of which are crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). Moreover, Cefalu currently leads a violent criminal enterprise and has at his disposal more than 200 made men - soldiers - sworn to follow his orders and commit violence upon his request. Cefalu faces 20 years’ imprisonment for each of the five counts with which he is charged. Thus, the nature and circumstances of the crimes charged favors detention.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
Cefalu is a long-standing member of the Gambino family who now serves as its underboss. He is a life-long criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. He also is a multiple convicted felon. Below is a brief summary of Cefalu’s arrests and convictions:
• On June 24, 1981, Cefalu was arrested in New York and charged with conspiracy to import heroin (21 U.S.C. § 963) and violating bank secrecy laws (31 U.S.C. § 1059); he was convicted on the heroin conspiracy charges and sentenced to eight years in prison;
• On June 13, 1995, Cefalu was charged with contempt of court and sentenced to 33 months in prison.
Cefalu’s position of leadership in the Gambino family combined with his history of criminal activity favors detention.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Cefalu poses a clear danger if released. As noted above, the government will establish Cefalu’s association with, and position of authority in, the Gambino family through a variety of sources, including the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence.
Courts in this circuit routinely detain high-ranking members of organized crime based on their leadership roles in criminal enterprises that engage in acts of violence. See, e.g, Defede, 7 F. Supp. 2d at 393 (detaining defendant on dangerousness based on the proffered testimony of cooperating witness and surveillance evidence that he was the acting boss of the Luchese family, an enterprise involved in extortionate conduct, among other crimes); Gotti, 312 F.3d at 542 (“Indeed, we made it quite clear in United States v. Colombo, 777 F.2d 96, 98 (2d Cir. 1985), that the [Bail Reform Act] ‘does not require that the defendant himself commit acts of physical violence as a condition precedent to a detention order.’ ”).
Cefalu is one of the current leaders of the Gambino family “on the street” and he has been involved in acts of violence, including extortions with Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. The violent nature of the Gambino family’s method of collecting money is made clear in the following recording of DiMaria: “You have to go bother these people for your money... they are going to tell you we got to sit down and talk and this and that. Rough them up a little. Tell them, ‘You’re a fucking stiff.’ Tell them what you have to tell them.... The next guy that owes you money from there with them guys, you catch them, and that’s what I’m saying, that you check in with the other guys ... Crack a face, fuck them up. Don’t you do it, send a fucking kid to rough them up, a fucking joke.”
He thus falls within the “small but identifiable group of particularly dangerous defendants as to whom neither the imposition of stringent release conditions nor the prospect of revocation of release can reasonably assure the safety of the community.” Senate Report at 3188-89. As demonstrated by the recorded conversations, Cefalu’s position in the Gambino family gives him the authority and resources to continue his criminal activities and to order and accomplish acts of violence against potential witnesses or any person he perceives as a threat - of which there will be many during the course of this prosecution.
Finally, Cefalu likely will continue his criminal conduct if released; he is a convicted felon and career criminal who heads a continuing criminal enterprise, the needs of which require constant monitoring. As noted, courts in this circuit have recognized that when organized crime defendants are charged with their participation in a criminal enterprise, the risk of continued criminal conduct is substantial and justifies detention. See Salerno, 631 F. Supp. at 1375.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Cefalu’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy and racketeering counts, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted or participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affected interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Cefalu’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance photographs. Numerous cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Cefalu is a longstanding member of the family and a captain. At least two witnesses are expected to testify that Cefalu currently serves as the underboss of the Gambino family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Cefalu engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity, the government will offer the testimony of the extortion victim, which is corroborated by law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses and consensual recordings, including more than a dozen recordings detailing Cefalu’s involvement in the extortions for which he is indicted.
Accordingly, the government’s evidence of Cefalu’s guilt clearly favors detention.
3. Cefalu Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the facts set forth above, given that he faces 20 years’ imprisonment on each of the five counts in which he is charged, Cefalu constitutes a risk of flight and should be detained.
See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). This risk of flight is heightened as a result of the strong evidence against Cefalu and the fact that he maintains ties to Italy. For these reasons, detention is warranted.
F. JOSEPH COROZZO
Joseph Corozzo currently is the consigliere of the Gambino family and a convicted felon. Corozzo is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including predicate acts of cocaine distribution conspiracy, extortion and extortion conspiracy. Corozzo is also charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy. If convicted as charged, Corozzo faces a term of life imprisonment.
The government seeks to have a permanent order of detention entered against Corozzo on two grounds: that he is a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the charges lodged against Corozzo.
a. Corozzo Is the Consigliere of the Gambino Family
Corozzo is a longstanding member and captain in the Gambino family; he currently serves as the consigliere - the third highest-ranking position. The government will establish Corozzo’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, an undercover law enforcement officer, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
At least five cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Corozzo is a longstanding member and captain in the Gambino family who presently serves as the consigliere of the family. This testimony will be corroborated by consensual recordings, as well as an undercover law enforcement officer who penetrated the Gambino family and are expected to testify that he heard Joseph Corozzo constantly referred to as the family’s consigliere.
The available surveillance evidence also establishes Corozzo’s long-lived association with and position in the Gambino family. As early as 1976 - more than 30 years ago - Corozzo has been observed at locations and events relating to the Gambino family. He has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at least 25 weddings and wakes. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that these events are attended by dozens of other members and associates of organized crime, many of whom are convicted felons who committed those crimes as part of an organized crime family, and that Gambino family business is routinely conducted at such events. Corozzo was observed at the following events: the 1976 wake of Carlo Gambino, the former boss of the Gambino family; the December 1984 wedding of Gambino family soldier Carmine Agnello and Victoria Gotti, the daughter of Gambino family boss John J. Gotti wedding; the 1991 wedding of John A. Gotti, the son of the then-Gambino family boss; the 1992 wake of Gambino family boss John J. Gotti.
In the past two years alone, Corozzo was surveilled attending the wake of the sister of Gambino family captain Bartolomeo “Baboots” Vernace; the wake of Gambino family soldier George Remini (and leaving with Gambino family underboss Domenico Cefalu and captain Frank Cali); and the wake of former Gambino family underboss Guiseppe Arcuri.
Further, consensual recordings corroborate Corozzo’s position of leadership in the family.
b. Corozzo Is Charged with Crimes of Violence and with Cocaine Distribution Conspiracy
As noted above, Corozzo is charged in multiple extortions, all crimes of violence. A brief proffer of the facts pertaining to each of the extortions follows.
i. Cocaine Distribution Conspiracy
At least four cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Corozzo was involved from the mid 1980s through the mid-1990s in a conspiracy to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine in Ozone Park, Queens. In approximately the mid-1980s, Corozzo, Gambino family soldier Vincent Gotti and others financed and helped consolidate the drug distribution activity in Ozone Park. During that time, the minimum amount of drugs sold per week was approximately two kilograms.
A witness is expected to testify that on one occasion, Corozzo threatened to kill him because Corozzo and the others believed the witness might be an undercover police officer. The witnesses are expected to testify that the cocaine trafficking conspiracy continued through the mid-1990s.
ii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Profits
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately December 2003, Joseph Vollaro approached Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli and requested permission to open a cement company on Staten Island. Due to the Gambino family’s control of the New York cement industry, Cacciopoli, together with Gambino family captain Louis Filippelli, engaged in a series of meetings to obtain permission from the Gambino family’s administration to open such a company. Cacciopoli and Filippelli succeeded and informed Joseph Vollaro that he could start the company provided that following a one-year grace period, the Gambino family would receive 15% or $1 per yard for all cement sold, with the payments to be collected by Filippelli and passed through to the family’s administration. Joseph Vollaro opened the company in April 2004. Since May 2005, he has paid over $60,000 of extortion payments to the Gambino family. The initial payments were collected by Gambino family soldier Vincent Pacelli on behalf of then incarcerated Louis Filippelli. After Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo assumed control of Joseph Vollaro from Filippelli in late June 2005, payments were collected on his behalf for the administration by DiMaria, who controlled Joseph Vollaro for Corozzo while Corozzo was on supervised release, as well as by Gambino family soldiers Mario Cassarino and Ernest Grillo.
Multiple members of the Gambino family informed Joseph Vollaro that the profits from his Staten Island cement company were passed along to the Gambino family administration, and that the administration consists of acting boss John D’Amico, acting underboss Domenico Cefalu and consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation.
iii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Sale
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
During the spring of 2007, a company offered to buy Joseph Vollaro’s Staten Island cement company. In keeping with instructions from Gambino family captains Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria to consult them before making any decisions concerning his business, Joseph Vollaro informed DiMaria of the offer. DiMaria later told Joseph Vollaro that the family had agreed to allow him to make the sale, provided he pay $100,000 to the Gambino family. In January 2008, Joseph Vollaro sold the Staten Island cement company. Thereafter, Gambino family consigliere Joseph Corozzo, through Gambino family solider Gus Sclafani, directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the $100,000 to Joseph Corozzo. Later, Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the money to Leonard DiMaria for distribution to the administration. As directed, Joseph Vollaro made a payment of the proceeds of the sale of the cement company to DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
2. Corozzo Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
The defendant Joseph Corozzo poses a danger to the community. He is the consigliere of a violent organized crime family and has himself engaged in crimes of violence in furtherance of the family’s illegal businesses. Courts in this circuit repeatedly have held that high-ranking members of organized crime constitute a danger to the community. The Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. Ciccone, 312 F.3d 535 (2d Cir. 2002) is particularly instructive. There, Gambino family acting boss Peter Gotti was indicted on racketeering charges that included predicate acts of extortion against others. Peter Gotti, himself, was not charged with any predicate acts of extortion; only money laundering and money laundering conspiracy. At the detention hearing, the government contended that Gotti, as the leader of the Gambino family, was able to direct the activities of his co-defendants and therefore was responsible for the extortions and the other crimes committed by them. Magistrate Judge Pollak ordered Gotti detained finding that Gotti had been “charged with a crime of violence” and therefore could be detained on grounds of dangerousness. Id. at 538. Judge Pollak held that the government had clearly shown that Gotti was the acting boss of the Gambino family, and as such, was responsible for controlling the activities of the enterprise. Id. Thus, while Gotti was not named in the specific racketeering acts charging extortion, he could nonetheless be held responsible for the acts of the members of his organization given his status as the acting boss of the family. Because extortions are crimes of violence, Judge Pollack ordered Gotti detained as a danger to the community. Id. at 538-39.
On appeal, the Second Circuit upheld the court’s findings that Gotti constituted a danger to the community. The court held that it was proper for a court to consider the RICO enterprise as a whole when considering the dangerousness of one of its leaders. Id. at 542. The court found once the government demonstrated Gotti’s leadership role in the enterprise, and the enterprise was charged with crimes of violence, there was clear and convincing evidence for the court to have found that Gotti was a danger to the community and therefore should be detained. Id. at 542-43.
As discussed below, Corozzo is the current consigliere, a position in the family administration designed to counsel the boss of the Gambino family. Not only are other members of the Gambino family charged with multiple counts of extortion and murder, but here, Corozzo, himself, along with the acting boss and acting underboss of the Gambino family, is charged with extortions. Accordingly, the evidence supporting the government’s argument for detention here is stronger than that in Ciccone. See also United States v. Cirillo, Cr. No. 05-212 (SLT), slip op. (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (Genovese family acting bosses Dominick Cirillo and Lawrence Dentico, as well as Genovese family captain Anthony Antico, who were charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy, detained as dangers to the community), aff’d, 149 Fed. Appx. 40 (2d Cir. 2005). As set forth below, each of the relevant considerations under the Bail Reform Act favors detention here.
Re: 2008 Gambino Indictment Detention Motion
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
In addition to racketeering conspiracy, Corozzo is charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy - both of which are crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). Moreover, Corozzo currently helps to lead a violent criminal enterprise and has at his disposal dozens of made men - soldiers - sworn to follow his orders and commit violence upon his request. Corozzo is also charged as part of the racketeering conspiracy with conspiracy to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine. Accordingly the offenses for which he is charged are either crimes of violence of involve narcotics and Corozzo faces life imprisonment if convicted. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(1). This prong of the analysis warrants detention.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
Corozzo is a long-standing member of the Gambino family who presently serves as the consigliere. In the 1980s, Corozzo was for a time John J. Gotti’s driver. He was involved in drug trafficking in the 1980s and in the 1990s, labor racketeering, extortion and illegal gambling. Corozzo was convicted in 1996 in the Eastern District of Louisiana for labor racketeering and gambling violations. Accordingly, the defendant’s history and characteristics favor detention.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Corozzo poses a clear danger if released. As noted above, the government will establish Corozzo’s association with, and position of authority in, the Gambino family through a variety of sources, including the testimony of more than five cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence.
Courts in this circuit routinely detain high-ranking members of organized crime based on their leadership roles in criminal enterprises that engage in acts of violence. See, e.g. United States v. Cirillo, Cr. No. 05-212 (SLT), slip op. (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (Genovese family acting bosses Dominick Cirillo and Lawrence Dentico, as well as Genovese family captain Anthony Antico, detained as dangers to the community), aff’d, 149 Fed. Appx. 40 (2d Cir. 2005); Defede, 7 F. Supp. 2d at 393 (detaining defendant on dangerousness based on the proffered testimony of cooperating witness and surveillance evidence that he was the acting boss of the Luchese family, an enterprise involved in extortionate conduct, among other crimes); Gotti, 312 F.3d at 542 (“Indeed, we made it quite clear in United States v. Colombo, 777 F.2d 96, 98 (2d Cir. 1985), that the [Bail Reform Act] ‘does not require that the defendant himself commit acts of physical violence as a condition precedent to a detention order.’ ”).
Corozzo is presently the consigliere of the Gambino family and he has been involved in acts of violence, including extortions with Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. The violent nature of the Gambino family’s method of collecting money is made clear in the following recording of DiMaria: “You have to go bother these people for your money... they are going to tell you we got to sit down and talk and this and that. Rough them up a little. Tell them, ‘You’re a fucking stiff.’ Tell them what you have to tell them.... The next guy that owes you money from there with them guys, you catch them, and that’s what I’m saying, that you check in with the other guys ... Crack a face, fuck them up. Don’t you do it, send a fucking kid to rough them up, a fucking joke.”
He thus falls within the “small but identifiable group of particularly dangerous defendants as to whom neither the imposition of stringent release conditions nor the prospect of revocation of release can reasonably assure the safety of the community.” Senate Report at 3188-89. Corozzo’s position in the Gambino family gives him the authority and resources to continue his criminal activities and to order and accomplish acts of violence against potential witnesses or any person he perceives as a threat - of which there will be many during the course of this prosecution.
Finally, Corozzo likely will continue his criminal conduct if released; he helps head a continuing criminal enterprise, the needs of which require constant monitoring. As noted, courts in this circuit have recognized that when organized crime defendants are charged with their participation in a criminal enterprise, the risk of continued criminal conduct is substantial and justifies detention. See Salerno, 631 F. Supp. at 1375.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Corozzo’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy and racketeering counts, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted or participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affected interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Corozzo’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of numerous cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance photographs. More than five cooperating witnesses, all members and/or associates of the Gambino family are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Corozzo is a longstanding member of the family and a captain. More than three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Corozzo currently serves as the consigliere of the Gambino family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Corozzo engaged the charged pattern of racketeering activity, the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses and consensual recordings in which Corozzo is caught speaking on multiple occasions regarding the Staten Island Cement Company extortion. The evidence regarding predicate acts charged is very strong. With respect to the cocaine trafficking conspiracy, more than four cooperating witnesses will detail the nature of the conspiracy and the day-to-day operation of the drug conspiracy.
Further, law enforcement witnesses will corroborate the testimony of the cooperating witnesses, as will surveillance evidence. With respect to the extortion counts, cooperating witnesses as well as more than a dozen consensual recordings prove the defendant’s involvement in the charged extortions. Accordingly, the government’s evidence of Corozzo’s guilt is thus overwhelming and clearly favors detention.
3. Corozzo Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set forth above, given that he faces the certainty of a life sentence if convicted, Corozzo constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). Even if he were not facing life in prison, Corozzo, who is 67 years old, will very likely spend the remainder of his life in jail. Accordingly, Corozzo should also be detained as a risk of flight.
G. NICHOLAS COROZZO
Nicholas Corozzo is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including two predicate acts of murder and murder conspiracy, ten predicate acts of extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy, and additional predicate acts of money laundering and illegal gambling. Corozzo is also charged with twenty counts of extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy, and counts of money laundering, money laundering conspiracy and illegal gambling. If convicted as charged, Corozzo faces a mandatory term of life imprisonment. Corozzo is 67 years old, is a multiple convicted felon, and has criminal convictions dating to the 1970’s. The government seeks to have a permanent order of detention entered against Corozzo on the ground that he is a danger to the community and as well as based on risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the charges lodged against Corozzo.
a. Corozzo Is a Captain in the Gambino Family
Nicholas Corozzo is a longstanding member of the Gambino family who currently serves as a captain. The government will establish Corozzo’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
More than five cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Corozzo is a longstanding member and an extremely powerful captain in the Gambino family.
This testimony is corroborated by the more than ten recorded conversations totaling approximately ten hours in which Corozzo participated, as well as hundreds of recorded conversations in which Corozzo is referenced by other members of the Gambino family in connection with the Gambino family’s illegal activities. During the course of the recordings, Corozzo is heard directing Gambino family business - commanding crimes be committed, discussing the enterprise, its criminal activities, its members and rules of operation. His uniquely powerful captain status is made plain by, among other things, myriad statements demonstrating his control over members of the Gambino family, including other captains.
The available surveillance evidence also establishes Corozzo’s long-lived association with and position in the Gambino family. As early as 1976 - over 30 years ago - Corozzo has been observed at locations and events relating to the Gambino family. He has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at over 15 weddings and wakes. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that these events are attended by dozens of other members and associates of organized crime, many of whom are convicted felons who committed those crimes as part of an organized crime family, and that Gambino family business is routinely conducted at such events. Corozzo’s attendance at these events stretches from the wake of boss Carlo Gambino in 1976 to the 1985 wake of underboss Aniello Dellacroce, to the 1992 wake of boss John Gotti, to the November 29, 2007 wake of captain Giuseppe “Joseph” Arcuri. Further, Corozzo’s immediate family’s wakes and wedding have been well attended by the upper reaches of the Gambino family, including boss John D’Amico, underboss Domenico Cefalu and more than a dozen captain and soldiers from within the defendants in just this case. Finally, Nicholas Corozzo is the brother of Gambino family consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
b. Corozzo Is Charged with Crimes of Violence
Nicholas Corozzo is charged in count one’s racketeering conspiracy with ordering the 1996 double murder of Robert Arena and Thomas Maranga. He is also charged with extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy in 10 racketeering acts, as well as in 20 substantive counts of the indictment - all crimes of violence. A brief proffer of the evidence underlying the murder charges and each of the extortions follows,
i. Murder Conspiracy/Murder
In January 1996, Nicholas Corozzo ordered the murder of Luchese family associate Robert Arena in retaliation for ignoring Corozzo’s demand that Arena return marijuana he had robbed from a narcotics dealer and for Arena’s believed participation in the murder of a member of Corozzo’s crew. Arena’s friend, Robert Maranga, was not a target of the murder, but was accompanying Arena at the time of the murder. Corozzo’s order was carried out by Gambino family associate Michael Yannotti, who shot and killed Arena and Maranga on January 26, 1996. Two cooperating witnesses will detail the events creating the motive for the murder, including the February 1995 slaying of Anthony “Tough Tony” Placido, a favorite associate in Corozzo’s crew, for which Arena came under suspicion, Arena’s failure to return narcotics Arena had stolen in contravention of Corozzo’s wishes, and fraying relations between Corozzo’s crew and the Luchese crew to which Arena belonged. The witnesses will also testify to the fact that Michael Yannotti, an associate of Corozzo’s confessed that he killed Arena and Maranga. Another cooperating witness is expected to testify that Corozzo admitted that he had ordered the killing of Arena to avenge the death of someone close to him as well as to settle a beef with Arena, and that Maranga was “in the wrong place at the wrong time.” A fourth cooperating witness is expected testify to statements by Corozzo after the murders that Yannotti “did good work” - an apparent reference to the Arena and Maranga murders. The witnesses testimonies will be corroborated by both physical evidence and ballistics evidence.
ii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Profits
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately December 2003, Joseph Vollaro approached Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli and requested permission to open a cement company on Staten Island. Due to the Gambino family’s control of the New York cement industry, Cacciopoli, together with Gambino family captain Louis Filippelli, engaged in a series of meetings to obtain permission from the Gambino family’s administration to open such a company. Cacciopoli and Filippelli succeeded and informed Joseph Vollaro that he could start the company provided that following a one-year grace period, the Gambino family would receive 15% or $1 per yard for all cement sold, with the payments to be collected by Filippelli and passed through to the family’s administration. Joseph Vollaro opened the company in April 2004. Since May 2005, he has paid over $60,000 of extortion payments to the Gambino family. The initial payments were collected by Gambino family soldier Vincent Pacelli on behalf of then incarcerated Louis Filippelli. After Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo assumed control of Joseph Vollaro from Filippelli in late June 2005, payments were collected on his behalf for the administration by DiMaria, who controlled Joseph Vollaro for Corozzo while Corozzo was on supervised release, as well as by Gambino family soldiers Mario Cassarino and Ernest Grille.
Multiple members of the Gambino family informed Joseph Vollaro that the profits from his Staten Island cement company were passed along to the Gambino family administration, and that the administration consists of acting boss John D’Amico, acting underboss Domenico Cefalu and consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation.
In addition to racketeering conspiracy, Corozzo is charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy - both of which are crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). Moreover, Corozzo currently helps to lead a violent criminal enterprise and has at his disposal dozens of made men - soldiers - sworn to follow his orders and commit violence upon his request. Corozzo is also charged as part of the racketeering conspiracy with conspiracy to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine. Accordingly the offenses for which he is charged are either crimes of violence of involve narcotics and Corozzo faces life imprisonment if convicted. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(1). This prong of the analysis warrants detention.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
Corozzo is a long-standing member of the Gambino family who presently serves as the consigliere. In the 1980s, Corozzo was for a time John J. Gotti’s driver. He was involved in drug trafficking in the 1980s and in the 1990s, labor racketeering, extortion and illegal gambling. Corozzo was convicted in 1996 in the Eastern District of Louisiana for labor racketeering and gambling violations. Accordingly, the defendant’s history and characteristics favor detention.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Corozzo poses a clear danger if released. As noted above, the government will establish Corozzo’s association with, and position of authority in, the Gambino family through a variety of sources, including the testimony of more than five cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence.
Courts in this circuit routinely detain high-ranking members of organized crime based on their leadership roles in criminal enterprises that engage in acts of violence. See, e.g. United States v. Cirillo, Cr. No. 05-212 (SLT), slip op. (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (Genovese family acting bosses Dominick Cirillo and Lawrence Dentico, as well as Genovese family captain Anthony Antico, detained as dangers to the community), aff’d, 149 Fed. Appx. 40 (2d Cir. 2005); Defede, 7 F. Supp. 2d at 393 (detaining defendant on dangerousness based on the proffered testimony of cooperating witness and surveillance evidence that he was the acting boss of the Luchese family, an enterprise involved in extortionate conduct, among other crimes); Gotti, 312 F.3d at 542 (“Indeed, we made it quite clear in United States v. Colombo, 777 F.2d 96, 98 (2d Cir. 1985), that the [Bail Reform Act] ‘does not require that the defendant himself commit acts of physical violence as a condition precedent to a detention order.’ ”).
Corozzo is presently the consigliere of the Gambino family and he has been involved in acts of violence, including extortions with Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. The violent nature of the Gambino family’s method of collecting money is made clear in the following recording of DiMaria: “You have to go bother these people for your money... they are going to tell you we got to sit down and talk and this and that. Rough them up a little. Tell them, ‘You’re a fucking stiff.’ Tell them what you have to tell them.... The next guy that owes you money from there with them guys, you catch them, and that’s what I’m saying, that you check in with the other guys ... Crack a face, fuck them up. Don’t you do it, send a fucking kid to rough them up, a fucking joke.”
He thus falls within the “small but identifiable group of particularly dangerous defendants as to whom neither the imposition of stringent release conditions nor the prospect of revocation of release can reasonably assure the safety of the community.” Senate Report at 3188-89. Corozzo’s position in the Gambino family gives him the authority and resources to continue his criminal activities and to order and accomplish acts of violence against potential witnesses or any person he perceives as a threat - of which there will be many during the course of this prosecution.
Finally, Corozzo likely will continue his criminal conduct if released; he helps head a continuing criminal enterprise, the needs of which require constant monitoring. As noted, courts in this circuit have recognized that when organized crime defendants are charged with their participation in a criminal enterprise, the risk of continued criminal conduct is substantial and justifies detention. See Salerno, 631 F. Supp. at 1375.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Corozzo’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy and racketeering counts, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted or participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affected interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Corozzo’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of numerous cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance photographs. More than five cooperating witnesses, all members and/or associates of the Gambino family are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Corozzo is a longstanding member of the family and a captain. More than three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Corozzo currently serves as the consigliere of the Gambino family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Corozzo engaged the charged pattern of racketeering activity, the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses and consensual recordings in which Corozzo is caught speaking on multiple occasions regarding the Staten Island Cement Company extortion. The evidence regarding predicate acts charged is very strong. With respect to the cocaine trafficking conspiracy, more than four cooperating witnesses will detail the nature of the conspiracy and the day-to-day operation of the drug conspiracy.
Further, law enforcement witnesses will corroborate the testimony of the cooperating witnesses, as will surveillance evidence. With respect to the extortion counts, cooperating witnesses as well as more than a dozen consensual recordings prove the defendant’s involvement in the charged extortions. Accordingly, the government’s evidence of Corozzo’s guilt is thus overwhelming and clearly favors detention.
3. Corozzo Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set forth above, given that he faces the certainty of a life sentence if convicted, Corozzo constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). Even if he were not facing life in prison, Corozzo, who is 67 years old, will very likely spend the remainder of his life in jail. Accordingly, Corozzo should also be detained as a risk of flight.
G. NICHOLAS COROZZO
Nicholas Corozzo is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including two predicate acts of murder and murder conspiracy, ten predicate acts of extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy, and additional predicate acts of money laundering and illegal gambling. Corozzo is also charged with twenty counts of extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy, and counts of money laundering, money laundering conspiracy and illegal gambling. If convicted as charged, Corozzo faces a mandatory term of life imprisonment. Corozzo is 67 years old, is a multiple convicted felon, and has criminal convictions dating to the 1970’s. The government seeks to have a permanent order of detention entered against Corozzo on the ground that he is a danger to the community and as well as based on risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the charges lodged against Corozzo.
a. Corozzo Is a Captain in the Gambino Family
Nicholas Corozzo is a longstanding member of the Gambino family who currently serves as a captain. The government will establish Corozzo’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
More than five cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Corozzo is a longstanding member and an extremely powerful captain in the Gambino family.
This testimony is corroborated by the more than ten recorded conversations totaling approximately ten hours in which Corozzo participated, as well as hundreds of recorded conversations in which Corozzo is referenced by other members of the Gambino family in connection with the Gambino family’s illegal activities. During the course of the recordings, Corozzo is heard directing Gambino family business - commanding crimes be committed, discussing the enterprise, its criminal activities, its members and rules of operation. His uniquely powerful captain status is made plain by, among other things, myriad statements demonstrating his control over members of the Gambino family, including other captains.
The available surveillance evidence also establishes Corozzo’s long-lived association with and position in the Gambino family. As early as 1976 - over 30 years ago - Corozzo has been observed at locations and events relating to the Gambino family. He has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at over 15 weddings and wakes. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that these events are attended by dozens of other members and associates of organized crime, many of whom are convicted felons who committed those crimes as part of an organized crime family, and that Gambino family business is routinely conducted at such events. Corozzo’s attendance at these events stretches from the wake of boss Carlo Gambino in 1976 to the 1985 wake of underboss Aniello Dellacroce, to the 1992 wake of boss John Gotti, to the November 29, 2007 wake of captain Giuseppe “Joseph” Arcuri. Further, Corozzo’s immediate family’s wakes and wedding have been well attended by the upper reaches of the Gambino family, including boss John D’Amico, underboss Domenico Cefalu and more than a dozen captain and soldiers from within the defendants in just this case. Finally, Nicholas Corozzo is the brother of Gambino family consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
b. Corozzo Is Charged with Crimes of Violence
Nicholas Corozzo is charged in count one’s racketeering conspiracy with ordering the 1996 double murder of Robert Arena and Thomas Maranga. He is also charged with extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy in 10 racketeering acts, as well as in 20 substantive counts of the indictment - all crimes of violence. A brief proffer of the evidence underlying the murder charges and each of the extortions follows,
i. Murder Conspiracy/Murder
In January 1996, Nicholas Corozzo ordered the murder of Luchese family associate Robert Arena in retaliation for ignoring Corozzo’s demand that Arena return marijuana he had robbed from a narcotics dealer and for Arena’s believed participation in the murder of a member of Corozzo’s crew. Arena’s friend, Robert Maranga, was not a target of the murder, but was accompanying Arena at the time of the murder. Corozzo’s order was carried out by Gambino family associate Michael Yannotti, who shot and killed Arena and Maranga on January 26, 1996. Two cooperating witnesses will detail the events creating the motive for the murder, including the February 1995 slaying of Anthony “Tough Tony” Placido, a favorite associate in Corozzo’s crew, for which Arena came under suspicion, Arena’s failure to return narcotics Arena had stolen in contravention of Corozzo’s wishes, and fraying relations between Corozzo’s crew and the Luchese crew to which Arena belonged. The witnesses will also testify to the fact that Michael Yannotti, an associate of Corozzo’s confessed that he killed Arena and Maranga. Another cooperating witness is expected to testify that Corozzo admitted that he had ordered the killing of Arena to avenge the death of someone close to him as well as to settle a beef with Arena, and that Maranga was “in the wrong place at the wrong time.” A fourth cooperating witness is expected testify to statements by Corozzo after the murders that Yannotti “did good work” - an apparent reference to the Arena and Maranga murders. The witnesses testimonies will be corroborated by both physical evidence and ballistics evidence.
ii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Profits
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately December 2003, Joseph Vollaro approached Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli and requested permission to open a cement company on Staten Island. Due to the Gambino family’s control of the New York cement industry, Cacciopoli, together with Gambino family captain Louis Filippelli, engaged in a series of meetings to obtain permission from the Gambino family’s administration to open such a company. Cacciopoli and Filippelli succeeded and informed Joseph Vollaro that he could start the company provided that following a one-year grace period, the Gambino family would receive 15% or $1 per yard for all cement sold, with the payments to be collected by Filippelli and passed through to the family’s administration. Joseph Vollaro opened the company in April 2004. Since May 2005, he has paid over $60,000 of extortion payments to the Gambino family. The initial payments were collected by Gambino family soldier Vincent Pacelli on behalf of then incarcerated Louis Filippelli. After Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo assumed control of Joseph Vollaro from Filippelli in late June 2005, payments were collected on his behalf for the administration by DiMaria, who controlled Joseph Vollaro for Corozzo while Corozzo was on supervised release, as well as by Gambino family soldiers Mario Cassarino and Ernest Grille.
Multiple members of the Gambino family informed Joseph Vollaro that the profits from his Staten Island cement company were passed along to the Gambino family administration, and that the administration consists of acting boss John D’Amico, acting underboss Domenico Cefalu and consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation.
Re: 2008 Gambino Indictment Detention Motion
iii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Sale
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
During the spring of 2007, a company offered to buy Joseph Vollaro’s Staten Island cement company. In keeping with instructions from Gambino family captains Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria to consult them before making any decisions concerning his business, Joseph Vollaro informed DiMaria of the offer. DiMaria later told Joseph Vollaro that the family had agreed to allow him to make the sale, provided he pay $100,000 to the Gambino family. In January 2008, Joseph Vollaro sold the Staten Island cement company. Thereafter, Gambino family consigliere Joseph Corozzo, through Gambino family solider Gus Sclafani, directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the $100,000 to Joseph Corozzo. Later, Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the money to Leonard DiMaria for distribution to the administration. As directed, Joseph Vollaro made a payment of the proceeds of the sale of the cement company to DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
iv. Attempted Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - Pump Truck
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In June 2005, Joseph Vollaro sought permission from Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria, who exercised day to day control over Joseph Vollaro for Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo, to purchase a cement pump truck and open a business. Later, DiMaria allowed Joseph Vollaro to start the business pursuant to an arrangement in which Joseph Vollaro would receive 40% of the pump truck profits and DiMaria and Corozzo would split the remaining profits together with Gambino family soldiers Ernie Grille and Mario Cassarino. The pump truck business operated for a time, but the business was ultimately not profitable.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s attempted extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iv) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
v. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - Liberty View Harbor Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
aIn April 2006, Joseph Vollaro started a company which constructed a portable cement plant at the Liberty View Harbor construction site at which VMS Construction served as general contractor. VMS Construction is owned by Gambino family associate Anthony Scibelli, who is controlled by Gambino family soldier Vincent Dragonetti. In addition to the portable cement plant, two companies owned by Joseph Vollaro also performed work at the Liberty View Harbor site. Joseph Vollaro obtained the work at the Liberty View Harbor site after Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo, who is Dragonetti’s father-in-law, granted him permission provided he pay 60% of the portable cement plant’s profits to Corozzo, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria and Dragonetti. In addition, Scibelli and Dragonetti demanded that Joseph Vollaro pay an additional $6 or $7 per yard of cement produced and extortionate payments for the other two businesses.
Over the course of the extortion, Jon Doe #4 made extortion payments to the Gambino family of more than $200,000.
Despite these payments, during the summer of 2007, with the backing of Corozzo, DiMaria and Dragonetti, Scibelli took possession of the portable cement plant without remuneration to Joseph Vollaro.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
vi. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - Cement Powder Deliveries
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In October 2007, following Gambino family soldier Anthony Scibelli’s takeover of his portable cement plant, Gambino family captains DiMaria and Corozzo approved a plan by which Joseph Vollaro would supply his former plant with the powder used to make cement at the Liberty View Harbor site. For this privilege, Joseph Vollaro was instructed to provide 60% of his profits relating to the cement powder deliveries to be split between Corozzo, DiMaria and Dragonetti. As directed, in the four months since, Joseph Vollaro has provided $6,000 in extortion payments. The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including dozens of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
vii. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - Construction List
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In July 2005, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria instructed Joseph Vollaro to help soldier Ernest Grille reinitiate collections from construction companies that had been making extortion payments to then jailed Gambino family soldier Edward Garafola prior to his incarceration. Garafola, who had been a member of the Gambino family’s “construction panel,” a body which oversees the Gambino family’s construction rackets, had exacted extortionate payments from scores of construction companies prior to his incarceration, but had not shared the identity of all those companies with his Gambino family superiors.
Joseph Vollaro contacted Grille as instructed. Together with Ruggiero and Gambino family associate Anthony O’Donnell, who had been Garafola’s right hand in conducting the extortions, and who had accompanied Garafola on at least one occasion while Garafola assaulted a contractor who was late in his payments, the men repeatedly met to reconstruct a list of the contractors who had been paying Garafola extortion and to plot the reinitiation of collections. Under the supervision and at the direction of Corozzo and DiMaria, the four men created a list of more than 40 construction companies and individual contractors that formerly paid extortion to Garafola. Grille, Ruggiero and O’Donnell then approached a number of the companies to place them back under Gambino family control.
During the this process, Edward Garafola’s son asserted his father’s right to the extortion victims, and complained of the efforts to take away his father’s former victims. In response, Grille told Joseph Vollaro that he assaulted Garafola’s son - “I choked him out.”
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family, and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) the testimony of a cooperating witnesses who was a former Gambino family member and member of the Gambino family construction panel who was tasked with compiling the same construction list years earlier but failed to complete the job prior to his arrest and incarceration, property or persons.
viii. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - NASCAR Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In January 2006, NASCAR had begun construction on a racetrack in Staten Island. Recine Trucking, a company under the control of Gambino family acting underboss Domenico Cefalu, was among the first companies hired to bring fill to the site. Thereafter, Gambino family soldier Ernest Grille acquired exclusive dumping rights at the site for Joseph Vollaro.
From late January 2006 to May 2006, Grille, Cefalu and Gambino family members Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Nicholas Corozzo and Frank Cali negotiated the amount of extortion Joseph Vollaro would be required to pay for the exclusive dumping rights. Eventually, Joseph Vollaro received those rights on the condition that he make extortion payments of $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Corozzo and DiMaria, and $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Cefalu and Call.
Before Joseph Vollaro could begin dumping at the site pursuant to these terms, the exclusive dumping deal fell through. Later, after a new deal was worked out, Corozzo and DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to take the job on the condition that he pay them $1 for every yard of fill dumped at the site.
Joseph Vollaro also was required to make a one-time $9,000 payment to NASCAR employee Todd Polakoff on behalf have NASCAR executive William Kilgannon.
Joseph Vollaro worked at the site for a short time and made approximately $13,000 in extortion payments to Gambino family soldier Mario Cassarino, who collected the extortion payments for Corozzo and DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
ix. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Excavation Company
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately January 2006, Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo instructed Joseph Vollaro to start an excavation business which, after a short period in which Joseph Vollaro would be allowed to operate the business without making extortion payments, would be required to pay 60% of its profits to Corozzo, Gambino family soldier Vincent Dragonetti and Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. Joseph Vollaro began making these payments a few months after starting the business. To date, Joseph Vollaro has paid more than $30,000 in extortion payments to DiMaria and Dragonetti, who collected the payments on Corozzo’s behalf.
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
During the spring of 2007, a company offered to buy Joseph Vollaro’s Staten Island cement company. In keeping with instructions from Gambino family captains Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria to consult them before making any decisions concerning his business, Joseph Vollaro informed DiMaria of the offer. DiMaria later told Joseph Vollaro that the family had agreed to allow him to make the sale, provided he pay $100,000 to the Gambino family. In January 2008, Joseph Vollaro sold the Staten Island cement company. Thereafter, Gambino family consigliere Joseph Corozzo, through Gambino family solider Gus Sclafani, directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the $100,000 to Joseph Corozzo. Later, Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the money to Leonard DiMaria for distribution to the administration. As directed, Joseph Vollaro made a payment of the proceeds of the sale of the cement company to DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
iv. Attempted Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - Pump Truck
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In June 2005, Joseph Vollaro sought permission from Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria, who exercised day to day control over Joseph Vollaro for Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo, to purchase a cement pump truck and open a business. Later, DiMaria allowed Joseph Vollaro to start the business pursuant to an arrangement in which Joseph Vollaro would receive 40% of the pump truck profits and DiMaria and Corozzo would split the remaining profits together with Gambino family soldiers Ernie Grille and Mario Cassarino. The pump truck business operated for a time, but the business was ultimately not profitable.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s attempted extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iv) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
v. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - Liberty View Harbor Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
aIn April 2006, Joseph Vollaro started a company which constructed a portable cement plant at the Liberty View Harbor construction site at which VMS Construction served as general contractor. VMS Construction is owned by Gambino family associate Anthony Scibelli, who is controlled by Gambino family soldier Vincent Dragonetti. In addition to the portable cement plant, two companies owned by Joseph Vollaro also performed work at the Liberty View Harbor site. Joseph Vollaro obtained the work at the Liberty View Harbor site after Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo, who is Dragonetti’s father-in-law, granted him permission provided he pay 60% of the portable cement plant’s profits to Corozzo, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria and Dragonetti. In addition, Scibelli and Dragonetti demanded that Joseph Vollaro pay an additional $6 or $7 per yard of cement produced and extortionate payments for the other two businesses.
Over the course of the extortion, Jon Doe #4 made extortion payments to the Gambino family of more than $200,000.
Despite these payments, during the summer of 2007, with the backing of Corozzo, DiMaria and Dragonetti, Scibelli took possession of the portable cement plant without remuneration to Joseph Vollaro.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
vi. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - Cement Powder Deliveries
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In October 2007, following Gambino family soldier Anthony Scibelli’s takeover of his portable cement plant, Gambino family captains DiMaria and Corozzo approved a plan by which Joseph Vollaro would supply his former plant with the powder used to make cement at the Liberty View Harbor site. For this privilege, Joseph Vollaro was instructed to provide 60% of his profits relating to the cement powder deliveries to be split between Corozzo, DiMaria and Dragonetti. As directed, in the four months since, Joseph Vollaro has provided $6,000 in extortion payments. The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including dozens of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
vii. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - Construction List
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In July 2005, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria instructed Joseph Vollaro to help soldier Ernest Grille reinitiate collections from construction companies that had been making extortion payments to then jailed Gambino family soldier Edward Garafola prior to his incarceration. Garafola, who had been a member of the Gambino family’s “construction panel,” a body which oversees the Gambino family’s construction rackets, had exacted extortionate payments from scores of construction companies prior to his incarceration, but had not shared the identity of all those companies with his Gambino family superiors.
Joseph Vollaro contacted Grille as instructed. Together with Ruggiero and Gambino family associate Anthony O’Donnell, who had been Garafola’s right hand in conducting the extortions, and who had accompanied Garafola on at least one occasion while Garafola assaulted a contractor who was late in his payments, the men repeatedly met to reconstruct a list of the contractors who had been paying Garafola extortion and to plot the reinitiation of collections. Under the supervision and at the direction of Corozzo and DiMaria, the four men created a list of more than 40 construction companies and individual contractors that formerly paid extortion to Garafola. Grille, Ruggiero and O’Donnell then approached a number of the companies to place them back under Gambino family control.
During the this process, Edward Garafola’s son asserted his father’s right to the extortion victims, and complained of the efforts to take away his father’s former victims. In response, Grille told Joseph Vollaro that he assaulted Garafola’s son - “I choked him out.”
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family, and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) the testimony of a cooperating witnesses who was a former Gambino family member and member of the Gambino family construction panel who was tasked with compiling the same construction list years earlier but failed to complete the job prior to his arrest and incarceration, property or persons.
viii. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - NASCAR Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In January 2006, NASCAR had begun construction on a racetrack in Staten Island. Recine Trucking, a company under the control of Gambino family acting underboss Domenico Cefalu, was among the first companies hired to bring fill to the site. Thereafter, Gambino family soldier Ernest Grille acquired exclusive dumping rights at the site for Joseph Vollaro.
From late January 2006 to May 2006, Grille, Cefalu and Gambino family members Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Nicholas Corozzo and Frank Cali negotiated the amount of extortion Joseph Vollaro would be required to pay for the exclusive dumping rights. Eventually, Joseph Vollaro received those rights on the condition that he make extortion payments of $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Corozzo and DiMaria, and $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Cefalu and Call.
Before Joseph Vollaro could begin dumping at the site pursuant to these terms, the exclusive dumping deal fell through. Later, after a new deal was worked out, Corozzo and DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to take the job on the condition that he pay them $1 for every yard of fill dumped at the site.
Joseph Vollaro also was required to make a one-time $9,000 payment to NASCAR employee Todd Polakoff on behalf have NASCAR executive William Kilgannon.
Joseph Vollaro worked at the site for a short time and made approximately $13,000 in extortion payments to Gambino family soldier Mario Cassarino, who collected the extortion payments for Corozzo and DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
ix. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Excavation Company
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately January 2006, Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo instructed Joseph Vollaro to start an excavation business which, after a short period in which Joseph Vollaro would be allowed to operate the business without making extortion payments, would be required to pay 60% of its profits to Corozzo, Gambino family soldier Vincent Dragonetti and Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. Joseph Vollaro began making these payments a few months after starting the business. To date, Joseph Vollaro has paid more than $30,000 in extortion payments to DiMaria and Dragonetti, who collected the payments on Corozzo’s behalf.
Re: 2008 Gambino Indictment Detention Motion
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including dozens of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
x. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - John Does #4 & #12
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In July 2006, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria informed Joseph Vollaro that John Doe #12, an individual close to Joseph Vollaro who previously made extortion payments to the commissary of jailed Gambino family soldier Jerome Brancato, needed to begin making extortion payments to Brancato again. At the end of 2006, when Brancato was released from prison, DiMaria instructed Joseph Vollaro to have John Doe #12 pay money to Brancato to help him get him back on his feet. Joseph Vollaro then gave $2,500 to Vincent Dragonetti, who collected the money for Brancato.
In January 2008, Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo told Joseph Vollaro that John Doe #12 failed to provide Brancato with a year end extortion payment. Corozzo instructed Joseph Vollaro to make sure that money from John Doe #12 was given to Gambino family soldier Joseph Chirico, who would collect it for Brancato. The following day, Joseph Vollaro gave $1,500 to Chirico for Brancato.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members who are expected to testify that individuals being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers or face some form of retaliation.
xi. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - Staten Island Recycling
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In conducting his trucking business, Joseph Vollaro came into frequent contact with the owners of a recycling facility located on Staten Island.
In approximately June 2008, Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to collect extortion payments from the facility.
In January 2008, Joseph Vollaro told Corozzo and DiMaria that he collected $2,000 from the facility, and provided the money to DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members who are expected to testify that individuals being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers or face some form of retaliation.
2. Corozzo Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
The defendant Nicholas Corozzo poses a danger to the community. He is an extraordinarily powerful captain of a violent organized crime family and has himself engaged in crimes of violence that include murder and extortion. Courts in this district and the Second Circuit repeatedly have held that high-ranking members of organized crime constitute a danger to the community. As discussed below, each of the relevant considerations under the Bail Reform Act favors detention here.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
In addition to racketeering and racketeering conspiracy, Corozzo is charged with murder, which is a crime of violence. Corozzo is also charged with myriad counts of extortion and extortion conspiracy - both of which are crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). Moreover, given his position in the Gambino family, Corozzo currently has at his disposal several dozen made men - soldiers - sworn to follow his orders and commit violence upon his request. Accordingly, the nature and circumstances of the crimes charged favor detention.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
Corozzo is a long-standing member of the Gambino family who now serves as a captain. He is a life-long criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. He also is a multiple convicted felon. Below is a brief summary of Corozzo’s arrests and convictions:
• In 1996, Corozzo pled guilty in the Southern District of Florida to racketeering that included predicate acts of loansharking. He was sentenced to six years imprisonment.
• In 1998, Corozzo pled guilty in the Eastern District of New York to racketeering including predicate acts of extortion and loansharking. Corozzo was sentenced to imprisonment and was on supervised release while he was committing some of the crimes with which he is charged in this indictment.
• Corozzo also has multiple convictions for gambling dating back to the 1970s. Further, Corozzo was engaged in the acts of extortion charged in the indictment while he was on supervised release from the 1998 case to which he pleaded before the Honorable Frederic Block. The fact that Corozzo has shown himself to have no regard for court ordered restrictions combined with his criminal history and the fact that he is a powerful member of a violent criminal enterprise who is charged with murder, among other things, strongly favors detention. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(1)(B).
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release/
Corozzo poses a clear danger if released. As noted above, the government will establish Corozzo’s association with, and position of authority in, the Gambino family through a variety of sources, including the testimony of more than five cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence.
Courts in this circuit routinely detain high-ranking members of organized crime based on their leadership roles in criminal enterprises that engage in acts of violence. See, e.g. Defede, 7 F. Supp. 2d at 393 (detaining defendant on dangerousness based on the proffered testimony of cooperating witness and surveillance evidence that he was the acting boss of the Luchese family, an enterprise involved in extortionate conduct, among other crimes); Gotti, 312 F.3d at 542 (“Indeed, we made it quite clear in United States v. Colombo, 777 F.2d 96, 98 (2d Cir. 1985), that the [Bail Reform Act] ‘does not require that the defendant himself commit acts of physical violence as a condition precedent to a detention order.’ ”).
x. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - John Does #4 & #12
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In July 2006, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria informed Joseph Vollaro that John Doe #12, an individual close to Joseph Vollaro who previously made extortion payments to the commissary of jailed Gambino family soldier Jerome Brancato, needed to begin making extortion payments to Brancato again. At the end of 2006, when Brancato was released from prison, DiMaria instructed Joseph Vollaro to have John Doe #12 pay money to Brancato to help him get him back on his feet. Joseph Vollaro then gave $2,500 to Vincent Dragonetti, who collected the money for Brancato.
In January 2008, Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo told Joseph Vollaro that John Doe #12 failed to provide Brancato with a year end extortion payment. Corozzo instructed Joseph Vollaro to make sure that money from John Doe #12 was given to Gambino family soldier Joseph Chirico, who would collect it for Brancato. The following day, Joseph Vollaro gave $1,500 to Chirico for Brancato.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members who are expected to testify that individuals being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers or face some form of retaliation.
xi. Extortion/Extortion Conspiracy - Staten Island Recycling
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In conducting his trucking business, Joseph Vollaro came into frequent contact with the owners of a recycling facility located on Staten Island.
In approximately June 2008, Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to collect extortion payments from the facility.
In January 2008, Joseph Vollaro told Corozzo and DiMaria that he collected $2,000 from the facility, and provided the money to DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members who are expected to testify that individuals being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers or face some form of retaliation.
2. Corozzo Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
The defendant Nicholas Corozzo poses a danger to the community. He is an extraordinarily powerful captain of a violent organized crime family and has himself engaged in crimes of violence that include murder and extortion. Courts in this district and the Second Circuit repeatedly have held that high-ranking members of organized crime constitute a danger to the community. As discussed below, each of the relevant considerations under the Bail Reform Act favors detention here.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
In addition to racketeering and racketeering conspiracy, Corozzo is charged with murder, which is a crime of violence. Corozzo is also charged with myriad counts of extortion and extortion conspiracy - both of which are crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). Moreover, given his position in the Gambino family, Corozzo currently has at his disposal several dozen made men - soldiers - sworn to follow his orders and commit violence upon his request. Accordingly, the nature and circumstances of the crimes charged favor detention.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
Corozzo is a long-standing member of the Gambino family who now serves as a captain. He is a life-long criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. He also is a multiple convicted felon. Below is a brief summary of Corozzo’s arrests and convictions:
• In 1996, Corozzo pled guilty in the Southern District of Florida to racketeering that included predicate acts of loansharking. He was sentenced to six years imprisonment.
• In 1998, Corozzo pled guilty in the Eastern District of New York to racketeering including predicate acts of extortion and loansharking. Corozzo was sentenced to imprisonment and was on supervised release while he was committing some of the crimes with which he is charged in this indictment.
• Corozzo also has multiple convictions for gambling dating back to the 1970s. Further, Corozzo was engaged in the acts of extortion charged in the indictment while he was on supervised release from the 1998 case to which he pleaded before the Honorable Frederic Block. The fact that Corozzo has shown himself to have no regard for court ordered restrictions combined with his criminal history and the fact that he is a powerful member of a violent criminal enterprise who is charged with murder, among other things, strongly favors detention. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(1)(B).
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release/
Corozzo poses a clear danger if released. As noted above, the government will establish Corozzo’s association with, and position of authority in, the Gambino family through a variety of sources, including the testimony of more than five cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence.
Courts in this circuit routinely detain high-ranking members of organized crime based on their leadership roles in criminal enterprises that engage in acts of violence. See, e.g. Defede, 7 F. Supp. 2d at 393 (detaining defendant on dangerousness based on the proffered testimony of cooperating witness and surveillance evidence that he was the acting boss of the Luchese family, an enterprise involved in extortionate conduct, among other crimes); Gotti, 312 F.3d at 542 (“Indeed, we made it quite clear in United States v. Colombo, 777 F.2d 96, 98 (2d Cir. 1985), that the [Bail Reform Act] ‘does not require that the defendant himself commit acts of physical violence as a condition precedent to a detention order.’ ”).
Re: 2008 Gambino Indictment Detention Motion
Corozzo is a powerful captain in the Gambino family and he has dozens of Gambino family members and associates working under him. Further, he has been involved in acts of violence, including murder, murder conspiracy and myriad extortions with Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. The violent nature of the Gambino family’s method of collecting money is made clear in the following recording of DiMaria: “You have to go bother these people for your money. . . they are going to tell you we got to sit down and talk and this and that. Rough them up a little. Tell them, ‘You’re a fucking stiff.’ Tell them what you have to tell them. . . . The next guy that owes you money from there with them guys, you catch them, and that’s what I’m saying, that you check in with the other guys . . . Crack a face, fuck them up. Don’t you do it, send a fucking kid to rough them up, a fucking joke.” He thus falls within the “small but identifiable group of particularly dangerous defendants as to whom neither the imposition of stringent release conditions nor the prospect of revocation of release can reasonably assure the safety of the community.” Senate Report at 3188-89. As demonstrated by the recorded conversations, Corozzo’s position in the Gambino family gives him the authority and resources to continue his criminal activities and to order and accomplish acts of violence against potential witnesses or any person he perceives as a threat - of which there will be many during the course of this prosecution.
Finally, Corozzo likely will continue his criminal conduct if released; he is a career criminal with a leadership position in a continuing criminal enterprise, the needs of which require constant monitoring, and he continued to commit crimes while on supervised release in the past, demonstrating his inability to abide by the court’s restrictions. As noted, courts in this circuit have recognized that when organized crime defendants are charged with their participation in a criminal enterprise, the risk of continued criminal conduct is substantial and justifies detention. See Salerno, 631 F. Supp. at 1375.
Under the cases cited above, the crimes charged and the facts proffered, there is little doubt that Corozzo is a danger to the community and ordered detained pending the outcome of his case.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Corozzo’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy and racketeering counts, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted or participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affected interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise. First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Corozzo’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance photographs. More than five cooperating witnesses, all made members of the Gambino family are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Corozzo is a longstanding member of the family who currently serves as a captain.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Corozzo engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses and consensual recordings. For example, the government has over 30 recordings documenting Corozzo’s involvement in the extortions for which he is indicted in this case. With respect to the two murder charges against him, cooperating witnesses, whose testimony will be corroborated by other evidence including ballistics and other crime scene evidence are expected to testify to Corozzo’s role in the double murder. Accordingly, the government’s evidence against Corozzo is overwhelming and clearly favors detention.
3. Nicholas Corozzo Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set forth above, given that he faces the certainty of life in prison if convicted, Corozzo constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). This risk of flight is heightened as a result of the strong evidence against Corozzo, which includes a large crew of members and associates with the means to provide refuge. Accordingly, Corozzo should also be detained as a risk of flight.
Finally, Corozzo likely will continue his criminal conduct if released; he is a career criminal with a leadership position in a continuing criminal enterprise, the needs of which require constant monitoring, and he continued to commit crimes while on supervised release in the past, demonstrating his inability to abide by the court’s restrictions. As noted, courts in this circuit have recognized that when organized crime defendants are charged with their participation in a criminal enterprise, the risk of continued criminal conduct is substantial and justifies detention. See Salerno, 631 F. Supp. at 1375.
Under the cases cited above, the crimes charged and the facts proffered, there is little doubt that Corozzo is a danger to the community and ordered detained pending the outcome of his case.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Corozzo’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy and racketeering counts, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted or participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affected interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise. First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Corozzo’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance photographs. More than five cooperating witnesses, all made members of the Gambino family are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Corozzo is a longstanding member of the family who currently serves as a captain.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Corozzo engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses and consensual recordings. For example, the government has over 30 recordings documenting Corozzo’s involvement in the extortions for which he is indicted in this case. With respect to the two murder charges against him, cooperating witnesses, whose testimony will be corroborated by other evidence including ballistics and other crime scene evidence are expected to testify to Corozzo’s role in the double murder. Accordingly, the government’s evidence against Corozzo is overwhelming and clearly favors detention.
3. Nicholas Corozzo Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set forth above, given that he faces the certainty of life in prison if convicted, Corozzo constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). This risk of flight is heightened as a result of the strong evidence against Corozzo, which includes a large crew of members and associates with the means to provide refuge. Accordingly, Corozzo should also be detained as a risk of flight.
Re: 2008 Gambino Indictment Detention Motion
H. JOHND’ AMICO
John D’Amico is the current acting boss of the Gambino family and a convicted felon. He is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including predicate acts of extortion and extortion conspiracy. D’Amico is also charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy. If convicted as charged, D’Amico faces a term of 20 years’ imprisonment on the racketeering conspiracy count, as well as for each of the four extortion and extortion conspiracy counts. Were D’Amico sentenced consecutively for just the two extortionate schemes covered in these counts - the evidence for which includes recorded conversations detailing his guilt - he faces a term of imprisonment of 40 years. As D’Amico is 71 years old, any conviction will lead to an effective life sentence.
The government seeks to have a permanent order of detention entered against D’Amico on the ground that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the charges lodged against D’Amico.
a. D’Amico Is the Acting Boss of The Gambino Family
D’Amico is a longstanding member and captain in the Gambino family; he currently serves as the acting boss. The government will establish D’Amico’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
More than five cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that D’Amico is a longstanding member and captain in the Gambino family. At least two witnesses can testify that D’Amico is presently the acting boss of the Gambino family.
This testimony is corroborated by consensual recordings detailing his leadership role within the Gambino family and confirming his current status as a member of the family’s administration. The available surveillance evidence also establishes D’Amico’s long-lived association with and position in the Gambino family. Since 1984 - more than 20 years ago - D’Amico has been observed at locations and events relating to the Gambino family. He has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at 19 weddings and wakes. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that these events are attended by dozens of other members and associates of organized crime, many of whom are convicted felons who committed those crimes as part of an organized crime family, and that Gambino family business is routinely conducted at such events. In the past two years alone, D’Amico was surveilled attending the January 2007 wake of Maryann Corozzo, the wife of Gambino family soldier Blaise Corozzo; the March 2007 wake of Gambino family soldier George Remini; the November 2007 wake of Gambino family captain Giuseppe “Joseph” Arcuri; and Gambino family captain (and co-defendant) Frank Cali’s December 2007 Christmas party.
b. D’Amico Is Charged with Crimes of Violence
As noted above, D’Amico is charged in multiple extortions, all crimes of violence. A brief proffer of the facts pertaining to each of the extortions follows.
i. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Profits
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately December 2003, Joseph Vollaro approached Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli and requested permission to open a cement company on Staten Island. Due to the Gambino family’s control of the New York cement industry, Cacciopoli, together with Gambino family captain Louis Filippelli, engaged in a series of meetings to obtain permission from the Gambino family’s administration to open such a company. Cacciopoli and Filippelli succeeded and informed Joseph Vollaro that he could start the company provided that following a one-year grace period, the Gambino family would receive 15% or $1 per yard for all cement sold, with the payments to be collected by Filippelli and passed through to the family’s administration. Joseph Vollaro opened the company in April 2004. Since May 2005, he has paid over $60,000 of extortion payments to the Gambino family. The initial payments were collected by Gambino family soldier Vincent Pacelli on behalf of then incarcerated Louis Filippelli. After Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo assumed control of Joseph Vollaro from Filippelli in late June 2005, payments were collected on his behalf for the administration by DiMaria, who controlled Joseph Vollaro for Corozzo while Corozzo was on supervised release, as well as by Gambino family soldiers Mario Cassarino and Ernest Grillo.
Multiple members of the Gambino family informed Joseph Vollaro that the profits from his Staten Island cement company were passed along to the Gambino family administration, and that the administration consists of acting boss John D’Amico, acting underboss Domenico Cefalu and consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation.
ii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Sale
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
During the spring of 2007, a company offered to buy Joseph Vollaro’s Staten Island cement company. In keeping with instructions from Gambino family captains Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria to consult them before making any decisions concerning his business, Joseph Vollaro informed DiMaria of the offer. DiMaria later told Joseph Vollaro that the family had agreed to allow him to make the sale, provided he pay $100,000 to the Gambino family. In January 2008, Joseph Vollaro sold the Staten Island cement company. Thereafter, Gambino family consigliere Joseph Corozzo, through Gambino family solider Gus Sclafani, directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the $100,000 to Joseph Corozzo. Later, Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the money to Leonard DiMaria for distribution to the administration. As directed, Joseph Vollaro made a payment of the proceeds of the sale of the cement company to DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
2. D’Amico Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
The defendant John D’Amico poses a danger to the community. He is the current acting boss of a violent organized crime family and has himself engaged in crimes of violence in furtherance of the family’s illegal businesses. Courts in this circuit repeatedly have held that high-ranking members of organized crime constitute a danger to the community. The Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. Ciccone, 312 F.3d 535 (2d Cir. 2002) is particularly instructive. There, Gambino family acting boss Peter Gotti was indicted on racketeering charges that included predicate acts of extortion against others. Peter Gotti, himself, was not charged with any predicate acts of extortion; only money laundering and money laundering conspiracy. At the detention hearing, the government contended that Gotti, as the leader of the Gambino family, was able to direct the activities of his co-defendants and therefore was responsible for the extortions and the other crimes committed by them. Magistrate Judge Pollak ordered Gotti detained finding that Gotti had been “charged with a crime of violence” and therefore could be detained on grounds of dangerousness. Id. at 538. Judge Pollak held that the government had clearly shown that Gotti was the acting boss of the Gambino family, and as such, was responsible for controlling the activities of the enterprise. Id. Thus, while Gotti was not named in the specific racketeering acts charging extortion, he could nonetheless be held responsible for the acts of the members of his organization given his status as the acting boss of the family. Because extortions are crimes of violence, Judge Pollack ordered Gotti detained as a danger to the community. Id. at 538-39.
On appeal, the Second Circuit upheld the court’s findings that Gotti constituted a danger to the community. The court held that it was proper for a court to consider the RICO enterprise as a whole when considering the dangerousness of one of its leaders. Id. at 542. The court found once the government demonstrated Gotti’s leadership role in the enterprise, and the enterprise was charged with crimes of violence, there was clear and convincing evidence for the court to have found that Gotti was a danger to the community and therefore should be detained. Id. at 542-43.
As discussed below, D’Amico - as was Peter Gotti - is the acting boss of the Gambino family. Not only are other members of the Gambino family charged with multiple counts of extortion and murder, but here, D’Amico, himself, along with the rest of the Gambino administration, is charged with extortions. Accordingly, the evidence supporting the government’s argument for detention here is stronger than that in Ciccone. See also United States v. Cirillo, Cr. No. 05-212 (SLT), slip op. (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (Genovese family acting bosses Dominick Cirillo and Lawrence Dentico, as well as Genovese family captain Anthony Antico, who were charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy, detained as dangers to the community), aff’d, 149 Fed. Appx. 40 (2d Cir. 2005). As set forth below, each of the relevant considerations under the Bail Reform Act favors detention here.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
In addition to racketeering and racketeering conspiracy, D’Amico is charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy - both of which are crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). Moreover, D’Amico currently leads a violent criminal enterprise and has at his disposal more than 200 made men - soldiers - sworn to follow his orders and commit murder upon his request.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
D’Amico is a long-standing member of the Gambino family who now serves as its acting boss. He is a life-long criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. Below is a brief summary of certain of D’Amico’s arrests and convictions:
• D’Amico was arrested and convicted several times for illegal gambling in the 1960s.
• On June 2, 1998, D’Amico was arrested in New York on RICO charges; ultimately pled guilty to operating an illegal gambling business (18 U.S.C. § 1955) and was sentenced to 20 months in prison and three years of supervised release.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
D’Amico poses a clear danger if released. As noted above, the government will establish D’Amico’s association with, and position of authority in, the Gambino family through a variety of sources, including the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence.
Courts in this circuit routinely detain high-ranking members of organized crime based on their leadership roles in criminal enterprises that engage in acts of violence. See, e.g. Defede, 7 F. Supp. 2d at 393 (detaining defendant on dangerousness based on the proffered testimony of cooperating witness and surveillance evidence that he was the acting boss of the Luchese family, an enterprise involved in extortionate conduct, among other crimes); Gotti. 312 F.3d at 542 (“Indeed, we made it quite clear in United States v. Colombo. 777 F.2d 96, 98 (2d Cir. 1985), that the [Bail Reform Act] ‘does not require that the defendant himself commit acts of physical violence as a condition precedent to a detention order.’ ”).
D’Amico is the current leader of the Gambino family “on the street” and he has been involved in acts of violence, including extortions with Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. The violent nature of the Gambino family’s method of collecting money is made clear in the following recording of DiMaria: “You have to go bother these people for your money. . . they are going to tell you we got to sit down and talk and this and that. Rough them up a little. Tell them, ‘You’re a fucking stiff.’ Tell them what you have to tell them. . . . The next guy that owes you money from there with them guys, you catch them, and that’s what I’m saying, that you check in with the other guys . . . Crack a face, fuck them up. Don’t you do it, send a fucking kid to rough them up, a fucking joke.”
D’Amico thus falls within the “small but identifiable group of particularly dangerous defendants as to whom neither the imposition of stringent release conditions nor the prospect of revocation of release can reasonably assure the safety of the community.” Senate Report at 3188-89. As demonstrated by the recorded conversations, D’Amico’s position in the Gambino family gives him the authority and resources to continue his criminal activities and to order and accomplish acts of violence against potential witnesses or any person he perceives as a threat - of which there will be many during the course of this prosecution.
Finally, D’Amico likely will continue his criminal conduct if released; he heads a continuing criminal enterprise, the needs of which require constant monitoring. As noted, courts in this circuit have recognized that when organized crime defendants are charged with their participation in a criminal enterprise, the risk of continued criminal conduct is substantial and justifies detention. See Salerno, 631 F. Supp. at 1375.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of D’Amico’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted or participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affected interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and D’Amico’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance. More than five cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that D’Amico is a longstanding member of the family and a captain. At least two witnesses are expected to testify that D’Amico currently serves as the acting boss of the Gambino family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that D’Amico engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses, and multiple consensual recordings that show the defendant’s involvement in the charged extortions. Accordingly, the government’s evidence of D’Amico’s guilt is thus strong and clearly favors detention.
3. D’Amico Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set forth above, given that he faces 20 years’ imprisonment on each count if convicted, D’Amico constitutes a risk of flight. This risk of flight is heightened as a result of the strong evidence against D’Amico, which, at the age of 71 years old may constitute a life sentence. As the leader of a large and organized criminal enterprise, D’Amico has the means and resources at his disposal which also increases the risk of flight. Accordingly, D’Amico should also be detained as a risk of flight.
John D’Amico is the current acting boss of the Gambino family and a convicted felon. He is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including predicate acts of extortion and extortion conspiracy. D’Amico is also charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy. If convicted as charged, D’Amico faces a term of 20 years’ imprisonment on the racketeering conspiracy count, as well as for each of the four extortion and extortion conspiracy counts. Were D’Amico sentenced consecutively for just the two extortionate schemes covered in these counts - the evidence for which includes recorded conversations detailing his guilt - he faces a term of imprisonment of 40 years. As D’Amico is 71 years old, any conviction will lead to an effective life sentence.
The government seeks to have a permanent order of detention entered against D’Amico on the ground that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the charges lodged against D’Amico.
a. D’Amico Is the Acting Boss of The Gambino Family
D’Amico is a longstanding member and captain in the Gambino family; he currently serves as the acting boss. The government will establish D’Amico’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
More than five cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that D’Amico is a longstanding member and captain in the Gambino family. At least two witnesses can testify that D’Amico is presently the acting boss of the Gambino family.
This testimony is corroborated by consensual recordings detailing his leadership role within the Gambino family and confirming his current status as a member of the family’s administration. The available surveillance evidence also establishes D’Amico’s long-lived association with and position in the Gambino family. Since 1984 - more than 20 years ago - D’Amico has been observed at locations and events relating to the Gambino family. He has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at 19 weddings and wakes. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that these events are attended by dozens of other members and associates of organized crime, many of whom are convicted felons who committed those crimes as part of an organized crime family, and that Gambino family business is routinely conducted at such events. In the past two years alone, D’Amico was surveilled attending the January 2007 wake of Maryann Corozzo, the wife of Gambino family soldier Blaise Corozzo; the March 2007 wake of Gambino family soldier George Remini; the November 2007 wake of Gambino family captain Giuseppe “Joseph” Arcuri; and Gambino family captain (and co-defendant) Frank Cali’s December 2007 Christmas party.
b. D’Amico Is Charged with Crimes of Violence
As noted above, D’Amico is charged in multiple extortions, all crimes of violence. A brief proffer of the facts pertaining to each of the extortions follows.
i. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Profits
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately December 2003, Joseph Vollaro approached Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli and requested permission to open a cement company on Staten Island. Due to the Gambino family’s control of the New York cement industry, Cacciopoli, together with Gambino family captain Louis Filippelli, engaged in a series of meetings to obtain permission from the Gambino family’s administration to open such a company. Cacciopoli and Filippelli succeeded and informed Joseph Vollaro that he could start the company provided that following a one-year grace period, the Gambino family would receive 15% or $1 per yard for all cement sold, with the payments to be collected by Filippelli and passed through to the family’s administration. Joseph Vollaro opened the company in April 2004. Since May 2005, he has paid over $60,000 of extortion payments to the Gambino family. The initial payments were collected by Gambino family soldier Vincent Pacelli on behalf of then incarcerated Louis Filippelli. After Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo assumed control of Joseph Vollaro from Filippelli in late June 2005, payments were collected on his behalf for the administration by DiMaria, who controlled Joseph Vollaro for Corozzo while Corozzo was on supervised release, as well as by Gambino family soldiers Mario Cassarino and Ernest Grillo.
Multiple members of the Gambino family informed Joseph Vollaro that the profits from his Staten Island cement company were passed along to the Gambino family administration, and that the administration consists of acting boss John D’Amico, acting underboss Domenico Cefalu and consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation.
ii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Sale
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
During the spring of 2007, a company offered to buy Joseph Vollaro’s Staten Island cement company. In keeping with instructions from Gambino family captains Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria to consult them before making any decisions concerning his business, Joseph Vollaro informed DiMaria of the offer. DiMaria later told Joseph Vollaro that the family had agreed to allow him to make the sale, provided he pay $100,000 to the Gambino family. In January 2008, Joseph Vollaro sold the Staten Island cement company. Thereafter, Gambino family consigliere Joseph Corozzo, through Gambino family solider Gus Sclafani, directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the $100,000 to Joseph Corozzo. Later, Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the money to Leonard DiMaria for distribution to the administration. As directed, Joseph Vollaro made a payment of the proceeds of the sale of the cement company to DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
2. D’Amico Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
The defendant John D’Amico poses a danger to the community. He is the current acting boss of a violent organized crime family and has himself engaged in crimes of violence in furtherance of the family’s illegal businesses. Courts in this circuit repeatedly have held that high-ranking members of organized crime constitute a danger to the community. The Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. Ciccone, 312 F.3d 535 (2d Cir. 2002) is particularly instructive. There, Gambino family acting boss Peter Gotti was indicted on racketeering charges that included predicate acts of extortion against others. Peter Gotti, himself, was not charged with any predicate acts of extortion; only money laundering and money laundering conspiracy. At the detention hearing, the government contended that Gotti, as the leader of the Gambino family, was able to direct the activities of his co-defendants and therefore was responsible for the extortions and the other crimes committed by them. Magistrate Judge Pollak ordered Gotti detained finding that Gotti had been “charged with a crime of violence” and therefore could be detained on grounds of dangerousness. Id. at 538. Judge Pollak held that the government had clearly shown that Gotti was the acting boss of the Gambino family, and as such, was responsible for controlling the activities of the enterprise. Id. Thus, while Gotti was not named in the specific racketeering acts charging extortion, he could nonetheless be held responsible for the acts of the members of his organization given his status as the acting boss of the family. Because extortions are crimes of violence, Judge Pollack ordered Gotti detained as a danger to the community. Id. at 538-39.
On appeal, the Second Circuit upheld the court’s findings that Gotti constituted a danger to the community. The court held that it was proper for a court to consider the RICO enterprise as a whole when considering the dangerousness of one of its leaders. Id. at 542. The court found once the government demonstrated Gotti’s leadership role in the enterprise, and the enterprise was charged with crimes of violence, there was clear and convincing evidence for the court to have found that Gotti was a danger to the community and therefore should be detained. Id. at 542-43.
As discussed below, D’Amico - as was Peter Gotti - is the acting boss of the Gambino family. Not only are other members of the Gambino family charged with multiple counts of extortion and murder, but here, D’Amico, himself, along with the rest of the Gambino administration, is charged with extortions. Accordingly, the evidence supporting the government’s argument for detention here is stronger than that in Ciccone. See also United States v. Cirillo, Cr. No. 05-212 (SLT), slip op. (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (Genovese family acting bosses Dominick Cirillo and Lawrence Dentico, as well as Genovese family captain Anthony Antico, who were charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy, detained as dangers to the community), aff’d, 149 Fed. Appx. 40 (2d Cir. 2005). As set forth below, each of the relevant considerations under the Bail Reform Act favors detention here.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
In addition to racketeering and racketeering conspiracy, D’Amico is charged with extortion and extortion conspiracy - both of which are crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). Moreover, D’Amico currently leads a violent criminal enterprise and has at his disposal more than 200 made men - soldiers - sworn to follow his orders and commit murder upon his request.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
D’Amico is a long-standing member of the Gambino family who now serves as its acting boss. He is a life-long criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. Below is a brief summary of certain of D’Amico’s arrests and convictions:
• D’Amico was arrested and convicted several times for illegal gambling in the 1960s.
• On June 2, 1998, D’Amico was arrested in New York on RICO charges; ultimately pled guilty to operating an illegal gambling business (18 U.S.C. § 1955) and was sentenced to 20 months in prison and three years of supervised release.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
D’Amico poses a clear danger if released. As noted above, the government will establish D’Amico’s association with, and position of authority in, the Gambino family through a variety of sources, including the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence.
Courts in this circuit routinely detain high-ranking members of organized crime based on their leadership roles in criminal enterprises that engage in acts of violence. See, e.g. Defede, 7 F. Supp. 2d at 393 (detaining defendant on dangerousness based on the proffered testimony of cooperating witness and surveillance evidence that he was the acting boss of the Luchese family, an enterprise involved in extortionate conduct, among other crimes); Gotti. 312 F.3d at 542 (“Indeed, we made it quite clear in United States v. Colombo. 777 F.2d 96, 98 (2d Cir. 1985), that the [Bail Reform Act] ‘does not require that the defendant himself commit acts of physical violence as a condition precedent to a detention order.’ ”).
D’Amico is the current leader of the Gambino family “on the street” and he has been involved in acts of violence, including extortions with Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. The violent nature of the Gambino family’s method of collecting money is made clear in the following recording of DiMaria: “You have to go bother these people for your money. . . they are going to tell you we got to sit down and talk and this and that. Rough them up a little. Tell them, ‘You’re a fucking stiff.’ Tell them what you have to tell them. . . . The next guy that owes you money from there with them guys, you catch them, and that’s what I’m saying, that you check in with the other guys . . . Crack a face, fuck them up. Don’t you do it, send a fucking kid to rough them up, a fucking joke.”
D’Amico thus falls within the “small but identifiable group of particularly dangerous defendants as to whom neither the imposition of stringent release conditions nor the prospect of revocation of release can reasonably assure the safety of the community.” Senate Report at 3188-89. As demonstrated by the recorded conversations, D’Amico’s position in the Gambino family gives him the authority and resources to continue his criminal activities and to order and accomplish acts of violence against potential witnesses or any person he perceives as a threat - of which there will be many during the course of this prosecution.
Finally, D’Amico likely will continue his criminal conduct if released; he heads a continuing criminal enterprise, the needs of which require constant monitoring. As noted, courts in this circuit have recognized that when organized crime defendants are charged with their participation in a criminal enterprise, the risk of continued criminal conduct is substantial and justifies detention. See Salerno, 631 F. Supp. at 1375.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of D’Amico’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted or participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affected interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and D’Amico’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance. More than five cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that D’Amico is a longstanding member of the family and a captain. At least two witnesses are expected to testify that D’Amico currently serves as the acting boss of the Gambino family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that D’Amico engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses, and multiple consensual recordings that show the defendant’s involvement in the charged extortions. Accordingly, the government’s evidence of D’Amico’s guilt is thus strong and clearly favors detention.
3. D’Amico Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set forth above, given that he faces 20 years’ imprisonment on each count if convicted, D’Amico constitutes a risk of flight. This risk of flight is heightened as a result of the strong evidence against D’Amico, which, at the age of 71 years old may constitute a life sentence. As the leader of a large and organized criminal enterprise, D’Amico has the means and resources at his disposal which also increases the risk of flight. Accordingly, D’Amico should also be detained as a risk of flight.
Re: 2008 Gambino Indictment Detention Motion
I. LEONARD DIMARIA
Leonard DiMaria is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including 10 predicate acts of extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy, and additional predicate acts of union benefit theft, bribery of union officials, money laundering and illegal gambling. DiMaria is also charged with extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy, union benefit theft, conspiracy to embezzle union benefits, mail fraud, mail fraud conspiracy, money laundering and money laundering conspiracy.
If convicted as charged, DiMaria faces a term of 20 years’ imprisonment on the racketeering conspiracy count, as well as for each of the 20 extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy counts. Were DiMaria sentenced consecutively for just the 10 distinct extortions covered in these counts - the evidence for which includes more than 100 hours of recorded conversations capturing DiMaria discussing the extortions - he faces a term of imprisonment of 200 years.
Significantly, he will be sentenced as a career offender due to his past convictions for violent crime, resulting in a guidelines range of 210 to 262 months’ imprisonment for each extortion conviction. DiMaria is 67 years old and has more than 20 criminal convictions dating to 1957.
The government seeks to have a permanent order of detention entered against DiMaria on the grounds that he is a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the charges lodged against DiMaria.
a. DiMaria Is a Captain in the Gambino Family
DiMaria is a longstanding member of the Gambino family who currently serves as a captain. The government will establish DiMaria’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
More than a dozen cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that DiMaria has been a member of the Gambino family since the 1970’s. These same cooperating witness are expected to testify that since that time DiMaria has served as the right hand to powerful Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo. More than five cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that DiMaria himself is a member of the Gambino family and at least two are expected to testify that presently he is a captain.
This testimony is corroborated by the more than 80 recorded conversations involving DiMaria. During the course of the recordings, he is heard engaging in the Gambino family’s business - discussing the enterprise, its criminal activities, its members and rules of operation - in which his captain status is made plain by, among other things, statements demonstrating his control of other members of members of the Gambino family.
Surveillance evidence also establishes DiMaria’s long-term association with and position in the Gambino family. Since 1976 - more than 30 years ago - DiMaria has been observed at locations and events relating to the Gambino family. He has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at weddings and wakes in the 1970’s, 1980’s, 1990’s and in this decade. In addition, members of the Gambino family charged in the instant indictment, including acting boss John D’Amico, consigliere Joseph Corozzo, captain Nicholas Corozzo, captain Thomas Cacciopoli, acting captain Augustus Sclafani and two other soldiers, attended DiMaria’s daughter’s wedding and/or his mother’s wake. As recently as January 31, 2008, DiMaria was observed meeting with a cooperating witness to collect $8000 for the Gambino family’s administration. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that these events are attended by dozens of other members and associates of organized crime, many of whom are convicted felons who committed those crimes as part of an organized crime family, and that Gambino family business is routinely conducted at such events.
b. DiMaria Is Charged with Crimes of Violence
DiMaria is charged with extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy in 10 racketeering acts within count one’s RICO conspiracy charge, as well as in 20 substantive counts of the indictment. These charges stem from 10 separate extortions involving dozens of businesses and business owners within the New York construction industry. A brief proffer of the facts pertaining to each of the extortions follows.
i. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Profits
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately December 2003, Joseph Vollaro approached Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli and requested permission to open a cement company on Staten Island. Due to the Gambino family’s control of the New York cement industry, Cacciopoli, together with Gambino family captain Louis Filippelli, engaged in a series of meetings to obtain permission from the Gambino family’s administration to open such a company. Cacciopoli and Filippelli succeeded and informed Joseph Vollaro that he could start the company provided that following a one-year grace period, the Gambino family would receive 15% or $1 per yard for all cement sold, with the payments to be collected by Filippelli and passed through to the family’s administration.
Joseph Vollaro opened the company in April 2004. Since May 2005, he has paid over $60,000 of extortion payments to the Gambino family. The initial payments were collected by Gambino family soldier Vincent Pacelli on behalf of then incarcerated Louis Filippelli. After Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo assumed control of Joseph Vollaro from Filippelli in late June 2005, payments were collected on his behalf for the administration by DiMaria, who controlled Joseph Vollaro for Corozzo while Corozzo was on supervised release, as well as by Gambino family soldiers Mario Cassarino and Ernest Grillo.
Multiple members of the Gambino family informed Joseph Vollaro that the profits from his Staten Island cement company were passed along to the Gambino family administration, and that the administration consists of acting boss John D’Amico, acting underboss Domenico Cefalu and consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation.
ii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Sale
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
During the spring of 2007, a company offered to buy Joseph Vollaro’s Staten Island cement company. In keeping with instructions from Gambino family captains Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria to consult them before making any decisions concerning his business, Joseph Vollaro informed DiMaria of the offer. DiMaria later told Joseph Vollaro that the family had agreed to allow him to make the sale, provided he pay $100,000 to the Gambino family.
In January 2008, Joseph Vollaro sold the Staten Island cement company. Thereafter, Gambino family consigliere Joseph Corozzo, through Gambino family solider Gus Sclafani, directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the $100,000 to Joseph Corozzo. Later, Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the money to Leonard DiMaria for distribution to the administration. As directed, Joseph Vollaro made a payment of the proceeds of the sale of the cement company to DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
iii. Extortion Conspiracy/Attempted Extortion - Pump Truck
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In June 2005, Joseph Vollaro sought permission from Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria, who exercised day to day control over Joseph Vollaro for Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo, to purchase a cement pump truck and open a business. Later, DiMaria allowed Joseph Vollaro to start the business pursuant to an arrangement in which Joseph Vollaro would receive 40% of the pump truck profits and DiMaria and Corozzo would split the remaining profits together with Gambino family soldiers Ernie Grillo and Mario Cassarino. The pump truck business operated for a time, but ultimately the business was not profitable.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s attempted extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iv) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
iv. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Liberty View Harbor Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In April 2006, Joseph Vollaro started a company which constructed a portable cement plant at the Liberty View Harbor construction site at which VMS Construction served as general contractor. VMS Construction is owned by Gambino family associate Anthony Scibelli, who is controlled by Gambino family soldier Vincent Dragonetti. In addition to the portable cement plant, two companies owned by Joseph Vollaro also performed work at the Liberty View Harbor site.
Joseph Vollaro obtained the work at the Liberty View Harbor site after Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo, who is Dragonetti’s father-in-law, granted him permission provided he pay 60% of the portable cement plant’s profits to Corozzo, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria and Dragonetti. In addition, Scibelli and Dragonetti demanded that Joseph Vollaro pay an additional $6 or $7 per yard of cement produced as well as extortionate payments for the other two businesses.
Over the course of the extortion, Jon Doe #4 made extortion payments to the Gambino family of more than $200,000.
Despite these payments, during the summer of 2007, with the backing of Corozzo, DiMaria and Dragonetti, Scibelli took possession of the portable cement plant without remuneration to Joseph Vollaro.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
v. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Cement Powder Deliveries ___
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In October 2007, following Gambino family soldier Anthony Scibelli’s takeover of his portable cement plant, Gambino family captains DiMaria and Corozzo approved a plan by which Joseph Vollaro would supply his former plant with the powder used to make cement at the Liberty View Harbor site. For this privilege, Joseph Vollaro was instructed to provide 60% of his profits relating to the cement powder deliveries to be split between Corozzo, DiMaria and Dragonetti. As directed, in the four months since, Joseph Vollaro has provided $6,000 in extortion payments.
Joseph Vollaro made the extortion payments demanded by his Gambino family handlers because he feared retaliation from the Gambino family and their associates.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including dozens of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
vi. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Construction List
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In July 2005, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria instructed Joseph Vollaro to help soldier Ernest Grillo reinitiate collections from construction companies that had been making extortion payments to then jailed Gambino family soldier Edward Garafola prior to his incarceration. Garafola, who had been a member of the Gambino family’s “construction panel,” a body which oversees the Gambino family’s construction rackets, had exacted extortionate payments from scores of construction companies prior to his incarceration, but had not shared the identity of all those companies with his Gambino family superiors.
Joseph Vollaro contacted Grillo as instructed. Together with Ruggiero and Gambino family associate Anthony O’Donnell, who had been Garafola’s right hand in conducting the extortions, and who had accompanied Garafola on one occasion while Garafola assaulted a contractor who was late in his payments, the men repeatedly met to reconstruct a list of the contractors who had been paying Garafola extortion and to plot the reinitiation of collections. Under the supervision and at the direction of Corozzo and DiMaria, the four men created a list of more than 40 construction companies and individual contractors that formerly paid extortion to Garafola. Grillo, Ruggiero and O’Donnell then approached a number of the companies to place them back under Gambino family control.
During the this process, Edward Garafola’s son asserted his father’s right to the extortion victims, and complained of the efforts to take away his father’s former victims. In response, Grillo told Joseph Vollaro that he assaulted Garafola’s son, saying, “I choked him out.”
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family, and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) the testimony of a cooperating witnesses who was a former Gambino family member and member of the Gambino family construction panel who was tasked with compiling the same construction list years earlier but failed to complete the job prior to his arrest and incarceration, property or persons.
vii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - NASCAR Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In January 2006, NASCAR had begun construction on a racetrack in Staten Island. Recine Trucking, a company under the control of Gambino family acting underboss Domenico Cefalu, was among the first companies hired to bring fill to the site. Thereafter, Gambino family soldier Ernest Grillo acquired exclusive dumping rights at the site for Joseph Vollaro.
From late January 2006 to May 2006, Grillo, Cefalu and Gambino family members Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Nicholas Corozzo and Frank Cali negotiated the amount of extortion Joseph Vollaro would be required to pay for the exclusive dumping rights. Eventually, Joseph Vollaro received those rights on the condition that he make extortion payments of $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Corozzo and DiMaria, and $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Cefalu and Cali.
Before Joseph Vollaro could begin dumping at the site pursuant to these terms, the exclusive dumping deal fell through. Later, after a new deal was worked out, Corozzo and DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to take the job on the condition that he pay them $1 for every yard of fill dumped at the site.
Joseph Vollaro also was required to make a one-time $9,000 payment to NASCAR employee Todd Polakoff on behalf have NASCAR executive William Kilgannon.
Joseph Vollaro worked at the site for a short time and made approximately $13,000 in extortion payments to Gambino family soldier Mario Cassarino, who collected the extortion payments for Corozzo and DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
viii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Excavation Company
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately January 2006, Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo instructed Joseph Vollaro to start an excavation business which, after a short period in which Joseph Vollaro would be allowed to operate the business without making extortion payments, would be required to pay 60% of its profits to Corozzo, Gambino family soldier Vincent Dragonetti and Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. Joseph Vollaro began making these payments a few months after starting the business. To date, Joseph Vollaro has paid more than $30,000 in extortion payments to DiMaria and Dragonetti, who collected the payments on Corozzo’s behalf.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including dozens of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
ix. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - John Does #4 & #12
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In July 2006, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria informed Joseph Vollaro that John Doe #12, an individual close to Joseph Vollaro who previously made extortion payments to the commissary of jailed Gambino family soldier Jerome Brancato, needed to begin making extortion payments to Brancato again. At the end of 2006, when Brancato was released from prison, DiMaria instructed Joseph Vollaro to have John Doe #12 pay money to Brancato to help him get him back on his feet. Joseph Vollaro then gave $2,500 to Vincent Dragonetti, who collected the money for Brancato.
In January 2008, Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo told Joseph Vollaro that John Doe #12 failed to provide Brancato with a year end extortion payment. Corozzo instructed Joseph Vollaro to make sure that money from John Doe #12 was given to Gambino family soldier Joseph Chirico, who would collect it for Brancato. The following day, Joseph Vollaro gave $1,500 to Chirico for Brancato.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members who are expected to testify that individuals being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers or face some form of retaliation.
x. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Recycling
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In conducting his trucking business, Joseph Vollaro came into frequent contact with the owners of a recycling facility located on Staten Island.
In approximately June 2008, Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to collect extortion payments from the facility.
In January 2008, Joseph Vollaro told Corozzo and DiMaria that he collected $2,000 from the facility, and provided the money to DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members who are expected to testify that individuals being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers or face some form of retaliation.
2. DiMaria Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
The defendant Leonard DiMaria poses a danger to the community. He is one of the leaders of a violent organized crime family and has himself engaged in crimes of violence in furtherance of the family’s illegal businesses. Courts in this district and the Second Circuit repeatedly have held that high-ranking members of organized crime constitute a danger to the community. As discussed below, each of the relevant considerations under the Bail Reform Act favors detention here.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
DiMaria is charged with numerous extortions as part of the racketeering conspiracy count as well as substantively. Extortions are crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). Moreover, DiMaria currently holds a leadership position in an ongoing criminal enterprise and commands made men - soldiers - sworn to follow his orders and commit violence upon his request.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
DiMaria is a long-standing member of the Gambino family who now serves as a captain. He is a life-long criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. He also is a multiple convicted felon, whose convictions include:
• In 1997, DiMaria was convicted in the Eastern District of New York of racketeering, racketeering conspiracy, loansharking, unlawful collection of debt, possession and sale of stolen property, transportation of stolen property; theft from interstate shipments, conspiracy to defraud the United States and bribery of a public official.6
• In 1998, DiMaria was convicted in the Southern District of Florida of Racketeering Conspiracy and sentenced to 64 months’ imprisonment.7
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
DiMaria poses a clear danger if released. As noted above, the government will establish DiMaria’s membership in the Gambino family through a variety of sources, including the testimony of more than five cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence.
Courts in this circuit routinely detain high-ranking members of organized crime based on their leadership roles in criminal enterprises that engage in acts of violence. See, e.g. Defede, 7 F. Supp. 2d at 393 (detaining defendant on dangerousness based on the proffered testimony of cooperating witness and surveillance evidence that he was the acting boss of the Luchese family, an enterprise involved in extortionate conduct, among other crimes); Gotti, 312 F.3d at 542 (“Indeed, we made it quite clear in United States v. Colombo, 777 F.2d 96, 98 (2d Cir. 1985), that the [Bail Reform Act] ‘does not require that the defendant himself commit acts of physical violence as a condition precedent to a detention order.’ ”).
DiMaria is a captain in the Gambino family and he has been involved in numerous acts of violence. In this investigation, he is caught in scores of recorded conversations related to extortion, a crime of violence. The violent nature of the Gambino family’s method of collecting money is made clear in the following recording of DiMaria: “You have to go bother these people for your money. . . they are going to tell you we got to sit down and talk and this and that. Rough them up a little. Tell them, ‘You’re a fucking stiff.’ Tell them what you have to tell them. . . . The next guy that owes you money from there with them guys, you catch them, and that’s what I’m saying, that you check in with the other guys . . . Crack a face, fuck them up. Don’t you do it, send a fucking kid to rough them up, a fucking joke.”
DiMaria thus falls within the “small but identifiable group of particularly dangerous defendants as to whom neither the imposition of stringent release conditions nor the prospect of revocation of release can reasonably assure the safety of the community.” Senate Report at 3188-89. As demonstrated by the recorded conversations, DiMaria’s position in the Gambino family gives him the authority and resources to continue his criminal activities and to order and accomplish acts of violence against potential witnesses or any person he perceives as a threat - of which there will be many during the course of this prosecution.
Finally, DiMaria likely will continue his criminal conduct if released; he is a career criminal who holds a leadership position in a continuing criminal enterprise, the needs of which require constant monitoring. As noted, courts in this circuit have recognized that when organized crime defendants are charged with their participation in a criminal enterprise, the risk of continued criminal conduct is substantial and justifies detention. See Salerno, 631 F. Supp. at 1375. Under the cases cited above, the crimes charged and the facts proffered, there is little doubt that DiMaria is a danger to the community and ordered detained pending the outcome of his case.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of DiMaria’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy and racketeering counts, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted or participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affected interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and DiMaria’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, hundreds of consensual recordings and surveillance. More than five cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that DiMaria is a longstanding member of the family. At least two witnesses are expected to testify that DiMaria currently serves as a captain.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that DiMaria engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses and scores of consensual and court-authorized recordings. For example, the testimony of the cooperating witness will be corroborated by over 80 recordings that show that the defendant engaged in the crimes charged.
The government’s evidence of DiMaria’s guilt is thus strong and clearly favors detention.
3. DiMaria Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
DiMaria faces 21 counts covering 10 different crimes of violence each carrying a penalty of 20 years’ imprisonment. In addition, DiMaria will be sentenced as a career offender under the Sentencing Guidelines. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding that the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). Given his age, the strength of the evidence and the likely sentence resulting from a conviction on even one of the charged extortions, it is a near certainty DiMaria faces an effective life sentence. Accordingly he constitutes a risk of flight and should be detained.
J. VINCENT DRAGONETTI
Vincent Dragonetti is a soldier in the Gambino family. He is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including more than a dozen predicate acts of extortion, attempted extortion, extortion conspiracy, extortionate extension of credit, extortionate extension of credit conspiracy, extortionate collection of credit, and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy. He is also charged with extortion, attempted extortion, extortion conspiracy, extortionate extension of credit, extortionate extension of credit conspiracy, extortionate collection of credit, extortionate collection of credit conspiracy, money laundering, money laundering conspiracy and illegal gambling.
If convicted as charged, Dragonetti faces a term of 20 years’ imprisonment on the racketeering conspiracy count, as well as each of the more than 10 counts charging crimes of violence. Were Dragonetti sentenced consecutively for just five of the extortionate schemes covered in these counts - the evidence for which includes more than 60 separate recorded conversations capturing Dragonetti discussing the extortions on tape - he faces a term of imprisonment of 100 years. Accordingly, the government seeks a permanent order of detention for Dragonetti on the grounds that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Dragonetti.
a. Dragonetti Is a Gambino Family Soldier
Dragonetti is a Gambino family soldier. The government will establish Dragonetti’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
At least two cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Dragonetti is a member of the Gambino family who enjoys special ties with powerful Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo, who is his father-in-law.
This testimony is corroborated by the more than 60 recorded conversations involving Dragonetti. During the course of the recordings, he is heard engaging in the Gambino family’s business, explicitly discussing the myriad crimes with which he is charged, the involvement of other Gambino family members in these crimes, and his position in the Gambino family’s hierarchy. Scores of recorded conversations with other Gambino family members referencing Dragonetti further demonstrate his position in the family.
The available surveillance evidence also establishes Dragonetti’s long association with and position in the Gambino family. Since 1993, Dragonetti has been observed at locations and events relating to the Gambino family. He has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at three weddings and wakes. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that these events are attended by dozens of other members and associates of organized crime, many of whom are convicted felons who committed those crimes as part of an organized crime family, and that Gambino family business is routinely conducted at such events. Dragonetti was observed at the 1993 wedding of Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria’s daughter. In the past year, Dragonetti was surveilled attending the January 2007 wake of Maryann Corozzo, the wife of Gambino family soldier Blaise Corozzo.
b. Crimes of Violence
As noted above, Dragonetti is charged in multiple extortions, all crimes of violence. A brief proffer of the facts pertaining to each of the extortions follows.
i. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Liberty View Harbor Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In April 2006, Joseph Vollaro started a company which constructed a portable cement plant at the Liberty View Harbor construction site at which VMS Construction served as general contractor. VMS Construction is owned by Gambino family associate Anthony Scibelli, who is controlled by Gambino family soldier Vincent Dragonetti. In addition to the portable cement plant, two companies owned by Joseph Vollaro also performed work at the Liberty View Harbor site.
Joseph Vollaro obtained the work at the Liberty View Harbor site after Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo, who is Dragonetti’s father-in-law, granted him permission provided he pay 60% of the portable cement plant’s profits to Corozzo, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria and Dragonetti. In addition, Scibelli and Dragonetti demanded that Joseph Vollaro pay an additional $6 or $7 per yard of cement produced as well as extortionate payments for the other two businesses.
Over the course of the extortion, Jon Doe #4 made extortion payments to the Gambino family of more than $200,000.
Despite these payments, during the summer of 2007, with the backing of Corozzo, DiMaria and Dragonetti, Scibelli took possession of the portable cement plant without remuneration to Joseph Vollaro.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
ii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Cement Powder Deliveries ___
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In October 2007, following Gambino family soldier Anthony Scibelli’s takeover of his portable cement plant, Gambino family captains DiMaria and Corozzo approved a plan by which Joseph Vollaro would supply his former plant with the powder used to make cement at the Liberty View Harbor site. For this privilege, Joseph Vollaro was instructed to provide 60% of his profits relating to the cement powder deliveries to be split between Corozzo, DiMaria and Dragonetti. As directed, in the four months since, Joseph Vollaro has provided $6,000 in extortion payments.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including dozens of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
iii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - NASCAR Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In January 2006, NASCAR had begun construction on a racetrack in Staten Island. Recine Trucking, a company under the control of Gambino family acting underboss Domenico Cefalu, was among the first companies hired to bring fill to the site. Thereafter, Gambino family soldier Ernest Grillo acquired exclusive dumping rights at the site for Joseph Vollaro.
From late January 2006 to May 2006, Grillo, Cefalu and Gambino family members Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Nicholas Corozzo and Frank Cali negotiated the amount of extortion Joseph Vollaro would be required to pay for the exclusive dumping rights. Eventually, Joseph Vollaro received those rights on the condition that he make extortion payments of $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Corozzo and DiMaria, and $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Cefalu and Cali.
Before Joseph Vollaro could begin dumping at the site pursuant to these terms, the exclusive dumping deal fell through. Later, after a new deal was worked out, Corozzo and DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to take the job on the condition that he pay them $1 for every yard of fill dumped at the site.
Joseph Vollaro also was required to make a one-time $9,000 payment to NASCAR employee Todd Polakoff on behalf have NASCAR executive William Kilgannon.
Joseph Vollaro worked at the site for a short time and made approximately $13,000 in extortion payments to Gambino family soldier Mario Cassarino, who collected the extortion payments for Corozzo and DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
iv. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Excavation Company
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately January 2006, Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo instructed Joseph Vollaro to start an excavation business which, after a short period in which Joseph Vollaro would be allowed to operate the business without making extortion payments, would be required to pay 60% of its profits to Corozzo, Gambino family soldier Vincent Dragonetti and Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. Joseph Vollaro began making these payments a few months after starting the business. To date, Joseph Vollaro has paid more than $30,000 in extortion payments to DiMaria and Dragonetti, who collected the payments on Corozzo’s behalf.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including dozens of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
v. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - John Does #4 & #12
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In July 2006, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria informed Joseph Vollaro that John Doe #12, an individual close to Joseph Vollaro who previously made extortion payments to the commissary of jailed Gambino family soldier Jerome Brancato, needed to begin making extortion payments to Brancato again. At the end of 2006, when Brancato was released from prison, DiMaria instructed Joseph Vollaro to have John Doe #12 pay money to Brancato to help him get him back on his feet. Joseph Vollaro then gave $2,500 to Vincent Dragonetti, who collected the money for Brancato.
In January 2008, Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo told Joseph Vollaro that John Doe #12 failed to provide Brancato with a year end extortion payment. Corozzo instructed Joseph Vollaro to make sure that money from John Doe #12 was given to Gambino family soldier Joseph Chirico, who would collect it for Brancato. The following day, Joseph Vollaro gave $1,500 to Chirico for Brancato.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members who are expected to testify that individuals being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers or face some form of retaliation.
2. Dragonetti Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
As discussed above, Dragonetti is a Gambino family soldier with a prior felony conviction for committing a crime of violence as part of the Gambino family.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Dragonetti has been indicted on 12 counts charging crimes of violence. This alone merits detention on the basis of dangerousness.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
As noted, Dragonetti is a Gambino family soldier. He is a criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. He also is a convicted felon who has pled guilty in the past - in this district - to some of the same conduct he has been charged with in the instant indictment.
On January 23, 1997, Dragonetti was arrested in the Eastern District of New York and charged with RICO and RICO conspiracy. On November 3, 1997, he pled guilty before the Honorable Frederic Block to loansharking, conducting an illegal gambling business and tax evasion, and was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment and a $60,000 fine.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Dragonetti has long engaged in violence on behalf of the Gambino family. His recent involvement in acts of violence include the multiple charged extortions with Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. The violent nature of the Gambino family’s method of collecting money is made clear in the following recording of DiMaria: “You have to go bother these people for your money. . . they are going to tell you we got to sit down and talk and this and that. Rough them up a little. Tell them, ‘You’re a fucking stiff.’ Tell them what you have to tell them. . . . The next guy that owes you money from there with them guys, you catch them, and that’s what I’m saying, that you check in with the other guys . . . Crack a face, fuck them up. Don’t you do it, send a fucking kid to rough them up, a fucking joke.”
The crimes charged, coupled with his prior conviction, make clear that Dragonetti is a danger to the community.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Dragonetti’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted and participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Dragonetti’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance. At least two cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Dragonetti is a member of the family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Dragonetti engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses and consensual recordings. The government has over 100 recordings documenting Dragonetti’s involvement in the extortions and other crimes for which he is indicted in this case. Accordingly, the government’s evidence of Dragonetti’s guilt is thus strong and clearly favors detention.
3. Dragonetti Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set forth above, given that he faces 20 years’ imprisonment on each count if convicted, Dragonetti also constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge. 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). The fact that the government has a strong case against Dragonetti heightens his incentive to flee. Accordingly, Dragonetti should also be detained as a risk of flight.
Leonard DiMaria is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including 10 predicate acts of extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy, and additional predicate acts of union benefit theft, bribery of union officials, money laundering and illegal gambling. DiMaria is also charged with extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy, union benefit theft, conspiracy to embezzle union benefits, mail fraud, mail fraud conspiracy, money laundering and money laundering conspiracy.
If convicted as charged, DiMaria faces a term of 20 years’ imprisonment on the racketeering conspiracy count, as well as for each of the 20 extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy counts. Were DiMaria sentenced consecutively for just the 10 distinct extortions covered in these counts - the evidence for which includes more than 100 hours of recorded conversations capturing DiMaria discussing the extortions - he faces a term of imprisonment of 200 years.
Significantly, he will be sentenced as a career offender due to his past convictions for violent crime, resulting in a guidelines range of 210 to 262 months’ imprisonment for each extortion conviction. DiMaria is 67 years old and has more than 20 criminal convictions dating to 1957.
The government seeks to have a permanent order of detention entered against DiMaria on the grounds that he is a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the charges lodged against DiMaria.
a. DiMaria Is a Captain in the Gambino Family
DiMaria is a longstanding member of the Gambino family who currently serves as a captain. The government will establish DiMaria’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
More than a dozen cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that DiMaria has been a member of the Gambino family since the 1970’s. These same cooperating witness are expected to testify that since that time DiMaria has served as the right hand to powerful Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo. More than five cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that DiMaria himself is a member of the Gambino family and at least two are expected to testify that presently he is a captain.
This testimony is corroborated by the more than 80 recorded conversations involving DiMaria. During the course of the recordings, he is heard engaging in the Gambino family’s business - discussing the enterprise, its criminal activities, its members and rules of operation - in which his captain status is made plain by, among other things, statements demonstrating his control of other members of members of the Gambino family.
Surveillance evidence also establishes DiMaria’s long-term association with and position in the Gambino family. Since 1976 - more than 30 years ago - DiMaria has been observed at locations and events relating to the Gambino family. He has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at weddings and wakes in the 1970’s, 1980’s, 1990’s and in this decade. In addition, members of the Gambino family charged in the instant indictment, including acting boss John D’Amico, consigliere Joseph Corozzo, captain Nicholas Corozzo, captain Thomas Cacciopoli, acting captain Augustus Sclafani and two other soldiers, attended DiMaria’s daughter’s wedding and/or his mother’s wake. As recently as January 31, 2008, DiMaria was observed meeting with a cooperating witness to collect $8000 for the Gambino family’s administration. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that these events are attended by dozens of other members and associates of organized crime, many of whom are convicted felons who committed those crimes as part of an organized crime family, and that Gambino family business is routinely conducted at such events.
b. DiMaria Is Charged with Crimes of Violence
DiMaria is charged with extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy in 10 racketeering acts within count one’s RICO conspiracy charge, as well as in 20 substantive counts of the indictment. These charges stem from 10 separate extortions involving dozens of businesses and business owners within the New York construction industry. A brief proffer of the facts pertaining to each of the extortions follows.
i. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Profits
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately December 2003, Joseph Vollaro approached Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli and requested permission to open a cement company on Staten Island. Due to the Gambino family’s control of the New York cement industry, Cacciopoli, together with Gambino family captain Louis Filippelli, engaged in a series of meetings to obtain permission from the Gambino family’s administration to open such a company. Cacciopoli and Filippelli succeeded and informed Joseph Vollaro that he could start the company provided that following a one-year grace period, the Gambino family would receive 15% or $1 per yard for all cement sold, with the payments to be collected by Filippelli and passed through to the family’s administration.
Joseph Vollaro opened the company in April 2004. Since May 2005, he has paid over $60,000 of extortion payments to the Gambino family. The initial payments were collected by Gambino family soldier Vincent Pacelli on behalf of then incarcerated Louis Filippelli. After Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo assumed control of Joseph Vollaro from Filippelli in late June 2005, payments were collected on his behalf for the administration by DiMaria, who controlled Joseph Vollaro for Corozzo while Corozzo was on supervised release, as well as by Gambino family soldiers Mario Cassarino and Ernest Grillo.
Multiple members of the Gambino family informed Joseph Vollaro that the profits from his Staten Island cement company were passed along to the Gambino family administration, and that the administration consists of acting boss John D’Amico, acting underboss Domenico Cefalu and consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation.
ii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Sale
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
During the spring of 2007, a company offered to buy Joseph Vollaro’s Staten Island cement company. In keeping with instructions from Gambino family captains Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria to consult them before making any decisions concerning his business, Joseph Vollaro informed DiMaria of the offer. DiMaria later told Joseph Vollaro that the family had agreed to allow him to make the sale, provided he pay $100,000 to the Gambino family.
In January 2008, Joseph Vollaro sold the Staten Island cement company. Thereafter, Gambino family consigliere Joseph Corozzo, through Gambino family solider Gus Sclafani, directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the $100,000 to Joseph Corozzo. Later, Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to deliver the money to Leonard DiMaria for distribution to the administration. As directed, Joseph Vollaro made a payment of the proceeds of the sale of the cement company to DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow someone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the Gambino family, (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family, and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
iii. Extortion Conspiracy/Attempted Extortion - Pump Truck
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In June 2005, Joseph Vollaro sought permission from Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria, who exercised day to day control over Joseph Vollaro for Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo, to purchase a cement pump truck and open a business. Later, DiMaria allowed Joseph Vollaro to start the business pursuant to an arrangement in which Joseph Vollaro would receive 40% of the pump truck profits and DiMaria and Corozzo would split the remaining profits together with Gambino family soldiers Ernie Grillo and Mario Cassarino. The pump truck business operated for a time, but ultimately the business was not profitable.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s attempted extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iv) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
iv. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Liberty View Harbor Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In April 2006, Joseph Vollaro started a company which constructed a portable cement plant at the Liberty View Harbor construction site at which VMS Construction served as general contractor. VMS Construction is owned by Gambino family associate Anthony Scibelli, who is controlled by Gambino family soldier Vincent Dragonetti. In addition to the portable cement plant, two companies owned by Joseph Vollaro also performed work at the Liberty View Harbor site.
Joseph Vollaro obtained the work at the Liberty View Harbor site after Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo, who is Dragonetti’s father-in-law, granted him permission provided he pay 60% of the portable cement plant’s profits to Corozzo, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria and Dragonetti. In addition, Scibelli and Dragonetti demanded that Joseph Vollaro pay an additional $6 or $7 per yard of cement produced as well as extortionate payments for the other two businesses.
Over the course of the extortion, Jon Doe #4 made extortion payments to the Gambino family of more than $200,000.
Despite these payments, during the summer of 2007, with the backing of Corozzo, DiMaria and Dragonetti, Scibelli took possession of the portable cement plant without remuneration to Joseph Vollaro.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
v. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Cement Powder Deliveries ___
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In October 2007, following Gambino family soldier Anthony Scibelli’s takeover of his portable cement plant, Gambino family captains DiMaria and Corozzo approved a plan by which Joseph Vollaro would supply his former plant with the powder used to make cement at the Liberty View Harbor site. For this privilege, Joseph Vollaro was instructed to provide 60% of his profits relating to the cement powder deliveries to be split between Corozzo, DiMaria and Dragonetti. As directed, in the four months since, Joseph Vollaro has provided $6,000 in extortion payments.
Joseph Vollaro made the extortion payments demanded by his Gambino family handlers because he feared retaliation from the Gambino family and their associates.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including dozens of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
vi. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Construction List
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In July 2005, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria instructed Joseph Vollaro to help soldier Ernest Grillo reinitiate collections from construction companies that had been making extortion payments to then jailed Gambino family soldier Edward Garafola prior to his incarceration. Garafola, who had been a member of the Gambino family’s “construction panel,” a body which oversees the Gambino family’s construction rackets, had exacted extortionate payments from scores of construction companies prior to his incarceration, but had not shared the identity of all those companies with his Gambino family superiors.
Joseph Vollaro contacted Grillo as instructed. Together with Ruggiero and Gambino family associate Anthony O’Donnell, who had been Garafola’s right hand in conducting the extortions, and who had accompanied Garafola on one occasion while Garafola assaulted a contractor who was late in his payments, the men repeatedly met to reconstruct a list of the contractors who had been paying Garafola extortion and to plot the reinitiation of collections. Under the supervision and at the direction of Corozzo and DiMaria, the four men created a list of more than 40 construction companies and individual contractors that formerly paid extortion to Garafola. Grillo, Ruggiero and O’Donnell then approached a number of the companies to place them back under Gambino family control.
During the this process, Edward Garafola’s son asserted his father’s right to the extortion victims, and complained of the efforts to take away his father’s former victims. In response, Grillo told Joseph Vollaro that he assaulted Garafola’s son, saying, “I choked him out.”
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family, and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) the testimony of a cooperating witnesses who was a former Gambino family member and member of the Gambino family construction panel who was tasked with compiling the same construction list years earlier but failed to complete the job prior to his arrest and incarceration, property or persons.
vii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - NASCAR Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In January 2006, NASCAR had begun construction on a racetrack in Staten Island. Recine Trucking, a company under the control of Gambino family acting underboss Domenico Cefalu, was among the first companies hired to bring fill to the site. Thereafter, Gambino family soldier Ernest Grillo acquired exclusive dumping rights at the site for Joseph Vollaro.
From late January 2006 to May 2006, Grillo, Cefalu and Gambino family members Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Nicholas Corozzo and Frank Cali negotiated the amount of extortion Joseph Vollaro would be required to pay for the exclusive dumping rights. Eventually, Joseph Vollaro received those rights on the condition that he make extortion payments of $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Corozzo and DiMaria, and $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Cefalu and Cali.
Before Joseph Vollaro could begin dumping at the site pursuant to these terms, the exclusive dumping deal fell through. Later, after a new deal was worked out, Corozzo and DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to take the job on the condition that he pay them $1 for every yard of fill dumped at the site.
Joseph Vollaro also was required to make a one-time $9,000 payment to NASCAR employee Todd Polakoff on behalf have NASCAR executive William Kilgannon.
Joseph Vollaro worked at the site for a short time and made approximately $13,000 in extortion payments to Gambino family soldier Mario Cassarino, who collected the extortion payments for Corozzo and DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
viii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Excavation Company
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately January 2006, Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo instructed Joseph Vollaro to start an excavation business which, after a short period in which Joseph Vollaro would be allowed to operate the business without making extortion payments, would be required to pay 60% of its profits to Corozzo, Gambino family soldier Vincent Dragonetti and Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. Joseph Vollaro began making these payments a few months after starting the business. To date, Joseph Vollaro has paid more than $30,000 in extortion payments to DiMaria and Dragonetti, who collected the payments on Corozzo’s behalf.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including dozens of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
ix. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - John Does #4 & #12
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In July 2006, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria informed Joseph Vollaro that John Doe #12, an individual close to Joseph Vollaro who previously made extortion payments to the commissary of jailed Gambino family soldier Jerome Brancato, needed to begin making extortion payments to Brancato again. At the end of 2006, when Brancato was released from prison, DiMaria instructed Joseph Vollaro to have John Doe #12 pay money to Brancato to help him get him back on his feet. Joseph Vollaro then gave $2,500 to Vincent Dragonetti, who collected the money for Brancato.
In January 2008, Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo told Joseph Vollaro that John Doe #12 failed to provide Brancato with a year end extortion payment. Corozzo instructed Joseph Vollaro to make sure that money from John Doe #12 was given to Gambino family soldier Joseph Chirico, who would collect it for Brancato. The following day, Joseph Vollaro gave $1,500 to Chirico for Brancato.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members who are expected to testify that individuals being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers or face some form of retaliation.
x. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Recycling
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In conducting his trucking business, Joseph Vollaro came into frequent contact with the owners of a recycling facility located on Staten Island.
In approximately June 2008, Nicholas Corozzo and Leonard DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to collect extortion payments from the facility.
In January 2008, Joseph Vollaro told Corozzo and DiMaria that he collected $2,000 from the facility, and provided the money to DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members who are expected to testify that individuals being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers or face some form of retaliation.
2. DiMaria Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
The defendant Leonard DiMaria poses a danger to the community. He is one of the leaders of a violent organized crime family and has himself engaged in crimes of violence in furtherance of the family’s illegal businesses. Courts in this district and the Second Circuit repeatedly have held that high-ranking members of organized crime constitute a danger to the community. As discussed below, each of the relevant considerations under the Bail Reform Act favors detention here.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
DiMaria is charged with numerous extortions as part of the racketeering conspiracy count as well as substantively. Extortions are crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). Moreover, DiMaria currently holds a leadership position in an ongoing criminal enterprise and commands made men - soldiers - sworn to follow his orders and commit violence upon his request.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
DiMaria is a long-standing member of the Gambino family who now serves as a captain. He is a life-long criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. He also is a multiple convicted felon, whose convictions include:
• In 1997, DiMaria was convicted in the Eastern District of New York of racketeering, racketeering conspiracy, loansharking, unlawful collection of debt, possession and sale of stolen property, transportation of stolen property; theft from interstate shipments, conspiracy to defraud the United States and bribery of a public official.6
• In 1998, DiMaria was convicted in the Southern District of Florida of Racketeering Conspiracy and sentenced to 64 months’ imprisonment.7
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
DiMaria poses a clear danger if released. As noted above, the government will establish DiMaria’s membership in the Gambino family through a variety of sources, including the testimony of more than five cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence.
Courts in this circuit routinely detain high-ranking members of organized crime based on their leadership roles in criminal enterprises that engage in acts of violence. See, e.g. Defede, 7 F. Supp. 2d at 393 (detaining defendant on dangerousness based on the proffered testimony of cooperating witness and surveillance evidence that he was the acting boss of the Luchese family, an enterprise involved in extortionate conduct, among other crimes); Gotti, 312 F.3d at 542 (“Indeed, we made it quite clear in United States v. Colombo, 777 F.2d 96, 98 (2d Cir. 1985), that the [Bail Reform Act] ‘does not require that the defendant himself commit acts of physical violence as a condition precedent to a detention order.’ ”).
DiMaria is a captain in the Gambino family and he has been involved in numerous acts of violence. In this investigation, he is caught in scores of recorded conversations related to extortion, a crime of violence. The violent nature of the Gambino family’s method of collecting money is made clear in the following recording of DiMaria: “You have to go bother these people for your money. . . they are going to tell you we got to sit down and talk and this and that. Rough them up a little. Tell them, ‘You’re a fucking stiff.’ Tell them what you have to tell them. . . . The next guy that owes you money from there with them guys, you catch them, and that’s what I’m saying, that you check in with the other guys . . . Crack a face, fuck them up. Don’t you do it, send a fucking kid to rough them up, a fucking joke.”
DiMaria thus falls within the “small but identifiable group of particularly dangerous defendants as to whom neither the imposition of stringent release conditions nor the prospect of revocation of release can reasonably assure the safety of the community.” Senate Report at 3188-89. As demonstrated by the recorded conversations, DiMaria’s position in the Gambino family gives him the authority and resources to continue his criminal activities and to order and accomplish acts of violence against potential witnesses or any person he perceives as a threat - of which there will be many during the course of this prosecution.
Finally, DiMaria likely will continue his criminal conduct if released; he is a career criminal who holds a leadership position in a continuing criminal enterprise, the needs of which require constant monitoring. As noted, courts in this circuit have recognized that when organized crime defendants are charged with their participation in a criminal enterprise, the risk of continued criminal conduct is substantial and justifies detention. See Salerno, 631 F. Supp. at 1375. Under the cases cited above, the crimes charged and the facts proffered, there is little doubt that DiMaria is a danger to the community and ordered detained pending the outcome of his case.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of DiMaria’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy and racketeering counts, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted or participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affected interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and DiMaria’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, hundreds of consensual recordings and surveillance. More than five cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that DiMaria is a longstanding member of the family. At least two witnesses are expected to testify that DiMaria currently serves as a captain.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that DiMaria engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses and scores of consensual and court-authorized recordings. For example, the testimony of the cooperating witness will be corroborated by over 80 recordings that show that the defendant engaged in the crimes charged.
The government’s evidence of DiMaria’s guilt is thus strong and clearly favors detention.
3. DiMaria Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
DiMaria faces 21 counts covering 10 different crimes of violence each carrying a penalty of 20 years’ imprisonment. In addition, DiMaria will be sentenced as a career offender under the Sentencing Guidelines. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding that the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). Given his age, the strength of the evidence and the likely sentence resulting from a conviction on even one of the charged extortions, it is a near certainty DiMaria faces an effective life sentence. Accordingly he constitutes a risk of flight and should be detained.
J. VINCENT DRAGONETTI
Vincent Dragonetti is a soldier in the Gambino family. He is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including more than a dozen predicate acts of extortion, attempted extortion, extortion conspiracy, extortionate extension of credit, extortionate extension of credit conspiracy, extortionate collection of credit, and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy. He is also charged with extortion, attempted extortion, extortion conspiracy, extortionate extension of credit, extortionate extension of credit conspiracy, extortionate collection of credit, extortionate collection of credit conspiracy, money laundering, money laundering conspiracy and illegal gambling.
If convicted as charged, Dragonetti faces a term of 20 years’ imprisonment on the racketeering conspiracy count, as well as each of the more than 10 counts charging crimes of violence. Were Dragonetti sentenced consecutively for just five of the extortionate schemes covered in these counts - the evidence for which includes more than 60 separate recorded conversations capturing Dragonetti discussing the extortions on tape - he faces a term of imprisonment of 100 years. Accordingly, the government seeks a permanent order of detention for Dragonetti on the grounds that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Dragonetti.
a. Dragonetti Is a Gambino Family Soldier
Dragonetti is a Gambino family soldier. The government will establish Dragonetti’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
At least two cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Dragonetti is a member of the Gambino family who enjoys special ties with powerful Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo, who is his father-in-law.
This testimony is corroborated by the more than 60 recorded conversations involving Dragonetti. During the course of the recordings, he is heard engaging in the Gambino family’s business, explicitly discussing the myriad crimes with which he is charged, the involvement of other Gambino family members in these crimes, and his position in the Gambino family’s hierarchy. Scores of recorded conversations with other Gambino family members referencing Dragonetti further demonstrate his position in the family.
The available surveillance evidence also establishes Dragonetti’s long association with and position in the Gambino family. Since 1993, Dragonetti has been observed at locations and events relating to the Gambino family. He has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at three weddings and wakes. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that these events are attended by dozens of other members and associates of organized crime, many of whom are convicted felons who committed those crimes as part of an organized crime family, and that Gambino family business is routinely conducted at such events. Dragonetti was observed at the 1993 wedding of Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria’s daughter. In the past year, Dragonetti was surveilled attending the January 2007 wake of Maryann Corozzo, the wife of Gambino family soldier Blaise Corozzo.
b. Crimes of Violence
As noted above, Dragonetti is charged in multiple extortions, all crimes of violence. A brief proffer of the facts pertaining to each of the extortions follows.
i. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Liberty View Harbor Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In April 2006, Joseph Vollaro started a company which constructed a portable cement plant at the Liberty View Harbor construction site at which VMS Construction served as general contractor. VMS Construction is owned by Gambino family associate Anthony Scibelli, who is controlled by Gambino family soldier Vincent Dragonetti. In addition to the portable cement plant, two companies owned by Joseph Vollaro also performed work at the Liberty View Harbor site.
Joseph Vollaro obtained the work at the Liberty View Harbor site after Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo, who is Dragonetti’s father-in-law, granted him permission provided he pay 60% of the portable cement plant’s profits to Corozzo, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria and Dragonetti. In addition, Scibelli and Dragonetti demanded that Joseph Vollaro pay an additional $6 or $7 per yard of cement produced as well as extortionate payments for the other two businesses.
Over the course of the extortion, Jon Doe #4 made extortion payments to the Gambino family of more than $200,000.
Despite these payments, during the summer of 2007, with the backing of Corozzo, DiMaria and Dragonetti, Scibelli took possession of the portable cement plant without remuneration to Joseph Vollaro.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
ii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Cement Powder Deliveries ___
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In October 2007, following Gambino family soldier Anthony Scibelli’s takeover of his portable cement plant, Gambino family captains DiMaria and Corozzo approved a plan by which Joseph Vollaro would supply his former plant with the powder used to make cement at the Liberty View Harbor site. For this privilege, Joseph Vollaro was instructed to provide 60% of his profits relating to the cement powder deliveries to be split between Corozzo, DiMaria and Dragonetti. As directed, in the four months since, Joseph Vollaro has provided $6,000 in extortion payments.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including dozens of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
iii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - NASCAR Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In January 2006, NASCAR had begun construction on a racetrack in Staten Island. Recine Trucking, a company under the control of Gambino family acting underboss Domenico Cefalu, was among the first companies hired to bring fill to the site. Thereafter, Gambino family soldier Ernest Grillo acquired exclusive dumping rights at the site for Joseph Vollaro.
From late January 2006 to May 2006, Grillo, Cefalu and Gambino family members Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Nicholas Corozzo and Frank Cali negotiated the amount of extortion Joseph Vollaro would be required to pay for the exclusive dumping rights. Eventually, Joseph Vollaro received those rights on the condition that he make extortion payments of $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Corozzo and DiMaria, and $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Cefalu and Cali.
Before Joseph Vollaro could begin dumping at the site pursuant to these terms, the exclusive dumping deal fell through. Later, after a new deal was worked out, Corozzo and DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to take the job on the condition that he pay them $1 for every yard of fill dumped at the site.
Joseph Vollaro also was required to make a one-time $9,000 payment to NASCAR employee Todd Polakoff on behalf have NASCAR executive William Kilgannon.
Joseph Vollaro worked at the site for a short time and made approximately $13,000 in extortion payments to Gambino family soldier Mario Cassarino, who collected the extortion payments for Corozzo and DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
iv. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Excavation Company
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately January 2006, Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo instructed Joseph Vollaro to start an excavation business which, after a short period in which Joseph Vollaro would be allowed to operate the business without making extortion payments, would be required to pay 60% of its profits to Corozzo, Gambino family soldier Vincent Dragonetti and Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. Joseph Vollaro began making these payments a few months after starting the business. To date, Joseph Vollaro has paid more than $30,000 in extortion payments to DiMaria and Dragonetti, who collected the payments on Corozzo’s behalf.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including dozens of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
v. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - John Does #4 & #12
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In July 2006, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria informed Joseph Vollaro that John Doe #12, an individual close to Joseph Vollaro who previously made extortion payments to the commissary of jailed Gambino family soldier Jerome Brancato, needed to begin making extortion payments to Brancato again. At the end of 2006, when Brancato was released from prison, DiMaria instructed Joseph Vollaro to have John Doe #12 pay money to Brancato to help him get him back on his feet. Joseph Vollaro then gave $2,500 to Vincent Dragonetti, who collected the money for Brancato.
In January 2008, Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo told Joseph Vollaro that John Doe #12 failed to provide Brancato with a year end extortion payment. Corozzo instructed Joseph Vollaro to make sure that money from John Doe #12 was given to Gambino family soldier Joseph Chirico, who would collect it for Brancato. The following day, Joseph Vollaro gave $1,500 to Chirico for Brancato.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members who are expected to testify that individuals being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers or face some form of retaliation.
2. Dragonetti Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
As discussed above, Dragonetti is a Gambino family soldier with a prior felony conviction for committing a crime of violence as part of the Gambino family.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Dragonetti has been indicted on 12 counts charging crimes of violence. This alone merits detention on the basis of dangerousness.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
As noted, Dragonetti is a Gambino family soldier. He is a criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. He also is a convicted felon who has pled guilty in the past - in this district - to some of the same conduct he has been charged with in the instant indictment.
On January 23, 1997, Dragonetti was arrested in the Eastern District of New York and charged with RICO and RICO conspiracy. On November 3, 1997, he pled guilty before the Honorable Frederic Block to loansharking, conducting an illegal gambling business and tax evasion, and was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment and a $60,000 fine.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Dragonetti has long engaged in violence on behalf of the Gambino family. His recent involvement in acts of violence include the multiple charged extortions with Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. The violent nature of the Gambino family’s method of collecting money is made clear in the following recording of DiMaria: “You have to go bother these people for your money. . . they are going to tell you we got to sit down and talk and this and that. Rough them up a little. Tell them, ‘You’re a fucking stiff.’ Tell them what you have to tell them. . . . The next guy that owes you money from there with them guys, you catch them, and that’s what I’m saying, that you check in with the other guys . . . Crack a face, fuck them up. Don’t you do it, send a fucking kid to rough them up, a fucking joke.”
The crimes charged, coupled with his prior conviction, make clear that Dragonetti is a danger to the community.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Dragonetti’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted and participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Dragonetti’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance. At least two cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Dragonetti is a member of the family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Dragonetti engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses and consensual recordings. The government has over 100 recordings documenting Dragonetti’s involvement in the extortions and other crimes for which he is indicted in this case. Accordingly, the government’s evidence of Dragonetti’s guilt is thus strong and clearly favors detention.
3. Dragonetti Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set forth above, given that he faces 20 years’ imprisonment on each count if convicted, Dragonetti also constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge. 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). The fact that the government has a strong case against Dragonetti heightens his incentive to flee. Accordingly, Dragonetti should also be detained as a risk of flight.
Re: 2008 Gambino Indictment Detention Motion
. LOUIS FILIPPELLI
Louis Filippelli is an acting captain in the Gambino family. In March 2006, Filippelli pled guilty in the Southern District of New York to racketeering conspiracy, including predicate acts of extortion. He was sentenced to 46 months’ incarceration by the Honorable Alvin K. Hellerstein on July 19, 2006. The government seeks pretrial detention of Filippelli based on factors outlined in the Bail Reform Act: that is, the nature and circumstances of the offense charged, the weight of the evidence against Filippelli, the history and characteristics of the defendant and the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community that would be posed by the person’s release.
Specifically, Filippelli is an acting captain in a violent criminal enterprise who is charged with extortions, which constitute crimes of violence. Tape recorded conversations detail Filippelli’s role in the crimes charged, for which he faces a term of incarceration of 20 years or more. Further, Filippelli was engaged in criminal conduct while on pretrial detention [correct?]. He is currently incarcerated. Should Filippelli be eligible for release during the pendency of this case, he should continue to be detained based on based on his demonstrated disregard for the court’s orders, his dangerousness to the community and the risk that he will flee.
L. VINCENT GOTTI
Vincent Gotti is a soldier in the Gambino family and is charged in Count One, racketeering conspiracy, with crimes of violence, including murder conspiracy, attempted murder and loansharking. Gotti also is charged with a narcotics offense -- conspiracy to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine.
Because the crimes for which Gotti has been charged constitute crimes of violence and narcotics offenses for which the maximum term of imprisonment is life, the government seeks a permanent order of detention for Gotti on the grounds that he is a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Gotti.
a. Gotti Is a Gambino Family Soldier
Gotti is a Gambino family soldier. The government will establish Gotti’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below. More than three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Gotti is a soldier of the Gambino family. This information is corroborated by both consensual recordings in which Gotti is discussed by co-conspirators and surveillance evidence. For example, in the past five years, Gotti was surveilled attending the November 2003 wake of John Gurino, an associate in the Gambino family, and the June 2006 wake of Anna Trucchio, mother of incarcerated Gambino family soldier Ronald Trucchio and grandmother of Gambino family soldier Alphonse Trucchio.
b. Crimes of Violence and Cocaine Distribution Conspiracy
As noted above, Gotti is charged with crimes of violence including murder conspiracy/attempted murder and loansharking. Gotti is also charged with conspiracy to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine, for which the maximum term of imprisonment is life. Below is a summary proffer of the facts pertaining to these charges.
i. Murder Conspiracy/Attempted Murder of John Doe
Two cooperating witnesses are expected to testify to the following. Vincent Gotti wanted John Doe #5 murdered. Because Richard G. Gotti and Gambino family soldier Robert Mormando owed Vincent Gotti a large sum of money from a loanshark debt, Vincent Gotti told them that he would reduce the debt if they killed John Doe #5. Angelo Ruggerio, Jr. was also tasked to help carry out the murder. After some planning, early in the morning on May 4, 2003, John Doe #5 was shot several times while sitting in his car parked outside his home in Queens. John Doe #5 survived the shooting and was able to drive away. He ended up at Jamaica Hospital. Hospital records confirm that John Doe #5 was hit several times in the upper torso.
ii. Loansharking
Two cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Vincent Gotti was partners with Vincent DeCongilio in a loanshark operation. Gotti and DeCongilio lent money at usurious rates of interest from the mid-1990s to 2005.
iii. Conspiracy to Distribute Cocaine
At least four cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Gotti was involved with Ronald Trucchio, Joseph Corozzo and others from the mid-1980s through the mid-1990s in a conspiracy to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine from various bars in Ozone Park, Queens. In approximately the mid-1980s, Gotti, Corozzo, Trucchio, John A. Gotti and John Alite agreed to try to consolidate the cocaine being sold in the Ozone Park area. The drugs were being sold out of various pubs in Ozone Park including the PM Pub, which was controlled by Trucchio. Gotti had conversations with cooperating witnesses during which he discussed trying to consolidate cocaine being sold out of bars in Ozone Park, Queens. Trucchio was close to Corozzo at that time and Corozzo helped finance the drug activity. The minimum amount of drugs sold per week was approximately two kilograms. The witnesses are expected to testify that the cocaine trafficking conspiracy continued through the mid-1990s.
2. Gotti Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
As discussed above, Gotti is a Gambino family soldier with a violent past who has continued to engage in acts of violence.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Gotti is charged with murder conspiracy/attempted murder that occurred in 2003, loansharking, which is a crime of violence, and conspiracy to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine, for which the maximum term of imprisonment if life. Accordingly, the nature and circumstances of the crimes charged merit detention.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
As noted, Gotti is a Gambino family soldier. He has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise and as recently as 2003 he arranged to murder an individual. He also is a multiple convicted felon. Below is a brief summary of Gotti’s arrests and convictions:
• In 1974, Gotti pled guilty to robbery in the 3rd Degree.
• In 1985, Gotti pled guilty to criminal impersonation in the 2nd Degree.
• In 1985, Gotti pled guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance.
Gotti was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of six years to life on the drug charge. Gotti was released in December 1991 and received life-time parole for this crime. Thus, Gotti was on parole while he engaged in loansharking and in the murder conspiracy/attempted murder of John Doe #5. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(B). Thus, this prong of the analysis favors detention.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Gotti is a soldier in a violent criminal enterprise and has himself engaged in acts of violence. Although just a soldier, in 2003, he was able to assemble a team of others to try to kill John Doe #5. His recent involvement in a murder conspiracy/attempted murder as well as loansharking, coupled with the narcotics trafficking, make clear that Gotti is a danger to the community. As a soldier, Gotti has taken a sworn oath to further the interests of the criminal enterprise. Given that he continued to commit crimes while on parole, it is likely that if called to do so, he will continue to commit crimes if he is released. Accordingly, this prong of the analysis favors detention.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Gotti’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted and participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Gotti’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of numerous cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance. More than four cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Gotti is a member of the family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Gotti engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses and consensual recordings. With respect to the murder conspiracy/attempted murder count, two cooperating witnesses will detail the agreement and testify as to what happened. They will both implicate Gotti as the one who arranged to have the victim killed. Further, lay witnesses will corroborate the testimony of the cooperating witnesses. With respect to the cocaine trafficking conspiracy, over four cooperating witnesses will detail the criminal arrangement among Gotti, Joseph Corozzo and others. These witnesses will elaborate on how the conspiracy operated, and their testimony is corroborated by law enforcement testimony. Finally, with respect to the loansharking conspiracy, two cooperating witnesses are expected to testify as to Gotti’s role in that conspiracy. Accordingly, the government’s evidence of Gotti’s guilt is strong and clearly favors detention.
3. Gotti Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set forth above, given that he faces life imprisonment if convicted, Gotti also constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). The strength of the government’s case makes Gotti’s incentive to flee even stronger. Thus, he should also be detained as a risk of flight.
Louis Filippelli is an acting captain in the Gambino family. In March 2006, Filippelli pled guilty in the Southern District of New York to racketeering conspiracy, including predicate acts of extortion. He was sentenced to 46 months’ incarceration by the Honorable Alvin K. Hellerstein on July 19, 2006. The government seeks pretrial detention of Filippelli based on factors outlined in the Bail Reform Act: that is, the nature and circumstances of the offense charged, the weight of the evidence against Filippelli, the history and characteristics of the defendant and the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community that would be posed by the person’s release.
Specifically, Filippelli is an acting captain in a violent criminal enterprise who is charged with extortions, which constitute crimes of violence. Tape recorded conversations detail Filippelli’s role in the crimes charged, for which he faces a term of incarceration of 20 years or more. Further, Filippelli was engaged in criminal conduct while on pretrial detention [correct?]. He is currently incarcerated. Should Filippelli be eligible for release during the pendency of this case, he should continue to be detained based on based on his demonstrated disregard for the court’s orders, his dangerousness to the community and the risk that he will flee.
L. VINCENT GOTTI
Vincent Gotti is a soldier in the Gambino family and is charged in Count One, racketeering conspiracy, with crimes of violence, including murder conspiracy, attempted murder and loansharking. Gotti also is charged with a narcotics offense -- conspiracy to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine.
Because the crimes for which Gotti has been charged constitute crimes of violence and narcotics offenses for which the maximum term of imprisonment is life, the government seeks a permanent order of detention for Gotti on the grounds that he is a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Gotti.
a. Gotti Is a Gambino Family Soldier
Gotti is a Gambino family soldier. The government will establish Gotti’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below. More than three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Gotti is a soldier of the Gambino family. This information is corroborated by both consensual recordings in which Gotti is discussed by co-conspirators and surveillance evidence. For example, in the past five years, Gotti was surveilled attending the November 2003 wake of John Gurino, an associate in the Gambino family, and the June 2006 wake of Anna Trucchio, mother of incarcerated Gambino family soldier Ronald Trucchio and grandmother of Gambino family soldier Alphonse Trucchio.
b. Crimes of Violence and Cocaine Distribution Conspiracy
As noted above, Gotti is charged with crimes of violence including murder conspiracy/attempted murder and loansharking. Gotti is also charged with conspiracy to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine, for which the maximum term of imprisonment is life. Below is a summary proffer of the facts pertaining to these charges.
i. Murder Conspiracy/Attempted Murder of John Doe
Two cooperating witnesses are expected to testify to the following. Vincent Gotti wanted John Doe #5 murdered. Because Richard G. Gotti and Gambino family soldier Robert Mormando owed Vincent Gotti a large sum of money from a loanshark debt, Vincent Gotti told them that he would reduce the debt if they killed John Doe #5. Angelo Ruggerio, Jr. was also tasked to help carry out the murder. After some planning, early in the morning on May 4, 2003, John Doe #5 was shot several times while sitting in his car parked outside his home in Queens. John Doe #5 survived the shooting and was able to drive away. He ended up at Jamaica Hospital. Hospital records confirm that John Doe #5 was hit several times in the upper torso.
ii. Loansharking
Two cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Vincent Gotti was partners with Vincent DeCongilio in a loanshark operation. Gotti and DeCongilio lent money at usurious rates of interest from the mid-1990s to 2005.
iii. Conspiracy to Distribute Cocaine
At least four cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Gotti was involved with Ronald Trucchio, Joseph Corozzo and others from the mid-1980s through the mid-1990s in a conspiracy to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine from various bars in Ozone Park, Queens. In approximately the mid-1980s, Gotti, Corozzo, Trucchio, John A. Gotti and John Alite agreed to try to consolidate the cocaine being sold in the Ozone Park area. The drugs were being sold out of various pubs in Ozone Park including the PM Pub, which was controlled by Trucchio. Gotti had conversations with cooperating witnesses during which he discussed trying to consolidate cocaine being sold out of bars in Ozone Park, Queens. Trucchio was close to Corozzo at that time and Corozzo helped finance the drug activity. The minimum amount of drugs sold per week was approximately two kilograms. The witnesses are expected to testify that the cocaine trafficking conspiracy continued through the mid-1990s.
2. Gotti Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
As discussed above, Gotti is a Gambino family soldier with a violent past who has continued to engage in acts of violence.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Gotti is charged with murder conspiracy/attempted murder that occurred in 2003, loansharking, which is a crime of violence, and conspiracy to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine, for which the maximum term of imprisonment if life. Accordingly, the nature and circumstances of the crimes charged merit detention.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
As noted, Gotti is a Gambino family soldier. He has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise and as recently as 2003 he arranged to murder an individual. He also is a multiple convicted felon. Below is a brief summary of Gotti’s arrests and convictions:
• In 1974, Gotti pled guilty to robbery in the 3rd Degree.
• In 1985, Gotti pled guilty to criminal impersonation in the 2nd Degree.
• In 1985, Gotti pled guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance.
Gotti was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of six years to life on the drug charge. Gotti was released in December 1991 and received life-time parole for this crime. Thus, Gotti was on parole while he engaged in loansharking and in the murder conspiracy/attempted murder of John Doe #5. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(B). Thus, this prong of the analysis favors detention.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Gotti is a soldier in a violent criminal enterprise and has himself engaged in acts of violence. Although just a soldier, in 2003, he was able to assemble a team of others to try to kill John Doe #5. His recent involvement in a murder conspiracy/attempted murder as well as loansharking, coupled with the narcotics trafficking, make clear that Gotti is a danger to the community. As a soldier, Gotti has taken a sworn oath to further the interests of the criminal enterprise. Given that he continued to commit crimes while on parole, it is likely that if called to do so, he will continue to commit crimes if he is released. Accordingly, this prong of the analysis favors detention.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Gotti’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted and participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Gotti’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of numerous cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance. More than four cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Gotti is a member of the family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Gotti engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses and consensual recordings. With respect to the murder conspiracy/attempted murder count, two cooperating witnesses will detail the agreement and testify as to what happened. They will both implicate Gotti as the one who arranged to have the victim killed. Further, lay witnesses will corroborate the testimony of the cooperating witnesses. With respect to the cocaine trafficking conspiracy, over four cooperating witnesses will detail the criminal arrangement among Gotti, Joseph Corozzo and others. These witnesses will elaborate on how the conspiracy operated, and their testimony is corroborated by law enforcement testimony. Finally, with respect to the loansharking conspiracy, two cooperating witnesses are expected to testify as to Gotti’s role in that conspiracy. Accordingly, the government’s evidence of Gotti’s guilt is strong and clearly favors detention.
3. Gotti Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set forth above, given that he faces life imprisonment if convicted, Gotti also constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). The strength of the government’s case makes Gotti’s incentive to flee even stronger. Thus, he should also be detained as a risk of flight.
Re: 2008 Gambino Indictment Detention Motion
M. RICHARD G. GOTTI
Richard G. Gotti is a soldier in the Gambino family and is charged in the indictment with the murder conspiracy/attempted murder of John Doe #5 in 2003, and conspiracy to distribute marijuana in approximately 1997-1998.
The attempted murder/murder conspiracy with which Gotti has been charged constitutes a crime of violence. Accordingly, the government seeks a permanent order of detention for Gotti on the grounds that he is a danger to the community and that a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Gotti.
a. Gotti Is a Gambino Family Soldier
Gotti is a longstanding Gambino family soldier. The government will establish Gotti’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
More than three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Gotti is a soldier in the Gambino family. This testimony is corroborated by consensual recordings of co-conspirators discussing Gotti. The available surveillance evidence of Gotti attending various Gambino family members or relatives weddings or wakes also establishes Gotti’s association with and position in the Gambino family. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that Gambino family business is often discusses at these events. As early as March 11, 1993, Gotti has been observed at locations and events relating to the Gambino family, including the June 3, 2001 wedding of Frank Cali.
b. Crimes of Violence
As noted above, Gotti is charged with the May 2003 murder conspiracy/attempted murder of John Doe #5. Two cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Vincent Gotti wanted John Doe #5 murdered. Because Richard G. Gotti and Gambino family soldier Robert Mormando owed Vincent Gotti a large sum of money from a loanshark debt, Vincent Gotti told them that he would reduce the debt if they killed John Doe #5. Angelo Ruggerio, Jr. was also tasked to help carry out the murder. After some planning, early in the morning on May 4, 2003, John Doe #5 was shot several times while sitting in his car parked outside his home in Queens. John Doe #5 survived the shooting and was able to drive away. He ended up at Jamaica Hospital. Hospital record confirm that John Doe #5 was hit several times in the upper torso.
2. Gotti Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
As discussed above, Gotti is a Gambino family soldier with a violent past who has continued to engage in acts of violence.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Gotti is charged with a crime of violence and he faces 20 years’ imprisonment if convicted. Gotti was also involved in a conspiracy to distribute marijuana. These crimes alone merit detention on the basis of dangerousness.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
As noted, Gotti is a Gambino family soldier. He is a criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. Gotti also committed these acts while he was awaiting sentencing by the Honorable Frederic Block in United States v. Ciccone. Gotti was convicted in March 2003 and sentenced in July 2004. Accordingly, he continued to commit crimes even though he was on supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(B). The fact that Gotti was involved in a murder conspiracy while he was on supervision demonstrates that he will not abide by the rules and restrictions of the court. Accordingly, this factor strongly favors detention.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Gotti has engaged in violence on behalf of the Gambino family while he was on pretrial supervision, demonstrating that he is a danger to the community. Gotti’s disregard for court orders and his oath to a violent criminal enterprise to do its bidding weighs strongly in favor of detaining Gotti, as he has shown himself to be a danger when out on release.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Gotti’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted and participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Gotti’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance. At least three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Gotti is a longstanding member of the family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect, interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Gotti engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses and lay witnesses. Two cooperating witnesses will detail the planning and execution of the murder conspiracy/attempted murder and law enforcement officers and lay witnesses will corroborate their testimony. Accordingly, the government’s evidence of Gotti’s guilt is overwhelming and clearly favors detention.
3. Gotti Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set forth above, given that he faces 20 years’ imprisonment if convicted, Gotti also constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding that the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). The strength of the government’s case makes Gotti’s incentive to flee even stronger. Thus, he should also be detained as a risk of flight.
N. ERNEST GRILLO
Ernest Grille is a longtime soldier in the Gambino family. He is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including three predicate acts of extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy. Grille is also charged with extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy.
The counts in which Grille has been charged constitute crimes of violence. Accordingly, the government seeks a permanent order of detention for Grille on the grounds that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Grille.
a. Grillo Is a Gambino Family Soldier
Grillo is a longstanding Gambino family soldier. The government will establish Grillo’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
At least three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Grillo is a member of the Gambino family.
This testimony is corroborated by the more than 150 recorded conversations involving Grillo. During the course of the recordings, he is heard engaging in the Gambino family’s business, explicitly discussing the crimes with which he is charged, the involvement of other Gambino family members in these crimes, and his position in the Gambino family’s hierarchy. Scores of recorded conversations with other Gambino family members referencing Grille further demonstrate his position in the family.
The available surveillance evidence also establishes Grille’s long-lived association with and position in the Gambino family. As early as 1984 - nearly 25 years ago - Grille has been observed at locations and events relating to the Gambino family. He has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at multiple weddings and wakes. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that these events are attended by dozens of other members and associates of organized crime, many of whom are convicted felons who committed those crimes as part of an organized crime family, and that Gambino family business is routinely conducted at such events. Grille was observed at the December 1984 Agnello-Gotti wedding, the 1985 wake of underboss Aniello Dellacroce, and the 1986 wake of former Gambino family underboss Frank DeCicco. In the past year, Grille was surveilled at the November 2007 wake of Gambino family captain Giuseppe “Joseph” Arcuri.
b. Crimes of Violence
As noted above, Grille is charged in multiple extortions, all crimes of violence. A brief proffer of the facts pertaining to each of the extortions follows.
i. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Profits
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately December 2003, Joseph Vollaro approached Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli and requested permission to open a cement company on Staten Island. Due to the Gambino family’s control of the New York cement industry, Cacciopoli, together with Gambino family captain Louis Filippelli, engaged in a series of meetings to obtain permission from the Gambino family’s administration to open such a company. Cacciopoli and Filippelli succeeded and informed Joseph Vollaro that he could start the company provided that following a one-year grace period, the Gambino family would receive 15% or $1 per yard for all cement sold, with the payments to be collected by Filippelli and passed through to the family’s administration.
Joseph Vollaro opened the company in April 2004. Since May 2005, he has paid over $60,000 of extortion payments to the Gambino family. The initial payments were collected by Gambino family soldier Vincent Pacelli on behalf of the then incarcerated Filippelli. After Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo assumed control of Joseph Vollaro from Filippelli in late June 2005, payments were collected on his behalf for the administration by Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria, who controlled Joseph Vollaro for Corozzo while Corozzo was on supervised release, as well as by Grille and Gambino family soldier Mario Cassarino.
Multiple members of the Gambino family informed Joseph Vollaro that the profits from his Staten Island cement company were passed along to the Gambino family administration, and that the administration consists of acting boss John D’Amico, acting underboss Domenico Cefalu and consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion; (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations; (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow anyone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the family; (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family; and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation.
ii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Construction List
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In July 2005, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria instructed Joseph Vollaro to help soldier Ernest Grille reinitiate collections from construction companies that had been making extortion payments to then jailed Gambino family soldier Edward Garafola prior to his incarceration. Garafola, who had been a member of the Gambino family’s “construction panel,” a body which oversees the Gambino family’s construction rackets, had exacted extortionate payments from scores of construction companies prior to his incarceration, but had not shared the identity of all those companies with his Gambino family superiors.
Joseph Vollaro contacted Grille as instructed. Together with Ruggiero and Gambino family associate Anthony O’Donnell, who had been Garafola’s right hand in conducting the extortions, and who had accompanied Garafola on one occasion while Garafola assaulted a contractor who was late in his payments, the men repeatedly met to reconstruct a list of the contractors who had been paying Garafola extortion and to plot the reinitiation of collections. Under the supervision and at the direction of Corozzo and DiMaria, the four men created a list of more than 40 construction companies and individual contractors that formerly paid extortion to Garafola. Grille, Ruggiero and O’Donnell then approached a number of the companies to place them back under Gambino family control.
During the this process, Edward Garafola’s son asserted his father’s right to the extortion victims, and complained of the efforts to take away his father’s former victims. In response, Grille told Joseph Vollaro that he assaulted Garafola’s son, saying, “I choked him out.”
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family, and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) the testimony of a cooperating witnesses who was a former Gambino family member and member of the Gambino family construction panel who was tasked with compiling the same construction list years earlier but failed to complete the job prior to his arrest and incarceration, property or persons.
iii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - NASCAR Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In January 2006, NASCAR had begun construction on a racetrack in Staten Island. Recine Trucking, a company under the control of Gambino family acting underboss Domenico Cefalu, was among the first companies hired to bring fill to the site. Thereafter, Gambino family soldier Ernest Grille acquired exclusive dumping rights at the site for Joseph Vollaro.
From late January 2006 to May 2006, Grille, Cefalu and Gambino family members Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Nicholas Corozzo and Frank Cali negotiated the amount of extortion Joseph Vollaro would be required to pay for the exclusive dumping rights. Eventually, Joseph Vollaro received those rights on the condition that he make extortion payments of $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Corozzo and DiMaria, and $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Cefalu and Cali.
Before Joseph Vollaro could begin dumping at the site pursuant to these terms, the exclusive dumping deal fell through. Later, after a new deal was worked out, Corozzo and DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to take the job on the condition that he pay them $1 for every yard of fill dumped at the site.
Joseph Vollaro also was required to make a one-time $9,000 payment to NASCAR employee Todd Polakoff on behalf have NASCAR executive William Kilgannon.
Joseph Vollaro worked at the site for a short time and made approximately $13,000 in extortion payments to Gambino family soldier Mario Cassarino, who collected the extortion payments for Corozzo and DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
Richard G. Gotti is a soldier in the Gambino family and is charged in the indictment with the murder conspiracy/attempted murder of John Doe #5 in 2003, and conspiracy to distribute marijuana in approximately 1997-1998.
The attempted murder/murder conspiracy with which Gotti has been charged constitutes a crime of violence. Accordingly, the government seeks a permanent order of detention for Gotti on the grounds that he is a danger to the community and that a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Gotti.
a. Gotti Is a Gambino Family Soldier
Gotti is a longstanding Gambino family soldier. The government will establish Gotti’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
More than three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Gotti is a soldier in the Gambino family. This testimony is corroborated by consensual recordings of co-conspirators discussing Gotti. The available surveillance evidence of Gotti attending various Gambino family members or relatives weddings or wakes also establishes Gotti’s association with and position in the Gambino family. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that Gambino family business is often discusses at these events. As early as March 11, 1993, Gotti has been observed at locations and events relating to the Gambino family, including the June 3, 2001 wedding of Frank Cali.
b. Crimes of Violence
As noted above, Gotti is charged with the May 2003 murder conspiracy/attempted murder of John Doe #5. Two cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Vincent Gotti wanted John Doe #5 murdered. Because Richard G. Gotti and Gambino family soldier Robert Mormando owed Vincent Gotti a large sum of money from a loanshark debt, Vincent Gotti told them that he would reduce the debt if they killed John Doe #5. Angelo Ruggerio, Jr. was also tasked to help carry out the murder. After some planning, early in the morning on May 4, 2003, John Doe #5 was shot several times while sitting in his car parked outside his home in Queens. John Doe #5 survived the shooting and was able to drive away. He ended up at Jamaica Hospital. Hospital record confirm that John Doe #5 was hit several times in the upper torso.
2. Gotti Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
As discussed above, Gotti is a Gambino family soldier with a violent past who has continued to engage in acts of violence.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Gotti is charged with a crime of violence and he faces 20 years’ imprisonment if convicted. Gotti was also involved in a conspiracy to distribute marijuana. These crimes alone merit detention on the basis of dangerousness.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
As noted, Gotti is a Gambino family soldier. He is a criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. Gotti also committed these acts while he was awaiting sentencing by the Honorable Frederic Block in United States v. Ciccone. Gotti was convicted in March 2003 and sentenced in July 2004. Accordingly, he continued to commit crimes even though he was on supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(B). The fact that Gotti was involved in a murder conspiracy while he was on supervision demonstrates that he will not abide by the rules and restrictions of the court. Accordingly, this factor strongly favors detention.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Gotti has engaged in violence on behalf of the Gambino family while he was on pretrial supervision, demonstrating that he is a danger to the community. Gotti’s disregard for court orders and his oath to a violent criminal enterprise to do its bidding weighs strongly in favor of detaining Gotti, as he has shown himself to be a danger when out on release.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Gotti’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted and participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Gotti’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance. At least three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Gotti is a longstanding member of the family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect, interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Gotti engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses and lay witnesses. Two cooperating witnesses will detail the planning and execution of the murder conspiracy/attempted murder and law enforcement officers and lay witnesses will corroborate their testimony. Accordingly, the government’s evidence of Gotti’s guilt is overwhelming and clearly favors detention.
3. Gotti Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set forth above, given that he faces 20 years’ imprisonment if convicted, Gotti also constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding that the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). The strength of the government’s case makes Gotti’s incentive to flee even stronger. Thus, he should also be detained as a risk of flight.
N. ERNEST GRILLO
Ernest Grille is a longtime soldier in the Gambino family. He is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including three predicate acts of extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy. Grille is also charged with extortion, attempted extortion and extortion conspiracy.
The counts in which Grille has been charged constitute crimes of violence. Accordingly, the government seeks a permanent order of detention for Grille on the grounds that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Grille.
a. Grillo Is a Gambino Family Soldier
Grillo is a longstanding Gambino family soldier. The government will establish Grillo’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
At least three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Grillo is a member of the Gambino family.
This testimony is corroborated by the more than 150 recorded conversations involving Grillo. During the course of the recordings, he is heard engaging in the Gambino family’s business, explicitly discussing the crimes with which he is charged, the involvement of other Gambino family members in these crimes, and his position in the Gambino family’s hierarchy. Scores of recorded conversations with other Gambino family members referencing Grille further demonstrate his position in the family.
The available surveillance evidence also establishes Grille’s long-lived association with and position in the Gambino family. As early as 1984 - nearly 25 years ago - Grille has been observed at locations and events relating to the Gambino family. He has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at multiple weddings and wakes. Cooperating witnesses and an organized crime expert are expected to testify that these events are attended by dozens of other members and associates of organized crime, many of whom are convicted felons who committed those crimes as part of an organized crime family, and that Gambino family business is routinely conducted at such events. Grille was observed at the December 1984 Agnello-Gotti wedding, the 1985 wake of underboss Aniello Dellacroce, and the 1986 wake of former Gambino family underboss Frank DeCicco. In the past year, Grille was surveilled at the November 2007 wake of Gambino family captain Giuseppe “Joseph” Arcuri.
b. Crimes of Violence
As noted above, Grille is charged in multiple extortions, all crimes of violence. A brief proffer of the facts pertaining to each of the extortions follows.
i. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Staten Island Cement Company Profits
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately December 2003, Joseph Vollaro approached Gambino family captain Thomas Cacciopoli and requested permission to open a cement company on Staten Island. Due to the Gambino family’s control of the New York cement industry, Cacciopoli, together with Gambino family captain Louis Filippelli, engaged in a series of meetings to obtain permission from the Gambino family’s administration to open such a company. Cacciopoli and Filippelli succeeded and informed Joseph Vollaro that he could start the company provided that following a one-year grace period, the Gambino family would receive 15% or $1 per yard for all cement sold, with the payments to be collected by Filippelli and passed through to the family’s administration.
Joseph Vollaro opened the company in April 2004. Since May 2005, he has paid over $60,000 of extortion payments to the Gambino family. The initial payments were collected by Gambino family soldier Vincent Pacelli on behalf of the then incarcerated Filippelli. After Gambino family captain Nicholas Corozzo assumed control of Joseph Vollaro from Filippelli in late June 2005, payments were collected on his behalf for the administration by Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria, who controlled Joseph Vollaro for Corozzo while Corozzo was on supervised release, as well as by Grille and Gambino family soldier Mario Cassarino.
Multiple members of the Gambino family informed Joseph Vollaro that the profits from his Staten Island cement company were passed along to the Gambino family administration, and that the administration consists of acting boss John D’Amico, acting underboss Domenico Cefalu and consigliere Joseph Corozzo.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion; (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations; (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were members and associates of the Gambino family that the family controlled the cement industry on Staten Island and would not allow anyone to open a cement company without paying extortion to the family; (iv) testimony from a cooperating witness who is a former Gambino family soldier with extensive knowledge of the family’s construction rackets that extortion payments related to cement were passed along to the administration of the family; and (v) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation.
ii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - Construction List
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In July 2005, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria instructed Joseph Vollaro to help soldier Ernest Grille reinitiate collections from construction companies that had been making extortion payments to then jailed Gambino family soldier Edward Garafola prior to his incarceration. Garafola, who had been a member of the Gambino family’s “construction panel,” a body which oversees the Gambino family’s construction rackets, had exacted extortionate payments from scores of construction companies prior to his incarceration, but had not shared the identity of all those companies with his Gambino family superiors.
Joseph Vollaro contacted Grille as instructed. Together with Ruggiero and Gambino family associate Anthony O’Donnell, who had been Garafola’s right hand in conducting the extortions, and who had accompanied Garafola on one occasion while Garafola assaulted a contractor who was late in his payments, the men repeatedly met to reconstruct a list of the contractors who had been paying Garafola extortion and to plot the reinitiation of collections. Under the supervision and at the direction of Corozzo and DiMaria, the four men created a list of more than 40 construction companies and individual contractors that formerly paid extortion to Garafola. Grille, Ruggiero and O’Donnell then approached a number of the companies to place them back under Gambino family control.
During the this process, Edward Garafola’s son asserted his father’s right to the extortion victims, and complained of the efforts to take away his father’s former victims. In response, Grille told Joseph Vollaro that he assaulted Garafola’s son, saying, “I choked him out.”
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family, and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) the testimony of a cooperating witnesses who was a former Gambino family member and member of the Gambino family construction panel who was tasked with compiling the same construction list years earlier but failed to complete the job prior to his arrest and incarceration, property or persons.
iii. Extortion Conspiracy/Extortion - NASCAR Construction Site
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In January 2006, NASCAR had begun construction on a racetrack in Staten Island. Recine Trucking, a company under the control of Gambino family acting underboss Domenico Cefalu, was among the first companies hired to bring fill to the site. Thereafter, Gambino family soldier Ernest Grille acquired exclusive dumping rights at the site for Joseph Vollaro.
From late January 2006 to May 2006, Grille, Cefalu and Gambino family members Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Nicholas Corozzo and Frank Cali negotiated the amount of extortion Joseph Vollaro would be required to pay for the exclusive dumping rights. Eventually, Joseph Vollaro received those rights on the condition that he make extortion payments of $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Corozzo and DiMaria, and $.50 per yard of fill dumped to Cefalu and Cali.
Before Joseph Vollaro could begin dumping at the site pursuant to these terms, the exclusive dumping deal fell through. Later, after a new deal was worked out, Corozzo and DiMaria directed Joseph Vollaro to take the job on the condition that he pay them $1 for every yard of fill dumped at the site.
Joseph Vollaro also was required to make a one-time $9,000 payment to NASCAR employee Todd Polakoff on behalf have NASCAR executive William Kilgannon.
Joseph Vollaro worked at the site for a short time and made approximately $13,000 in extortion payments to Gambino family soldier Mario Cassarino, who collected the extortion payments for Corozzo and DiMaria.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including scores of recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members familiar with the family’s construction rackets who are expected to testify that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers and make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
Re: 2008 Gambino Indictment Detention Motion
2. Grillo Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
As discussed above, Grillo is a Gambino family soldier with a violent past who has continued to engage in acts of violence.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Grillo is charged with multiple extortions. These crimes alone merit detention on the basis of dangerousness.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
As noted, Grillo is a Gambino family soldier. He is a life-long criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. He also is a multiple convicted felon. Below is a brief summary of Grillo’s arrests and convictions:
• On July 5, 1973, Grillo was arrested for Possession of a Loaded Firearm, Forgery in the Second Degree and Driver’s Licence Violations. On September 5, 1973, he was convicted of an Attemped Class E Felony and Driver’s License Violations. Grillo received a sentence of five years probation.
• On October 17, 1974, Grillo was arrested for Possession of Stolen Property in the Third Degree and Petit Larceny. On January 21, 1975, Grillo pled guilty to Attempted Possession of Stolen Property and received a sentence of conditional discharge.
• On October 2, 1977, Grillo was arrested for Attempted Burglary and Harassment. On December 1, 1977, Grillo pled guilty to Harassment and was given a sentence of a fine of $150 or 10 days’ imprisonment.
• On October 12, 1988, Grille was arrested for Murder in the Second Degree, Conspiracy in the Second Degree, Grand Larceny in the Second Degree, Coercion in the First Degree, Criminal Usury in the First Degree and Promoting Gambling in the First Degree, among other charges. On April 17, 1989, Grille pled guilty to Enterprise Corruption and received a sentence of six to 18 years’ imprisonment. Grille was incarcerated until October 6, 2000, and released from parole on October 29, 2003.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Grille has long engaged in violence on behalf of the Gambino family. His recent involvement in acts of violence include the multiple charged extortions with Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. The violent nature of the Gambino family’s method of collecting money is made clear in the following recording of DiMaria: “You have to go bother these people for your money. . . they are going to tell you we got to sit down and talk and this and that. Rough them up a little. Tell them, ‘You’re a fucking stiff.’ Tell them what you have to tell them. . . . The next guy that owes you money from there with them guys, you catch them, and that’s what I’m saying, that you check in with the other guys . . . Crack a face, fuck them up. Don’t you do it, send a fucking kid to rough them up, a fucking joke.”
The crimes charged, coupled with Grille’s prior conviction for a crime of violence, make clear that Grille is a danger to the community.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Grille’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted and participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Grille’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance. At least three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Grille is a longstanding member of the family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect, interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Grille engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and court-authorized wiretaps.
The government has more than 100 consensual recordings documenting Grille’s involvement in the extortions for which he is indicted in this case.
The government’s evidence of Grillo’s guilt is thus overwhelming and clearly favors detention.
3. Grillo Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set for above, given that he faces 20 years’ imprisonment if convicted, Grillo also constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding that the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). The strength of the government’s case makes Grillo’s incentive to flee even stronger. Thus, he should also be detained as a risk of flight.
O. JAMES OUTERIE
James Outerie, a Gambino family soldier, is charged with RICO conspiracy, including four predicate acts of extortionate collection of credit and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy, and an additional predicate act of illegal gambling. Outerie is also charged in substantive counts with extortionate collection of credit, extortionate collection of credit conspiracy and illegal gambling.
If convicted, Outerie faces a term of 20 years’ imprisonment on the racketeering conspiracy count, as well as for each of the four extortionate collection of credit and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy counts. Were Outerie sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment for just the four extortionate schemes covered in these counts - the evidence of which includes recorded conversations capturing Outerie’s active participation in the extortions - he faces a combined term of imprisonment of 80 years. Outerie is a 54-year-old recidivist with more than 11 arrests and four criminal convictions dating back over 35 years. He has been imprisoned twice, once for armed robbery. He is currently under home detention while awaiting trial under separate RICO conspiracy charges brought against him in this district last year.
The government seeks a permanent order of detention against Outerie on the ground that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Outerie.
a. Outerie Is a Gambino Family Soldier
Outerie is a longstanding Gambino family soldier. The government will establish Outerie’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
Cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Outerie is a longstanding member of the Gambino family. This testimony will be corroborated by multiple consensual recordings and surveillance evidence which also establishes Outerie’s position in the Gambino family. As early as 1996, Outerie has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at various organized crime-related events. In the past two years, Outerie was surveilled attending the June 2006 wake of Anna Trucchio, mother of incarcerated Gambino family soldier Ronald Trucchio and grandmother of Gambino family soldier Alphonse Trucchio and the January 2007 wake of Maryann Corozzo, the wife of Gambino family soldier Blaise Corozzo. During the same time period, Outerie has also been observed meeting with co-defendants Leonard DiMaria, Richard Ranieri, and Gambino family associate Steven laria and others on multiple occasions in social clubs, diners and other locations throughout Brooklyn and Staten Island.
b. Crimes of Violence
As noted above, the four acts of loansharking charged against Outerie are all crimes of violence.
i. Extortionate Collection of Credit/Extortionate Collection of Credit Conspiracy - John Does #6-9
Outerie is charged with extortionate collection of credit and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy - loansharking - with respect to four loanshark victims, John Does #6 through #9, from approximately November 2005 to June 2006. Outerie was involved in the day-to-day collection of loanshark monies owed to him. In this role, Outerie was involved in threatening debtors and instructing others to threaten debtors, among other criminal activities. The government will establish Outerie’s involvement in loansharking through the testimony of cooperating witnesses and consensual recordings.
For example, consensual recordings from late 2005 and early 2006 reveal Outerie discussing a loanshark victim’s “shy loan.” At one point, Outerie’s co-defendant Richard Ranieri made arrangements for John Doe #6 to meet Outerie and Ranieri late one evening. Ranieri commented how John Doe #6 had “fucking paid James with a check,” and how “[fjucking James takes checks now,” referring to Outerie. At one point, Ranieri said, again referring to Outerie, “he said tell this fucking kid to bring some fucking dough with him.” Ranieri later said, “See if he can bring some money, ‘cause he’s going to get fucking crazy something,” again referring to Outerie. In another recording, it is explained that Outerie and Ranieri had attempted to collect the debts from a victim by calling his house and speaking with his family members.
2. Outerie Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
As discussed above, Outerie is a Gambino family soldier with a violent past who has continued to engage in acts of violence.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Outerie is charged with four acts of extortion. Extortions are crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). These crimes alone merit detention on the basis of dangerousness.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
As noted, Outerie is a Gambino family soldier. He is a life-long criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. He also is a multiple convicted felon. Below is a brief summary of Outerie’s arrests and convictions:
• On July 16, 1972, Outerie was arrested in Kings County for Attempted Robbery in the 1 st Degree involving the use or threatened use of a dangerous instrument, among other charges. He pled guilty to Petit Larceny and received a probationary sentence of three years.
• On January 6, 1982, Outerie was arrested in Kings County for Robbery in the 1 st Degree, Kidnapping in the 2nd Degree, Criminal Use of a Firearm in the 1st Degree, Criminal Possession of a Loaded Firearm in the 3rd Degree, and Grand Larceny in the 2nd Degree. He pled guilty to Robbery in the 1st Degree and was sentenced to two to six years in prison.
• On March 28, 1991, Outerie was arrested in Kings County for Grand Larceny in the 2nd Degree: Property Obtained by Extortion. He pled guilty to Grand Larceny in the 4th Degree and was sentenced to 20 to 42 months in prison.
• On June 28, 1996, Outerie was arrested in Richmond County for a misdemeanor fireworks-related offense. He pled guilty and paid a fine.
• On February 27, 2007, Outerie was arrested in the Eastern District of New York and charged with RICO conspiracy, including predicate acts involving loansharking; those charges are currently pending.
Given Outerie’s past history of involvement in violent crimes, including armed robbery, and arrests for loansharking, extortion and gambling - similar to the very crimes with which he is currently charged - his “history and characteristics” favor detention.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Outerie’s recent involvement in loansharking, coupled with his prior conviction for a crime of violence (the 1982 armed robbery), make clear that he is a danger to the community.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Outerie’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted and participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government intends to prove the existence of the Gambino family and Outerie’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Outerie is a longstanding associate and member of the family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect, interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Outerie engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses and consensual recordings in which he is overheard discussing his involvement in loansharking. The government’s evidence of Outerie’s guilt is thus overwhelming and clearly favors detention.
3. Outerie Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set for above, given that he faces 20 years’ imprisonment if convicted, Outerie also constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding that the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). The strength of the government’s case makes Outerie’s incentive to flee even stronger. Thus, he should also be detained as a risk of flight.
P. RICHARD RANIERI
Richard Ranieri, a Gambino family associate, is charged with RICO conspiracy, including six predicate acts of extortionate collection of credit and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy, and an additional predicate act of illegal gambling. Ranieri is also charged in substantive counts with extortionate collection of credit, extortionate collection of credit conspiracy and illegal gambling.
If convicted, Ranieri faces a term of 20 years’ imprisonment on the racketeering conspiracy count, as well as for each of the 11 extortionate collection of credit and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy counts. Were Ranieri sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment for just the six extortionate schemes covered in these counts - the evidence of which includes recorded conversations capturing Ranieri’s active participation in the loansharking - he faces a combined term of imprisonment of 120 years.
The government seeks a permanent order of detention against Ranieri on the ground that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Ranieri.
a. Ranieri Is a Gambino Family Associate
Ranieri has been associated with the Gambino family and Nicholas Corozzo’s crew for years. The government will establish Ranieri’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
Cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Ranieri is a longstanding associate of the Gambino family. This testimony will be corroborated by multiple consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. In January 2007, Ranieri was surveilled attending the January 2007 wake of Maryann Corozzo, the wife of Gambino family soldier Blaise Corozzo. In 2006, Ranieri was also observed meeting with co-defendants Leonard DiMaria, James Outerie and Gambino family associate Steven laria and others on multiple occasions in restaurants, on piers and at other locations throughout Brooklyn and Staten Island.
b. Crimes of Violence
As noted above, the six acts of loansharking charged against Ranieri are all crimes of violence.
i. Extortionate Collection of Credit/Extortionate Collection of Credit Conspiracy - John Does #6-#l 1
Ranieri is charged with extortionate collection of credit and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy - loansharking - with respect to six loanshark victims, John Does #6 through #11, from approximately November 2005 to September 2006. Ranieri was involved in the day-to-day collection of loanshark monies owed to him and Outerie. In this role, Ranieri was involved in threatening debtors, among other activities. The government will establish Ranieri’s involvement in loansharking through the testimony of cooperating witnesses and consensual recordings.
For example, consensual recordings from late 2005 and early 2006 reveal Outerie discussing a loanshark victim’s “shy loan.” At one point, Ranieri made arrangements for John Doe #6 to meet him and Outerie late one evening. Ranieri commented how John Doe #6 had “fucking paid James with a check,” and how “[fjucking James takes checks now,” referring to Outerie. At one point, Ranieri said, again referring to Outerie, “he said tell this fucking kid to bring some fucking dough with him.” Ranieri later said, “See if he can bring some money, ‘cause he’s going to get fucking crazy something,” again referring to Outerie. In another recording, it is explained that Ranieri and Outerie had attempted to collect the debts from a victim by calling his house and speaking with his family members.
2. Ranieri Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
As discussed above, Ranieri is a Gambino family associate who is engaging in acts of violence.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Ranieri is charged with six acts of extortion. Extortions are crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). These crimes alone merit detention on the basis of dangerousness.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
Ranieri is an associate of the Gambino family who engages in a variety of criminal activities, including serving as the enforcer for the loansharking operation run by Outerie.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Ranieri’s association with the Gambino family and his willingness to do Outierie’s bidding make clear that he is a danger to the community.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Ranieri’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted and participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government intends to prove the existence of the Gambino family and Outerie’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Ranieri is a longstanding associate of the family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect, interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Ranieri engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses and consensual recordings in which he is overheard discussing his involvement in loansharking. The government’s evidence of Ranieri’s guilt is thus overwhelming and clearly favors detention.
3. Ranieri Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set for above, given that he faces 20 years’ imprisonment if convicted, Ranieri also constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge. 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding that the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). The strength of the government’s case makes Ranieri’s incentive to flee even stronger. Thus, he should also be detained as a risk of flight.
As discussed above, Grillo is a Gambino family soldier with a violent past who has continued to engage in acts of violence.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Grillo is charged with multiple extortions. These crimes alone merit detention on the basis of dangerousness.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
As noted, Grillo is a Gambino family soldier. He is a life-long criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. He also is a multiple convicted felon. Below is a brief summary of Grillo’s arrests and convictions:
• On July 5, 1973, Grillo was arrested for Possession of a Loaded Firearm, Forgery in the Second Degree and Driver’s Licence Violations. On September 5, 1973, he was convicted of an Attemped Class E Felony and Driver’s License Violations. Grillo received a sentence of five years probation.
• On October 17, 1974, Grillo was arrested for Possession of Stolen Property in the Third Degree and Petit Larceny. On January 21, 1975, Grillo pled guilty to Attempted Possession of Stolen Property and received a sentence of conditional discharge.
• On October 2, 1977, Grillo was arrested for Attempted Burglary and Harassment. On December 1, 1977, Grillo pled guilty to Harassment and was given a sentence of a fine of $150 or 10 days’ imprisonment.
• On October 12, 1988, Grille was arrested for Murder in the Second Degree, Conspiracy in the Second Degree, Grand Larceny in the Second Degree, Coercion in the First Degree, Criminal Usury in the First Degree and Promoting Gambling in the First Degree, among other charges. On April 17, 1989, Grille pled guilty to Enterprise Corruption and received a sentence of six to 18 years’ imprisonment. Grille was incarcerated until October 6, 2000, and released from parole on October 29, 2003.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Grille has long engaged in violence on behalf of the Gambino family. His recent involvement in acts of violence include the multiple charged extortions with Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria. The violent nature of the Gambino family’s method of collecting money is made clear in the following recording of DiMaria: “You have to go bother these people for your money. . . they are going to tell you we got to sit down and talk and this and that. Rough them up a little. Tell them, ‘You’re a fucking stiff.’ Tell them what you have to tell them. . . . The next guy that owes you money from there with them guys, you catch them, and that’s what I’m saying, that you check in with the other guys . . . Crack a face, fuck them up. Don’t you do it, send a fucking kid to rough them up, a fucking joke.”
The crimes charged, coupled with Grille’s prior conviction for a crime of violence, make clear that Grille is a danger to the community.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Grille’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted and participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Grille’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance. At least three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Grille is a longstanding member of the family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect, interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Grille engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and court-authorized wiretaps.
The government has more than 100 consensual recordings documenting Grille’s involvement in the extortions for which he is indicted in this case.
The government’s evidence of Grillo’s guilt is thus overwhelming and clearly favors detention.
3. Grillo Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set for above, given that he faces 20 years’ imprisonment if convicted, Grillo also constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding that the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). The strength of the government’s case makes Grillo’s incentive to flee even stronger. Thus, he should also be detained as a risk of flight.
O. JAMES OUTERIE
James Outerie, a Gambino family soldier, is charged with RICO conspiracy, including four predicate acts of extortionate collection of credit and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy, and an additional predicate act of illegal gambling. Outerie is also charged in substantive counts with extortionate collection of credit, extortionate collection of credit conspiracy and illegal gambling.
If convicted, Outerie faces a term of 20 years’ imprisonment on the racketeering conspiracy count, as well as for each of the four extortionate collection of credit and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy counts. Were Outerie sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment for just the four extortionate schemes covered in these counts - the evidence of which includes recorded conversations capturing Outerie’s active participation in the extortions - he faces a combined term of imprisonment of 80 years. Outerie is a 54-year-old recidivist with more than 11 arrests and four criminal convictions dating back over 35 years. He has been imprisoned twice, once for armed robbery. He is currently under home detention while awaiting trial under separate RICO conspiracy charges brought against him in this district last year.
The government seeks a permanent order of detention against Outerie on the ground that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Outerie.
a. Outerie Is a Gambino Family Soldier
Outerie is a longstanding Gambino family soldier. The government will establish Outerie’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
Cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Outerie is a longstanding member of the Gambino family. This testimony will be corroborated by multiple consensual recordings and surveillance evidence which also establishes Outerie’s position in the Gambino family. As early as 1996, Outerie has been observed with other members of the Gambino family at various organized crime-related events. In the past two years, Outerie was surveilled attending the June 2006 wake of Anna Trucchio, mother of incarcerated Gambino family soldier Ronald Trucchio and grandmother of Gambino family soldier Alphonse Trucchio and the January 2007 wake of Maryann Corozzo, the wife of Gambino family soldier Blaise Corozzo. During the same time period, Outerie has also been observed meeting with co-defendants Leonard DiMaria, Richard Ranieri, and Gambino family associate Steven laria and others on multiple occasions in social clubs, diners and other locations throughout Brooklyn and Staten Island.
b. Crimes of Violence
As noted above, the four acts of loansharking charged against Outerie are all crimes of violence.
i. Extortionate Collection of Credit/Extortionate Collection of Credit Conspiracy - John Does #6-9
Outerie is charged with extortionate collection of credit and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy - loansharking - with respect to four loanshark victims, John Does #6 through #9, from approximately November 2005 to June 2006. Outerie was involved in the day-to-day collection of loanshark monies owed to him. In this role, Outerie was involved in threatening debtors and instructing others to threaten debtors, among other criminal activities. The government will establish Outerie’s involvement in loansharking through the testimony of cooperating witnesses and consensual recordings.
For example, consensual recordings from late 2005 and early 2006 reveal Outerie discussing a loanshark victim’s “shy loan.” At one point, Outerie’s co-defendant Richard Ranieri made arrangements for John Doe #6 to meet Outerie and Ranieri late one evening. Ranieri commented how John Doe #6 had “fucking paid James with a check,” and how “[fjucking James takes checks now,” referring to Outerie. At one point, Ranieri said, again referring to Outerie, “he said tell this fucking kid to bring some fucking dough with him.” Ranieri later said, “See if he can bring some money, ‘cause he’s going to get fucking crazy something,” again referring to Outerie. In another recording, it is explained that Outerie and Ranieri had attempted to collect the debts from a victim by calling his house and speaking with his family members.
2. Outerie Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
As discussed above, Outerie is a Gambino family soldier with a violent past who has continued to engage in acts of violence.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Outerie is charged with four acts of extortion. Extortions are crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). These crimes alone merit detention on the basis of dangerousness.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
As noted, Outerie is a Gambino family soldier. He is a life-long criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. He also is a multiple convicted felon. Below is a brief summary of Outerie’s arrests and convictions:
• On July 16, 1972, Outerie was arrested in Kings County for Attempted Robbery in the 1 st Degree involving the use or threatened use of a dangerous instrument, among other charges. He pled guilty to Petit Larceny and received a probationary sentence of three years.
• On January 6, 1982, Outerie was arrested in Kings County for Robbery in the 1 st Degree, Kidnapping in the 2nd Degree, Criminal Use of a Firearm in the 1st Degree, Criminal Possession of a Loaded Firearm in the 3rd Degree, and Grand Larceny in the 2nd Degree. He pled guilty to Robbery in the 1st Degree and was sentenced to two to six years in prison.
• On March 28, 1991, Outerie was arrested in Kings County for Grand Larceny in the 2nd Degree: Property Obtained by Extortion. He pled guilty to Grand Larceny in the 4th Degree and was sentenced to 20 to 42 months in prison.
• On June 28, 1996, Outerie was arrested in Richmond County for a misdemeanor fireworks-related offense. He pled guilty and paid a fine.
• On February 27, 2007, Outerie was arrested in the Eastern District of New York and charged with RICO conspiracy, including predicate acts involving loansharking; those charges are currently pending.
Given Outerie’s past history of involvement in violent crimes, including armed robbery, and arrests for loansharking, extortion and gambling - similar to the very crimes with which he is currently charged - his “history and characteristics” favor detention.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Outerie’s recent involvement in loansharking, coupled with his prior conviction for a crime of violence (the 1982 armed robbery), make clear that he is a danger to the community.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Outerie’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted and participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government intends to prove the existence of the Gambino family and Outerie’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Outerie is a longstanding associate and member of the family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect, interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Outerie engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses and consensual recordings in which he is overheard discussing his involvement in loansharking. The government’s evidence of Outerie’s guilt is thus overwhelming and clearly favors detention.
3. Outerie Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set for above, given that he faces 20 years’ imprisonment if convicted, Outerie also constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding that the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). The strength of the government’s case makes Outerie’s incentive to flee even stronger. Thus, he should also be detained as a risk of flight.
P. RICHARD RANIERI
Richard Ranieri, a Gambino family associate, is charged with RICO conspiracy, including six predicate acts of extortionate collection of credit and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy, and an additional predicate act of illegal gambling. Ranieri is also charged in substantive counts with extortionate collection of credit, extortionate collection of credit conspiracy and illegal gambling.
If convicted, Ranieri faces a term of 20 years’ imprisonment on the racketeering conspiracy count, as well as for each of the 11 extortionate collection of credit and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy counts. Were Ranieri sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment for just the six extortionate schemes covered in these counts - the evidence of which includes recorded conversations capturing Ranieri’s active participation in the loansharking - he faces a combined term of imprisonment of 120 years.
The government seeks a permanent order of detention against Ranieri on the ground that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Ranieri.
a. Ranieri Is a Gambino Family Associate
Ranieri has been associated with the Gambino family and Nicholas Corozzo’s crew for years. The government will establish Ranieri’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
Cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Ranieri is a longstanding associate of the Gambino family. This testimony will be corroborated by multiple consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. In January 2007, Ranieri was surveilled attending the January 2007 wake of Maryann Corozzo, the wife of Gambino family soldier Blaise Corozzo. In 2006, Ranieri was also observed meeting with co-defendants Leonard DiMaria, James Outerie and Gambino family associate Steven laria and others on multiple occasions in restaurants, on piers and at other locations throughout Brooklyn and Staten Island.
b. Crimes of Violence
As noted above, the six acts of loansharking charged against Ranieri are all crimes of violence.
i. Extortionate Collection of Credit/Extortionate Collection of Credit Conspiracy - John Does #6-#l 1
Ranieri is charged with extortionate collection of credit and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy - loansharking - with respect to six loanshark victims, John Does #6 through #11, from approximately November 2005 to September 2006. Ranieri was involved in the day-to-day collection of loanshark monies owed to him and Outerie. In this role, Ranieri was involved in threatening debtors, among other activities. The government will establish Ranieri’s involvement in loansharking through the testimony of cooperating witnesses and consensual recordings.
For example, consensual recordings from late 2005 and early 2006 reveal Outerie discussing a loanshark victim’s “shy loan.” At one point, Ranieri made arrangements for John Doe #6 to meet him and Outerie late one evening. Ranieri commented how John Doe #6 had “fucking paid James with a check,” and how “[fjucking James takes checks now,” referring to Outerie. At one point, Ranieri said, again referring to Outerie, “he said tell this fucking kid to bring some fucking dough with him.” Ranieri later said, “See if he can bring some money, ‘cause he’s going to get fucking crazy something,” again referring to Outerie. In another recording, it is explained that Ranieri and Outerie had attempted to collect the debts from a victim by calling his house and speaking with his family members.
2. Ranieri Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
As discussed above, Ranieri is a Gambino family associate who is engaging in acts of violence.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Ranieri is charged with six acts of extortion. Extortions are crimes of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4)(A) (defining “crime of violence” as an offense that has as one of its elements the “attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another”). These crimes alone merit detention on the basis of dangerousness.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
Ranieri is an associate of the Gambino family who engages in a variety of criminal activities, including serving as the enforcer for the loansharking operation run by Outerie.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Ranieri’s association with the Gambino family and his willingness to do Outierie’s bidding make clear that he is a danger to the community.
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Ranieri’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted and participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government intends to prove the existence of the Gambino family and Outerie’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Ranieri is a longstanding associate of the family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect, interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Ranieri engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses and consensual recordings in which he is overheard discussing his involvement in loansharking. The government’s evidence of Ranieri’s guilt is thus overwhelming and clearly favors detention.
3. Ranieri Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set for above, given that he faces 20 years’ imprisonment if convicted, Ranieri also constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge. 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding that the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). The strength of the government’s case makes Ranieri’s incentive to flee even stronger. Thus, he should also be detained as a risk of flight.
Re: 2008 Gambino Indictment Detention Motion
Q. ANGELO RUGGIERO. JR.
Angelo Ruggiero, Jr. is a solider in the Gambino family. In October 2007, after charges in the Eastern District of New York were transferred to the Southern District of New York, Ruggerio pled guilty to money laundering conspiracy. He also pled guilty in a separate case in the Southern District of New York to extortion conspiracy. Those cases are pending before the Honorable Lawrence McKenna and are scheduled for sentencing in March 2008.
Ruggerio has prior criminal convictions for possession of illegal vehicle identification numbers and grand larceny. Cooperating witnesses also are expected to testify that he ran an auto-body shop where he would receive stolen vehicles. He is presently incarcerated while awaiting sentencing.
The government moves for pre-trial detention of Ruggerio based on the fact that he is a danger to the community and a risk of flight. Ruggerio is charged with racketeering conspiracy including murder conspiracy/attempted murder as a predicate act. In May 2003, Ruggerio and others were involved in a conspiracy to murder John Doe #5 for Vincent Gotti, another soldier in the Gambino family. John Doe #5 was shot several times, but survived. The evidence on this charge, detailed in previous sections, is strong. Two cooperating witnesses will detail the facts surrounding the attempted murder and both lay witnesses and law enforcement witnesses corroborate the cooperating witnesses’ testimony.
Ruggiero also is charged with extortion conspiracy and attempted extortion as predicate acts. A brief summary of the evidence against Ruggiero in connection with those charges is described below.
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In July 2005, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria instructed Joseph Vollaro to help soldier Ernest Grille reinitiate collections from construction companies that had been making extortion payments to then jailed Gambino family soldier Edward Garafola prior to his incarceration. Garafola, who had been a member of the Gambino family’s “construction panel,” a body which oversees the Gambino family’s construction rackets, had exacted extortionate payments from scores of construction companies prior to his incarceration, but had not shared the identity of all those companies with his Gambino family superiors.
Joseph Vollaro contacted Grille as instructed. Together with Ruggiero and Gambino family associate Anthony O’Donnell, who had been Garafola’s right hand in conducting the extortions, and who had accompanied Garafola on one occasion while Garafola assaulted a contractor who was late in his payments, the men repeatedly met to reconstruct a list of the contractors who had been paying Garafola extortion and to plot the reinitiation of collections. Under the supervision and at the direction of Corozzo and DiMaria, the four men created a list of more than 40 construction companies and individual contractors that formerly paid extortion to Garafola. Grille, Ruggiero and O’Donnell then approached a number of the companies to place them back under Gambino family control.
During the this process, Edward Garafola’s son asserted his father’s right to the extortion victims, and complained of the efforts to take away his father’s former victims. In response, Grille told Joseph Vollaro that he assaulted Garafola’s son, saying, “I choked him out.”
Joseph Vollaro’s testimony regarding Ruggiero’s involvement in these extortions will be corroborated by (i) more than 10 recordings in which Ruggiero was either captured on tape discussing the crimes charged or referenced by his criminal associates concerning those crimes, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family, and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) the testimony of a cooperating witnesses who was a former Gambino family member and member of the Gambino family construction panel who was tasked with compiling the same construction list years earlier but failed to complete the job prior to his arrest and incarceration.
Ruggeiro is a soldier in a violent criminal enterprise charged with crimes of violence, including attempted murder in 2003. He is currently incarcerated. Should he be eligible for release during the pendency of this case, he should be detained due to his criminal history of violence as a danger to the community. In addition, given the substantial sentence he faces for the crimes charged, he should also be detained as a risk of flight.
R. WILLIAM SCOTTO
William Scotto is a soldier in the Gambino family. He is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including three predicate acts of extortion, extortion conspiracy, extortionate collection of credit, and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy. Scotto is also charged in substantive counts with extortion, extortion conspiracy, extortionate collection of credit, and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy. Further, Scotto recently pled guilty to racketeering with predicate acts of extortion that were unrelated to the charges in this case. On February 4, 2008, the Honorable Charles Sifton sentenced Scotto to 33 months imprisonment. Scotto is scheduled to surrender in April 2008.
The government seeks a permanent order of detention for Scotto on the grounds that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Scotto.
a. Scotto Is a Gambino Family Soldier
Scotto is a Gambino family soldier. The government will establish Scotto’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
At least three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Scotto is a soldier in the Gambino family. This testimony is corroborated by consensual recordings showing Scotto engaging in Gambino family business.
The available surveillance evidence also establishes Scotto’s association with and position in the Gambino family. In the last two years alone, Scotto was surveilled attending the June 2006 wake of Anna Trucchio, mother of incarcerated Gambino family soldier Ronald Trucchio and grandmother of Gambino family soldier Alphonse Trucchio, and the September 2006 wake of the sister of Gambino family captain Bartolomeo “Baboots” Vernace.
b. Crimes of Violence
As noted above, Scotto is charged in crimes of violence. A brief proffer of the facts pertaining to each of the extortions follows.
i. Extortion/Extortionate Collection of Credit - ADCO Electrical Corporation
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In late April 2005, Scotto approached Joseph Vollaro to collect a debt owed to ADCO Electrical Corporation, a company that had come under Scotto’s control. Joseph Vollaro paid $4,000 demanded of him by Scotto.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including a recording of the conversation in which Scotto demanded and Joseph Vollaro paid the debt to ADCO Electrical Corporation, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
ii. Extortion/Extortionate Collection of Credit - El Camino Trucking
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In early June 2005, Scotto approached Joseph Vollaro to collect a debt owed to El Camino Trucking, a company that had come under Scotto’s control. Joseph Vollaro paid the $5,000 demanded of him by Scotto to El Camino Trucking in the form of free trucking services.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including a recording of the conversation in which Scotto demanded that Joseph Vollaro pay the debt to El Camino Trucking, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
iii. Extortion Conspiracy/Attempted Extortion - Cracolici Dispute
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately January 2006, Gambino family associate Gino Cracolici asserted that Joseph Vollaro owed him $70,000 in connection with a certain trucking business and turned to Scotto and Gambino family soldier Anthony Licata to force Joseph Vollaro to pay the money. Thereafter, Scotto participated in meetings with other members of the Gambino family to resolve the dispute in favor of Cracolici.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, including surveillance of the February 2006 meeting relating to Cracolici’s claims described above, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members who are expected to testify that individuals being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers or face some form of retaliation.
2. Scotto Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
As discussed above, Scotto is a Gambino family soldier with a violent past who has continued to engage in acts of violence.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Scotto is charged with numerous extortions, which alone merit detention on the basis of dangerousness.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
As noted, Scotto is a Gambino family soldier. He is a criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. He also is a convicted felon, having pled guilty in 2007 to racketeering that included predicate acts of extortion dating back to 1995 - for which he received a term of incarceration of 33 months.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Scotto has engaged in acts of extortion dating back to 1995 on behalf of the Gambino family and his recent involvement in acts of violence, including the three extortions detailed above make clear that Scotto is a danger to the community,
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Scotto’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted and participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Scotto’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance. At least three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Scotto is a longstanding member of the family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Scotto engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses and multiple consensual recordings. The government’s evidence of Scotto’s guilt is thus very strong and clearly favors detention.
3. Scotto Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set for above, given that he is due to surrender to serve a 33-month prison term and now faces another 20 years’ imprisonment if convicted, Scotto also constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding that the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). The strength of the government’s case makes Scotto’s incentive to flee even stronger. Thus, he should also be detained as a risk of flight.
IV. Conclusion
For the reasons cited above, the government hereby moves for a permanent order of detention with respect to the following defendants: Thomas Cacciopoli, Frank Cali, Charles Carneglia, Mario Cassarino, Domenico Cefalu, Joseph Corozzo, Nicholas Corozzo, John D’Amico, Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Louis Filippelli, Vincent Gotti, Richard G. Gotti, Ernest Grille, James Outerie, Richard Ranieri, Angelo Ruggiero, Jr. and William Scotto.
Respectfully submitted,
BENTON J. CAMPBELL
United States Attorney
Eastern District of New York
271 Cadman Plaza East
Brooklyn, New York 11201
Angelo Ruggiero, Jr. is a solider in the Gambino family. In October 2007, after charges in the Eastern District of New York were transferred to the Southern District of New York, Ruggerio pled guilty to money laundering conspiracy. He also pled guilty in a separate case in the Southern District of New York to extortion conspiracy. Those cases are pending before the Honorable Lawrence McKenna and are scheduled for sentencing in March 2008.
Ruggerio has prior criminal convictions for possession of illegal vehicle identification numbers and grand larceny. Cooperating witnesses also are expected to testify that he ran an auto-body shop where he would receive stolen vehicles. He is presently incarcerated while awaiting sentencing.
The government moves for pre-trial detention of Ruggerio based on the fact that he is a danger to the community and a risk of flight. Ruggerio is charged with racketeering conspiracy including murder conspiracy/attempted murder as a predicate act. In May 2003, Ruggerio and others were involved in a conspiracy to murder John Doe #5 for Vincent Gotti, another soldier in the Gambino family. John Doe #5 was shot several times, but survived. The evidence on this charge, detailed in previous sections, is strong. Two cooperating witnesses will detail the facts surrounding the attempted murder and both lay witnesses and law enforcement witnesses corroborate the cooperating witnesses’ testimony.
Ruggiero also is charged with extortion conspiracy and attempted extortion as predicate acts. A brief summary of the evidence against Ruggiero in connection with those charges is described below.
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In July 2005, Gambino family captain Leonard DiMaria instructed Joseph Vollaro to help soldier Ernest Grille reinitiate collections from construction companies that had been making extortion payments to then jailed Gambino family soldier Edward Garafola prior to his incarceration. Garafola, who had been a member of the Gambino family’s “construction panel,” a body which oversees the Gambino family’s construction rackets, had exacted extortionate payments from scores of construction companies prior to his incarceration, but had not shared the identity of all those companies with his Gambino family superiors.
Joseph Vollaro contacted Grille as instructed. Together with Ruggiero and Gambino family associate Anthony O’Donnell, who had been Garafola’s right hand in conducting the extortions, and who had accompanied Garafola on one occasion while Garafola assaulted a contractor who was late in his payments, the men repeatedly met to reconstruct a list of the contractors who had been paying Garafola extortion and to plot the reinitiation of collections. Under the supervision and at the direction of Corozzo and DiMaria, the four men created a list of more than 40 construction companies and individual contractors that formerly paid extortion to Garafola. Grille, Ruggiero and O’Donnell then approached a number of the companies to place them back under Gambino family control.
During the this process, Edward Garafola’s son asserted his father’s right to the extortion victims, and complained of the efforts to take away his father’s former victims. In response, Grille told Joseph Vollaro that he assaulted Garafola’s son, saying, “I choked him out.”
Joseph Vollaro’s testimony regarding Ruggiero’s involvement in these extortions will be corroborated by (i) more than 10 recordings in which Ruggiero was either captured on tape discussing the crimes charged or referenced by his criminal associates concerning those crimes, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family, and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) the testimony of a cooperating witnesses who was a former Gambino family member and member of the Gambino family construction panel who was tasked with compiling the same construction list years earlier but failed to complete the job prior to his arrest and incarceration.
Ruggeiro is a soldier in a violent criminal enterprise charged with crimes of violence, including attempted murder in 2003. He is currently incarcerated. Should he be eligible for release during the pendency of this case, he should be detained due to his criminal history of violence as a danger to the community. In addition, given the substantial sentence he faces for the crimes charged, he should also be detained as a risk of flight.
R. WILLIAM SCOTTO
William Scotto is a soldier in the Gambino family. He is charged in Count One with racketeering conspiracy, including three predicate acts of extortion, extortion conspiracy, extortionate collection of credit, and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy. Scotto is also charged in substantive counts with extortion, extortion conspiracy, extortionate collection of credit, and extortionate collection of credit conspiracy. Further, Scotto recently pled guilty to racketeering with predicate acts of extortion that were unrelated to the charges in this case. On February 4, 2008, the Honorable Charles Sifton sentenced Scotto to 33 months imprisonment. Scotto is scheduled to surrender in April 2008.
The government seeks a permanent order of detention for Scotto on the grounds that he is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight.
1. Proffered Facts
The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the pretrial detention of Scotto.
a. Scotto Is a Gambino Family Soldier
Scotto is a Gambino family soldier. The government will establish Scotto’s position in the Gambino family through the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance evidence. Each category of evidence is briefly discussed below.
At least three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that Scotto is a soldier in the Gambino family. This testimony is corroborated by consensual recordings showing Scotto engaging in Gambino family business.
The available surveillance evidence also establishes Scotto’s association with and position in the Gambino family. In the last two years alone, Scotto was surveilled attending the June 2006 wake of Anna Trucchio, mother of incarcerated Gambino family soldier Ronald Trucchio and grandmother of Gambino family soldier Alphonse Trucchio, and the September 2006 wake of the sister of Gambino family captain Bartolomeo “Baboots” Vernace.
b. Crimes of Violence
As noted above, Scotto is charged in crimes of violence. A brief proffer of the facts pertaining to each of the extortions follows.
i. Extortion/Extortionate Collection of Credit - ADCO Electrical Corporation
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In late April 2005, Scotto approached Joseph Vollaro to collect a debt owed to ADCO Electrical Corporation, a company that had come under Scotto’s control. Joseph Vollaro paid $4,000 demanded of him by Scotto.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including a recording of the conversation in which Scotto demanded and Joseph Vollaro paid the debt to ADCO Electrical Corporation, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
ii. Extortion/Extortionate Collection of Credit - El Camino Trucking
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In early June 2005, Scotto approached Joseph Vollaro to collect a debt owed to El Camino Trucking, a company that had come under Scotto’s control. Joseph Vollaro paid the $5,000 demanded of him by Scotto to El Camino Trucking in the form of free trucking services.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including a recording of the conversation in which Scotto demanded that Joseph Vollaro pay the debt to El Camino Trucking, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, and (iii) testimony from multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members that individuals and companies being extorted by Gambino family members must make the extortion payments demanded of them or face retaliation against their businesses, property or persons.
iii. Extortion Conspiracy/Attempted Extortion - Cracolici Dispute
A cooperating witness is expected to testify to the following.
In approximately January 2006, Gambino family associate Gino Cracolici asserted that Joseph Vollaro owed him $70,000 in connection with a certain trucking business and turned to Scotto and Gambino family soldier Anthony Licata to force Joseph Vollaro to pay the money. Thereafter, Scotto participated in meetings with other members of the Gambino family to resolve the dispute in favor of Cracolici.
The cooperating witness’s testimony will be corroborated by (i) recordings made of conversations with Gambino family members, including multiple recordings detailing Joseph Vollaro’s extortion by the defendants charged in the racketeering acts and counts related to this extortion, (ii) surveillance confirming Joseph Vollaro’s contacts with various members of the Gambino family and the participants in many of the taped conversations, including surveillance of the February 2006 meeting relating to Cracolici’s claims described above, and (iii) multiple cooperating witnesses who were former Gambino family members who are expected to testify that individuals being extorted by Gambino family members must comply with the demands of their Gambino family handlers or face some form of retaliation.
2. Scotto Constitutes a Danger to the Community and Should Be Detained
As discussed above, Scotto is a Gambino family soldier with a violent past who has continued to engage in acts of violence.
a. Nature and Circumstances of the Crimes Charged
Scotto is charged with numerous extortions, which alone merit detention on the basis of dangerousness.
b. History and Characteristics of the Defendant
As noted, Scotto is a Gambino family soldier. He is a criminal who has sworn an oath to a violent criminal enterprise. He also is a convicted felon, having pled guilty in 2007 to racketeering that included predicate acts of extortion dating back to 1995 - for which he received a term of incarceration of 33 months.
c. Seriousness of Danger Posed by the Defendant’s Release
Scotto has engaged in acts of extortion dating back to 1995 on behalf of the Gambino family and his recent involvement in acts of violence, including the three extortions detailed above make clear that Scotto is a danger to the community,
d. Evidence of the Defendant’s Guilt
The government’s evidence of Scotto’s guilt on the charged crimes is strong. To prevail on the racketeering conspiracy charge, the government must prove the following four elements: (a) that the defendant knowingly agreed to conduct or participate - and conducted and participated - directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of the charged enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; (b) that the enterprise, here the Gambino family, exists; (c) that the enterprise engaged in, or its activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce; and (d) that the defendant was employed by, or associated with, the enterprise.
First, the government will prove the existence of the Gambino family and Scotto’s membership in that enterprise through, among other evidence, the testimony of cooperating witnesses, consensual recordings and surveillance. At least three cooperating witnesses are expected to testify that the Gambino family exists and that Scotto is a longstanding member of the family.
The second element, the interstate commerce requirement, is also easily proved as the Gambino family has engaged in a variety of crimes, including narcotics trafficking, robbery, extortion of businesses and other crimes which affect interstate commerce.
Finally, to prove that Scotto engaged in the charged pattern of racketeering activity the government will offer law enforcement witnesses, cooperating witnesses and multiple consensual recordings. The government’s evidence of Scotto’s guilt is thus very strong and clearly favors detention.
3. Scotto Also Constitutes a Risk of Flight
In addition to the reasons set for above, given that he is due to surrender to serve a 33-month prison term and now faces another 20 years’ imprisonment if convicted, Scotto also constitutes a risk of flight. See United States v. Dodge, 846 F. Supp. 181, 184-85 (D. Conn. 1994) (finding that the possibility of a “severe sentence” heightens the risk of flight). The strength of the government’s case makes Scotto’s incentive to flee even stronger. Thus, he should also be detained as a risk of flight.
IV. Conclusion
For the reasons cited above, the government hereby moves for a permanent order of detention with respect to the following defendants: Thomas Cacciopoli, Frank Cali, Charles Carneglia, Mario Cassarino, Domenico Cefalu, Joseph Corozzo, Nicholas Corozzo, John D’Amico, Leonard DiMaria, Vincent Dragonetti, Louis Filippelli, Vincent Gotti, Richard G. Gotti, Ernest Grille, James Outerie, Richard Ranieri, Angelo Ruggiero, Jr. and William Scotto.
Respectfully submitted,
BENTON J. CAMPBELL
United States Attorney
Eastern District of New York
271 Cadman Plaza East
Brooklyn, New York 11201
Re: 2008 Gambino Indictment Detention Motion
Sorry if that was annoying in multiple posts. I posted from my phone.
Hope people enjoy if hadn’t seen before!
Hope people enjoy if hadn’t seen before!
-
johnny_scootch
- Full Patched
- Posts: 3053
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:48 am