Sciascia and Montagna

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Sciascia and Montagna

Re: Sciascia and Montagna

by Hailbritain » Tue Sep 27, 2016 3:26 pm

Lupara wrote:
TommyGambino wrote:
toto wrote:
TommyGambino wrote:Why would Rizzuto kick up 100k to Basciano? I thought they stopped answering to NY not long after Sciasca got hit?
Because they didn't stop answering. Anybody who understands Cosa Nostra never believed this kind of story that they decided not to answer.
So they still answer today?
Doesn't seem like it, but it wouldn't suprise me either. It also needs to be said that from the members of the Sciascia period there are only a handful left. However I imagine that Stefano and Leonardo have been made in recent years.
That's another thing I don't understand , which family are making these Montreal guys ?? Bonnanos , gambinos , themselves ???

Re: Sciascia and Montagna

by Lupara » Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:40 am

Pete wrote:
Lupara wrote:
Chris Christie wrote:It just seems that Montreal's connections extended outside of the Italian colony, they made alliances with the local criminals (who weren't connected to a Sicilian Honored Society aka the Mafia) and they became their own New-World Crew, composed of made guys and non-members forming a vast and powerful ring. This is what made the Montreal Crew/decina/Family so influential. So much so that Desjardin and Fernandez believed enough they were a part of "it" to lay claim over it. Think a Montreal version of the Chicago Outfit: an inner circle of made guys, and influential underworld members every bit as influential in the Outfit as some of the made guys themselves.
I think that's a good analysis of how things were set up under the Rizzutos. I've also thought that they were similar to the Outfit even though Montreal was more Cosa Nostra than the Outfit ever was. The whole criminal landscape in Montreal was pretty much as you described, but the inner-core was more like a traditional Sicillian clan. I don't think that you have access to the RD forum anymore, but there is an old post there by Lee Lamothe about the structure of the Montreal Mafia. I consider that probably the best post I've ever read about Montreal, I think it's even better than anything he wrote in the Sixth Family.
Please explain this Montreal was more cosa nostra than the outfit. Do you mean more similar to nyc? Obviously most families outside of nyc were run differently than nyc in general, is this what your getting at?
Because I believe that the Outfit had its roots in the Camorra while Montreal was more Sicillian Cosa Nostra for obvious reasons. The Outfit's structure also seemed to differ from that of the other families.

Re: Sciascia and Montagna

by dixiemafia » Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 am

Paolo Renda wiretap, I forget who posted it over on GBB but good stuff.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYbQRFLZ9tE

Re: Sciascia and Montagna

by Snakes » Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am

If Capone had "lost" his war against the Gennas I would be inclined to believe that the Outfit would have resembled more of a NY-style LCN group. They didn't, and we see the result: a mostly heterogeneous mix of criminals with a solid Italian core.

Re: Sciascia and Montagna

by Angelo Santino » Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am

Pete wrote:
Lupara wrote:
Chris Christie wrote:It just seems that Montreal's connections extended outside of the Italian colony, they made alliances with the local criminals (who weren't connected to a Sicilian Honored Society aka the Mafia) and they became their own New-World Crew, composed of made guys and non-members forming a vast and powerful ring. This is what made the Montreal Crew/decina/Family so influential. So much so that Desjardin and Fernandez believed enough they were a part of "it" to lay claim over it. Think a Montreal version of the Chicago Outfit: an inner circle of made guys, and influential underworld members every bit as influential in the Outfit as some of the made guys themselves.
I think that's a good analysis of how things were set up under the Rizzutos. I've also thought that they were similar to the Outfit even though Montreal was more Cosa Nostra than the Outfit ever was. The whole criminal landscape in Montreal was pretty much as you described, but the inner-core was more like a traditional Sicillian clan. I don't think that you have access to the RD forum anymore, but there is an old post there by Lee Lamothe about the structure of the Montreal Mafia. I consider that probably the best post I've ever read about Montreal, I think it's even better than anything he wrote in the Sixth Family.
Please explain this Montreal was more cosa nostra than the outfit. Do you mean more similar to nyc? Obviously most families outside of nyc were run differently than nyc in general, is this what your getting at?
I'd answer that Montreal remains connected to Italy and carries on the Mafia tradition while integrating it to fit a new world model. Whereas Chicago after Capone had no ties to Italy and evolved into a localized organization connected nationally with the LCN network.

Re: Sciascia and Montagna

by Pete » Wed Jan 20, 2016 8:46 pm

Lupara wrote:
Chris Christie wrote:It just seems that Montreal's connections extended outside of the Italian colony, they made alliances with the local criminals (who weren't connected to a Sicilian Honored Society aka the Mafia) and they became their own New-World Crew, composed of made guys and non-members forming a vast and powerful ring. This is what made the Montreal Crew/decina/Family so influential. So much so that Desjardin and Fernandez believed enough they were a part of "it" to lay claim over it. Think a Montreal version of the Chicago Outfit: an inner circle of made guys, and influential underworld members every bit as influential in the Outfit as some of the made guys themselves.
I think that's a good analysis of how things were set up under the Rizzutos. I've also thought that they were similar to the Outfit even though Montreal was more Cosa Nostra than the Outfit ever was. The whole criminal landscape in Montreal was pretty much as you described, but the inner-core was more like a traditional Sicillian clan. I don't think that you have access to the RD forum anymore, but there is an old post there by Lee Lamothe about the structure of the Montreal Mafia. I consider that probably the best post I've ever read about Montreal, I think it's even better than anything he wrote in the Sixth Family.
Please explain this Montreal was more cosa nostra than the outfit. Do you mean more similar to nyc? Obviously most families outside of nyc were run differently than nyc in general, is this what your getting at?

Re: Sciascia and Montagna

by dixiemafia » Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:20 pm

You have to realize CC that Desjardins is the MOST powerful French-Canadian or non-Sicilian/Italian in Canada probably period. Like Lupara said, I don't think he so much wanted to take over, he just went along with things until Montagna felt the need to try and kill him. Desjardins was kind of the FC boss even under Rizzuto and holds a ton of power there among the non-Italians. Of course Rizzuto seemed to have seen this as not being loyal as he did with his brother in law Di Maulo.

As for Joe Bravo, I think he was just trying to strut there in Palermo and try to use Rizzuto's name to get folks to work with him and push drugs. Like you said though, we will probably never know his end game to that claim. I think he was just trying to stay important and was hoping Rizzuto was over thrown after he got out, and he obviously panicked when Rizzuto called him to the Dominican Republic and he didn't show up there or in Cuba and we know the rest.

Re: Sciascia and Montagna

by Lupara » Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:06 pm

Chris Christie wrote:It just seems that Montreal's connections extended outside of the Italian colony, they made alliances with the local criminals (who weren't connected to a Sicilian Honored Society aka the Mafia) and they became their own New-World Crew, composed of made guys and non-members forming a vast and powerful ring. This is what made the Montreal Crew/decina/Family so influential. So much so that Desjardin and Fernandez believed enough they were a part of "it" to lay claim over it. Think a Montreal version of the Chicago Outfit: an inner circle of made guys, and influential underworld members every bit as influential in the Outfit as some of the made guys themselves.
I think that's a good analysis of how things were set up under the Rizzutos. I've also thought that they were similar to the Outfit even though Montreal was more Cosa Nostra than the Outfit ever was. The whole criminal landscape in Montreal was pretty much as you described, but the inner-core was more like a traditional Sicillian clan. I don't think that you have access to the RD forum anymore, but there is an old post there by Lee Lamothe about the structure of the Montreal Mafia. I consider that probably the best post I've ever read about Montreal, I think it's even better than anything he wrote in the Sixth Family.

Re: Sciascia and Montagna

by Angelo Santino » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:59 pm

Lupara wrote:
Chris Christie wrote:
toto wrote:What gave Fernandez the cajones to try and pass himself off as a stessa cosa in Sicily? I don't think anyone can answer with definity. And what gave Desjardin the thought that he could "take over" a mafia crew despite being non-Italian and not-made. I'd love to hear thoughts on this though all around. This is interesting shit.
I don't think that Desjardins was trying to take over the Rizzuto organization. I think that he just wanted them out of the way to gain more power for himself and his people.

As for Fernandez, the guy was a brute and bragging was part of his nature. Perhaps he was so stupid and arrogant that he truly saw himself as a made guy.

Just my two cents.
Point taken on Desjardins.

Regarding Fernandez. that's possible. But made and not made is a pretty significant thing. You don't hear about alot of non-Italians claiming to be made. That Fernandez could claim such a thing in Palermo of all places is ballsy. He was either a retarded and ignorant criminal (which all evidence leads against) or he truly "believed" he was amico nos. I don't know honestly. I think it's just a question we should keep raising, not to argue it to general consensus but to raise questions to be answered if and when we have more intel. He could have been making it up because he liked to brag, he could have been actually ceremonied by Rizzuto, it could have have been a "you're one of us" misunderstandings, or he could have thought he could "pull it off." From what I see, each POV is possible. But until we get any factual reports, it's all opinion.

Re: Sciascia and Montagna

by Lupara » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:55 pm

Chris Christie wrote:
toto wrote:What gave Fernandez the cajones to try and pass himself off as a stessa cosa in Sicily? I don't think anyone can answer with definity. And what gave Desjardin the thought that he could "take over" a mafia crew despite being non-Italian and not-made. I'd love to hear thoughts on this though all around. This is interesting shit.
I don't think that Desjardins was trying to take over the Rizzuto organization. I think that he just wanted them out of the way to gain more power for himself and his people.

As for Fernandez, the guy was a brute and bragging was part of his nature. Perhaps he was so stupid and arrogant that he truly saw himself as a made guy.

Just my two cents.

Re: Sciascia and Montagna

by Angelo Santino » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:31 pm

toto wrote:He's criminal. Those guys have no integrity. Or maybe Rizzuto did a ceremony with him to trick him for some reason. Its not as if the ceremony and symbols and oaths are secret. Nevertheless, he will never be recognized and if there was a problem for Rizzuto about it he would just say Fernandez is lying. However, it could also be used against Rizzuto by somebody wanting to make a move which is possibly why he wouldn't do such a thing.
Yes, but I've never heard about them promising to make outsiders just to kill them. It's possible (is it?) that Rizzuto told Fernandez that he's made and sent him to Sicily to be killed, similar to LA making Bomp consigliere in the 70's so they could kill him. We can't rule that out. But to put out a fake ceremony? That's only been done in the 90's in Cleveland when the FBI posed as NYC wiseguys and made a black guy and then indicted him.

It just seems that Montreal's connections extended outside of the Italian colony, they made alliances with the local criminals (who weren't connected to a Sicilian Honored Society aka the Mafia) and they became their own New-World Crew, composed of made guys and non-members forming a vast and powerful ring. This is what made the Montreal Crew/decina/Family so influential. So much so that Desjardin and Fernandez believed enough they were a part of "it" to lay claim over it. Think a Montreal version of the Chicago Outfit: an inner circle of made guys, and influential underworld members every bit as influential in the Outfit as some of the made guys themselves.

And in essence, that's what any mafia organization does. Be it in Palermo or America: they mingle. The idea that they only deal with Sicilians or Italians is a myth. Some members might prefer that for themselves, but most of your "break through" mafiosi like Al Capone, Luciano, Costello, to Gotti and any Chicago leader all had vast contacts that extended outside of the mafia/cosa nostra network. I imagine the same is so with influential leaders in Sicily.

I think we are coming to see Cosa Nostra as part of the criminal element rather than dominating it. Desjardin and Fernandez would not have had the clout they had if not for the Rizzutos but the same can be said in reverse. Desjardin and Fernandez, buttoned or not, are just as part of the Montreal organization as anyone else when we look at it objectively. Labeling "made guys" as the only viable Mafia force, is subtracting alot of important elements that make up the force of the mafia epidemic.

Toto or Lupara and other Canadian experts shoot me down if there's anything you disagree with. I'm open.

Re: Sciascia and Montagna

by toto » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:23 pm

He's criminal. Those guys have no integrity. Or maybe Rizzuto did a ceremony with him to trick him for some reason. Its not as if the ceremony and symbols and oaths are secret. Nevertheless, he will never be recognized and if there was a problem for Rizzuto about it he would just say Fernandez is lying. However, it could also be used against Rizzuto by somebody wanting to make a move which is possibly why he wouldn't do such a thing.

Re: Sciascia and Montagna

by Angelo Santino » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:18 pm

toto wrote:He wasn't made in to Cosa Nostra but it could be Vito Rizzuto was making some kind of a new secret sect and it would accept guys of other nationalities. Like a child it must be educated and reared until it matures and then the adult follows his own path and so the same way such a sect will need guidance and control until it matures and then it will go its own way. Perhaps it was Rizzuto gathering forces maybe against what he saw as the threat from what we might call the group of John Gambino in New York and Toronto.

At the least this group gave Salvatore Montagna a green light to move in Montreal. They wanted Rizzuto out out of the way probably because he was taking part of all drug trafficking that even came neat his territory.
Still doesn't explain the question I raised: what was his endgame? Did he think no one would ask Vito?

Of course Sicily would not recognize him. First, he went directly to Palermo. For us Mob historian buffs, we can easily state that his connections (let's say he WAS made) would have been social and familial and that would have linked him to C.E., Sicily. That would have involved being introduced and vouched for by 3rd party members who would then vouch his status in Palermo. This is mafia etiquette, it's on a one-on-one basis, either "friend of ours" or "stessa cosa" to an intricate question and answer session in the 1900's, that's never changed. Unless you're John Veasey, one does not introduce himself as a made guy.

Respectfully, I don't see Vito creating a secret sect, his organization was a new world organization and thus relied on French Canadian Desjardins and Spanish Fernandez. Sicilian (or even other Italian criminal cells) don't operate like that, the 1910's are long over. They make connections and influence, they rarely "take over" anything. The Rizzutos appear not to have been "set in stone" as previously thought. Instead it appears they "held things together" by making various alliances with local underworld players. If you disagree, let's hear it.

What gave Fernandez the cajones to try and pass himself off as a stessa cosa in Sicily? I don't think anyone can answer with definity. And what gave Desjardin the thought that he could "take over" a mafia crew despite being non-Italian and not-made. I'd love to hear thoughts on this though all around. This is interesting shit.

Re: Sciascia and Montagna

by toto » Wed Jan 20, 2016 4:45 pm

He wasn't made in to Cosa Nostra but it could be Vito Rizzuto was making some kind of a new secret sect and it would accept guys of other nationalities. Like a child it must be educated and reared until it matures and then the adult follows his own path and so the same way such a sect will need guidance and control until it matures and then it will go its own way. Perhaps it was Rizzuto gathering forces maybe against what he saw as the threat from what we might call the group of John Gambino in New York and Toronto.

At the least this group gave Salvatore Montagna a green light to move in Montreal. They wanted Rizzuto out out of the way probably because he was taking part of all drug trafficking that even came neat his territory.

Re: Sciascia and Montagna

by Angelo Santino » Wed Jan 20, 2016 4:18 pm

I'm still curious about Juan Ramon Fernandez claiming to be a made guy when he went to Sicily. It's easy to brush it off as him lying but something to consider is that Vito was still alive, this wasn't Natale claiming something about a long dead Bruno. Eventually, this would have been easily solved by contacting Vito in some way to confirm or deny. So what was the endgame?

Montreal is very interesting, alot of people including me have been proven wrong and surprised by certain things.

Top