Why San Francisco family remained so small?

Forum rules

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Why San Francisco family remained so small?

Re: Why San Francisco family remained so small?

by Pogo The Clown » Thu Apr 15, 2021 11:31 am

Etna wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 11:28 am Wasn't like 75% of the family informing on each other? Or was that San Jose?


It was half in both families. Here is the thread on it.


viewtopic.php?f=29&t=3756&p=85336&hilit=Jose#p85336

Re: Why San Francisco family remained so small?

by Etna » Thu Apr 15, 2021 11:28 am

Wasn't like 75% of the family informing on each other? Or was that San Jose?

Re: Why San Francisco family remained so small?

by Stroccos » Thu Apr 15, 2021 10:24 am

furiofromnaples wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 10:13 am San Francisco had a big little italy si why the family never had more than 25 made men or expanded outsite to San José ir Sacramento? While the LA family that was forced to import wiseguys from other families became more big and enlasted until the early 2000s?
All rats

Why San Francisco family remained so small?

by furiofromnaples » Thu Apr 15, 2021 10:13 am

San Francisco had a big little italy si why the family never had more than 25 made men or expanded outsite to San José ir Sacramento? While the LA family that was forced to import wiseguys from other families became more big and enlasted until the early 2000s?

Top