Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

by willychichi » Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:48 pm

Pogo The Clown wrote: Fri Jun 23, 2017 11:59 am
willychichi wrote: Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:52 am What if anything did Gambino have to do with Colombo becoming the Boss and were the Profaci's/Colombo's able to regain their territory they lost to Gambino and Lucchese? Were there any reprisals against Bonanno for his involvement?

Gambino and Lucchese pushed for him to become the new Boss. From all accounts Gambino had tremendous influence over Colombo when he was Boss. Basically controlling the Colombo family vote on the Commission.


Lucchese and Gambino were of course responsible (along with Stefano Magaddino) in deposing Bonanno by backing Gaspare DiGregorio and his faction
to take over the family.


Pogo
Thanks Pogo, much obliged!!

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

by Pogo The Clown » Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:00 pm

BillyBrizzi wrote: Fri Jun 23, 2017 4:42 am He still is, 92 years of age.. Does anybody know if he's still active?

From all accounts he is inactive.


Pogo

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

by Pogo The Clown » Fri Jun 23, 2017 11:59 am

willychichi wrote: Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:52 am What if anything did Gambino have to do with Colombo becoming the Boss and were the Profaci's/Colombo's able to regain their territory they lost to Gambino and Lucchese? Were there any reprisals against Bonanno for his involvement?

Gambino and Lucchese pushed for him to become the new Boss. From all accounts Gambino had tremendous influence over Colombo when he was Boss. Basically controlling the Colombo family vote on the Commission.


Lucchese and Gambino were of course responsible (along with Stefano Magaddino) in deposing Bonanno by backing Gaspare DiGregorio and his faction
to take over the family.


Pogo

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

by BillyBrizzi » Fri Jun 23, 2017 4:42 am

SonnyBlackstein wrote: Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:53 pm You're not just a pretty face Pogo.

Isn't Charlie Moose still alive?
He still is, 92 years of age.. Does anybody know if he's still active?

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

by willychichi » Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:52 am

What if anything did Gambino have to do with Colombo becoming the Boss and were the Profaci's/Colombo's able to regain their territory they lost to Gambino and Lucchese? Were there any reprisals against Bonanno for his involvement?

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

by SonnyBlackstein » Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:53 pm

You're not just a pretty face Pogo.

Isn't Charlie Moose still alive?

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

by Pogo The Clown » Thu Jun 22, 2017 5:22 pm

SonnyBlackstein wrote: Thu Jun 22, 2017 2:46 pm In Donnie Brascos book Pistone talks about how guys who tell on other guys within LCN are despised, outcast and often clipped. He relates a tale when he's with Jilly that I can't quite recall but suffice to say if a guy tells on another guy to his Capo or soldier superior then they are distrusted as the view is 'if they're telling on that guy, what's to stop them telling on me?'.

Makes sense.

The story was in reference to Jilly and the guy's lying about about their scores to their Capo Charlie Panarella. Panarella didn't trust his crew and had them bring in their scores so he could count it and divide it up. One of the guy's, forgot who, said something to the effect of "fuck him, if he don't trust us we won't trust. We'll just tell him we made x amount. How the fuck will he know the difference". Pistone talked about how Panarella could find out about it if one of the guy's snitched to him but how it was unlikely because those types of snitches are despised as you said.


Pogo

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

by Doobeez » Thu Jun 22, 2017 5:04 pm

I read it somewhere but I believe Greca was clipped because they thought he was an informant

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

by OlBlueEyesClub » Thu Jun 22, 2017 3:57 pm

The Gallo-Profaci war was mainly over the fact that the Gallo brothers felt they weren't being compensated enough for their work, mainly the hit on Frankie Shots Abbatemarco. They felt that because they supposedly carried out this high profile hit for Profaci, that Profaci would reward them with Abbatemarco's rackets, instead Profaci split Abbatemarco's action with his cronies whom happened to be captains mostly, and he left the Gallos out. That made Profaci the main target, I believe. And the kidnappings were done as an attempt to make Profaci step down, or give Larry, perhaps Joey as well, a higher position in the family. Colombo was more of afterthought, but he was most likely a guy whom Profaci liked and trusted, so that may be why he was kidnapped with the others. In fact, I'm almost positive Profaci thought highly of Colombo because all of the other kidnapped victims were all guys whom were close to Profaci, like his brother, his brother-in-law Magliocco, and then Colombo. So it seems like he was pretty popular within the Profaci-Colombo family, at least. Had it not been for Charlie The Sidge, whom supposedly used his stature and respectability to negotiate with the Gallos to release those who they had kidnapped and hidden, who knows if Colombo or Magliocco would've lived long enough to sit in the boss chair.


And I believe you're referring to the Patsy story from Pistone, Patsy & Frankie. I thought I remembered reading that too, that they were screamed on by Jilly for sending word around that Pistone was this and that, and how he sold Patsy fake diamonds. But I went back to that passage just now and couldn't find it. The closest I got was after Patsy comes back after receiving word that Pistone was vouched for by his criminal miami contact. And Pistone feigning being pissed and getting into a physical altercation with Patsy, and a member of the crew, named Chino or something like that, getting in between them and saying he didn't want to hear anything else about "Donnie" being a rat. Oddly enough, the guy who began accusing Pistone of being a rat, Patsy, flipped himself later on and was placed in the WPP. And Pistones Miami contact happened to be a fed, as the number Pistone gave went back to an FBI building and the office of his supervising officer. Lol. Shame though, all of what Pistone wrote about him, it seems like Jilly was a pretty decent guy, he was murdered by after being shot while riding his motorcycle. I've never heard much of the story surrounding his death, hopefully some of the guys here can shed some light on that situation as I've always been interested in that part of Pistones story.

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

by SonnyBlackstein » Thu Jun 22, 2017 2:46 pm

In Donnie Brascos book Pistone talks about how guys who tell on other guys within LCN are despised, outcast and often clipped. He relates a tale when he's with Jilly that I can't quite recall but suffice to say if a guy tells on another guy to his Capo or soldier superior then they are distrusted as the view is 'if they're telling on that guy, what's to stop them telling on me?'.

Makes sense.

Maybe that's part of the reason for the Gallo war. Columbo was distrusted within the LCN community.

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

by willychichi » Thu Jun 22, 2017 2:35 pm

Speaking of Colombo his birthday was on June 16th and someone wished him a happy birthday in the NYDN obits, a Big Lou From Avenue U.

http://obituaries.nydailynews.com/obitu ... =185816797

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

by furiofromnaples » Thu Jun 22, 2017 5:46 am

Dwalin2014 wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 9:23 pm
UTC wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 8:28 pm
BillyBrizzi wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 2:06 pm Well said Dwalin, I co-sign that statement 100%
The difference is huge and cuts to the core of LCN. The first is a breach of omerta. The second isn't.
If the 2nd isn't a breach of omerta', they are more hypocrites than I thought. What logic did they have, when writing this so-called "code of honor"? A cop is an enemy, so leaking information to them and/or testifying is treason, ok. But if an underworld rival happens to be an enemy too, why are mafiosi who switched sides or spied on their bosses for the rival clan. considered less "traitors" that the ones who spy for the cops? An enemy is an enemy. The cop wants to jail you for life, the rival wants to kill you. What "loyalty" do they talk about it double crossing your own boss isn't considered a breach of the "code of honor?"

Dwalin the concept of omertà means to don't speak with who are out of the secret society. Colombo don't break the omertà when said to commission the Magliocco plan. The commission was above the single bosses.

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

by Dwalin2014 » Wed Jun 21, 2017 9:23 pm

UTC wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 8:28 pm
BillyBrizzi wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 2:06 pm Well said Dwalin, I co-sign that statement 100%
The difference is huge and cuts to the core of LCN. The first is a breach of omerta. The second isn't.
If the 2nd isn't a breach of omerta', they are more hypocrites than I thought. What logic did they have, when writing this so-called "code of honor"? A cop is an enemy, so leaking information to them and/or testifying is treason, ok. But if an underworld rival happens to be an enemy too, why are mafiosi who switched sides or spied on their bosses for the rival clan. considered less "traitors" that the ones who spy for the cops? An enemy is an enemy. The cop wants to jail you for life, the rival wants to kill you. What "loyalty" do they talk about it double crossing your own boss isn't considered a breach of the "code of honor?"

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

by UTC » Wed Jun 21, 2017 8:28 pm

BillyBrizzi wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 2:06 pm
Dwalin2014 wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 10:16 am If somebody who passes information to law enforcement is a "rat", then somebody who informs on his boss to underworld rivals, is a rat too imo. What's the difference? It's still being disloyal. Fuck Colombo.
Well said Dwalin, I co-sign that statement 100%
The difference is huge and cuts to the core of LCN. The first is a breach of omerta. The second isn't.

Re: Magliocco, Columbo, Lucchese and Gambino

by BillyBrizzi » Wed Jun 21, 2017 2:06 pm

Dwalin2014 wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 10:16 am If somebody who passes information to law enforcement is a "rat", then somebody who informs on his boss to underworld rivals, is a rat too imo. What's the difference? It's still being disloyal. Fuck Colombo.
Well said Dwalin, I co-sign that statement 100%

Top