Pogo The Clown wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 9:16 am Santo Traficante is the Boss of Florida. He sits on the fucking Commission did you know that?
This was line from Donnie Brasco for those who missed it.
Pogo
Moderator: Capos
Pogo The Clown wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 9:16 am Santo Traficante is the Boss of Florida. He sits on the fucking Commission did you know that?
https://maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?do ... rdo_lanskymotorfab wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 10:01 amExactly.Homerthedog wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 9:58 am I believe Meyer Lansky could attend Commission meetings and give advice at least during the reigns of Luciano and Costello. Some people confuse the Italian-Jewish confederation formed in 1929 with the Cosa Nostra Commission.
Nepa31 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 8:31 am100% spot onmaxiestern11 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 3:13 pmFrom time to time as the need arises, anyone can be designated as a “representative” for the commission. DeCavalcante was indeed just that during the 1960’s. Specifically Sam was tapped by Carlo among others to reach out and speak to Bonanno and various members as an “extension” of the commission itself. When that’s done, the person so designated is in fact a “member” of the particular mini-Commission relative to the issue at hand.thekiduknow wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 12:10 pm DeCavalcante was used as a messenger during the early 1960s between Bonanno and the Commission. I don’t think he had a seat, but from what I gather he often spoke for them, along with Zerilli and Bruno, who were members.
I dont know who CG T-3 is..could be PIerce...could be Fratto or maybe some other fella from another family associated with the Outfit at the time...but he also mentions "the big round table". Im not pushing anything here since believe me that I also dismiss Lansky as commission member but Im just posting the strange infos which at least needs to be looked atB. wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 1:28 pm Avugad/avugat/avvocato is used by a number of guys on tapes back then... the translation is "lawyer" and is used loosely, probably in the literal sense as an "advocate" on a certain issue. It was on the list of terms they asked informants about and the response was that it did not refer to any formal position in Cosa Nostra.
Meyer Lansky was an incredibly influential associate. Associates can still attend sitdowns when a matter concerns them, so I'd assume the same idea is true at higher levels. No doubt not all associates are created equal.
Rockman was invited to quite a few sit downs in Chicago, Milwaukee & KC regarding the skim. Rockman was well respected.B. wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 2:55 pm Yeah, going back to the Lonardo testimony, he talks about Rockman in Cleveland being included and consulted in high-level mafia matters. We have recordings of made guys talking to associates (Italian and non-Italian) about promotions, titles, etc. in the organization. Would be no surprise if people were open with Lansky about everything and that he pushed the limits of the word "associate".
I do believe Lansky sat in on many high level meetings as it applied to him or his dealings with top members (commission members per se).... but I DO NOT believe he would have ever been allowed to actually sit in on a formal “commission” meeting of multiple family heads (7-9 top bosses) ...... just my opinion. He was still an associate. And Jewish at that! ..... only the heads “per se” sit at that level although others, members and associates alike are utilized for commission business. Especially in the old days where things and the structure was more formalized.B. wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 2:55 pm Yeah, going back to the Lonardo testimony, he talks about Rockman in Cleveland being included and consulted in high-level mafia matters. We have recordings of made guys talking to associates (Italian and non-Italian) about promotions, titles, etc. in the organization. Would be no surprise if people were open with Lansky about everything and that he pushed the limits of the word "associate".
My theory is that Lansky was recognized as the head of the "Jewish Mafia." He represented Moe Dalitz, David Berman, Morris Rosen, Ice Pick Willie Alderman, and others as sort of a nationwide crew of Jewish mobsters. If there was a beef between Mafia members and Jewish mobsters, Lansky would represent them.B. wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 1:28 pm Avugad/avugat/avvocato is used by a number of guys on tapes back then... the translation is "lawyer" and is used loosely, probably in the literal sense as an "advocate" on a certain issue. It was on the list of terms they asked informants about and the response was that it did not refer to any formal position in Cosa Nostra.
Meyer Lansky was an incredibly influential associate. Associates can still attend sitdowns when a matter concerns them, so I'd assume the same idea is true at higher levels. No doubt not all associates are created equal.
Agreed.... and much of that power emanated from his close friendship with Luciano and Costello..... and the Jewish racketeers looked up to him as their “rabbi”Antiliar wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 4:22 pmMy theory is that Lansky was recognized as the head of the "Jewish Mafia." He represented Moe Dalitz, David Berman, Morris Rosen, Ice Pick Willie Alderman, and others as sort of a nationwide crew of Jewish mobsters. If there was a beef between Mafia members and Jewish mobsters, Lansky would represent them.B. wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 1:28 pm Avugad/avugat/avvocato is used by a number of guys on tapes back then... the translation is "lawyer" and is used loosely, probably in the literal sense as an "advocate" on a certain issue. It was on the list of terms they asked informants about and the response was that it did not refer to any formal position in Cosa Nostra.
Meyer Lansky was an incredibly influential associate. Associates can still attend sitdowns when a matter concerns them, so I'd assume the same idea is true at higher levels. No doubt not all associates are created equal.
Another example would have been the Commission meeting in late 1946 or early 1947 to resolve the Bugsy Siegel issue at the Flamingo. I guess the Commission consulted Lansky out of respect and because it had to approve a hit on a boss, even if not an Italian one but one closely associated with them. Just like Dutch Schultz in 1935.maxiestern11 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 4:01 pmI do believe Lansky sat in on many high level meetings as it applied to him or his dealings with top members (commission members per se).... but I DO NOT believe he would have ever been allowed to actually sit in on a formal “commission” meeting of multiple family heads (7-9 top bosses) ...... just my opinion. He was still an associate. And Jewish at that! ..... only the heads “per se” sit at that level although others, members and associates alike are utilized for commission business. Especially in the old days where things and the structure was more formalized.B. wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 2:55 pm Yeah, going back to the Lonardo testimony, he talks about Rockman in Cleveland being included and consulted in high-level mafia matters. We have recordings of made guys talking to associates (Italian and non-Italian) about promotions, titles, etc. in the organization. Would be no surprise if people were open with Lansky about everything and that he pushed the limits of the word "associate".
If anything, “sitdowns” relative to Casinos in Cuba, Vegas, Bahamas etc., I think is where he may have had to interact at a higher level if simply because of his knowledge relative to same.... he was often at the helm of those gambling operations so his “input” would have been required..... if he did sit at a commission meet, the conversation would have been restricted to the particular subject he was needed for and then he would have been excused from the table ..... for sure!!
I’d have to agree with you on that oneHomerthedog wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 8:00 pmAnother example would have been the Commission meeting in late 1946 or early 1947 to resolve the Bugsy Siegel issue at the Flamingo. I guess the Commission consulted Lansky out of respect and because it had to approve a hit on a boss, even if not an Italian one but one closely associated with them. Just like Dutch Schultz in 1935.maxiestern11 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 4:01 pmI do believe Lansky sat in on many high level meetings as it applied to him or his dealings with top members (commission members per se).... but I DO NOT believe he would have ever been allowed to actually sit in on a formal “commission” meeting of multiple family heads (7-9 top bosses) ...... just my opinion. He was still an associate. And Jewish at that! ..... only the heads “per se” sit at that level although others, members and associates alike are utilized for commission business. Especially in the old days where things and the structure was more formalized.B. wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 2:55 pm Yeah, going back to the Lonardo testimony, he talks about Rockman in Cleveland being included and consulted in high-level mafia matters. We have recordings of made guys talking to associates (Italian and non-Italian) about promotions, titles, etc. in the organization. Would be no surprise if people were open with Lansky about everything and that he pushed the limits of the word "associate".
If anything, “sitdowns” relative to Casinos in Cuba, Vegas, Bahamas etc., I think is where he may have had to interact at a higher level if simply because of his knowledge relative to same.... he was often at the helm of those gambling operations so his “input” would have been required..... if he did sit at a commission meet, the conversation would have been restricted to the particular subject he was needed for and then he would have been excused from the table ..... for sure!!
You might be onto something here, since Ive seen references regarding Chicago Jewish gangsters such as Vogel and Larner being closely associated with Lansky, but Ive never seen anything on Guzik or any other high profile fella being connected to him. Although I think that Chicago's Jewish faction didnt need any protection from Lansky since few of them had the Outfit's membership for themselves. BUT as I already stated that you might be onto something here since many of the non-Italian gangsters had bases of their own, like for example Gus Alex controlled all Greek bookies or loan sharks from around the Chicago area and so on the Outfit's round table he was responsible for them. So it is possible that Lansky attended few commission meetings regarding the interests of some high profile non-Italian gangsters who were involved with the Mafia, as a different faction or something like that.Antiliar wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 4:22 pmMy theory is that Lansky was recognized as the head of the "Jewish Mafia." He represented Moe Dalitz, David Berman, Morris Rosen, Ice Pick Willie Alderman, and others as sort of a nationwide crew of Jewish mobsters. If there was a beef between Mafia members and Jewish mobsters, Lansky would represent them.B. wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 1:28 pm Avugad/avugat/avvocato is used by a number of guys on tapes back then... the translation is "lawyer" and is used loosely, probably in the literal sense as an "advocate" on a certain issue. It was on the list of terms they asked informants about and the response was that it did not refer to any formal position in Cosa Nostra.
Meyer Lansky was an incredibly influential associate. Associates can still attend sitdowns when a matter concerns them, so I'd assume the same idea is true at higher levels. No doubt not all associates are created equal.