Pete lovaglio

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Pete lovaglio

Re: Pete lovaglio

by Jbravo » Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:26 pm

Well they have that rat steve sabella...that weisel will have alot of shit to say

Re: Pete lovaglio

by slimshady_007 » Thu Aug 02, 2018 7:06 pm

Still if lovaglio is a shit witness idk how reliable his info on gambino capo frank camuso is.

Re: Pete lovaglio

by dack2001 » Thu Aug 02, 2018 4:31 pm

WITSEC was a good idea. Now its a get out of jail free card for losers like Lovaglio.

Re: Pete lovaglio

by gohnjotti » Thu Aug 02, 2018 4:06 pm

Staten Island businessman, according to GL News. They didn’t go into any more detail than that.

Re: Pete lovaglio

by slimshady_007 » Thu Aug 02, 2018 2:44 pm

gohnjotti wrote: Thu Aug 02, 2018 2:07 pm
slimshady_007 wrote: Thu Aug 02, 2018 1:16 pm
gohnjotti wrote: Wed Aug 01, 2018 12:19 pm The key case against Albert Armetta revolves around the assault of Fred Forte. That was called "assault-in-aid-of-racketeering." Bear in mind that Lovaglio, out of the blue, walked over to Forte and smashed him in the face with a glass, seriously blinding him. Those are the facts. They were caught on camera. Now the feds are trying to allege that, just because "Al Muscles" was at the scene, he was part of the "assault-in-aid-of-racketeering." Go figure. Not to mention that this Armetta guy has no prior criminal record.

Now, the assault charge makes up one of the three counts in the indictment. The first count being racketeering conspiracy. The third count is "conspiracy to commit extortion," which Joe Cammarano Jr., John Zancocchio, Joseph Sabella, George Tropiano, Eugene Castelle, and Domenick Miniero are charged with. According to Gang Land News, this charge relates to the shakedown of a Staten Island businessman. However, the racketeering conspiracy count (the first count in the indictment) charges all sorts of "pattern acts." If a jury finds a defendant guilty of two of the pattern acts, he's guilty of racketeering conspiracy. The pattern acts are, as follows: extortion, loansharking, mail & wire fraud, murder (conspiracy, attempt, etc.) & trafficking in controlled substances.

In my opinion, for the feds to have an arsenal of allegations like that, they'll need more than Lovaglio. Probably some "John Does" who were loanshark debtors, shakedown victims, drug dealers, etc. So, my opinion is they probably have a case that revolves around more than just Lovaglio.

Just my two cents.
I hope al muscles gets aquitted of the bs forte assault charge. Goin back to lovaglio, since chances r he’s gunna be on the witness stand, i wonder if he’ll testify about mike mancuso and about the 2015 power struggle. The trial will be very intriguing.
There'll probably be no trial, slimmy. Guy will take a plea or something because even if he's acquitted on the assault charge he'll likely be found guilty of racketeering conspiracy, which could see him get up to 20 years (considering there's murder conspiracy as a predicate act).
What was the murder conspiracy about?

Re: Pete lovaglio

by gohnjotti » Thu Aug 02, 2018 2:07 pm

slimshady_007 wrote: Thu Aug 02, 2018 1:16 pm
gohnjotti wrote: Wed Aug 01, 2018 12:19 pm The key case against Albert Armetta revolves around the assault of Fred Forte. That was called "assault-in-aid-of-racketeering." Bear in mind that Lovaglio, out of the blue, walked over to Forte and smashed him in the face with a glass, seriously blinding him. Those are the facts. They were caught on camera. Now the feds are trying to allege that, just because "Al Muscles" was at the scene, he was part of the "assault-in-aid-of-racketeering." Go figure. Not to mention that this Armetta guy has no prior criminal record.

Now, the assault charge makes up one of the three counts in the indictment. The first count being racketeering conspiracy. The third count is "conspiracy to commit extortion," which Joe Cammarano Jr., John Zancocchio, Joseph Sabella, George Tropiano, Eugene Castelle, and Domenick Miniero are charged with. According to Gang Land News, this charge relates to the shakedown of a Staten Island businessman. However, the racketeering conspiracy count (the first count in the indictment) charges all sorts of "pattern acts." If a jury finds a defendant guilty of two of the pattern acts, he's guilty of racketeering conspiracy. The pattern acts are, as follows: extortion, loansharking, mail & wire fraud, murder (conspiracy, attempt, etc.) & trafficking in controlled substances.

In my opinion, for the feds to have an arsenal of allegations like that, they'll need more than Lovaglio. Probably some "John Does" who were loanshark debtors, shakedown victims, drug dealers, etc. So, my opinion is they probably have a case that revolves around more than just Lovaglio.

Just my two cents.
I hope al muscles gets aquitted of the bs forte assault charge. Goin back to lovaglio, since chances r he’s gunna be on the witness stand, i wonder if he’ll testify about mike mancuso and about the 2015 power struggle. The trial will be very intriguing.
There'll probably be no trial, slimmy. Guy will take a plea or something because even if he's acquitted on the assault charge he'll likely be found guilty of racketeering conspiracy, which could see him get up to 20 years (considering there's murder conspiracy as a predicate act).

Re: Pete lovaglio

by slimshady_007 » Thu Aug 02, 2018 1:16 pm

gohnjotti wrote: Wed Aug 01, 2018 12:19 pm The key case against Albert Armetta revolves around the assault of Fred Forte. That was called "assault-in-aid-of-racketeering." Bear in mind that Lovaglio, out of the blue, walked over to Forte and smashed him in the face with a glass, seriously blinding him. Those are the facts. They were caught on camera. Now the feds are trying to allege that, just because "Al Muscles" was at the scene, he was part of the "assault-in-aid-of-racketeering." Go figure. Not to mention that this Armetta guy has no prior criminal record.

Now, the assault charge makes up one of the three counts in the indictment. The first count being racketeering conspiracy. The third count is "conspiracy to commit extortion," which Joe Cammarano Jr., John Zancocchio, Joseph Sabella, George Tropiano, Eugene Castelle, and Domenick Miniero are charged with. According to Gang Land News, this charge relates to the shakedown of a Staten Island businessman. However, the racketeering conspiracy count (the first count in the indictment) charges all sorts of "pattern acts." If a jury finds a defendant guilty of two of the pattern acts, he's guilty of racketeering conspiracy. The pattern acts are, as follows: extortion, loansharking, mail & wire fraud, murder (conspiracy, attempt, etc.) & trafficking in controlled substances.

In my opinion, for the feds to have an arsenal of allegations like that, they'll need more than Lovaglio. Probably some "John Does" who were loanshark debtors, shakedown victims, drug dealers, etc. So, my opinion is they probably have a case that revolves around more than just Lovaglio.

Just my two cents.
I hope al muscles gets aquitted of the bs forte assault charge. Goin back to lovaglio, since chances r he’s gunna be on the witness stand, i wonder if he’ll testify about mike mancuso and about the 2015 power struggle. The trial will be very intriguing.

Re: Pete lovaglio

by gohnjotti » Wed Aug 01, 2018 12:19 pm

The key case against Albert Armetta revolves around the assault of Fred Forte. That was called "assault-in-aid-of-racketeering." Bear in mind that Lovaglio, out of the blue, walked over to Forte and smashed him in the face with a glass, seriously blinding him. Those are the facts. They were caught on camera. Now the feds are trying to allege that, just because "Al Muscles" was at the scene, he was part of the "assault-in-aid-of-racketeering." Go figure. Not to mention that this Armetta guy has no prior criminal record.

Now, the assault charge makes up one of the three counts in the indictment. The first count being racketeering conspiracy. The third count is "conspiracy to commit extortion," which Joe Cammarano Jr., John Zancocchio, Joseph Sabella, George Tropiano, Eugene Castelle, and Domenick Miniero are charged with. According to Gang Land News, this charge relates to the shakedown of a Staten Island businessman. However, the racketeering conspiracy count (the first count in the indictment) charges all sorts of "pattern acts." If a jury finds a defendant guilty of two of the pattern acts, he's guilty of racketeering conspiracy. The pattern acts are, as follows: extortion, loansharking, mail & wire fraud, murder (conspiracy, attempt, etc.) & trafficking in controlled substances.

In my opinion, for the feds to have an arsenal of allegations like that, they'll need more than Lovaglio. Probably some "John Does" who were loanshark debtors, shakedown victims, drug dealers, etc. So, my opinion is they probably have a case that revolves around more than just Lovaglio.

Just my two cents.

Pete lovaglio

by slimshady_007 » Wed Aug 01, 2018 7:52 am

Ive read that the Bonanno administration r going to roll the dice and head to trial. The case against joe c, joe sabella, etc is relying partially on pete lovaglio’s testimony. Ya think it’s possible pete could he a disaster on the witness stand? The defense can def bring up how pete’s a drunk, and was not all that beneficial when he testified at joey merlino’s trial. Not to mention pete also recklessly slashed some poor guy’s face at a sushi place. Thoughts?

Top