Interesting I did not know that. I did know he did work with Corky Vastola in NJ and was present at that Lucchese family funeral for Joey Narrows or something it was in the Tribune years ago.Snakes wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 9:29 amHe owed 40k in juice loans to higher ups in Chicago so he skipped town until he got right with his debt. He stayed in New York from 1962-63 and did some hijacking and possibly made a few narcotics deals. He went back a few times over the next few years.SolarSolano wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 9:24 amWhen did Infelise stay in NYC? His power came through his wife's father Tony Capezio - I'm surprised if he was drifting into another family.Snakes wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 7:24 pm I don't know much about Del Duca but I realized he died in 1960, which predates Rocky's stay in New York, although that doesn't preclude them from association at an earlier time. Infelise was born in Wisconsin and moved to Chicago after he got out of the service so I'm not sure when he began his connection with New York.
General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
Moderator: Capos
-
- Full Patched
- Posts: 2175
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 8:23 am
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
If the guy's name isn't Rocky, he might be the "Frankie" described at the end as close to Giancana.
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
I was thinking Frankie was in reference to Frank Sinatra.
- PolackTony
- Filthy Few
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 10:54 am
- Location: NYC/Chicago
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
Bingo. It's relevant also that this convo was in the Sinatra file.
"Hey, hey, hey — this is America, baby! Survival of the fittest.”
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
Ah, that makes sense.PolackTony wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:12 pmBingo. It's relevant also that this convo was in the Sinatra file.
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
So they're asking why Frank Sinatra hasn't been straightened out yet.
(....)
(....)
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
anything is possible with the US mob....
Maybe we are looking in the wrong direction, meaning it might be a NY guy instead of a Chicago one?
Do not be deceived, neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God - Corinthians 6:9-10
- PolackTony
- Filthy Few
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 10:54 am
- Location: NYC/Chicago
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
“He’s been around so long, he should be made. He hears everything we talk about.”
Frank Sinatra — the singing Johnny Roselli.
"Hey, hey, hey — this is America, baby! Survival of the fittest.”
- PolackTony
- Filthy Few
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 10:54 am
- Location: NYC/Chicago
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
At this point who knows lol. All we know is that whoever he was, Chicago wasn’t going to make him because they didn’t make nobody over there.
If they did, they’d have to give him a Caddy and a house.
"Hey, hey, hey — this is America, baby! Survival of the fittest.”
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
Lol I think someone from Chicago was feeding these NY guys with false info, mainly because there were guys who were made in the Outfit during that same time period.PolackTony wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:07 pmAt this point who knows lol. All we know is that whoever he was, Chicago wasn’t going to make him because they didn’t make nobody over there.
If they did, they’d have to give him a Caddy and a house.
Do not be deceived, neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God - Corinthians 6:9-10
- PolackTony
- Filthy Few
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 10:54 am
- Location: NYC/Chicago
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
Sure, I don’t see this kind of chatter as reflecting any perfectly accurate info. But the broad strokes are probably correct. Chicago had a comparatively very small number of made men for the size and power of its syndicate, and they made guys relatively infrequently and sparingly (aside from the 1956 inductions, which was like the Taylor St faction Young Turk takeover).Villain wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:12 pmLol I think someone from Chicago was feeding these NY guys with false info, mainly because there were guys who were made in the Outfit during that same time period.PolackTony wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:07 pmAt this point who knows lol. All we know is that whoever he was, Chicago wasn’t going to make him because they didn’t make nobody over there.
If they did, they’d have to give him a Caddy and a house.
This info here was coming at the same time that the Feds thought Chicago had 300 members. My belief is that 50 actually wasn’t far off.
"Hey, hey, hey — this is America, baby! Survival of the fittest.”
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
I agree, although if we also count some of the surviving old Capone members, the number might get biggerPolackTony wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:18 pmSure, I don’t see this kind of chatter as reflecting any perfectly accurate info. But the broad strokes are probably correct. Chicago had a comparatively very small number of made men for the size and power of its syndicate, and they made guys relatively infrequently and sparingly (aside from the 1956 inductions, which was like the Taylor St faction Young Turk takeover).Villain wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:12 pmLol I think someone from Chicago was feeding these NY guys with false info, mainly because there were guys who were made in the Outfit during that same time period.PolackTony wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:07 pmAt this point who knows lol. All we know is that whoever he was, Chicago wasn’t going to make him because they didn’t make nobody over there.
If they did, they’d have to give him a Caddy and a house.
This info here was coming at the same time that the Feds thought Chicago had 300 members. My belief is that 50 actually wasn’t far off.
Do not be deceived, neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God - Corinthians 6:9-10
- PolackTony
- Filthy Few
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2020 10:54 am
- Location: NYC/Chicago
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
True, but my guess is somewhere between like 50 to 80ish made members at their peak.Villain wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:22 pmI agree, although if we also count some of the surviving old Capone members, the number might get biggerPolackTony wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:18 pmSure, I don’t see this kind of chatter as reflecting any perfectly accurate info. But the broad strokes are probably correct. Chicago had a comparatively very small number of made men for the size and power of its syndicate, and they made guys relatively infrequently and sparingly (aside from the 1956 inductions, which was like the Taylor St faction Young Turk takeover).Villain wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:12 pmLol I think someone from Chicago was feeding these NY guys with false info, mainly because there were guys who were made in the Outfit during that same time period.PolackTony wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:07 pmAt this point who knows lol. All we know is that whoever he was, Chicago wasn’t going to make him because they didn’t make nobody over there.
If they did, they’d have to give him a Caddy and a house.
This info here was coming at the same time that the Feds thought Chicago had 300 members. My belief is that 50 actually wasn’t far off.
"Hey, hey, hey — this is America, baby! Survival of the fittest.”
Re: General Chicago Outfit Info Dumping Ground
I doubt they meant the statement too literally -- they were basically saying Chicago was a smaller mafia organization (in terms of made members) that was exclusive about offering formal membership. This conversation follows the period where NYC members felt far too many unqualified members had been inducted in their own area, so Chicago's practices would have stood out to them.
Looking back at the transcript that was posted, is there other context on the next page that points to "Frankie" being Sinatra? They are talking about why the unidentified associate hasn't been made, and DeCarlo seems to bring up Giancana in that context, asking "What about Moonie?" He seems to be asking why Giancana doesn't induct the guy, and then points out that Giancana hangs around with "Frankie". Unless there is something that clearly points to Sinatra, I still think "Frankie" could be the name of the associate given the context of the conversation.
I know you said the file is in the Sinatra sub-section on Mary Ferrell, but plenty of random information ends up in those sub-sections that has nothing to do with the subject.
Looking back at the transcript that was posted, is there other context on the next page that points to "Frankie" being Sinatra? They are talking about why the unidentified associate hasn't been made, and DeCarlo seems to bring up Giancana in that context, asking "What about Moonie?" He seems to be asking why Giancana doesn't induct the guy, and then points out that Giancana hangs around with "Frankie". Unless there is something that clearly points to Sinatra, I still think "Frankie" could be the name of the associate given the context of the conversation.
I know you said the file is in the Sinatra sub-section on Mary Ferrell, but plenty of random information ends up in those sub-sections that has nothing to do with the subject.