by B. » Sun Apr 25, 2021 9:07 pm
Yeah, depends whether or not Costello retained his position as consigliere the whole time he was acting boss. Costello was official boss when Bill Bonanno was made, so his knowledge would have been after the fact... the question is if his father or someone told him the exact years Costello held the position or if he only knew he previously held it.
Valachi said Costello had little to do with the membership during that time, so doesn't seem he carried out the duties of a consigliere when he was running the family for the 10-15 years before he became official boss. Would make sense for there to be an acting one and Valachi described Pandolfo as the "Family counsel" and a "counselor", so he is the best candidate if anyone held the position, acting or otherwise.
I don't think there's enough evidence to completely remove Pandolfo from the admin for that era, but also not enough to definitively say he was the official consigliere. Carrying him as acting consigliere might be the best bet.
--
Speaking of Genovese consigliere:
- In the Real Thing, Valachi says Costello didn't become official boss until the early 1950s, so either way you cut it there is a period from the early 1950s until 1957 when there is no official consigliere identified. Pandolfo was dead and Costello was the official boss. They may have left the position empty during that time... the Profaci family went five years before electing a new official consigliere (1959-1964) but they had guys acting during that time. Did the Genovese have someone acting? Doesn't seem to be any clear info.
- When Valachi was told by Vito Genovese not to deal heroin, he said he was called to a meeting and forced to wait, eventually being greeted by Toddo Del Duca. Del Duca told Valachi that he liked him, the implication being he advocated on Valachi's behalf to Genovese. I can't figure out why Del Duca played a role in this meeting. He was a Brooklyn capodecina who Valachi didn't report to and it's strange he would have been involved in this particular issue, particularly as an advocate for Valachi.
- One of the duties of consigliere was to advocate for the membership. I don't remember if Valachi says exactly when the meeting occurred, but he claims he didn't start dealing drugs until the 1950s. Unless the meeting happened after 1957, it might coincide with the the period where there is no known official or acting consigliere. Maybe Del Duca acted in that capacity which would explain why he got involved in the Valachi issue. Just a guess... it's crazy we have tons of info from a made member during this time and we still can't say for sure.
Yeah, depends whether or not Costello retained his position as consigliere the whole time he was acting boss. Costello was official boss when Bill Bonanno was made, so his knowledge would have been after the fact... the question is if his father or someone told him the exact years Costello held the position or if he only knew he previously held it.
Valachi said Costello had little to do with the membership during that time, so doesn't seem he carried out the duties of a consigliere when he was running the family for the 10-15 years before he became official boss. Would make sense for there to be an acting one and Valachi described Pandolfo as the "Family counsel" and a "counselor", so he is the best candidate if anyone held the position, acting or otherwise.
I don't think there's enough evidence to completely remove Pandolfo from the admin for that era, but also not enough to definitively say he was the official consigliere. Carrying him as acting consigliere might be the best bet.
--
Speaking of Genovese consigliere:
- In the Real Thing, Valachi says Costello didn't become official boss until the early 1950s, so either way you cut it there is a period from the early 1950s until 1957 when there is no official consigliere identified. Pandolfo was dead and Costello was the official boss. They may have left the position empty during that time... the Profaci family went five years before electing a new official consigliere (1959-1964) but they had guys acting during that time. Did the Genovese have someone acting? Doesn't seem to be any clear info.
- When Valachi was told by Vito Genovese not to deal heroin, he said he was called to a meeting and forced to wait, eventually being greeted by Toddo Del Duca. Del Duca told Valachi that he liked him, the implication being he advocated on Valachi's behalf to Genovese. I can't figure out why Del Duca played a role in this meeting. He was a Brooklyn capodecina who Valachi didn't report to and it's strange he would have been involved in this particular issue, particularly as an advocate for Valachi.
- One of the duties of consigliere was to advocate for the membership. I don't remember if Valachi says exactly when the meeting occurred, but he claims he didn't start dealing drugs until the 1950s. Unless the meeting happened after 1957, it might coincide with the the period where there is no known official or acting consigliere. Maybe Del Duca acted in that capacity which would explain why he got involved in the Valachi issue. Just a guess... it's crazy we have tons of info from a made member during this time and we still can't say for sure.