Did Siegel and Cohen really have that much power? I mean, do keep in mind that Dragna and his crew were systematically eliminating Cohen's associates and nothing ever came of it.Grouchy Sinatra wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:55 pmBut Bugsy and Cohen did wield that kind of power, and their crew was never big.Pogo The Clown wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:24 pm I don't think they ever got close to that. The city of LA was just too big and they were always too small to really wield that sort of power on the streets.
Pogo
Los Angeles odds & ends
Moderator: Capos
Re: Los Angeles odds & ends
- Pogo The Clown
- Men Of Mayhem
- Posts: 14139
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 7:02 am
Re: Los Angeles odds & ends
Adam wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:09 amDid Siegel and Cohen really have that much power? I mean, do keep in mind that Dragna and his crew were systematically eliminating Cohen's associates and nothing ever came of it.Grouchy Sinatra wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:55 pmBut Bugsy and Cohen did wield that kind of power, and their crew was never big.Pogo The Clown wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:24 pm I don't think they ever got close to that. The city of LA was just too big and they were always too small to really wield that sort of power on the streets.
Pogo
Yeah that is correct. They had their slice of the pie but were never "the power" as evidenced by what you said.
I have no idea about Cascio but from what Ed wrote it sounds like Piscopo identified him as a member. Thanks for the other info.
Piscopo said Thomas Palermo had never been a particularly active member of the crime family. His brother-in-law and fellow member John Cascio owned a winery that was sometimes used for meetings and initiation ceremonies.
http://mafiahistory.us/rattrap/salvatorepiscopo.html
It's a new morning in America... fresh, vital. The old cynicism is gone. We have faith in our leaders. We're optimistic as to what becomes of it all. It really boils down to our ability to accept. We don't need pessimism. There are no limits.
- Angelo Santino
- Filthy Few
- Posts: 6564
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:15 am
Re: Los Angeles odds & ends
Best scene ever. Richard Serafian as Dragna knocked it out of the park.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Full Patched
- Posts: 3044
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:48 am
Re: Los Angeles odds & ends
A soldier could transfer between two crime families if he had the permission of both bosses. Piscopo gave the example of former Los Angles Crime Family member Charles Battaglia who transferred his membership to the Arizona group led by Joseph Bonanno. (Battaglia would later regret the transfer.)johnny_scootch wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:43 am Borgia was "made" in the late 1940s. Piscopo indicated Borgia had been inducted into the crime family for the financial help he might give rather than for any criminal help he might provide.
Sounds a lot like Dominic Longo, seems like the LA family made some of it’s own Italian extortion victims and even kept extorting them afterwards although it would be considered ‘tribute’ at that point.
Wouldn't this be impossible unless the Bonanno/Tucson group was officially recognized by Cosa Nostra?
- motorfab
- Full Patched
- Posts: 2712
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2017 2:07 am
- Location: Grenoble, France
- Contact:
Re: Los Angeles odds & ends
It was a crew of the Bonanno Crime Family at the time, not an autonomous organization like Bonanno would have wanted after the Banana War (I don't know if that answers your question exactly ?)johnny_scootch wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:49 amA soldier could transfer between two crime families if he had the permission of both bosses. Piscopo gave the example of former Los Angles Crime Family member Charles Battaglia who transferred his membership to the Arizona group led by Joseph Bonanno. (Battaglia would later regret the transfer.)johnny_scootch wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:43 am Borgia was "made" in the late 1940s. Piscopo indicated Borgia had been inducted into the crime family for the financial help he might give rather than for any criminal help he might provide.
Sounds a lot like Dominic Longo, seems like the LA family made some of it’s own Italian extortion victims and even kept extorting them afterwards although it would be considered ‘tribute’ at that point.
Wouldn't this be impossible unless the Bonanno/Tucson group was officially recognized by Cosa Nostra?
- Pogo The Clown
- Men Of Mayhem
- Posts: 14139
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 7:02 am
Re: Los Angeles odds & ends
It would have been like Rochester. Members of a family in another city who broke off and did their own thing. Bill
Bonanno talks about in his book how after the war several loyalists members in NY moved to Arizona to be with them. He gave a number but I forgot what it was but it was around 20 or so. Previously the Bonannos had a Crew in Arizona which Bill had been Capo of.
Pogo
Bonanno talks about in his book how after the war several loyalists members in NY moved to Arizona to be with them. He gave a number but I forgot what it was but it was around 20 or so. Previously the Bonannos had a Crew in Arizona which Bill had been Capo of.
Pogo
It's a new morning in America... fresh, vital. The old cynicism is gone. We have faith in our leaders. We're optimistic as to what becomes of it all. It really boils down to our ability to accept. We don't need pessimism. There are no limits.
-
- Full Patched
- Posts: 3044
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:48 am
Re: Los Angeles odds & ends
The article states he transferred to the Tucson group led by Joe Bonanno, so if this was prior to Bonanno being ousted it was a transfer to the Bonanno family. If it was after Bonanno had been banished it wasn't in effect a transfer but rather Battaglia almost self exiling himself because no one under Bonanno in Tucson was recognized by the rest of Cosa Nostra.Pogo The Clown wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:52 am It would have been like Rochester. Members of a family in another city who broke off and did their own thing. Bill
Bonanno talks about in his book how after the war several loyalists members in NY moved to Arizona to be with them. He gave a number but I forgot what it was but it was around 20 or so. Previously the Bonannos had a Crew in Arizona which Bill had been Capo of.
Pogo
- motorfab
- Full Patched
- Posts: 2712
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2017 2:07 am
- Location: Grenoble, France
- Contact:
Re: Los Angeles odds & ends
Ok. Actually he transferred in 1956 when DeSimone passed Boss and he came back to the L.A. borgata in 1967 or 1968 after the banana war. So during the 50's-mid 60's the Arizona group was recognized as an official crew of the Bonanno Crime Family
Re: Los Angeles odds & ends
His uncle was early boss Rosario Desimone and he was part of that relation tree. Not surprised Fratianno wasn't impressed given he had been plotting against Palermo's cousin Frank Desimone the entire time Desimone was boss. Details from up above:Chris Christie wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:42 am Is there more info on Tommy Palermo? He's another one who Fratianno wasn't impressed with, "where the hell they get this guy from?"
As for Battaglia, Bompensiero said he was trying to transfer back to Los Angeles as of August 1968 but was having trouble because of the Bonanno group's status:B. wrote: Tommy Palermo was also a cousin of Frank Desimone and Dallas boss Joe Civello. The LA Desimones / Palermos, Dallas Civellos / Mussos, and SF Lanzas were all related either by blood or marriage. Rosario Desimone also married a woman from Lucca Sicula in Pueblo before going to LA... can't connect her surname, but it's likely she was connected to the mafia there given that family was all from Lucca Sicula.
Did Fratianno or anyone else actually say Longo was something like an extortion victim aside from him being good for a "touch" now and again? Look back at the long post about Longo on the last page. He appears to have been part of a well-connected family in the Ontario / Buffalo underworld and was on record with Los Angeles by 1964.johnny_scootch wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:43 am Borgia was "made" in the late 1940s. Piscopo indicated Borgia had been inducted into the crime family for the financial help he might give rather than for any criminal help he might provide.
Sounds a lot like Dominic Longo, seems like the LA family made some of it’s own Italian extortion victims and even kept extorting them afterwards although it would be considered ‘tribute’ at that point.
Longo employed Brooklier and other LA figures in small jobs, so the "touch" comment may have involved that. They very well may have been using him, though I'm thinking there is more to the story as far as his membership in LA goes.
Curious about Cascio. DeCavalcante member Joseph Lolordo married a Cascio in Los Angeles in the 1920s before going to Chicago and then NYC.
Last edited by B. on Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Los Angeles odds & ends
"COSCIO [sic], while not a member of the Los Angeles brugad..."Pogo The Clown wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:50 amAdam wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:09 amDid Siegel and Cohen really have that much power? I mean, do keep in mind that Dragna and his crew were systematically eliminating Cohen's associates and nothing ever came of it.Grouchy Sinatra wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:55 pmBut Bugsy and Cohen did wield that kind of power, and their crew was never big.Pogo The Clown wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:24 pm I don't think they ever got close to that. The city of LA was just too big and they were always too small to really wield that sort of power on the streets.
Pogo
Yeah that is correct. They had their slice of the pie but were never "the power" as evidenced by what you said.
I have no idea about Cascio but from what Ed wrote it sounds like Piscopo identified him as a member. Thanks for the other info.
Piscopo said Thomas Palermo had never been a particularly active member of the crime family. His brother-in-law and fellow member John Cascio owned a winery that was sometimes used for meetings and initiation ceremonies.
http://mafiahistory.us/rattrap/salvatorepiscopo.html
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.htm ... 9&tab=page
- Pogo The Clown
- Men Of Mayhem
- Posts: 14139
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 7:02 am
Re: Los Angeles odds & ends
Thanks for clearing this up.
Pogo
Pogo
It's a new morning in America... fresh, vital. The old cynicism is gone. We have faith in our leaders. We're optimistic as to what becomes of it all. It really boils down to our ability to accept. We don't need pessimism. There are no limits.
Re: Los Angeles odds & ends
Antiliar wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:21 pm"COSCIO [sic], while not a member of the Los Angeles brugad..."Pogo The Clown wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:50 amAdam wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:09 amDid Siegel and Cohen really have that much power? I mean, do keep in mind that Dragna and his crew were systematically eliminating Cohen's associates and nothing ever came of it.Grouchy Sinatra wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:55 pmBut Bugsy and Cohen did wield that kind of power, and their crew was never big.Pogo The Clown wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:24 pm I don't think they ever got close to that. The city of LA was just too big and they were always too small to really wield that sort of power on the streets.
Pogo
Yeah that is correct. They had their slice of the pie but were never "the power" as evidenced by what you said.
I have no idea about Cascio but from what Ed wrote it sounds like Piscopo identified him as a member. Thanks for the other info.
Piscopo said Thomas Palermo had never been a particularly active member of the crime family. His brother-in-law and fellow member John Cascio owned a winery that was sometimes used for meetings and initiation ceremonies.
http://mafiahistory.us/rattrap/salvatorepiscopo.html
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.htm ... 9&tab=page
I linked to the same FBI document in my article.
But five years later, in 1968, Piscopo stated Cascio was a member(or at the very least, the FBI said Piscopo said Cascio was a member.) So I went with the latest info regarding his membership. (Of course, maybe Piscopo was correct in 1963 and wrong in 1968.)
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.htm ... 4&tab=page
(T-6 is Piscopo)
I should have included the second link in the article to be clearer. I can see where a reader, if he checked the endnote, would be confused. Sometimes when I edit articles I cut endnotes that I think at the time are extraneous but in hindsight are not. I hope no one feels I tried to mislead them.
My article was about what Piscopo told the FBI, but at the time I was writing, I was probably influenced by a 1977 report from the Organized Crime & Criminal Intelligence Branch of the California Department of Justice that also states Cascio was a member.
As an aside, here are Cascio's details from the 1977 report.
John Cascio
AKA: John Collura, Mike Calder
DOB: 3-1-04 Palermo, Sicily
PHY: 5'5 150# Brown eyes, Grey hair
CII: 32 844
FBI: 184009
CDL: V345891
LKA: 9421 Stokes Ave, Downey, CA
OCC: Winery Owner
Cascio allegedly immigrated to US from Sicily in 1925. He bought the Big Tree Winery in 1947. The winery was doing $900,000 in sales annually by 1971.
Cascio was arrested in 1928 for possession of a still. Charge was dismissed. The report indicates he was alive in 1977 but it isn't always accurate.
Pogo, thanks for linking to my article.
Antiliar, thanks for keeping me on my toes.
Re: Los Angeles odds & ends
That's a great article on Dago Louie Piscopo. I thought this particular paragraph on LT Dragna was interesting. Seems like it wasn't only Jimmy Fratianno who resented him...
Former consigliere, Tom Dragna, lived in Las Vegas. Dragna had fallen out of favor with the new leadership and was mostly retired. [55] Piscopo said that "resentment" had built up among members during the last few years of Jack Dragna's time as boss as it became apparent that Jack and Tom Dragna were "grooming" Tom's son Louis Tom Dragna for "leadership" in the crime family. [56] This didn't sit well with other members because Louis Tom Dragna had never "proved" himself. Piscopo said he "had no particular abilities." [57] After Jack Dragna died in 1956, the resentment spilled out into the open and the new leadership decided to hold a "trial" for Tom Dragna and his son. They were found guilty and were sentenced to death. According to Piscopo, only the intervention of New York crime boss Thomas Lucchese saved their lives. According to Piscopo, Desimone and Licata were still concerned about Louis Tom Dragna's ambitions into the 1960s. Joseph Dippolito, Dragna's caporegime, was under instructions to keep on an eye on him and to report back any suspicious activity.
Copied from: http://mafiahistory.us/rattrap/salvatorepiscopo.html
The article also included a photo of the oft mentioned Tommy Palermo. I don't think I ever saw it before. Thanks Ed.
Former consigliere, Tom Dragna, lived in Las Vegas. Dragna had fallen out of favor with the new leadership and was mostly retired. [55] Piscopo said that "resentment" had built up among members during the last few years of Jack Dragna's time as boss as it became apparent that Jack and Tom Dragna were "grooming" Tom's son Louis Tom Dragna for "leadership" in the crime family. [56] This didn't sit well with other members because Louis Tom Dragna had never "proved" himself. Piscopo said he "had no particular abilities." [57] After Jack Dragna died in 1956, the resentment spilled out into the open and the new leadership decided to hold a "trial" for Tom Dragna and his son. They were found guilty and were sentenced to death. According to Piscopo, only the intervention of New York crime boss Thomas Lucchese saved their lives. According to Piscopo, Desimone and Licata were still concerned about Louis Tom Dragna's ambitions into the 1960s. Joseph Dippolito, Dragna's caporegime, was under instructions to keep on an eye on him and to report back any suspicious activity.
Copied from: http://mafiahistory.us/rattrap/salvatorepiscopo.html
The article also included a photo of the oft mentioned Tommy Palermo. I don't think I ever saw it before. Thanks Ed.
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize
-
- Full Patched
- Posts: 3044
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:48 am
Re: Los Angeles odds & ends
You're right the "soft touch" comment is probably not 100% true because in the same breath Pete Milano says that Longo did a piece of work with Peanuts Tronolone, so he was at least capable of taking part in a murder. Longo was also important enough (probably because of those familial connections you mentioned) to be sent as an emissary of Brooklier to Detroit with Sam Sciortino to explain to them that Frattiano was misrepresenting himself as acting Boss of LA. On the other hand if we are to believe Frattiano's account of this meeting Milano calling him a soft touch and laughing about taking money off him once in a while in front of the top members of the family doesn't speak well for his reputation locally.B. wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:20 pm
Did Fratianno or anyone else actually say Longo was something like an extortion victim aside from him being good for a "touch" now and again? Look back at the long post about Longo on the last page. He appears to have been part of a well-connected family in the Ontario / Buffalo underworld and was on record with Los Angeles by 1964.
Longo employed Brooklier and other LA figures in small jobs, so the "touch" comment may have involved that. They very well may have been using him, though I'm thinking there is more to the story as far as his membership in LA goes.
Re: Los Angeles odds & ends
Good points all around. Though with the last part, these guys are prone to so much backbiting it is hard to say how it all worked out in reality.johnny_scootch wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:52 pmYou're right the "soft touch" comment is probably not 100% true because in the same breath Pete Milano says that Longo did a piece of work with Peanuts Tronolone, so he was at least capable of taking part in a murder. Longo was also important enough (probably because of those familial connections you mentioned) to be sent as an emissary of Brooklier to Detroit with Sam Sciortino to explain to them that Frattiano was misrepresenting himself as acting Boss of LA. On the other hand if we are to believe Frattiano's account of this meeting Milano calling him a soft touch and laughing about taking money off him once in a while in front of the top members of the family doesn't speak well for his reputation locally.B. wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:20 pm
Did Fratianno or anyone else actually say Longo was something like an extortion victim aside from him being good for a "touch" now and again? Look back at the long post about Longo on the last page. He appears to have been part of a well-connected family in the Ontario / Buffalo underworld and was on record with Los Angeles by 1964.
Longo employed Brooklier and other LA figures in small jobs, so the "touch" comment may have involved that. They very well may have been using him, though I'm thinking there is more to the story as far as his membership in LA goes.
Did Fratianno say Brooklier sent Longo and Sciortino to Detroit to spread word about Fratianno? Had Fratianno misrepresented himself to Detroit or were they just keeping them in the loop on LA politics? I appreciate you refreshing me on all of this.