by tmarotta » Mon May 15, 2017 10:18 am
I agree Attaboi1 that Pitera clearly has/had some psychopathic tendencies. In fairness, to Phil Carlo, his book about Richard Ramirez was actually pretty good. The problem is that clearly Carlo did not have much experience researching organized crime which can be seen in his books about Kuklinski, Casso, and Pitera respectively. In all those books he more or less framed the subjects in the same light as he did Ramirez, in that all the subjects were products of their environment and they could have been normal under different circumstances. Carlo should have stuck to writing about serial killers in that there is not as much research required. Clearly he was out of his element when writing about organized crime. I wish had more sources of good information about Pitera but there seems to be little out there that is not already common knowledge.
I agree Attaboi1 that Pitera clearly has/had some psychopathic tendencies. In fairness, to Phil Carlo, his book about Richard Ramirez was actually pretty good. The problem is that clearly Carlo did not have much experience researching organized crime which can be seen in his books about Kuklinski, Casso, and Pitera respectively. In all those books he more or less framed the subjects in the same light as he did Ramirez, in that all the subjects were products of their environment and they could have been normal under different circumstances. Carlo should have stuck to writing about serial killers in that there is not as much research required. Clearly he was out of his element when writing about organized crime. I wish had more sources of good information about Pitera but there seems to be little out there that is not already common knowledge.