Buffalo/Ontario Mob Acitivity

Discuss all mafia families in the U.S., Canada, Italy, and everywhere else in the world.

Moderator: Capos

Post Reply
User avatar
SILENT PARTNERZ
Full Patched
Posts: 1211
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 9:14 am

Re: Buffalo/Ontario Mob Acitivity

Post by SILENT PARTNERZ »

Moscone65 wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2018 8:58 am
bosslt wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2018 6:37 am I think the fact that Violi got made underboss two years after being made really tells all you need to know about the viability of the Buffalo family.
Why? He is of age, probably has a lot of sway in Hamilton, he's got his own guys, and they need someone on that side of the border to manage things there. Who else would be more qualified for the job? Sure he was only made in the Buffalo family 2 years before, but surely the has had a large mafia family pedigree, and who knows if he was also made as a 'ndranghetisti.
Good point- Big Joe would want someone in Hamilton to oversee
the members/activity. Making Dom UB gives Dom the power
necessary to control activity. Gives Big Joe the ability to remain
in the background which he clearly wants.
'three can keep a secret, if two are dead'
scagghiuni
Full Patched
Posts: 1140
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 7:04 am

Re: Buffalo/Ontario Mob Acitivity

Post by scagghiuni »

in a small family it is possible a made man is promoted to underboss in a little while
if buffalo family is viable (like wiretaps seems to proof) has 30 members at most, mainly in canada, the fact is not a big family like the ny ones it doesn't mean it can't be viable, you don't need 200 members like the gambino's
User avatar
cavita
Full Patched
Posts: 1969
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 10:04 am

Re: Buffalo/Ontario Mob Acitivity

Post by cavita »

scagghiuni wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2018 10:35 am in a small family it is possible a made man is promoted to underboss in a little while
if buffalo family is viable (like wiretaps seems to proof) has 30 members at most, mainly in canada, the fact is not a big family like the ny ones it doesn't mean it can't be viable, you don't need 200 members like the gambino's
Frank Buscemi was made a Rockford LCN member in May 1959 and was made underboss in October 1961. Of course, his sister was married to the son of boss Joe Zammuto which probably had something to do with his quick rise.
Adam
Sergeant Of Arms
Posts: 670
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2016 2:20 pm
Location: East Lansing

Re: Buffalo/Ontario Mob Acitivity

Post by Adam »

Moscone65 wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2018 8:59 am It's not as bad as Ralph Natale going from associate to made then immediately boss. Lightning rod or not, he was still "boss".
But even before Natale stuff like that happened in Philadelphia. Joe Cincaglini Jr. was made in 1991 and he was made underboss in 1992 right? And while I don't personally buy this, Freselone claimed that he was going to be made underboss after being made in 1990. Along with being immediately made captain after getting made. But like I said, I don't buy Freselone's claim. I find it suspicious that those conversations weren't recorded.
Cheech
Full Patched
Posts: 4427
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 9:42 am

Re: Buffalo/Ontario Mob Acitivity

Post by Cheech »

did we ever get the indictment for this where it has the wiretap info?
Salude!
Moscone65
Sergeant Of Arms
Posts: 867
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 9:44 pm

Re: Buffalo/Ontario Mob Acitivity

Post by Moscone65 »

SILENT PARTNERZ wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2018 9:40 am
Moscone65 wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2018 8:58 am
bosslt wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2018 6:37 am I think the fact that Violi got made underboss two years after being made really tells all you need to know about the viability of the Buffalo family.
Why? He is of age, probably has a lot of sway in Hamilton, he's got his own guys, and they need someone on that side of the border to manage things there. Who else would be more qualified for the job? Sure he was only made in the Buffalo family 2 years before, but surely the has had a large mafia family pedigree, and who knows if he was also made as a 'ndranghetisti.
Good point- Big Joe would want someone in Hamilton to oversee
the members/activity. Making Dom UB gives Dom the power
necessary to control activity. Gives Big Joe the ability to remain
in the background which he clearly wants.
Exactly!
Moscone65
Sergeant Of Arms
Posts: 867
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 9:44 pm

Re: Buffalo/Ontario Mob Acitivity

Post by Moscone65 »

Adam wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2018 10:48 am
Moscone65 wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2018 8:59 am It's not as bad as Ralph Natale going from associate to made then immediately boss. Lightning rod or not, he was still "boss".
But even before Natale stuff like that happened in Philadelphia. Joe Cincaglini Jr. was made in 1991 and he was made underboss in 1992 right? And while I don't personally buy this, Freselone claimed that he was going to be made underboss after being made in 1990. Along with being immediately made captain after getting made. But like I said, I don't buy Freselone's claim. I find it suspicious that those conversations weren't recorded.
To be honest, after Bruno was killed, things really started going down hill in Philly. Not in activity per say, moreso in organization and smart choices. The only guy that comes to mind that was a solid wiseguy for a leadership position is Ligambi.
User avatar
SILENT PARTNERZ
Full Patched
Posts: 1211
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 9:14 am

Re: Buffalo/Ontario Mob Acitivity

Post by SILENT PARTNERZ »

Moscone65 wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:37 pm
Adam wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2018 10:48 am
Moscone65 wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2018 8:59 am It's not as bad as Ralph Natale going from associate to made then immediately boss. Lightning rod or not, he was still "boss".
But even before Natale stuff like that happened in Philadelphia. Joe Cincaglini Jr. was made in 1991 and he was made underboss in 1992 right? And while I don't personally buy this, Freselone claimed that he was going to be made underboss after being made in 1990. Along with being immediately made captain after getting made. But like I said, I don't buy Freselone's claim. I find it suspicious that those conversations weren't recorded.
To be honest, after Bruno was killed, things really started going down hill in Philly. Not in activity per say, moreso in organization and smart choices. The only guy that comes to mind that was a solid wiseguy for a leadership position is Ligambi.
[/qu

on point
'three can keep a secret, if two are dead'
User avatar
Lupara
Full Patched
Posts: 3044
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 7:24 pm

Re: RE: Re: Buffalo/Ontario Mob Acitivity

Post by Lupara »

bosslt wrote:I think the fact that Violi got made underboss two years after being made really tells all you need to know about the viability of the Buffalo family.
It doesn't tell anything. Angelo Bruno was apparantly made boss of the Philly family just a few years after being made. Gotti was elevated to capo instantly after being made. Joe "Le grand boss" Bonanno took over from Maranzano perhaps only a year after his induction...

bosslt
Associate
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 10:00 am

Re: RE: Re: Buffalo/Ontario Mob Acitivity

Post by bosslt »

Lupara wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:24 pm
bosslt wrote:I think the fact that Violi got made underboss two years after being made really tells all you need to know about the viability of the Buffalo family.
It doesn't tell anything. Angelo Bruno was apparantly made boss of the Philly family just a few years after being made. Gotti was elevated to capo instantly after being made. Joe "Le grand boss" Bonanno took over from Maranzano perhaps only a year after his induction...
None of those are modern examples, the last was Natale about 25 years ago.

In my opinion those alleged 30 guys are probably 80% of them over 75 and inactive or involved in low level bookmaking and extortion.

All we have to take is Violi’s word when he was bragging to an informer. He could’ve just being trying to impress the guy with his alleged structure.

I know I don’t take the FBI’s word over this bum any day.
Moscone65
Sergeant Of Arms
Posts: 867
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 9:44 pm

Re: Buffalo/Ontario Mob Acitivity

Post by Moscone65 »

What do modern examples have to do with it, if anything it would be more lose and fluid in this day and age. A guy could be with a family 20-30 years, if he's a doorknob or disliked, he ain't right for an admin position.
Cheech
Full Patched
Posts: 4427
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 9:42 am

Re: Buffalo/Ontario Mob Acitivity

Post by Cheech »

So we got nothing still besides the Humphrey article? Guys?
Salude!
scagghiuni
Full Patched
Posts: 1140
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 7:04 am

Re: RE: Re: Buffalo/Ontario Mob Acitivity

Post by scagghiuni »

bosslt wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:56 pm
Lupara wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:24 pm
bosslt wrote:I think the fact that Violi got made underboss two years after being made really tells all you need to know about the viability of the Buffalo family.
It doesn't tell anything. Angelo Bruno was apparantly made boss of the Philly family just a few years after being made. Gotti was elevated to capo instantly after being made. Joe "Le grand boss" Bonanno took over from Maranzano perhaps only a year after his induction...
None of those are modern examples, the last was Natale about 25 years ago.

In my opinion those alleged 30 guys are probably 80% of them over 75 and inactive or involved in low level bookmaking and extortion.

All we have to take is Violi’s word when he was bragging to an informer. He could’ve just being trying to impress the guy with his alleged structure.

I know I don’t take the FBI’s word over this bum any day.
the informer was a bonanno member, i doubt violi would lie about this
User avatar
Lupara
Full Patched
Posts: 3044
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 7:24 pm

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Buffalo/Ontario Mob Acitivity

Post by Lupara »


bosslt wrote:
Lupara wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:24 pm
bosslt wrote:I think the fact that Violi got made underboss two years after being made really tells all you need to know about the viability of the Buffalo family.
It doesn't tell anything. Angelo Bruno was apparantly made boss of the Philly family just a few years after being made. Gotti was elevated to capo instantly after being made. Joe "Le grand boss" Bonanno took over from Maranzano perhaps only a year after his induction...
None of those are modern examples, the last was Natale about 25 years ago.

In my opinion those alleged 30 guys are probably 80% of them over 75 and inactive or involved in low level bookmaking and extortion.

All we have to take is Violi’s word when he was bragging to an informer. He could’ve just being trying to impress the guy with his alleged structure.

I know I don’t take the FBI’s word over this bum any day.
It says everything about it how the mob has always functioned if even during the golden days when mob organizations weren't "desperate" which you seem to suggest (unless I'm misinterpreting) people could rise to high positions within a short time.

Violi would be a fool if he was lying to another made member of his status, especially since he's working with the Americans. He could be killed for it and as you may know the guys up there don't shy away from killing people. As a matter of fact he has already jeopardised himself for admitting this on wiretap, if not for his fellow compadres then for LE.


User avatar
Lupara
Full Patched
Posts: 3044
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 7:24 pm

Re: RE: Re: Buffalo/Ontario Mob Acitivity

Post by Lupara »

Cheech wrote:So we got nothing still besides the Humphrey article? Guys?
Capeci repeated it too. I would be suprised if he wouldn't have reaffirmed the validity of these wiretaps.
Post Reply