Yup !johnny_scootch wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 6:12 pmI agree, well said.BobbyPazzo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 4:51 pmPlease don’t confuse me saying “it’s the principle” with me condoning their behavior. They do what they want. That’s it. The way they see it is that you owe Money, you didn’t pay, they won’t allow themselves to look like they’re being disrespected or worse that they are an easy mark, so they act irrationally to prove a point. If that doesn’t make sense to you then I don’t know what to tell you. No disrespect but this is why I don’t post much on here anymore. Everyone knows better and has something to say. I give my two cents here and there because I’ve been around a little bit and I’ve seen how these guys operate. Some people want this to make sense but it won’t makes sense to a sensible person because guys in the life are on another planet and do outrageous shit. But you got it pal. Stay safe. God bless.
These guys would take 40 cents off you a month if it came to that it's a power trip as much as it's about money and sometimes more so.
Did Peter Tuccio really torch a car for 400 bucks annual payment?
Moderator: Capos
-
- Straightened out
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 11:38 am
- Location: Essex and Passaic Counties, North Jersey
Re: Did Peter Tuccio really torch a car for 400 bucks annual payment?
Most of you wouldn't be comfortable in my playground.
-
- Straightened out
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2017 11:11 am
Re: Did Peter Tuccio really torch a car for 400 bucks annual payment?
i wish i could type a message this good, i always mess it upBobbyPazzo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 5:56 pmIt’s retarded. You’re right. We’re not dealing with a bunch of geniuses here for the most part. Of course there’s an exception with a few guys who are smart and know when it’s time to make a point and time to walk away but obviously this wasn’t that. It just doesn’t surprise me because I’ve met guys who have more money than God but would chase you down for fifty bucks. Them old timers had a package but would cry poverty. Then there’s guys who are broke and are just maniacs. Also someone said crash dummies. That’s exactly it too. Guys know these young guys glorify the life like it’s the fucking Godfather when it’s far from it and no one would piss on you if you were on fire. They use that to their advantage and that’s where a young kid does some shit to be down and gets a dime in the feds for it.OcSleeper wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 5:36 pm I thought the same when reading this. Like $400 a year is literally nothing. I get what thevother guy said about the principle but still $400 a year!! Why torch a car when there probably were less risky alternatives but either way one else shitbag on the street
- JeremyTheJew
- Full Patched
- Posts: 3208
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 10:08 pm
- Location: DETROIT
- Contact:
Re: Did Peter Tuccio really torch a car for 400 bucks annual payment?
Now.... did he get TOLD to torch the car??
See... I look at this all as... TUCCI IS A MORON.....and choose to torch it himself and got caught up on this rediculous thing bc it was in fact, rediculous.
Now at the same time.... you got this moron TUCCIO .... who is dick biting and sucking there dicks....
I wouldn't be surprised if they gave him these MINOR MINOR jobs (400 a year...) BECAUSE hes a fool.
Butttt it blew up on them and ended up becoming BIG problems.
Also.... this is probably exactly what someone like Tuccio needs. Joe Merlino did it plenty times.
Maybe hell come out and 10 years from now hes gonna be a capo
See... I look at this all as... TUCCI IS A MORON.....and choose to torch it himself and got caught up on this rediculous thing bc it was in fact, rediculous.
Now at the same time.... you got this moron TUCCIO .... who is dick biting and sucking there dicks....
I wouldn't be surprised if they gave him these MINOR MINOR jobs (400 a year...) BECAUSE hes a fool.
Butttt it blew up on them and ended up becoming BIG problems.
Also.... this is probably exactly what someone like Tuccio needs. Joe Merlino did it plenty times.
Maybe hell come out and 10 years from now hes gonna be a capo
HANG IT UP NICKY. ITS TIME TO GO HOME.
-
- Full Patched
- Posts: 2175
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 8:23 am
Re: Did Peter Tuccio really torch a car for 400 bucks annual payment?
I agree - no experienced criminal Tuccio was reporting to is going to torch that car.
Is Joe Cafe a rough guy? Penissi makes him out to sound pretty soft.
Is Joe Cafe a rough guy? Penissi makes him out to sound pretty soft.
-
- Full Patched
- Posts: 3052
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:48 am
Re: Did Peter Tuccio really torch a car for 400 bucks annual payment?
Tuccio did this as a favor trying to impress Iggy. Like any young guy on the street he was trying to build a rep but things went terribly wrong. Although now he’s in jail where there will be plenty of opportunities to show the wiseguys how tough he is.
-
- Full Patched
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:35 pm
Re: Did Peter Tuccio really torch a car for 400 bucks annual payment?
It's been said in different articles that it was was both $400 / month, and also $400 / year. The $400/year thing was what was initially reported back when Tuccio and them first got indicted. "Failing to make a $400 annual payment..."
What would make the most sense, not that it has to make sense, is that if the owner had something worked out to pay what amounted to $400/month in one shot, annually, at the end of the year - a little under $5000. Iggy could have helped the business owner out of a big jam, whether it was a fabricated jam in order to shake the guy down, or a real, legitimate problem. Or, Iggy could have gotten the guy out of a big debt. Or an issue with a vendor. Or an issue with an employee. Hell, Iggy could have donned an apron back in the day and was making pizzas there for free when the guy was trying to get the business off the ground. Or it could have been one of these long standing generational type of tribute payments where back in the day they worked something out in order for the place to open in that specific neighborhood; a territorial thing. But I'm assuming the $400 figure was monthly, lumped together in one payment annually.
I'd bet a million bucks this wasn't a situation where Alogna sent his crew to just walk in and tell the owner 'you're with us now and we'll be back for $400 a month, every month' - the owner probably had a reason to be paying and just ended up balking because he either got tired of it, felt he had paid his debt multiple times over, simply had a bad year, or no longer took serious the people Alogna had on the street for him. But these guys don't pick businesses out of the white pages to start shaking down, almost always we see a reason for it where the owner benefitted from the relationship with LCN at one point in time. It sounds sick, but it's understandable they did what they did. At least they didn't physically hurt or kill the guy or do anything worse to his business. Look what happened to that other Pizza shop owner not too far away in Queens about 10 years ago. Some low rung Gambino associate / drug dealer sent some black kids to rob the weekend receipts and they ended up accidentally killing the old man.
What would make the most sense, not that it has to make sense, is that if the owner had something worked out to pay what amounted to $400/month in one shot, annually, at the end of the year - a little under $5000. Iggy could have helped the business owner out of a big jam, whether it was a fabricated jam in order to shake the guy down, or a real, legitimate problem. Or, Iggy could have gotten the guy out of a big debt. Or an issue with a vendor. Or an issue with an employee. Hell, Iggy could have donned an apron back in the day and was making pizzas there for free when the guy was trying to get the business off the ground. Or it could have been one of these long standing generational type of tribute payments where back in the day they worked something out in order for the place to open in that specific neighborhood; a territorial thing. But I'm assuming the $400 figure was monthly, lumped together in one payment annually.
I'd bet a million bucks this wasn't a situation where Alogna sent his crew to just walk in and tell the owner 'you're with us now and we'll be back for $400 a month, every month' - the owner probably had a reason to be paying and just ended up balking because he either got tired of it, felt he had paid his debt multiple times over, simply had a bad year, or no longer took serious the people Alogna had on the street for him. But these guys don't pick businesses out of the white pages to start shaking down, almost always we see a reason for it where the owner benefitted from the relationship with LCN at one point in time. It sounds sick, but it's understandable they did what they did. At least they didn't physically hurt or kill the guy or do anything worse to his business. Look what happened to that other Pizza shop owner not too far away in Queens about 10 years ago. Some low rung Gambino associate / drug dealer sent some black kids to rob the weekend receipts and they ended up accidentally killing the old man.