Frank LaBruzzo possible CI.

Discuss all mafia families in the U.S., Canada, Italy, and everywhere else in the world.

Moderator: Capos

User avatar
thekiduknow
Full Patched
Posts: 1054
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 4:43 pm

Frank LaBruzzo possible CI.

Post by thekiduknow »

I had originally planned to do a post breaking down what information Bill Bonanno gave during his time as an informant in the mid 1960s. However, I found out another Bonanno member who gave information during the Bonanno split. This informant I believe was one time acting boss, Joseph Bonanno’s brother-in-law Frank LaBruzzo.

I’ve posted it in the Sciacca files thread, but the informant gave the following information on December 1st, 1965(It starts on page 140 in file 1):

He stated that DiGregorio and his “group”, were pawns for Luchese and Magaddino, and that DiGregorio and Peter Crociata were “not capable of handling their jobs”. Due to DiGregorio’s “complete lack of ability and ignorance and factionalism”, the informant said the “group” will soon fall apart.

While refusing to use the specific terms, he identified DiGregorio, Peter Crociata, and Paul Sciacca as the boss, underboss, and consigliere of DiGregorio’s “group”, which he used instead of “family”. Instead of captain or caporegime, he referred to influential members as “rising stars”.

At first, it seemed to me that the informant was Bill, given the criticism of DiGregorio and the intimate knowledge of the family both piror to and during the split. I also guessed based on the refusal to use LCN terms like “underboss”, or “caporegime”, possibly based on a refusal to see DiGregorio’s ascension as illegitimate, not unlike his and Joseph’s view that the Commission itself was illegitimate. Bill did an interview with the FBI in April of 1964 where when asked about said “I don’t use them”. However, in subsequent reports it appears he did use those terms.

I learned that this informant was not Bill when looking at an October, 1967 report on Mary Ferrell.

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.htm ... lPageId=63

The date and info NY T-5 gives matches the above informant. He’s also listed as the source identifying Bonanno members, many of whom show up on the December 1st report. Looking at the unredacted list of informants, I saw that NY T-5 was in fact NY 5297-C-TE, who by that time was deceased.

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.htm ... elPageId=3

The only other time NY 5297-C-TE shows up on Mary Ferrell is in a September 1968 report, which just has the same membership list as the 1967 report, but no other information is attributed to him.

However, based on the fact he was listed as deceased by October 1967 is a big clue. The informant was firmly against DiGregorio and his “group”, and being designated as a TE meant he was a known member. The only two that come to my mind that match Joseph Notaro, and Frank LaBruzzo.

In the 1967 and 1968 report, the informant is listed as the source for mostly Brooklyn based members, but from the 1965 report he was familiar with other members as well, specifically noting that Michael Consolo took over part of Notaro’s crew. Despite this familiarity, in the 1965 report he didn’t know Armando Pollastrino’s last name, referring to him as Armand aka “Buddy”, or Rusty Rastelli’s true name.

It's spread out across a few different files, but here is what this informant said about both:
Armando (LNU) aka Buddy:
PC described this individual as a good-looking young man, age 39 or 40, who is always very well dressed. He was formerly under Joe Notaro and was close to Rusty. He is from the Bronx, but in the new reorganization, his influence has extended outside of the NYC area and he is considered one of the most important “rising stars” under DiGregorio. He is also highly regarded by Steve Magaddino and is very influential in matters relating to the Buffalo area.
Rusty (LNU):
PC described this individual as a young “rising star” who is close to [redacted](Probably Armando/Buddy). Both were formerly under Joseph Notaro. Buddy now hold considerable authority. He is from the Bronx and is married to a girl from the Howard Johnson family.

He did know they were both under Notaro, but says that Rusty was from the Bronx. The fact that he didn’t know Pollastrino’s last name, and thought Rusty Rastelli was from the Bronx, probably means the informant wasn’t Notaro, who would likely know Armando’s last name, and wouldn’t confuse Rusty for a Bronx based member.

I have no idea what he means by Rusty was married to the Howard Johnson family. Rusty was married for a time after Connie was killed, but her name was Irene Mckee.

The last bit of evidence I found was when I looked back through LaBruzzo’s file for clues. In January of 1966, there was a report done on LaBruzzo. On December 10, 1965. “NY T-1” reported that LaBruzzo was in ill health, and identified LaBruzzo’s doctor as a redacted Bonanno relative(possibly Martin Bonventre). In that same report, “NY T-1” gives the same info as our informant. LaBruzzo’s health would be no secret, but who his doctor was is only an informant close to him, or LaBruzzo himself, could share.

IMG_0290.jpg
IMG_0291.jpg

All this leads me to conclude that the informant likely could have been LaBruzzo. With his health problems worsening, increased law enforcement pressure, and being ostracized with the threat of being killed could have led him to speak to the FBI. I don’t have anything to base this on, but he could have also been trying to gain leverage to secure an eventual deal for Bonanno like Bill seems to have done.

Despite having a TE code in the 1967 report, in the December 1965 the informant was referred to as “PC”. I wasn’t sure what this meant, but I knew “PCI” meant potential confidential informant. When I asked in the general questions thread, OcSleeper guessed “Potential Cooperative” which would fit well. I haven't found anything yet indicating the informant was active after December, so it's not clear to me how he became a TE.

I hope this made sense, I’d love to hear any input others have. I want to be clear, I don’t think I’ve proved it was Frank LaBruzzo, just from what I’ve seen he would be the more likely candidate.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
B.
Men Of Mayhem
Posts: 10692
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 10:18 pm
Contact:

Re: Frank LaBruzzo possible CI.

Post by B. »

Good info here. I assumed the informant was Bill at first glance, too. It would make sense if it was someone close to him, like his uncle.

The FBI had extensive recordings made in LaBruzzo's office, so he indirectly provided a lot of info also. The informant code makes it clear this didn't come from a bug, but an informant like you said. If LaBruzzo did cooperate you have to wonder if they let him know they already had him on tape and that, combined with the general war pressure, made him crack. He had severe health problems and was in one of the most high-pressure positions given he was the boss/acting boss of that faction and still living in NYC. His knowledge of the new DiGregorio hierarchy suggests it was someone still close to what was going on in NYC even though he was clearly pro-Bonanno.

If both Bill Bonanno and LaBruzzo were informing, it could be further indication Joe Bonanno condoned it. Rat Trap noted that Bill Bonanno's first known cooperation is believed to have happened after a trip to Montreal when his father was "kidnapped". Joe Bonanno may have been in Montreal himself around that time, so interesting if Bill began informing soon after meeting with his father. Both Bill Bonanno and possibly Frank LaBruzzo cooperating suggests to me this could have been a strategy by Joe Bonanno himself.

It stands out too this informant blamed Magaddino and Tommy Lucchese for their problems -- that is similar to what Joe Bonanno himself said in his book which is further evidence this was someone close to Bonanno and shared the same views on the high-level backroom politics.
User avatar
thekiduknow
Full Patched
Posts: 1054
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 4:43 pm

Re: Frank LaBruzzo possible CI.

Post by thekiduknow »

My thoughts exactly B, you put it much more eloquently than I did lol.

I hadn’t thought about the bug, the FBI could have definitely used that to try and gain leverage.

I think that one of the tells an informant is Bill is that the informant keeps mentioning that if the FBI promises Joe only a year sentence, Bill will produce him “within five days”. It wouldn’t be far fetched to think this informant started for the same reason. Since Bill was so sure he could get Joe to reappear, it makes sense that Joe at least knew, if not directed, Bill and this other informant to work with the FBI.
User avatar
Ed
Straightened out
Posts: 445
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 3:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Frank LaBruzzo possible CI.

Post by Ed »

There are so few details available connected to NY 5297 that it's hard to build a good profile and make a positive ID, but you've done an excellent job. Cross-referencing dates from files on MF to other FBI files is all you're left with. LaBruzzo is definitely a strong candidate.

As B. stated, another Bonanno-relation sharing confidential information with law enforcement could be evidence of a deliberate strategy authorized by Joe B himself. However, it begs the question, what advantage he thought he would get from allowing certain supporters to cooperate secretly?

Mind you, Bill Bonanno never admitted he cooperated despite writing numerous books. It would have been easy for him to say he shared some confidential information with the FBI in the 1960s to win back his crime family, but he never did. Was that because it was too shameful, or because his father never authorized his cooperation?
User avatar
thekiduknow
Full Patched
Posts: 1054
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 4:43 pm

Re: Frank LaBruzzo possible CI.

Post by thekiduknow »

Thanks Ed.

If the plan was Joe for them to inform to try and get a lenient sentence for Joe, it doesn’t seem to have really worked. He didn’t plead guilty, and the trial dragged on for a few years.

I would guess that he felt it wouldn’t reflect well on him, or the image of the Bonanno’s they wanted to show. Their narrative is that they had an honorable thing that got corrupted and pushed them out. If Bill admitted to cooperating, it would shatter that image in my opinion.
B.
Men Of Mayhem
Posts: 10692
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 10:18 pm
Contact:

Re: Frank LaBruzzo possible CI.

Post by B. »

I think Bill was more motivated to keep up the appearance of mafia "honor" (a word used by Bill and Joe in their book titles), as the entire justification for the Bonannos' later public revelations was based on the idea that they were honorable mafiosi and their peers were not, which was also how they marketed themselves.

Unlike other ex-mafiosi, they didn't demonize the entire "life" and say it was without honor, they demonized their opponents and claimed the mafia was still honorable to those like themselves who upheld it. Would have completely wrecked their narrative if Bill admitted to being a CI.

On the January 1965 Magaddino tape, Stefano accuses Joe Bonanno of socializing and talking too openly with "sbirri" but I don't know what substance there is to that accusation. He makes it sound like Bonanno drank with LE figures and said too much, not that Bonanno was actually cooperating, but Magaddino knew Joe Bonanno arguably as well as anyone could and this could indicate Magaddino felt Joe Bonanno found value in friendly relationships with LE.

Joe Bonanno was also interviewed by an FBI agent for hours when he was hospitalized around the time he wrapped up his book. Would be interested to know what he told the agent. I've only seen a general overview referring to this, not the details of the discussion.

If Joe did endorse the cooperation of his son and even brother-in-law, Bill's insistence on using his cooperation to help his father's legal situation (as noted by Kiduknow) would be a big motivator. Having Joe Bonanno on the street without legal trouble would have greatly helped morale during the war in addition to whatever intel they could share about their opponents.

I imagine the truth died with Bill Bonanno.
B.
Men Of Mayhem
Posts: 10692
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 10:18 pm
Contact:

Re: Frank LaBruzzo possible CI.

Post by B. »

What's crazy to me is how most of the Bonanno faction were non-paesans / non-relatives, with the main loyalists being street criminals recruited by Carmine Galante. How would their perception have changed if they knew Bill was an FBI informant? Throw in LaBruzzo's possible cooperation and these other guys are basically throwing their lives away for a regime of egomaniacal "rats". Not to verge into real life politics, but it fits a time-honored pattern of peasants doing the bidding of manipulative elites.

When Sam DeCavlcante met with Bonanno loyalists at the start of the war he was recorded saying it was weird they kept insisting on calling JB their "Father" (like Bonanno does in his book). Joe Bonanno's leadership brings to mind the phrase "cult of personality".
User avatar
PolackTony
Filthy Few
Posts: 5829
Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 10:54 am
Location: NYC/Chicago

Re: Frank LaBruzzo possible CI.

Post by PolackTony »

B. wrote: Mon Sep 27, 2021 5:20 pm When Sam DeCavlcante met with Bonanno loyalists at the start of the war he was recorded saying it was weird they kept insisting on calling JB their "Father" (like Bonanno does in his book). Joe Bonanno's leadership brings to mind the phrase "cult of personality".
Thanks for citing this. I’ve wondered if Bonanno’s usage of “father” was just an affectation for posterity’s sake, centering his narrative and thus his own legitimacy on honor and ascriptive bonds (when, as you point above, his loyalist camp was largely derived from underworld criminal recruitment networks). Very interesting that this usage seems to have filtered out into his camp, though I wonder to what degree this “cult of personality” was in place prior to the split.

Also, big ups to TKUK, great detective work here Kid. The Bonannos are not my bailiwick, so I’m not able to contribute to the conversation, but informative and well-researched/reasoned posts like this make this forum what it is.
"Hey, hey, hey — this is America, baby! Survival of the fittest.”
User avatar
thekiduknow
Full Patched
Posts: 1054
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 4:43 pm

Re: Frank LaBruzzo possible CI.

Post by thekiduknow »

Thanks PolackTony.

I thought that too when reading his book, that he was exaggerating to show how well like he was.

DeCavalcante made that comment right after the Commission voted to remove Bonanno and his admin. He met with some representatives who were skeptical of the charges brought against Bonanno, Zicarelli being one of them. The way DeCavalcante talks about it, it sounds like the whole family was still behind Bonanno at this point. When talking to Sam one on one, Zicarelli argues on behalf of Bonanno. His arguments are based on basic loyalty to a boss/whether the Commission’s vote was even “legal”, rather than defending Bonanno himself. His opinion could reflect the feelings of the family at that point, that they were sticking with their boss.

Things really fall apart after Bonanno disappears, that's when the family starts to break and Gaspar becomes the new power. If Bonanno's disappearance was faked, it might have been what really drove the family apart. If he had stayed around, he might have had the family still supporting him.
Last edited by thekiduknow on Mon Sep 27, 2021 6:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Pogo The Clown
Men Of Mayhem
Posts: 14146
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 7:02 am

Re: Frank LaBruzzo possible CI.

Post by Pogo The Clown »

B. wrote: Mon Sep 27, 2021 5:20 pm Joe Bonanno's leadership brings to mind the phrase "cult of personality".

I know your anger, I know your dreams
I've been everything you want to be
Like Mussolini and Kennedy
I'm the cult of personality


Pogo
It's a new morning in America... fresh, vital. The old cynicism is gone. We have faith in our leaders. We're optimistic as to what becomes of it all. It really boils down to our ability to accept. We don't need pessimism. There are no limits.
User avatar
Angelo Santino
Filthy Few
Posts: 6564
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:15 am

Re: Frank LaBruzzo possible CI.

Post by Angelo Santino »

B. wrote: Mon Sep 27, 2021 5:20 pm What's crazy to me is how most of the Bonanno faction were non-paesans / non-relatives, with the main loyalists being street criminals recruited by Carmine Galante. How would their perception have changed if they knew Bill was an FBI informant? Throw in LaBruzzo's possible cooperation and these other guys are basically throwing their lives away for a regime of egomaniacal "rats". Not to verge into real life politics, but it fits a time-honored pattern of peasants doing the bidding of manipulative elites.

When Sam DeCavlcante met with Bonanno loyalists at the start of the war he was recorded saying it was weird they kept insisting on calling JB their "Father" (like Bonanno does in his book). Joe Bonanno's leadership brings to mind the phrase "cult of personality".
Similar to how Joe Morello and his relatives fell in with the non-traditionalists while most of the Corleonesi went Lucchese in the 1920's. Just throwing that out.
B.
Men Of Mayhem
Posts: 10692
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 10:18 pm
Contact:

Re: Frank LaBruzzo possible CI.

Post by B. »

thekiduknow wrote: Mon Sep 27, 2021 6:16 pm DeCavalcante made that comment right after the Commission voted to remove Bonanno and his admin. He met with some representatives who were skeptical of the charges brought against Bonanno, Zicarelli being one of them. The way DeCavalcante talks about it, it sounds like the whole family was still behind Bonanno at this point. When talking to Sam one on one, Zicarelli argues on behalf of Bonanno. His arguments are based on basic loyalty to a boss/whether the Commission’s vote was even “legal”, rather than defending Bonanno himself. His opinion could reflect the feelings of the family at that point, that they were sticking with their boss.
Yeah, it wasn't just the diehard loyalists who stayed with him into 1965-1968 that called him "Father", as Sam was talking about other top members who would soon switch sides. Zicarelli also calls Bonanno a "Father" repeatedly on the tapes. Sam's father Frank had been a close friend of Joe Bonanno and Angelo Caruso so it shows you the families have their own quirks that might not be known outside the family even among "friends".

Sam seemed incredulous that they insisited on calling the rappresentante their "Father" which is funny. Reminds me of Junior Gotti embarrassing other Gambino leaders by referring to John Gotti as "the Chief" to other families.

One of the reasons for Zicarelli's stance is he thought Bonanno was in trouble just for shelving Gaspare DiGregorio. DeCavalcante was trying to explain to him there was a whole mess of issues going back a few years (the move against Desimone, inducting members without approval, etc.). The DiGregorio issue seems like the straw that broke the camel's back because it turned Magaddino against him.
B.
Men Of Mayhem
Posts: 10692
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 10:18 pm
Contact:

Re: Frank LaBruzzo possible CI.

Post by B. »

Chris Christie wrote: Mon Sep 27, 2021 6:29 pm
B. wrote: Mon Sep 27, 2021 5:20 pm What's crazy to me is how most of the Bonanno faction were non-paesans / non-relatives, with the main loyalists being street criminals recruited by Carmine Galante. How would their perception have changed if they knew Bill was an FBI informant? Throw in LaBruzzo's possible cooperation and these other guys are basically throwing their lives away for a regime of egomaniacal "rats". Not to verge into real life politics, but it fits a time-honored pattern of peasants doing the bidding of manipulative elites.

When Sam DeCavlcante met with Bonanno loyalists at the start of the war he was recorded saying it was weird they kept insisting on calling JB their "Father" (like Bonanno does in his book). Joe Bonanno's leadership brings to mind the phrase "cult of personality".
Similar to how Joe Morello and his relatives fell in with the non-traditionalists while most of the Corleonesi went Lucchese in the 1920's. Just throwing that out.
Great comparison.

You can tell from the various 1960s bugs that bosses were terrified of another Morello-like situation happening, i.e. a former top boss pulling the strings using a proxy.

One of the arguments early in the war was to allow Joe Bonanno to retain recognition as an "amico nos" without any rank but they quickly shot that down and made sure he was shelved, likely because of the implications it had.

An argument could be made that Bonanno did succeed at influencing the Bonanno family until Carmine Galante's murder, which coincides with Bonanno finally giving up his attempts to get back involved in Cosa Nostra.
davidf1989
Sergeant Of Arms
Posts: 722
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:33 pm

Re: Frank LaBruzzo possible CI.

Post by davidf1989 »

thekiduknow wrote: Mon Sep 27, 2021 4:56 pm Thanks Ed.

If the plan was Joe for them to inform to try and get a lenient sentence for Joe, it doesn’t seem to have really worked. He didn’t plead guilty, and the trial dragged on for a few years.

I would guess that he felt it wouldn’t reflect well on him, or the image of the Bonanno’s they wanted to show. Their narrative is that they had an honorable thing that got corrupted and pushed them out. If Bill admitted to cooperating, it would shatter that image in my opinion.
Mobsters do cooperate when it suits them to remove their enemies or people that they don't like but they would keep their cooperation to themselves rather than talk about it or testify in court. Bulger denied being an informant at his trial and said that his handler made up the information in his file. While according to the article below Patrick Nee was thought to have talked to law enforcement about Bulger and Flemmi but he never testified.

http://archive.boston.com/news/local/ma ... ut_bulger/
User avatar
thekiduknow
Full Patched
Posts: 1054
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 4:43 pm

Re: Frank LaBruzzo possible CI.

Post by thekiduknow »

B. wrote: Mon Sep 27, 2021 6:39 pm
One of the reasons for Zicarelli's stance is he thought Bonanno was in trouble just for shelving Gaspare DiGregorio. DeCavalcante was trying to explain to him there was a whole mess of issues going back a few years (the move against Desimone, inducting members without approval, etc.). The DiGregorio issue seems like the straw that broke the camel's back because it turned Magaddino against him.
Even after the complaints became known, DeCavalcante says that representatives wondered they heard warranted Bonanno's removal. Zicarelli referred to the attempted takeover of California as a "rumor". DeCavalcante argued with them for hours trying to get them to meet with the Commission to hear the complaints in full. Whether they truly believed that accusations were complaints, or they were just too scared, isn't clear.

Notaro and DeFilippo talk about the meeting where DiGregorio is shelved, and from what they say Gaspar was voted out by the captains, rather than Bonanno alone.
Post Reply