I agree with you on the Coli, case, though. May be nepotism, slight chance that this is something still connected to and Outfit approved -- but not likely.Wiseguy wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 2:49 pmI said that the Paolian case has clear Outfit involvement. And I'm aware the prosecutor said that case was "tied to" the Delguidice case, though I'm not sure what those ties are. But it goes to my point that we see this "tied to," "connections to," etc. phenomenon regarding Chicago more than anyone else. And frankly, it's in this haze, the area of the unknown, or at least not so clear, where outdated and exaggerated views of the modern-day Chicago Outfit thrive the most.Snakes wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 2:39 pm Well, one of the assistant U.S. attorneys in the Paolian case tied that case to the Delgiudice case. Paolian has longstanding Outfit ties and was on Sarno's visitor list and a regular contributor to his commissary account. I don't think those things are coincidental
However, I think the AUSA tying the two gambling cases together is more than what you normally get from Outfit-related cases, so it needs to be taken at face value.