Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

Re: Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

by phatmatress777 » Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:47 pm

Ivan wrote:
rayray wrote:
Pogo The Clown wrote:He was a nephew of Harry Riccobene.


Pogo

Was he involved or a citizen? If innocent, that's not right.
I've heard that he was a minor player in Riccobene Crew rackets, and not totally innocent as some have said.
they weren't there to kill him though ... At least that's what they said ... Who knows...one thing is for certain they were some feared people


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

by Ivan » Sat Jan 23, 2016 4:20 pm

rayray wrote:
Pogo The Clown wrote:He was a nephew of Harry Riccobene.


Pogo

Was he involved or a citizen? If innocent, that's not right.
I've heard that he was a minor player in Riccobene Crew rackets, and not totally innocent as some have said.

Re: Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

by rayray » Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:55 pm

Pogo The Clown wrote:He was a nephew of Harry Riccobene.


Pogo

Was he involved or a citizen? If innocent, that's not right.

Re: Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

by Pogo The Clown » Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:41 am

He was a nephew of Harry Riccobene.


Pogo

Re: Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

by rayray » Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:10 am

That story always made me a little sad, the shop keeper, that kid committing suicide out of fear. Wasn't that kid innocent? Just somebody's relative?

Re: Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

by phatmatress777 » Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:09 pm

Ivan wrote:
rayray wrote: I haven't read the Leonetti book, does a lot of it come across self-serving? Cause, imho, that's the way he comes across in his interviews, especially when he starts talking about his uncle. The guy has no issues killing about 10 people, gets caught and now about thirty years down the road his uncle is a psycho killer. Didn't that come across earlier to the guy?
Yeah, it's kind of self-serving. Lots of good info though. Especially the parts about Scarfo maneuvering into the boss's seat - the guy is always ten steps ahead of everyone.

Phil is a sociopath in my non-professional opinion.
Amazing how sorry people are after they are caught fuck he laughed about that shop keeper killing himself instead of answering the door

Sent from my QTAQZ3 using Tapatalk

Re: Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

by Ivan » Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:23 pm

rayray wrote: I haven't read the Leonetti book, does a lot of it come across self-serving? Cause, imho, that's the way he comes across in his interviews, especially when he starts talking about his uncle. The guy has no issues killing about 10 people, gets caught and now about thirty years down the road his uncle is a psycho killer. Didn't that come across earlier to the guy?
Yeah, it's kind of self-serving. Lots of good info though. Especially the parts about Scarfo maneuvering into the boss's seat - the guy is always ten steps ahead of everyone.

Phil is a sociopath in my non-professional opinion.

Re: Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

by rayray » Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:11 pm

Ivan wrote:
JCB1977 wrote:
rayray wrote:Wasn't the ..."bring him back alive just to kill him again..." quote Salvie Testa's? I thought he said that about Narducci for ordering his fathers murder.
I thought that Fat Anthony Dinunzio made that statement on tape with a member of NYC Gambino Family after he was appointed acting boss of New England?
Phil Leonetti says that he said it in his book. It has also bee attributed to Salvie Testa in I think Blood and Honor and elsewhere.

It's probably just a stock phrase among mobsters that gets recycled.
I think you're right because I believe the Crow Caramandi said it about Salvie Testa years ago in a interview, in fact I'm fairly certain it was the Crow. That's not to say others have not said it too.

I haven't read the Leonetti book, does a lot of it come across self-serving? Cause, imho, that's the way he comes across in his interviews, especially when he starts talking about his uncle. The guy has no issues killing about 10 people, gets caught and now about thirty years down the road his uncle is a psycho killer. Didn't that come across earlier to the guy?

Re: Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

by JCB1977 » Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:59 pm

toto wrote:In fact I doubt the majority of members in America from the 1970s onwards have been part of a murder. From the 1980s onwards the numbers of murders have decreased and so the number of people involved in a murder has decreased as well and since the ban on murders in New York ended in 1997 or 1998 there has not been many murders at all. I don't think the majority have been involved in even 1 murder. Most of the guys involved in murder have been jailed because of the amount of people who flipped. If so many were involved in murder there would be more in jail.

That's why the premise is false in the first post that most of these guys are killers. In America its not the case and its because of the heavy jail sentences. For most murders somebody flips and the others go to jail.

Toto, I'm not trying to have a debate with you. I should have been more specific and said the generation of Gambino, Genovese, Profaci, Bonanno, Columbo, Costello, Accardo etc. and having knowledge of a murder without reporting it could result in an indictment for accessory or harboring. Murder was prevalent for a solid period of time in those days. Again, I'm not trying to argue, just spinning a hypothetical.

Re: Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

by toto » Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:39 pm

In fact I doubt the majority of members in America from the 1970s onwards have been part of a murder. From the 1980s onwards the numbers of murders have decreased and so the number of people involved in a murder has decreased as well and since the ban on murders in New York ended in 1997 or 1998 there has not been many murders at all. I don't think the majority have been involved in even 1 murder. Most of the guys involved in murder have been jailed because of the amount of people who flipped. If so many were involved in murder there would be more in jail.

That's why the premise is false in the first post that most of these guys are killers. In America its not the case and its because of the heavy jail sentences. For most murders somebody flips and the others go to jail.

Re: Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

by Stroccos » Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:04 pm

My original post for this thread that I started was based off "traditional LCN" rules about committing murder before one gets his button. Most American mafiosi have killed or been a part of a gangland murder. I agree, there is a sector of mafioso who strictly run their bookmaking, strip clubs etc. But most American LCN members (I'm not talking about these lollipop gangtsers of the 2000's) have killed or been a part of planning the hit, removing the body or an accessory after the fact.[/quote]

Lollipop Gangsters lmao

Re: Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

by Ivan » Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:42 pm

JCB1977 wrote:
rayray wrote:Wasn't the ..."bring him back alive just to kill him again..." quote Salvie Testa's? I thought he said that about Narducci for ordering his fathers murder.
I thought that Fat Anthony Dinunzio made that statement on tape with a member of NYC Gambino Family after he was appointed acting boss of New England?
Phil Leonetti says that he said it in his book. It has also bee attributed to Salvie Testa in I think Blood and Honor and elsewhere.

It's probably just a stock phrase among mobsters that gets recycled.

Re: Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

by Angelo Santino » Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:58 pm

toto wrote:I think the statement in the first post is wrong: most of these guys are not killers. Very few are and even from them most do not enjoy it. In Sicily it was one reason that some pentiti gave for flipping. Buscetta said violence and murder are against the spirit of Cosa Nostra. Leonardo Messina said he took an oath to join a secret sect not to become a assasin. Gaspare Mutolo said the most difficult test of Cosa Nostra is homicide and the most difficult homicide is by strangling and dissolving the body in acid.

The guy who invented the method of strangling and dissolving in acid was Stefano Bontate but now people say he was the moderate one from Cosa Nostra!

The guy who probably has the most hits in Sicily is probably Leoluca Bagarella he's incredibly religious. When he had to do a murder he used to go to church and start to pray "please lord take him I don't wish to kill him". His wife blamed him because she couldnt have children and she blamed this on her husbands murders including children and said it was a punishment from god. Nobody knows where she's buried - unknown if she committed suicide or Bagarella killed her. Weird story: Bagarella and his guys were strangling a guy and he got a message from his wife "dinner is ready" so he didn't want to be late or disappoint her so he said lets leave this guy and I'll strangle him after the meal.

Pino Greco was convicted of 58 murders in maxi it became something normal. So he and Mario Prestifilppo used to laugh and joke and carry on like normal even after they strangled a few guys and then pissed and shitted on the corpses.

Giuseppe Lucchese killed the wives (might be girlfriends I cant remember exactly) of his brothers who were in jail. He was one known to be a fierce killer.

Brusca strangled Santino Di Matteo's 11 year old son but I dont get the impression he enjoyed it. It seems like many of these guys they look at this as something which as part of a job description. I think he said something about a career in Cosa Nostra requires certain things and this was one of those so he did it for his career.

Luciano Leggio, Nino Calderone said he enjoyed killing and he had a way to look at people which used to frighten them and even mafiosi were frightened of him.

Filippo Marchese "Fifu" is one who was known to enjoy killing. He used to snort cocaine and masturbate while he watched guys being tortured and strangled. He was also involved in personally strangling many guys even his friends like Franco Mafara. Probably Riina found out about his "habits" and thats why he was strangled also.
Yeah, I concur. Murder is a last resort and supposed to be sparingly. It is rather detailed in that most are "to send a message" so that the "implied threat" inspires fear. In the mafia when it's boring you have less pentiti, when bloodshed occurs if when informants come out of the woodwork. Most of them are "losers" when their luck runs out (death or long jail sentences) and they come from various ranks who reflect on the mobs imperfections. Francesco Siino, capo provincia did it in 1890, Gentile and Valachi in the 1960's, Fratiano in the 1970's, Lonardo in the 1980's, Gravano in the 1990's and so on. Despite what the losers say, the system carries on. As this relates to America, with the demise in demographics, the mafia will go away like the cowboys. If Chicago were to began accepting non-Italians as members and eventual leaders carrying on the Outfit could probably survive. But the New York Families... For people who want to argue that it's trucking along, they are forgetting that the 1970's-80's drop off of membership caused a riffle that accorded nationally with the 80's having generational changes in leadership. The mafia declined heavily in the 1970's-1980's and that's where you seen the big membership recruitment. Of course I'm speaking of America and not Sicily.

What are your thoughts on the current events there? My relatives there were victims in Partinico, they refused to pay, got their business blown up, reported it and the men responsible were arrested as mafia members. It seems since the 1980's with the death of Falcone/Borsellino, Sicily finally decided that Mafia wasn't a rugged mentality but a serious problem and what Sicilians do now with stickers on their storefronts proclaiming they pay no mafia tax, would have never happened 100 years ago. That's progress. The Sicilian Mafia will outlast the American one, but I see it's influence declining only at a slower pace.

Re: Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

by JCB1977 » Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:48 pm

toto wrote:I think the statement in the first post is wrong: most of these guys are not killers. Very few are and even from them most do not enjoy it. In Sicily it was one reason that some pentiti gave for flipping. Buscetta said violence and murder are against the spirit of Cosa Nostra. Leonardo Messina said he took an oath to join a secret sect not to become a assasin. Gaspare Mutolo said the most difficult test of Cosa Nostra is homicide and the most difficult homicide is by strangling and dissolving the body in acid.

The guy who invented the method of strangling and dissolving in acid was Stefano Bontate but now people say he was the moderate one from Cosa Nostra!

The guy who probably has the most hits in Sicily is probably Leoluca Bagarella he's incredibly religious. When he had to do a murder he used to go to church and start to pray "please lord take him I don't wish to kill him". His wife blamed him because she couldnt have children and she blamed this on her husbands murders including children and said it was a punishment from god. Nobody knows where she's buried - unknown if she committed suicide or Bagarella killed her. Weird story: Bagarella and his guys were strangling a guy and he got a message from his wife "dinner is ready" so he didn't want to be late or disappoint her so he said lets leave this guy and I'll strangle him after the meal.

Pino Greco was convicted of 58 murders in maxi it became something normal. So he and Mario Prestifilppo used to laugh and joke and carry on like normal even after they strangled a few guys and then pissed and shitted on the corpses.

Giuseppe Lucchese killed the wives (might be girlfriends I cant remember exactly) of his brothers who were in jail. He was one known to be a fierce killer.

Brusca strangled Santino Di Matteo's 11 year old son but I dont get the impression he enjoyed it. It seems like many of these guys they look at this as something which as part of a job description. I think he said something about a career in Cosa Nostra requires certain things and this was one of those so he did it for his career.

Luciano Leggio, Nino Calderone said he enjoyed killing and he had a way to look at people which used to frighten them and even mafiosi were frightened of him.

Filippo Marchese "Fifu" is one who was known to enjoy killing. He used to snort cocaine and masturbate while he watched guys being tortured and strangled. He was also involved in personally strangling many guys even his friends like Franco Mafara. Probably Riina found out about his "habits" and thats why he was strangled also.

My original post for this thread that I started was based off "traditional LCN" rules about committing murder before one gets his button. Most American mafiosi have killed or been a part of a gangland murder. I agree, there is a sector of mafioso who strictly run their bookmaking, strip clubs etc. But most American LCN members (I'm not talking about these lollipop gangtsers of the 2000's) have killed or been a part of planning the hit, removing the body or an accessory after the fact.

Re: Mafioso v Mafioso Savages

by JCB1977 » Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:42 pm

rayray wrote:Wasn't the ..."bring him back alive just to kill him again..." quote Salvie Testa's? I thought he said that about Narducci for ordering his fathers murder.
I thought that Fat Anthony Dinunzio made that statement on tape with a member of NYC Gambino Family after he was appointed acting boss of New England?

Top