Balasteri Question

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Balasteri Question

Re: Balasteri Question

by JCB1977 » Sat Feb 23, 2019 9:37 pm

bobbybats wrote: Sat Feb 23, 2019 9:18 pm
JCB1977 wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 9:42 am Excerpt of Angelo Lonardo Testimony

Lonardo said that Balistrieri, a defendant in the case, "knew Milwaukee Teamsters official and Pension Fund trustee Frank Ranney very well." In addition, he testified, Balistrieri reportedly said he would "talk to the late Kansas City crime boss Nick Civella," who was "very friendly" with another trustee, Roy L. Williams.

“Civella, in turn, met with Rockman in Las Vegas, Lonardo said, and "asked him if he could talk to Bill Presser in regards to getting a mortgage for the Stardust."
This was the set up before Fitzsimmons died and Roy Williams went from a Trustee to national President of the Teamsters. Once that happened then according to Williams testimony all roads went through KC.
I agree. Bill Presser certainly helped Roy get the top spot. I was just trying to demonstrate the connections by all 3 families. They had the IBT in a stranglehold. Civella was as influential as many of the top bosses. He was one sharp motherfucker. Mucho respect, he was old school.

Re: Balasteri Question

by bobbybats » Sat Feb 23, 2019 9:18 pm

JCB1977 wrote: Thu Feb 21, 2019 9:42 am Excerpt of Angelo Lonardo Testimony

Lonardo said that Balistrieri, a defendant in the case, "knew Milwaukee Teamsters official and Pension Fund trustee Frank Ranney very well." In addition, he testified, Balistrieri reportedly said he would "talk to the late Kansas City crime boss Nick Civella," who was "very friendly" with another trustee, Roy L. Williams.

“Civella, in turn, met with Rockman in Las Vegas, Lonardo said, and "asked him if he could talk to Bill Presser in regards to getting a mortgage for the Stardust."
This was the set up before Fitzsimmons died and Roy Williams went from a Trustee to national President of the Teamsters. Once that happened then according to Williams testimony all roads went through KC.

Re: Balasteri Question

by JCB1977 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 9:42 am

Excerpt of Angelo Lonardo Testimony

Lonardo said that Balistrieri, a defendant in the case, "knew Milwaukee Teamsters official and Pension Fund trustee Frank Ranney very well." In addition, he testified, Balistrieri reportedly said he would "talk to the late Kansas City crime boss Nick Civella," who was "very friendly" with another trustee, Roy L. Williams.

“Civella, in turn, met with Rockman in Las Vegas, Lonardo said, and "asked him if he could talk to Bill Presser in regards to getting a mortgage for the Stardust."

Re: Balasteri Question

by JCB1977 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 9:37 am

Here are a few links that are helpful to anybody interested in the skim

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/ ... 90281d6a1/

http://articles.latimes.com/1987-06-02/ ... ie-presser

Re: Balasteri Question

by JCB1977 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 9:30 am

bobbybats wrote: Tue Feb 19, 2019 6:27 pm
Adam wrote: Mon Feb 18, 2019 8:14 pm
bobbybats wrote: Mon Feb 18, 2019 7:55 pm He had squat to do with KC. KC owned the pension fund through Williams. In the strawman trial, Williams stated under oath that anyone from any family who contacted him about a loan was directed to contact Nick Civella in KC.
That might be a little harsh too. Balistrieri clearly dealt with KC. Even if maybe they thought little of him. Glick's transcript in Casino had Civella being pretty dismissive of Balistrieri. But all the Midwest families had their piece of the pension fund. I get that if you went to Williams you had to go through Civella, but other cities had their guys they used. And it's easy to marginalize Balistrieri, but he got a quarter of the Argent skim just like Chicago, KC and Cleveland.
I didn't make my point clear, they had nothing to do with the running of the skim, they did have a good relationship with KC, one of KCs soldiers then actually transferred from the Milwakee family, Buster Balistere, don't believe they are related though. As the national president of the teamsters Williams had final say over the pension fund. Think of it this way, if each family had someone in the pension fund their would be no need to split the skim. Other than Williams and Dorefman who did the other familys have in place to issue union loans.
Cleveland’s connections to the skim were through Maishe Rockman, Bill & Jackie Presser. Aka The Jew Crew

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/ ... e792e5eec/

Re: Balasteri Question

by bobbybats » Tue Feb 19, 2019 6:27 pm

Adam wrote: Mon Feb 18, 2019 8:14 pm
bobbybats wrote: Mon Feb 18, 2019 7:55 pm He had squat to do with KC. KC owned the pension fund through Williams. In the strawman trial, Williams stated under oath that anyone from any family who contacted him about a loan was directed to contact Nick Civella in KC.
That might be a little harsh too. Balistrieri clearly dealt with KC. Even if maybe they thought little of him. Glick's transcript in Casino had Civella being pretty dismissive of Balistrieri. But all the Midwest families had their piece of the pension fund. I get that if you went to Williams you had to go through Civella, but other cities had their guys they used. And it's easy to marginalize Balistrieri, but he got a quarter of the Argent skim just like Chicago, KC and Cleveland.
I didn't make my point clear, they had nothing to do with the running of the skim, they did have a good relationship with KC, one of KCs soldiers then actually transferred from the Milwakee family, Buster Balistere, don't believe they are related though. As the national president of the teamsters Williams had final say over the pension fund. Think of it this way, if each family had someone in the pension fund their would be no need to split the skim. Other than Williams and Dorefman who did the other familys have in place to issue union loans.

Re: Balasteri Question

by cavita » Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:33 pm

Balistrieri was always arrogant and Augie Maniaci, the Milwaukee member who turned informant stated that there was talk among the older members of overthrowing Balistrieri in the early 1960s but the plan was nixed because they feared the Chicago Outfit wouldn’t approve of it.

In July 1978 Balistrieri was extorting who he thought was a Milwaukee vending machine company owner, Tony Conte, but he was in actuality FBI undercover agent Gail Cobb. A meeting to introduce Bonanno member Benjamin “Lefty” Ruggiero and “Conte” to Frank Balistrieri and his sons was set up by Rockford mob members Joe Zito, who was Rockford LCN underboss, Rockford LCN capo Charles Vince and Rockford LCN street gambling boss Phil “The Tailor” Emordeno. New Jersey Bonanno capo Tony Riela asked the Rockford guys to do the introductions because he had a long history and friendship with the Rockford group.

Secret recordings of Balistrieri’s conversations from the summer of 1978 meeting with the three Rockford mobsters and “Conte” were played in court. When Benjamin “Lefty” Ruggiero suggested he travel to Rockford to thank the Rockford men for setting up the meeting, Balistrieri was quoted as saying, “No, they’re nothing. They’re under the boss of Chicago,” and he (Balistrieri) proposed to introduce Ruggiero and Cobb to the top Chicago boss himself. It was well known that Frank Balistrieri was an arrogant, egotistical sort and this comment may have been said in an attempt to portray himself in a more important light because Milwaukee itself was under Chicago as well. Balistrieri was also caught on tape talking about Joe Amato, the area boss of McHenry County, who was in charge of gambling in that county and who also was a ranking member of the Chicago Outfit. Balistrieri had told agent Cobb that Amato was “put in McHenry County to control vending for the Milwaukee organization.” He was also quoted as saying, “now he’s (Amato) acting like he belongs to the Chicago crew rather than Milwaukee,” Cobb testified at the trial. The simple fact was that Amato always belonged to Chicago and was close to Outfit boss Tony Accardo. Balistrieri’s comments were clearly an attempt to try and downplay the roles of those around him and elevate himself to a higher position especially to agent Cobb.

Re: Balasteri Question

by JerryB » Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:28 pm

Just for the record, I'd like to include "factual" information on the subject, as cited in an interlocutory appeal from an order of the District Court, US Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit (Jan. 16, 1985)


" ...Frank, John, and Joseph Balistrieri made an agreement with Glick to use their influence over trustees of the CSPF to obtain financing for Glick's purchase of Recrion Corporation, which later became the Argent Corporation, in exchange for an undisclosed interest in the Argent Corporation ..."
https://law.resource.org/pub/us/case/re ... -2285.html


Anecdotally, I have talked to more than one person here (Milwaukee) that has told me that Johnny Bal actually knew Allen before Franky Bal made the decision to approach him.

I agree, BTW, that KC was apparently in control of the skim. It is a fact that Civella was caught on tape, along with Las Vegas operator Carl Thomas, who was instrumental in teaching the "Fill Slip" scam to others, part of the over whelming evidence the G had on all those indicted in the Straw Man case.

REQUEST: Can Soliai or a Moderator correct the spelling of the subject of this topic; i.e., BALISTRIERI??

Re: Balasteri Question

by JeremyTheJew » Tue Feb 19, 2019 6:40 am

dixiemafia wrote: Tue Feb 19, 2019 6:22 am
JeremyTheJew wrote: Mon Feb 18, 2019 9:53 pm milwaukee is probably the only family that never had a "leadership war" or feud ... none that ik about at least.

interestingly tho... Franks dad was boss before him and supposeduly didnt want to give him the title. (i believe this came from one of B posts w great tidbits)
I thought it was Frankie B's Father-in-law that was boss before him? Alioto I think was his surname?
ahhh yes i do believe that is right.

Re: Balasteri Question

by dixiemafia » Tue Feb 19, 2019 6:22 am

JeremyTheJew wrote: Mon Feb 18, 2019 9:53 pm milwaukee is probably the only family that never had a "leadership war" or feud ... none that ik about at least.

interestingly tho... Franks dad was boss before him and supposeduly didnt want to give him the title. (i believe this came from one of B posts w great tidbits)
I thought it was Frankie B's Father-in-law that was boss before him? Alioto I think was his surname?

Re: Balasteri Question

by JeremyTheJew » Mon Feb 18, 2019 9:53 pm

milwaukee is probably the only family that never had a "leadership war" or feud ... none that ik about at least.

interestingly tho... Franks dad was boss before him and supposeduly didnt want to give him the title. (i believe this came from one of B posts w great tidbits)

Re: Balasteri Question

by B. » Mon Feb 18, 2019 8:33 pm

Balistrieri at least had strong relationships with Kansas City mafia figures. Not sure how things stood in the late 1970s when Brasco made contact, but here is some older info from the 1950s / 60s:

- Buster Balestrere and Joseph Gurera were two members who had transferred from the Kansas City family at Milwaukee to help shake down gamblers and businessmen. No clue if Balestrere is related to Frank Balistrieri despite the spelling differences. Buster Balestrere was shaking down the Pfister Hotel through its manager and attempts were made to shake down a hotel in Jamaica owned by Fox Head Brewery and run by the same manager. Frank Balistrieri invited Sam Giancana to take over a gambling casino in the hotel but the plan fell through when the manager lost his job.

- Informant said that Kansas City family members have visited Milwaukee and that Frank Balistrieri is a blood relative of Big Jim Balistrieri, deceased Kanasas City boss. Kansas City members who have visited Milwaukee are John Molle, who has visited both recently and a "long time ago", Joseph Cusumano, and Joe Jellosa/Jealouso (ph.). "Jellosa" is a former liquor store onwer from KC around 65-years-old who moved to St. Louis, MO. Informant does not know the leadership of Kansas City and knows of no arrangements between them and Milwaukee.

- Again, he describes that upon becoming boss in 1962, Balistrieri recruited Kansas City members Joseph Gurera and Buster Balestrere to shake down Milwaukee gamblers and businessmen. Joe Gurera came "well recommended" for the job and allegedly killed two politicians in Kansas City. Informant did not know who the politicians were, but LE identified them as Charles Binaggio and his bodyguard Charles Gargotta. Upon his transfer, Frank Balistrieri made Gurera a capodecina in the Milwaukee family, with Buster Balestrere put into his crew. Buster's brother Jim Balestrere also came to Milwaukee but was not a member.

Anyway, the way that Ruggiero is portrayed in the book makes it clear he was prone to exaggeration and rambling on, sometimes with a distorted view of things. I'm sure the Balistrieri bit fits right in with that.

Re: Balasteri Question

by Adam » Mon Feb 18, 2019 8:14 pm

bobbybats wrote: Mon Feb 18, 2019 7:55 pm He had squat to do with KC. KC owned the pension fund through Williams. In the strawman trial, Williams stated under oath that anyone from any family who contacted him about a loan was directed to contact Nick Civella in KC.
That might be a little harsh too. Balistrieri clearly dealt with KC. Even if maybe they thought little of him. Glick's transcript in Casino had Civella being pretty dismissive of Balistrieri. But all the Midwest families had their piece of the pension fund. I get that if you went to Williams you had to go through Civella, but other cities had their guys they used. And it's easy to marginalize Balistrieri, but he got a quarter of the Argent skim just like Chicago, KC and Cleveland.

Re: Balasteri Question

by bobbybats » Mon Feb 18, 2019 7:55 pm

He had squat to do with KC. KC owned the pension fund through Williams. In the strawman trial, Williams stated under oath that anyone from any family who contacted him about a loan was directed to contact Nick Civella in KC.

Re: Balasteri Question

by JeremyTheJew » Mon Feb 18, 2019 7:31 pm

Adam wrote: Mon Feb 18, 2019 7:24 pm Well, I think it's a little harsh to say everything in Donnie Brasco has been disproven. But there's a lot in there that we now know is inaccurate and that Pistons left out a lot of things he didn't want coming out at the time.

But when it comes to Balistrieri's portrayal, you have to take it as Pistons relating things Lefty says, and Lefty just bullshitting on tape. It's best to think of it like released FBI files we read now from the 50s and 60s. It's information given that could be exaggeration, intentional lies, bragging, bitching....Clearly Detroit and Cleveland didn't belong to Balistrieri. Cleveland I can see the mistake, they were part of the Argent skim, but there is literally no connection between Detroit and Balistrieri I've seen. But Lefty demonstrates over and over that all he knew about was the New York mob. And even a lot of that was wrong in hindsight. So it's best to think of it as bragging to make Pistones involvement with a non New York family more exciting.
just for the record i was only saying everythibg lefty said about balosteri was disproven

i think the original donnie brasco (2nd edition i have) is a great book and isnt as glorified himzelf as the second coming against the mafia as he does in the second book

Top