The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

Re: The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

by Pogo The Clown » Thu Nov 19, 2015 7:05 pm

I remember several years back someone (I think it was Limey, maybe JD) posted a list of Gambinos who bought their memberships. I don't remember who was on it but a list does exist.


Pogo

Re: The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

by Bruno187 » Thu Nov 19, 2015 6:59 pm

Most of these guys were not even on the radar and are now dead.
It's been mentioned before and it more or less public knowledge at this point.
Guys who have been named are Skinny Phil LoScalzo, John "Johnny Pie" DeMatteo, Fortunato Cicciu, another guy I knew only as Pietro the Baker, I'm sure there are other guys but that's all I can think of right now.

Re: The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

by B. » Thu Nov 19, 2015 4:39 pm

Many members have been made because they indirectly "bought" their button by being generous earners, but in the 1950s the accusation is that they were straight up sold. You have to figure these "customers" were already associates, though, otherwise they wouldn't have been in a position to make the "purchase".

Re: The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

by johnny_scootch » Thu Nov 19, 2015 4:18 pm

Could be these guys 'bought' their button in the same way John Staluppi bought his.

Re: The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

by Lupara » Thu Nov 19, 2015 3:43 pm

I've always wondered what happened to the guys who bought their membership and whether anyone has identified who these individuals were. I imagine that buying membership could warrant a death sentence.

Re: The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

by B. » Thu Nov 19, 2015 2:52 pm

HairyKnuckles wrote:
Pogo The Clown wrote:Didn't one of the Bonannos mention people buying their memberships in one of their books? My memory is hazy but I think one of them may have mentioned it.


Pogo
It was Pistone who said in one of his follow up books that Joey D´Amico´s mother bought her son a botton. If Pistone was not outright lying, it could actually mean that D´Amico´s mother paid off loans he owned which cleared his way to become made and that this somehow was translated into "D´Amico bought his button".
I'm willing to bet that was just a rumor because of his young age. The guy's whole family was involved in the Bonanno family and his uncle reported directly to the administration.

Re: The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

by HairyKnuckles » Thu Nov 19, 2015 2:26 pm

Pogo The Clown wrote:Didn't one of the Bonannos mention people buying their memberships in one of their books? My memory is hazy but I think one of them may have mentioned it.


Pogo
It was Pistone who said in one of his follow up books that Joey D´Amico´s mother bought her son a botton. If Pistone was not outright lying, it could actually mean that D´Amico´s mother paid off loans he owned which cleared his way to become made and that this somehow was translated into "D´Amico bought his button".

Re: The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

by Bruno187 » Thu Nov 19, 2015 1:22 pm

Not surprisingly, most of the guys that were rumored to have paid Scalise for their buttons were centered in the Bronx, particularly the Belmont section. They are all gone now, from natural causes, but their fates were up in the air for a while from what I was told growing up. The figure that I heard tossed around was 50K.
Most went on to lead rather "normal" lives, at least for button guys....having businesses, being union delegates, and other pretty un-remarkable careers whether fully involved in criminal activity or just marginally so.

Re: The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

by B. » Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:34 pm

I can't remember where I read about Anastasia allegedly selling memberships, but I know it was mentioned somewhere. Scalise is usually named as the culprit, which is surprising considering he was one of the older Sicilian members of the family and not one of the younger "Americanized" guys.

Also, you have to wonder how this info would have come out. Did guys go around comparing notes, i.e. "How much did you pay old man Cheech for your button?"

Ed... I remember we had a topic on the old board about the administration spots of the Gambinos. It's confusing.

Biondo was consigliere in 1931, but seems to have lost the spot by the time Anastasia took over and was a capo, only to become underboss for Gambino. Bill Bonanno refers to both Carlo Gambino and Scalise as consigliere during the 1950s in his last book. Magaddino also refers to Carlo Gambino as the consigliere around the time of Anastasia's death. Toto Chirico, Nino Conte, and Scalise have all been mentioned as underbosses under Anastasia. Scalise is also mentioned as a capo during the 1950s.

Re: The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

by Ed » Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:06 pm

Pogo The Clown wrote:Didn't one of the Bonannos mention people buying their memberships in one of their books? My memory is hazy but I think one of them may have mentioned it.

In Bound by Honor, Bill Bonanno wrote that one of Anastasia's capos was selling memberships. Bonanno doesn't give a name but I guess he's likely referring to Scalise. Bonanno says Anastasia wasn't involved in the sale. (I wonder why he doesn't mention Scalise by name? Was he protecting Scalise's reputation for some reason, or was the capo someone other than Scalise? Would Scalise be considered a capo or underboss?)

The Lucchese informant from the late 1960s that shows up in MF also mentioned that memberships were sold in the Anastasia Crime Family. He mentions a couple of guys who allegedly bought their way in so it suggests he had firsthand info and it wasn't hearsay or something he just heard from the Valachi Hearings.

Re: The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

by Pogo The Clown » Thu Nov 19, 2015 11:33 am

Didn't one of the Bonannos mention people buying their memberships in one of their books? My memory is hazy but I think one of them may have mentioned it.


Pogo

Re: The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

by HairyKnuckles » Thu Nov 19, 2015 6:23 am

B. wrote:This might be treading on territory we've talked about before, but as we learn more I feel there is more to discuss.


One thing to note is that the idea of unqualified members being made seems to have been around forever, long before the 1950s and up to present day. I'd consider this "Damn kids!" syndrome, as it seems every generation thinks that the younger generations are less disciplined, lack the same values, etc.

My questions are:

- What was the evidence for Scalise and/or Anastasia selling memberships? Where did the rumor, whether true or not, come from?

- Is there anything else that backs up this idea that Genovese wanted to shelve unqualified members?

- Are there any examples of members who were "officially" deemed unqualified (whether they allegedly bought memberships or not)?
There were some informants in the early 1960s talking about members who had been initiated but unqualified and not worthy of membership. But I don´t think any specific reasons for their unworthiness were explained. Informants talked about that these men would probably be thrown out of the Mafia. Perhaps JD has some info on this, but I don´t think that I have ever seen (on MF or documents found/obtained elsewhere) any specific names being mentioned regarding this. I´m sure there were a lot of members who were considered not worthy but these views may have been reflections of what the informants felt about certain members. Perhaps they had beefs with them or were just jealous of their success?

I think the rumors on Scalise/Anastasia selling memberships started with Valachi. I think he mentioned it during the hearings and during the debriefings prior to the hearings. Some of the debriefings can be found on MF. I have no clue if Valachi was correct, or if he just embellished the selling of membership thing. In many ways, he strikes me as someone who wants to be more important than he really was, giving answers to questions he really didn´t know that much about. Who knows, the selling of memberships could have been just a rumor he had picked up from the street, going from mouth to mouth before reaching him? And who knows, it could have been just an excuse from Anastasia so he could get rid of Scalise. The reason why I´m sceptical about it is that it just don´t seem right. A boss and an underboss selling memberships, in that time and age...what a disgrace! Don Vito Cascioferro would be turning in his grave if he knew.

So funny! Some time ago they found a plaque with the description saying mankind is doomed and the world is about to end because the younger generation lacks discipline, lacks the same values and can not be reasoned with. They determined the plaque originated from a time way before the birth of Christ!

Re: The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

by B. » Wed Nov 18, 2015 8:46 pm

Chris Christie wrote:I've wondered all this myself and have the same questions.

Didn't the Colombos go through an expansion with boss Joe Colombo or somewhere during that era? Going back to the 1950's when you map out where everyone lived you'll find the Genoveses, Bonannos, Gambinos and Luccheses in every borough of New York. The Profaci's however, kept it to Brooklyn and Long Island. They don't appear to have ever had any significant or long term influence in Manhattan or the Bronx. I have no idea why the Profaci's stayed in Brooklyn. Was this a long ago arrangement between D'Aquila and Mineo or just a coincidence?
The Colombo regime was still very much rooted in Bensonhurst and South Brooklyn, with some branches in Staten Island, the Jersey crew, and a few guys in other areas. No members were made while Joe Colombo was boss.

Re: The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

by TommyGambino » Wed Nov 18, 2015 6:01 pm

Chris Christie wrote:I've wondered all this myself and have the same questions.

Didn't the Colombos go through an expansion with boss Joe Colombo or somewhere during that era? Going back to the 1950's when you map out where everyone lived you'll find the Genoveses, Bonannos, Gambinos and Luccheses in every borough of New York. The Profaci's however, kept it to Brooklyn and Long Island. They don't appear to have ever had any significant or long term influence in Manhattan or the Bronx. I have no idea why the Profaci's stayed in Brooklyn. Was this a long ago arrangement between D'Aquila and Mineo or just a coincidence?
Interesting post Chris, I've always wondered about this. I'm sure HK or one of the other historians will have some info.

Re: The 1950s Recruitment Fiasco

by Angelo Santino » Wed Nov 18, 2015 5:21 pm

I've wondered all this myself and have the same questions.

Didn't the Colombos go through an expansion with boss Joe Colombo or somewhere during that era? Going back to the 1950's when you map out where everyone lived you'll find the Genoveses, Bonannos, Gambinos and Luccheses in every borough of New York. The Profaci's however, kept it to Brooklyn and Long Island. They don't appear to have ever had any significant or long term influence in Manhattan or the Bronx. I have no idea why the Profaci's stayed in Brooklyn. Was this a long ago arrangement between D'Aquila and Mineo or just a coincidence?

Top