by B. » Sun Feb 24, 2019 4:40 pm
Scarfo was very deliberate in who he made. He made many younger guys, especially as time went on, with most of them recruited and groomed by Merlino, Salvie Testa, iannarella/DelGiornio, etc. They made a point to get certain young associates involved in murders which was a key factor in many of the inductions. Scarfo was made young himself and clearly liked having an entourage of 20-somethings around him, but I've never seen a clear explanation why they prioritized the inductions of guys like Nick Milano, Joe Grande, Tory Scafidi, and Phil Narducci, none of which were experienced in making money and managing rackets, while someone like John Ciancaglini who had a few years in age and experience over the others, along with a high-ranking father, wasn't brought in.
AtlanticCity, who was a very knowledgeable and reliable RD member 10+ years ago, attended the D'Alfonso retrial and claimed to have had lunch with the father of one of the defendants, the father himself being a longtime Philly family member or associate. He had an interesting post about this exact subject. He claimed this old timer told him that Scarfo had a couple of different "tiers" when it came to the younger members, with very specific plans for inducting certain young associates opposed to others, along with purposely holding Scarfo Jr. and Joey Merlino back, among others. The old timer told him whatever plan Scarfo had in mind fell apart after the Salvie Testa murder. AC didn't post often but was the only person on the board who had accurate information on the Ligambi/Merlino regime years before the indictment came down and confirmed much of what he said. His posts were hardly "fresh street talk", either... he was a lawyer or at least a law graduate and I learned his identity through another trustworthy RD member who had communicated with him off the board. He had a "familiar" last name; whether there is a relation or not I don't know, but it would lend itself to some of the info he supplied despite not being a "street guy".
EDIT: AC also supplied some information privately on Phil Leonetti, specifically post-cooperation, that would only come out publicly, to my knowledge, in his book. Info that might have been known by someone in certain circles at the Jersey shore or in Philly.
Anyway, this got me on a tangent thinking about why some associates were inducted over others in the mid-1980s.
Scarfo was very deliberate in who he made. He made many younger guys, especially as time went on, with most of them recruited and groomed by Merlino, Salvie Testa, iannarella/DelGiornio, etc. They made a point to get certain young associates involved in murders which was a key factor in many of the inductions. Scarfo was made young himself and clearly liked having an entourage of 20-somethings around him, but I've never seen a clear explanation why they prioritized the inductions of guys like Nick Milano, Joe Grande, Tory Scafidi, and Phil Narducci, none of which were experienced in making money and managing rackets, while someone like John Ciancaglini who had a few years in age and experience over the others, along with a high-ranking father, wasn't brought in.
AtlanticCity, who was a very knowledgeable and reliable RD member 10+ years ago, attended the D'Alfonso retrial and claimed to have had lunch with the father of one of the defendants, the father himself being a longtime Philly family member or associate. He had an interesting post about this exact subject. He claimed this old timer told him that Scarfo had a couple of different "tiers" when it came to the younger members, with very specific plans for inducting certain young associates opposed to others, along with purposely holding Scarfo Jr. and Joey Merlino back, among others. The old timer told him whatever plan Scarfo had in mind fell apart after the Salvie Testa murder. AC didn't post often but was the only person on the board who had accurate information on the Ligambi/Merlino regime years before the indictment came down and confirmed much of what he said. His posts were hardly "fresh street talk", either... he was a lawyer or at least a law graduate and I learned his identity through another trustworthy RD member who had communicated with him off the board. He had a "familiar" last name; whether there is a relation or not I don't know, but it would lend itself to some of the info he supplied despite not being a "street guy".
EDIT: AC also supplied some information privately on Phil Leonetti, specifically post-cooperation, that would only come out publicly, to my knowledge, in his book. Info that might have been known by someone in certain circles at the Jersey shore or in Philly.
Anyway, this got me on a tangent thinking about why some associates were inducted over others in the mid-1980s.