by dack2001 » Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:42 am
Good for him. I don't know what the rule is in New York but in many places if the plaintiff (Shots) had been assigned 50.1% of fault or higher, the comparative fault rule barred you from recovering anything. This way he can get some money knocked down against the money he owes the G, he gets out of the slam to work on this case and his lawyer gets paid, if he has one.
Good for him. I don't know what the rule is in New York but in many places if the plaintiff (Shots) had been assigned 50.1% of fault or higher, the comparative fault rule barred you from recovering anything. This way he can get some money knocked down against the money he owes the G, he gets out of the slam to work on this case and his lawyer gets paid, if he has one.