by CabriniGreen » Wed Mar 22, 2023 4:14 pm
I'll say this..
Much has been said about how Montreal has been overhyped, and not a family, and I myself said recently that Vito Rizzutos charisma has been mistaken for authority.
But there is a flip side to all this too..
I don't think whatever hierarchy that applies to the Bonnano regime is directly translational to the Greater criminal landscape of Canada. It's like people think the Bonnanos really control all crime in Canada. The Hells, the Irish, Lebanese, Street gangs, all these are not UNDER the mafia. They are criminal entities in their own right that coalesce around a central reference, which historically was a Bonnano decina. The criminal landscape in Canada has more in common with an Ndrangheta Crimine than a traditional LCN hierarchy.
Listen to Arillotta talk about his crew. How he said to OUTSIDERS ( The new buzzword, lol) these guys were UNDER him, but in actuality they were his partners, independents, who kind of "orbit" around him. If you were to make an accurate chart, it would probably look like the Canadian charts, with one guy or group in the middle, and everyone in an orbital around the central figure. He was the central reference. Canada is like 40 Arrilottas types...
I mean Buffalo never OWNED Ontario either. It's really silly if you think about it. If I said a SINGLE decina could control, any of the boroughs, say Brooklyn, this would be nonsense. But we readily accept that Quebec or Ontario could be OWNED by a single decina. Why?
To me, Morena actually proved the Bonnanos lost Montreal, but understood that and were trying to rebuild the thing that it was important for in the first place, the drug routes.
And I continue to be intrigued by this Bonvonta clan...
And half the stuff Cicale said seems plausible, but some stuff is off to me....
I'll say this..
Much has been said about how Montreal has been overhyped, and not a family, and I myself said recently that Vito Rizzutos charisma has been mistaken for authority.
But there is a flip side to all this too..
I don't think whatever hierarchy that applies to the Bonnano regime is directly translational to the Greater criminal landscape of Canada. It's like people think the Bonnanos really control all crime in Canada. The Hells, the Irish, Lebanese, Street gangs, all these are not UNDER the mafia. They are criminal entities in their own right that coalesce around a central reference, which historically was a Bonnano decina. The criminal landscape in Canada has more in common with an Ndrangheta Crimine than a traditional LCN hierarchy.
Listen to Arillotta talk about his crew. How he said to OUTSIDERS ( The new buzzword, lol) these guys were UNDER him, but in actuality they were his partners, independents, who kind of "orbit" around him. If you were to make an accurate chart, it would probably look like the Canadian charts, with one guy or group in the middle, and everyone in an orbital around the central figure. He was the central reference. Canada is like 40 Arrilottas types...
I mean Buffalo never OWNED Ontario either. It's really silly if you think about it. If I said a SINGLE decina could control, any of the boroughs, say Brooklyn, this would be nonsense. But we readily accept that Quebec or Ontario could be OWNED by a single decina. Why?
To me, Morena actually proved the Bonnanos lost Montreal, but understood that and were trying to rebuild the thing that it was important for in the first place, the drug routes.
And I continue to be intrigued by this Bonvonta clan...
And half the stuff Cicale said seems plausible, but some stuff is off to me....