by newera_212 » Tue May 10, 2022 8:23 am
What's crazy is that Pasqua told his Meldish story throughout his cooperation - and even after the trial's verdict - he still tells the same story publicly on a podcast.
Pasqua's father was first the trigger man, but then later it was downplayed to him just being at the scene/witnessing it. Both Pasqua's also helped set up Meldish with the fake heroin deal thing and were supposedly the reason why he was to be on the street in Throggs Neck that night (meeting up) - but Pasqua II was never charged with anything? Unless part of Pasqua III's cooperation agreement involved immunity for his father, shouldn't Pasqua II have been at the defendants table with these guys? If Pasqua III is telling the truth - which again, he continues to repeat his story to this day - than his Dad had just as big of a role in the conspiracy as everyone else who was charged
There's a lot going on with this case and I wasn't able to keep up with it all, but my understanding is that the government heard Pasqua III's story and recount of events and eventually said "okay, we believe some of that. We don't think you're a credible witness, and we don't believe 100% of your story, but we do believe the murder went as you described - except that you and your father were not there" - am I wrong on that or do I have it right?
I know the license plate and EZ Pass tracking, coupled with Londonio's phone calls, really do not look good - and all but put Londonio there that night. How do they know Caldwell was with him and pulled the trigger?
What's crazy is that Pasqua told his Meldish story throughout his cooperation - and even after the trial's verdict - he still tells the same story publicly on a podcast.
Pasqua's father was first the trigger man, but then later it was downplayed to him just being at the scene/witnessing it. Both Pasqua's also helped set up Meldish with the fake heroin deal thing and were supposedly the reason why he was to be on the street in Throggs Neck that night (meeting up) - but Pasqua II was never charged with anything? Unless part of Pasqua III's cooperation agreement involved immunity for his father, shouldn't Pasqua II have been at the defendants table with these guys? If Pasqua III is telling the truth - which again, he continues to repeat his story to this day - than his Dad had just as big of a role in the conspiracy as everyone else who was charged
There's a lot going on with this case and I wasn't able to keep up with it all, but my understanding is that the government heard Pasqua III's story and recount of events and eventually said "okay, we believe some of that. We don't think you're a credible witness, and we don't believe 100% of your story, but we do believe the murder went as you described - except that you and your father were not there" - am I wrong on that or do I have it right?
I know the license plate and EZ Pass tracking, coupled with Londonio's phone calls, really do not look good - and all but put Londonio there that night. How do they know Caldwell was with him and pulled the trigger?